Earl Hood wrote:
On February 20, 2003 at 11:58, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
It's a constant battle against the spambots. We do a lot of
anti-spambot stuff already, but there are a lot of spam miscreants out
there. Now that MHonArc 2.6 is out I will probably switch to (succumb
to?) completely censor
Title: ::M::Vlxcrvrhakmrlnjhdyllwsjnbdgsmptnnlkshuoaiwvveiseqrlg
ABRIANNA
6a4rI0dTNEIsi6N5
2636eFdF6-724Mfxh1115ZZwJ5-924GskO6540TlKk5-858VqyG6933wTlc5-770aIjb9243CfLn1-97l75
On February 20, 2003 at 11:58, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> It's a constant battle against the spambots. We do a lot of
> anti-spambot stuff already, but there are a lot of spam miscreants out
> there. Now that MHonArc 2.6 is out I will probably switch to (succumb
> to?) completely censoring the emai
Hi all,
It's a constant battle against the spambots. We do a lot of
anti-spambot stuff already, but there are a lot of spam miscreants out
there. Now that MHonArc 2.6 is out I will probably switch to (succumb
to?) completely censoring the email addresses appearing in message
bodies, i.e. replace
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, William J. Kammerer wrote:
> Ooohh, I don't like that idea much. Every mailing list that I've
> archived requires confirmation - not because the lists are "private" but
> to keep pranksters from subscribing others using the web page sign up
> form.
>
Usually the list admini
Ooohh, I don't like that idea much. Every mailing list that I've
archived requires confirmation - not because the lists are "private" but
to keep pranksters from subscribing others using the web page sign up
form.
As an aside, I have noticed also that spammers go through the archives
looking for
