>Jeff, if you can confirm my initial (the 1996 ones) submissions went
>*in* OK yesterday
There are 16 messages from 1996 in the audities@binhost raw email
collection with, with three of those having duplicate timestamps.
I did a spot check on one of those 1996 messages and did not
see the corros
On 02/18/01, Jeff Breidenbach (as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]") wrote:
>
>>Is it maybe there's a different policy for the MHonArc threaded and
>>chrono lists and the searchable archives?
>
>Correct. I'm limiting the MHonArc generated indexes to the latest 3000
>messages, but no messages are erased and the
>Is it maybe there's a different policy for the MHonArc threaded and
>chrono lists and the searchable archives?
Correct. I'm limiting the MHonArc generated indexes to the latest 3000
messages, but no messages are erased and the search engine should be
able to search the whole collection. I did t
Tonight, while trying to determine why my archive submissions
weren't going through (see previous msg), I poked around other
lists and found out none of the ones I checked have more than
10 pages worth of archives (both mailXX & thrdXX), though ones
like linux-kernel and debian-users would certai
So Jeff replied to me (thanks again), stating:
>The problem is the lack of the "To:" header. Your messages are being
>thrown out as probable spam due to the lack of this header.
>You should modify bounce.pl to put back the "To:" header that
>majordomo stripped out (e.g "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
