On Wednesday 19 November 2003 08:58, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Well, it's not quite that bad. I can't computationally afford to put
> SpamAssassin on the existing primary server.
I am running a Celeron 1200 with 256 MB RAM and a single IDE disk. The machine
is running Suse Linux 8.1 with sendmai
On Thursday 30 October 2003 00:22, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> I would be much happier if the list administrator is the one who
> initiates the archival process for three reasons. First, forwarding
> (also known as tunneling) a list can cause technical problems with
> Mail-Archive's sorting engine. S
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 21:34, Earl Hood wrote:
> > Since the vast majority of these types of statements are being prepared
> > withi n
> > few days of the issueing of the original statement, a 3000 messages
> > window is
> >
> > just fine. If it isn't, that's tough luck...
>
> But, ignoring j
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 20:04, Earl Hood wrote:
> As for the German law, it has no jurisdiction with the U.S., where
> mail-archive is located.
That is one particular reason why I chose mail-archive.org as a destination
site for the mailing list as opposed to any site within the same juris
Question the first: How does mail-archive.org act when a reply to one mail is
sent very much later, say one to five years? The message will be a reply to
the original message, with In-Reply-To headers and everything else set
correctly, and will be part of the mailing-list that mail-archive.org i
