Re: [gentoo-user] Was Vim compiled with +eval feature?

2014-10-06 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 22:42:22 -0600 Jc García wrote: > 2014-10-05 22:18 GMT-06:00 Gevisz : > > I have downloaded the snippet plugin from > > http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=361 > > and have done all the steps described there to > > install it but, unfo

[gentoo-user] Re: Was Vim compiled with +eval feature?

2014-10-06 Thread Gevisz
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 07:18:59 +0300 Gevisz wrote: > I have downloaded the snippet plugin from > http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=361 > and have done all the steps described there to > install it but, unfortunately, it does not work. > > My first thought was that

Re: [gentoo-user] Was Vim compiled with +eval feature?

2014-10-07 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 14:51:06 -0400 Todd Goodman wrote: > * Gevisz [141006 00:19]: > [SNIP] > > I am going to post the question about it in vim mailing list > > but I guess that the first question to me will be: "Was your > > vim compiled with the +eval feature?"

[gentoo-user] XFCE weather plugin does not work

2014-10-17 Thread Gevisz
Already for a a few days my XFCE weather plugin (xfce-extra/xfce4-weather-plugin-0.8.3-r1) does not work (forecast data unavailable). Its website (http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/panel-plugins/xfce4-weather-plugin) says that "You need to apply two patches on version 0.8.3 because Met.no API has

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: XFCE weather plugin does not work

2014-10-18 Thread Gevisz
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 23:37:16 +0100 David W Noon wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:33:45 +0100, Neil Bothwick (n...@digimed.co.uk) > wrote about "Re: [gentoo-user] Re: XFCE weather plugin does not work" > (in <20141017223345.16c96...@digimed.co.uk

[gentoo-user] An alternative keyboard layout is lost

2014-10-18 Thread gevisz
This is the continuation from the thread "XFCE weather plugin does not work" 2014-10-18 10:03 GMT+03:00 Gevisz : > On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 23:37:16 +0100 > David W Noon wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On Fri, 1

Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative keyboard layout is lost

2014-10-18 Thread Gevisz
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 10:12:29 +0100 Mick wrote: > On Saturday 18 Oct 2014 09:34:53 gevisz wrote: > > This is the continuation from the thread > > "XFCE weather plugin does not work" > > > > 2014-10-18 10:03 GMT+03:00 Gevisz : > > > On Fri, 17 Oct

[gentoo-user] Re: An alternative keyboard layout is lost

2014-10-18 Thread gevisz
2014-10-18 11:34 GMT+03:00 gevisz : > This is the continuation from the thread > "XFCE weather plugin does not work" > > 2014-10-18 10:03 GMT+03:00 Gevisz : >> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 23:37:16 +0100 >> David W Noon wrote: >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED M

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: XFCE weather plugin does not work

2014-10-18 Thread Gevisz
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 17:18:34 +0100 David W Noon wrote: > On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 10:03:10 +0300, Gevisz (gev...@gmail.com) wrote > about "Re: [gentoo-user] Re: XFCE weather plugin does not work" (in > <544210d1.22a0700a.56bc.5...@mx.google.com>): > > On 18/10/14 08:03

[gentoo-user] Re: An alternative keyboard layout is lost

2014-10-18 Thread Gevisz
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:10:15 +0300 gevisz wrote: > I have found out that my problem with xfce4 keyboard plugin > reduces to the fact that now I cannot choose Russian Winkeys > alternative keyboard: there is no such option in the corresponding > keyboard layout settings. So, I ha

Re: [gentoo-user] XFCE weather plugin does not work

2014-10-18 Thread Gevisz
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 20:07:22 +0100 David W Noon wrote: > On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 20:58:40 +0300, Gevisz (gev...@gmail.com) wrote > about "Re: [gentoo-user] Re: XFCE weather plugin does not work" (in > <5442aa74.8212980a.2836.7...@mx.google.com>): > > > On Sat, 18 O

Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative keyboard layout is lost

2014-10-19 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 11:28:00 +0100 Stroller wrote: > > On Sat, 18 October 2014, at 11:10 am, gevisz wrote: > > … > > I have found out that my problem with xfce4 keyboard plugin > > reduces to the fact that now I cannot choose Russian Winkeys > > alternative key

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: An alternative keyboard layout is lost

2014-10-19 Thread gevisz
2014-10-19 0:08 GMT+03:00 Matti Nykyri : >> On Oct 18, 2014, at 21:04, Gevisz wrote: >> >> On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:10:15 +0300 >> gevisz wrote: >> >>> I have found out that my problem with xfce4 keyboard plugin >>> reduces to the fact that now

Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative keyboard layout is lost

2014-10-19 Thread Gevisz
> > I have found out that my problem with xfce4 keyboard plugin > > reduces to the fact that now I cannot choose Russian Winkeys > > alternative keyboard: there is no such option in the corresponding > > keyboard layout settings. So, I have to choose Osetinian Winkeys > > alternative keyboard as i

[gentoo-user] Building media-libs/lcms-2.6-r1 failed

2014-10-29 Thread Gevisz
After today's # emerge-webrsyc # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask world failed with the following message: These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild U ] media-libs/lcms-2.6-r1 [2.5] USE="threads%*" ABI_

Re: [gentoo-user] Building media-libs/lcms-2.6-r1 failed

2014-10-29 Thread Gevisz
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:25:20 +0200 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Gevisz wrote: > > After today's # emerge-webrsyc > > # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask world > > failed with the following message: >

Re: [gentoo-user] Building media-libs/lcms-2.6-r1 failed

2014-10-29 Thread Gevisz
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:19:54 -0600 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Gevisz wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:25:20 +0200 Alexander Kapshuk > > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Gevisz wrote: > >> > Afte

[gentoo-user] Strange reaction of gvim to : in a normal mode

2014-11-02 Thread Gevisz
I use gvim from xfce4 and sometimes get into a strange situation when pressing : while being in a normal mode leads not to the command line mode but instead highlights the icon "Copy to clipboad". Just now I have noted that in this situation I also cannot see the version of my gvim via the Help me

Re: [gentoo-user] etiquette for stabilization request

2014-11-02 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 10:10:34 -0500 gottl...@nyu.edu wrote: > I am running firefox-24.8.0, which is highest stable (highest testing is > 33.0). > > Several sites, in particular mail.google.com, report that "This version > of Firefox is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported > browser".

[gentoo-user] Re: Strange reaction of gvim to : in a normal mode

2014-11-02 Thread Gevisz
From: Gevisz To: Gevisz , vim_...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Strange reaction of gvim to : in a normal mode Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 20:44:21 +0200 On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 14:51:24 +0200 Gevisz wrote: > I use gvim from xfce4 and sometimes get into a strange > situation when pressing : while

[gentoo-user] openjpeg dependency conflict

2014-11-08 Thread Gevisz
Yesterday, during my system update, I have got the following warning: WARNING: One or more updates have been skipped due to a dependency conflict: media-libs/openjpeg:2 (media-libs/openjpeg-2.1.0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) conflicts with

Re: [gentoo-user] openjpeg dependency conflict

2014-11-08 Thread Gevisz
On Sat, 08 Nov 2014 18:36:59 +0800 Lin Xiao wrote: > > On 11/08/2014 04:43 PM, Gevisz wrote: > > Yesterday, during my system update, > > I have got the following warning: > > > > WARNING: One or more updates have been skipped due to a dependency > > confl

[gentoo-user] Inconsistency in portage automake package versioning

2014-11-17 Thread Gevisz
In today's system update I was advised to update sys-devel/automake from version 1.11.6 to version 1.11.6-r1. However, just after the update the system reported that sys-devel/automake has version 1.13.4. Is it only me who think that something is wrong here? The commands and their output is given

Re: [gentoo-user] Inconsistency in portage automake package versioning

2014-11-17 Thread Gevisz
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:46:48 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 11/17/2014 04:29 PM, Gevisz wrote: > > In today's system update I was advised to update sys-devel/automake > > from version 1.11.6 to version 1.11.6-r1. However, just after the > > update the system report

Re: [gentoo-user] Inconsistency in portage automake package versioning

2014-11-17 Thread Gevisz
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:49:18 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 17/11/2014 23:29, Gevisz wrote: > > In today's system update I was advised to update sys-devel/automake > > from version 1.11.6 to version 1.11.6-r1. However, just after the > > update the system reported t

Re: [gentoo-user] Inconsistency in portage automake package versioning

2014-11-17 Thread gevisz
2014-11-18 2:04 GMT+02:00 Neil Bothwick : > On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:55:09 +0200, Gevisz wrote: > >> > You have both installed, 1.13.4 is just the latest. Give eix a try, it >> > will make your life better. In this case equery also works: >> > >> > $

[gentoo-user] no-emul profiles

2014-11-19 Thread Gevisz
Looking into profile list, I have found out new, at least for me, no-emul profiles. (As far as I remember, they were not there one and a half years ago, when I installed my first Gentoo system.) I tried to google something about them but have found virtually nothing except for the following wiki p

Re: [gentoo-user] no-emul profiles

2014-11-20 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:05:30 +0100 Marc Joliet wrote: > Am Wed, 19 Nov 2014 23:09:16 +0200 > schrieb Gevisz : > > > Looking into profile list, I have found out new, > > at least for me, no-emul profiles. (As far as I > > remember, they were not there one and a

Re: [gentoo-user] no-emul profiles

2014-11-20 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 12:05:26 +0100 Marc Joliet wrote: > Am Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:05:30 +0100 > schrieb Marc Joliet : > > > Anyway, I just switched to > > default/linux/amd64/13.0/no-emul-linux-x86/desktop > > as an experiment and am waiting for emerge @world to finish :) . > > For the record, it

Re: [gentoo-user] no-emul profiles

2014-11-20 Thread gevisz
2014-11-20 16:53 GMT+02:00 Andreas K. Huettel : >> Looking into profile list, I have found out new, >> at least for me, no-emul profiles. (As far as I >> remember, they were not there one and a half >> years ago, when I installed my first Gentoo system.) > > I asked the experts; these are mainly fo

Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now

2014-11-24 Thread Gevisz
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:54:26 +0100 Marc Stürmer wrote: > Am 21.11.2014 um 18:36 schrieb Philip Webb: > > > Adoption of Systemd by other major distros sb good for Gentoo. > > Disgruntled Debians, Fedoras, Archies (IIRC they've also adopted it) > > will have a choice of giving in or moving to Slac

Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now

2014-11-24 Thread Gevisz
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:05:16 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:25:22 +0200, Gevisz wrote: > > > I switched from Ubuntu 10.04 to Gentoo just because it forced closing > > window button "x" to the upper-left corner of the window in Unity of > >

Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now

2014-11-24 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 06:53:14 +0200 Gevisz wrote: > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:05:16 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:25:22 +0200, Gevisz wrote: > > > > > I switched from Ubuntu 10.04 to Gentoo just because it forced closing > > > window

Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now

2014-11-25 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:45:50 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 25/11/2014 09:15, Gevisz wrote: > >> I even can agree with them that a new place of that button was > >> > logical, ergonomic and saved screen space. > > Only now, I have realized that, logically, it was

Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now

2014-11-25 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 08:41:10 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 06:53:14 +0200, Gevisz wrote: > > > > Wouldn't it have been easier to use the simple configuration option to > > > move the button back to where you expected it? Far less effort

Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now

2014-11-25 Thread Gevisz
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:13:53 +0100 Marc Stürmer wrote: > Am 24.11.2014 um 19:25 schrieb Gevisz: > > > I switched from Ubuntu 10.04 to Gentoo just because it forced closing > > window button "x" to the upper-left corner of the window in Unity of > > Ubuntu 12

Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now

2014-11-25 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:37:48 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:09:08 +0200, Gevisz wrote: > > > > It was possible, Google has hits on this dated from shortly after the > > > time Unity was released. > > > > Please, give me the link. I w

Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now

2014-11-25 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:37:48 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:09:08 +0200, Gevisz wrote: > I do recall that one way of doing it is with UbuntuTweak. Unity-tweak-tool cant move window buttons to the right in 14.04 as of September 3, 2014: https://bugs.launchpad.net/

Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now

2014-11-25 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:21:06 -0700 Maxim Wexler wrote: > > > > No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible > > in Unity at the time when Ubuntu 12.04 was released. They really > > *forced* their users to accept the new place of the closing window > > frame button and have ar

Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now

2014-11-25 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:56:05 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 25/11/2014 19:03, Gevisz wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:45:50 +0200 Alan McKinnon > > wrote: > > > >> On 25/11/2014 09:15, Gevisz wrote: > >>>> I even can agree with them that a

Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now

2014-11-25 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:49:53 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:55:07 +0200, Gevisz wrote: > > > > > Please, give me the link. I will check if it is correct on my old > > > > Ubuntu 12.04 partition (yes, I still have it) and report the result >

Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now

2014-11-25 Thread Gevisz
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:35:18 +0100 Emanuele Rusconi wrote: > On 25 November 2014 at 23:42, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > > The point was that it could be changed. […] > > > > […] It's about as on-topic and relevant as WinXP. > > No, the point was that sometimes even a small annoyance is plenty > e

Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now

2014-11-25 Thread Gevisz
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:56:58 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:35:18 +0100, Emanuele Rusconi wrote: > > > > The point was that it could be changed. […] > > > > > > […] It's about as on-topic and relevant as WinXP. > > > > No, the point was that sometimes even a small annoyan

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now

2014-11-25 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:02:49 + (UTC) Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2014-11-25, Maxim Wexler wrote: > >> > >> No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible > >> in Unity at the time when Ubuntu 12.04 was released. They really > >> *forced* their users to accept the new place

Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now

2014-11-26 Thread Gevisz
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:45:31 +0100 Marc Stürmer wrote: > Am 25.11.2014 um 18:44 schrieb Gevisz: > > > It usually took me from 10 to 20 minutes to download my daily updates > > in Ubuntu. For big packages - about 40 minutes or even more. > > > >> That

[gentoo-user] Building VirtualBox kernel modules failed

2014-12-21 Thread Gevisz
Tonight I have compiled a new sys-kernel/gentoo-sources version 3.17.7 (the previous version was 3.16.5). Everything as usual: 1) copy .config from /usr/src/linux-3.16.5-gentoo to /usr/src/linux that points to the /usr/src/linux-3.17.7-gentoo, 2) `cd /usr/src/linux` 3) `make oldconfig`, 4) `make

Re: [gentoo-user] Building VirtualBox kernel modules failed

2014-12-21 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 11:47:10 +0100 "J. Roeleveld" wrote: > On Sunday, December 21, 2014 10:16:50 AM Gevisz wrote: > > Tonight I have compiled a new sys-kernel/gentoo-sources > > version 3.17.7 (the previous version was 3.16.5). > > Everything as usual: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Building VirtualBox kernel modules failed

2014-12-21 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 15:27:44 +0400 Alexander Shorin wrote: > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Gevisz wrote: > > macro «alloc_netdev» requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given > > I had the same issue. Solution is simple: update your virtualbox up to > the latest (unstable) one

Re: [gentoo-user] Building VirtualBox kernel modules failed

2014-12-21 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 12:34:03 +0100 "J. Roeleveld" wrote: > On Sunday, December 21, 2014 01:13:01 PM Gevisz wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 11:47:10 +0100 "J. Roeleveld" > wrote: > > > On Sunday, December 21, 2014 10:16:50 AM Gevisz wrote: > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Building VirtualBox kernel modules failed

2014-12-24 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 14:31:45 +0200 Gevisz wrote: > On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 12:34:03 +0100 "J. Roeleveld" wrote: > > > On Sunday, December 21, 2014 01:13:01 PM Gevisz wrote: > > > On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 11:47:10 +0100 "J. Roeleveld" > > wrote: > >

[gentoo-user] eix-update, run from root, failed to write database file

2015-01-05 Thread Gevisz
After today's world update, the eix-update command, run under root, failed to "open the database file '/var/cache/eix/portage.eix' for writing." Nevertheless, the same command, run with ordinary user privileges, completed without error. Why? # eix-update Reading Portage settings .. Building da

Re: [gentoo-user] eix-update, run from root, failed to write database file

2015-01-06 Thread Gevisz
On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:11:02 +0100 Florian Gamböck wrote: > Am 05.01.2015 um 11:54 schrieb Gevisz: > > After today's world update, the eix-update command, run under root, > > failed to "open the database file '/var/cache/eix/portage.eix' for writing." >

[gentoo-user] Cannot have the default USE='static pam' for sys-apps/busybox

2015-01-23 Thread Gevisz
While doing recent wold updates I get the following message: * Messages for package sys-apps/busybox-1.23.0-r1: * You cannot have USE='static pam'. Assuming static is more important. However, I never set any of those two flags neither in /etc/portage/make.conf no in /etc/portage/packag.use. So,

Re: [gentoo-user] Cannot have the default USE='static pam' for sys-apps/busybox

2015-01-23 Thread Gevisz
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:31:20 +0200 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Gevisz wrote: > > > While doing recent wold updates I get the following message: > > > > * Messages for package sys-apps/busybox-1.23.0-r1: > > * You cannot have USE=

Re: [gentoo-user] Cannot have the default USE='static pam' for sys-apps/busybox

2015-01-23 Thread Gevisz
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:29:38 +0200 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Gevisz wrote: > > > On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:31:20 +0200 Alexander Kapshuk < > > alexander.kaps...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:46 PM, G

Re: [gentoo-user] Cannot have the default USE='static pam' for sys-apps/busybox

2015-01-23 Thread Gevisz
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 22:46:02 +0200 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Gevisz wrote: > > > On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:29:38 +0200 Alexander Kapshuk < > > alexander.kaps...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 6:53 PM,

Re: [gentoo-user] Flash and cpu_flags_x86_sse2

2015-01-29 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:46:57 -0500 ddjones wrote: > Getting the following on updating world: > > !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "www-plugins/adobe-flash" has unmet > requirements. > - www-plugins/adobe-flash-11.2.202.440::gentoo USE="kde -debug (-selinux)" > CPU_FLAGS_X86="-sse2" > > Th

[gentoo-user] Switching off some linguas variables

2015-02-11 Thread Gevisz
What is the elegant way to switch off all but one linguas variables for a given package. I have tried all "obvious" solutions but they seem to do not work. For example, I have tried to put the following line into /etc/portage/package.use file: www-client/chromium -nls -linguas* linguas_en lingu

Re: [gentoo-user] Switching off some linguas variables

2015-02-11 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:59:57 +0100 bitlord wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:09:44 +0200 > Gevisz wrote: > > > What is the elegant way to switch off all but one linguas variables > > for a given package. > > > > I have tried all "obvious" solutions

[gentoo-user] Package conflict while trying to emerge chromium

2015-02-12 Thread Gevisz
# emerge --ask chromium ... > The following USE changes are necessary to proceed: > (see "package.use" in the portage(5) man page for more details) > # required by www-client/chromium-40.0.2214.111 > # required by chromium (argument) > >=dev-libs/libxml2-2.9.2 icu Ok, done. # emerge --ask chromiu

Re: [gentoo-user] Switching off some linguas variables

2015-02-13 Thread Gevisz
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 04:17:42 -0500 "Walter Dnes" wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:10:59AM +0200, Gevisz wrote > > On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:59:57 +0100 bitlord wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:09:44 +0200 > > > Gevisz wrote: > > > &

Re: [gentoo-user] Package conflict while trying to emerge chromium

2015-02-13 Thread Gevisz
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:50:35 +0100 Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:02:33AM -0500, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > > > > On 02/12/2015 08:15 AM, Gevisz wrote: > > > # emerge --ask chromium > > > ... > > >> The following USE

Re: [gentoo-user] Package conflict while trying to emerge chromium

2015-02-13 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:24:55 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:15:50 +0200, Gevisz wrote: > > > And I would not report it if ._cfg0002_package.use would not suggested > > to insert # required by www-client/chromium-40.0.2214.111 > ># requir

Re: [gentoo-user] Package conflict while trying to emerge chromium

2015-02-13 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:02:33 -0500 Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > On 02/12/2015 08:15 AM, Gevisz wrote: > > # emerge --ask chromium > > ... > >> The following USE changes are necessary to proceed: > >> (see "package.use" in the portage(5) man page for

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox 31.3 - no youtube video

2015-02-15 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 23:29:22 -0700 Joseph wrote: > After recent update to Firefox 31.3 youtube videos won't play. Recent update of Firefox was to 31.4, at least on amd64 but when I was on 31.3 I noticed no change in my youtube experience: approximately half of their videos can be played. P.S. I

Re: [gentoo-user] Package conflict while trying to emerge chromium

2015-02-16 Thread Gevisz
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:11:31 -0500 "Walter Dnes" wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 08:02:08PM +0200, Gevisz wrote > > > > 2. I am not sure but my guess is that the gstreamer allows me to watch > >the video from youtube (partially), edX, cousera, etc. in a w

Re: [gentoo-user] Package conflict while trying to emerge chromium

2015-02-16 Thread Gevisz
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:36:48 +0100 Marc Joliet wrote: > Am Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:11:31 -0500 > schrieb "Walter Dnes" : > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 08:02:08PM +0200, Gevisz wrote > > > > > > 2. I am not sure but my guess is that the gstreamer allows

Re: [gentoo-user] Package conflict while trying to emerge chromium

2015-02-16 Thread Gevisz
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 23:05:16 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:36:45 +0200, Gevisz wrote: > > > > Has that line actually been inserted into package.use? > > > Portage doesn't add it to the live file, you need to run > > > cfg-update or

Re: [gentoo-user] Package conflict while trying to emerge chromium

2015-02-18 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:09:23 + Stroller wrote: > > On Sat, 14 February 2015, at 10:36 am, Marc Joliet wrote: > > > Personally, I don't like that way of doing things, because unless you > > completely deactivate Flash, Youtube will stupidly never attempt to use > > HTML5 > > videos > > Y

Re: [gentoo-user] unwanted cursor change

2015-03-15 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:58:02 -0400 Philip Webb wrote: > Yesterday, I updated to gtk+-3.14.9 , > which required installation of x11-themes/adwaita-icon-theme . > This new unwanted pkg created a dir under /usr/share/cursors/xorg-x11 > & a symbolic link 'default->Adwaita', which changed my mouse c

Re: [gentoo-user] This nite's switch to "full multilib"

2015-03-30 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 19:53:18 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote: > > I have to do that for 195 ebuilds here and really wonder if that is > correct in the end Have you tried to unmerge all the emulation packages before updating the system, as advised by the news? I did it before the full u

[gentoo-user] march cflag for Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 SLA8Z Malay processor

2018-09-18 Thread gevisz
Currently, I am prepairing to build Gentoo system on computer with AMD Athlon 64 X2 for computer with Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 SLA8Z Malay processor. What will be the correct march cflag for Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 SLA8Z Malay processor to set up in make.conf ? Am I right to use amd64

Re: [gentoo-user] march cflag for Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 SLA8Z Malay processor

2018-09-19 Thread gevisz
run on the target computer, which I got only a few minutes ago. The corresponding image is attached to this e-mail. > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 at 08:24, gevisz wrote: > > > > Currently, I am prepairing to build Gentoo system on > > computer with AMD Athlon 64 X2 for computer with &

Re: [gentoo-user] march cflag for Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 SLA8Z Malay processor

2018-09-19 Thread gevisz
ср, 19 сент. 2018 г. в 0:53, james : > > On 9/18/18 3:22 AM, gevisz wrote: > > Currently, I am prepairing to build Gentoo system on > > computer with AMD Athlon 64 X2 for computer with > > Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 SLA8Z Malay processor. > > > > What will

Re: [gentoo-user] march cflag for Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 SLA8Z Malay processor

2018-09-19 Thread gevisz
ср, 19 сент. 2018 г. в 11:38, Walter Dnes : > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:22:30AM +0300, gevisz wrote > > > What will be the correct march cflag for Intel Pentium > > Dual-Core E2160 SLA8Z Malay processor to set up in > > make.conf ? > > If you have gcc *ON

Re: [gentoo-user] march cflag for Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 SLA8Z Malay processor

2018-09-19 Thread gevisz
чт, 20 сент. 2018 г. в 0:56, Jack : > > On 9/19/18 5:45 PM, gevisz wrote: > > вт, 18 сент. 2018 г. в 22:44, George Kettleborough : > >> If you can run gcc on the new system first you can find out what flags > >> -march=native would produce and use those. See: > &

Re: [gentoo-user] march cflag for Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 SLA8Z Malay processor

2018-09-24 Thread gevisz
вс, 23 сент. 2018 г. в 10:10, Walter Dnes : > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 01:00:39AM +0300, gevisz wrote > > , 19 . 2018 ??. ?? 11:38, Walter Dnes : > > > > According to > > > http://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/SL/SLA8Z.html it has... > > > > &g

Re: [gentoo-user] march cflag for Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 SLA8Z Malay processor

2018-09-24 Thread gevisz
Thanks to all who has replied to this thread so far.

Re: [gentoo-user] Trouble on the horizon!

2018-09-24 Thread gevisz
пн, 24 сент. 2018 г. в 21:24, J. Roeleveld : > On Monday, September 24, 2018 2:42:49 PM CEST Philip Webb wrote: > > I did note in a msg to this list earlier this year (2018) > > that there had been no kernel stabilised by Gentoo since spring 2017, > > which suggested there had been some decline in

[gentoo-user] stage3 does not have Gentoo signing keys, which is unacceptable!

2018-09-24 Thread gevisz
Yesterday, I have found out that the first invocation of emerge-webrsync command can not download a snapshot of the portage tree if webrsync-gpg feature has been set in make.conf because stage3 does not have Gentoo signing keys and I can not install Gentoo package with Gentoo signing keys because t

Re: [gentoo-user] Trouble on the horizon!

2018-09-24 Thread gevisz
вт, 25 сент. 2018 г. в 9:15, J. Roeleveld : > > On September 25, 2018 4:36:27 AM UTC, gevisz wrote: > >пн, 24 сент. 2018 г. в 21:24, J. Roeleveld : > >> On Monday, September 24, 2018 2:42:49 PM CEST Philip Webb wrote: > >> > I did note in a msg to this list ear

Re: [gentoo-user] Trouble on the horizon!

2018-09-25 Thread gevisz
вт, 25 сент. 2018 г. в 10:12, J. Roeleveld : > > On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 8:23:53 AM CEST gevisz wrote: > > вт, 25 сент. 2018 г. в 9:15, J. Roeleveld : > > > On September 25, 2018 4:36:27 AM UTC, gevisz wrote: > > > >пн, 24 сент. 2018 г. в 21:24, J. Roelevel

Re: [gentoo-user] march cflag for Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 SLA8Z Malay processor

2018-09-25 Thread gevisz
вт, 25 сент. 2018 г. в 7:07, gevisz : > > вс, 23 сент. 2018 г. в 10:10, Walter Dnes : > > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 01:00:39AM +0300, gevisz wrote > > > , 19 . 2018 ??. ?? 11:38, Walter Dnes : > > > > > > According to > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] march cflag for Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 SLA8Z Malay processor

2018-10-02 Thread gevisz
ср, 19 сент. 2018 г. в 11:38, Walter Dnes : > > If you have gcc *ON THE TARGET MACHINE*, execute the command... > > gcc -c -Q -march=native --help=target | grep march= I finally installed a web browser on the target computer, and so can (just for the history:) copy and paste the result of running

Re: [gentoo-user] march cflag for Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 SLA8Z Malay processor

2018-10-02 Thread gevisz
вт, 2 окт. 2018 г. в 22:45, gevisz : > > So, mmxext flag is indeed absent here. > > I have not yet included it in CPU_FLAGS_X86 and think that > it produces a strange error messages when I try emerge some > packages like firefox: > > # emerge firefox > These are the pa

Re: [gentoo-user] march cflag for Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160 SLA8Z Malay processor

2018-10-03 Thread gevisz
ср, 3 окт. 2018 г. в 12:50, Walter Dnes : > > What's happening is that the ebuild is going through a lookup table of > CPU flags, and saying... "if you invoke a certain advanced feature, then > you also have to invoke the base version of that feature". If you ask > for the advanced feature, but

[gentoo-user] Skypeforlinux does not start

2018-10-04 Thread gevisz
I have just installed skypeforlinux-8.30.0.50. After starting from command line, it successfully does nothing. I even do not get "permission denied" message. # whereis skypeforlinux skypeforlinux: /usr/bin/skypeforlinux # ls -al /usr/bin/skypeforlinux lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Oct 4 /usr/bin/sky

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Skypeforlinux does not start

2018-10-04 Thread gevisz
чт, 4 окт. 2018 г. в 16:16, Holger Hoffstätte : > > On Thu, 04 Oct 2018 16:09:51 +0300, gevisz wrote: > > > I have just installed skypeforlinux-8.30.0.50. > > > > After starting from command line, it successfully does nothing. > > I even do not get "

Re: [gentoo-user] help

2018-10-04 Thread gevisz
чт, 4 окт. 2018 г. в 16:18, Jorge Ventura : > > Hm, could you, please, describe your problem in a bit more details?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Skypeforlinux does not start

2018-10-05 Thread gevisz
пт, 5 окт. 2018 г. в 13:25, Mick : > > On Thursday, 4 October 2018 14:40:57 BST gevisz wrote: > > чт, 4 окт. 2018 г. в 16:16, Holger Hoffstätte asynchrony.com>: > > > On Thu, 04 Oct 2018 16:09:51 +0300, gevisz wrote: > > > > I have just installed skypeforli

Re: [gentoo-user] Permissions error on starting X.

2018-11-08 Thread gevisz
сб, 3 нояб. 2018 г. в 16:02, Alan Mackenzie : > > If you start your X server from the command line with, e.g. startx, you > now need to set the new(?) suid USE flag for the xorg-server package. I was hit today by this after updating my system. Thanks to God, I have noticed the use flag change in

Re: [gentoo-user] Permissions error on starting X.

2018-11-08 Thread gevisz
чт, 8 нояб. 2018 г. в 22:47, gevisz : > > сб, 3 нояб. 2018 г. в 16:02, Alan Mackenzie : > > > > The matter was fairly intensively discussed in bug #669648 > > in Gentoo's bugzilla. > > Can you give a link, please. Found it myself: https://bugs.gentoo.org/66964

Re: [gentoo-user] Permissions error on starting X.

2018-11-09 Thread gevisz
пт, 9 нояб. 2018 г. в 2:20, Hervé Guillemet : > > Le 07/11/2018 à 04:59, YUE Daian a écrit : > > > > > I got "setblabla error: cannot open /dev/tty0 (permission denied)". > > > > A possible solution without changing anything unnecessary is to run > > startx as "startx -- vt1". > > > > No need to ch

[gentoo-user] Something strange with use flags

2018-11-22 Thread gevisz
After recent bug with changed Xorg-server suid use flag, I became very suspicious about spontanеous use flag shanges during system update and check them all. Today, I noticed the following attemped to change use flags in my Gentoo system during update: # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --ne

Re: [gentoo-user] Something strange with use flags

2018-11-22 Thread gevisz
чт, 22 нояб. 2018 г. в 17:55, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera : > > November 22, 2018 4:41 PM, "gevisz" wrote: > > > After recent bug with changed Xorg-server suid use flag, > > I became very suspicious about spontanеous use flag > > shanges during system update

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox, downloading files and odd behavior.

2019-01-05 Thread gevisz
вт, 1 янв. 2019 г. в 06:45, Dale : > > With the newer Firefox versions, I've noticed something weird about > downloading files. Usually these are videos using a download helper for > videos and sometimes it is a normal file download, depends on the site. > Either way, I get something odd at times.

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox, downloading files and odd behavior.

2019-01-06 Thread gevisz
вс, 6 янв. 2019 г. в 02:54, Dale : > > gevisz wrote: > > вт, 1 янв. 2019 г. в 06:45, Dale : > >> With the newer Firefox versions, I've noticed something weird about > >> downloading files. Usually these are videos using a download helper for > >> video

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox, downloading files and odd behavior.

2019-01-06 Thread gevisz
вс, 6 янв. 2019 г. в 15:57, Peter Humphrey : > > On Sunday, 6 January 2019 11:05:10 GMT gevisz wrote: > > > I never used LVM as I believe that it increases the chance of [losing] > > all the information on hard disks. > > Interesting. Would you like to explain why? I

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox, downloading files and odd behavior.

2019-01-08 Thread gevisz
пн, 7 янв. 2019 г. в 12:21, Peter Humphrey : > > On Sunday, 6 January 2019 22:13:31 GMT Dale wrote: > > > Even from my simple setup, LVM adds more benefits to managing data and > > drives than it does risk. The biggest thing, placing blame where it > > lies. Blaming LVM for a drive dying is placi

[gentoo-user] Portage snapshot signing key expired again

2019-01-09 Thread gevisz
Just tonight I tried to update my portage snapshot by emerge-webrsync command and found out that the portage snapshot signing key expired again without being properly updated by app-crypt/gentoo-keys update before its expiration as described here: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Working

<    1   2   3   4   5   >