Re: [gentoo-user] runscript is deprecated; please use openrc-run instead

2015-04-12 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 13:52:37 +0100 Mick wrote: > On Sunday 12 Apr 2015 12:27:33 Gevisz wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 13:04:40 +0200 Alan McKinnon > wrote: > > > On 12/04/2015 12:48, Gevisz wrote: > > > > Quite for a long time, while booting my Gentoo sy

Re: [gentoo-user] runscript is deprecated; please use openrc-run instead

2015-04-12 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 16:13:24 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:27:33 +0300, Gevisz wrote: > > > > Do nothing. > > > > Thank you for your answer but why that message appear at all, then? > > Because the message say deprecated, which means i

[gentoo-user] ffmpeg command not found

2015-04-12 Thread gevisz
I used to convert dav to avi files with the following command yet a year ago: $ ffmpeg -i input.dav -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi but now, while trying to use it, I get > bash: ffmpeg: command not found What happened? I still have virtual/ffmpeg package installed. In my case it points to lib

Re: [gentoo-user] ffmpeg command not found

2015-04-12 Thread gevisz
2015-04-12 22:04 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk : > On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:58 PM, gevisz wrote: >> >> I used to convert dav to avi files with the following command >> yet a year ago: >> $ ffmpeg -i input.dav -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi >> but now, while

Re: [gentoo-user] ffmpeg command not found

2015-04-12 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 15:27:17 -0400 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > On Sunday, April 12, 2015 10:23:32 PM gevisz wrote: > > Thank you for your reply. I am aware of that change. But the news says: > > > > "Users who currently use libav (the Gentoo default) do not have

[gentoo-user] libav and ffmpeg on the same computer issue once again

2015-05-14 Thread gevisz
After Gentoo devs decided to switch back to ffmpeg default, I set libav USE flag at my /etc/portage/make.conf and was happy with that so far. :) However, after yesterday's # emerge-webrsync # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask world I've got some blocks that in my

Re: [gentoo-user] libav and ffmpeg on the same computer issue once again

2015-05-14 Thread Gevisz
, it would be interesting to hear what the Gentoo devs think about this issue. > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:18 AM, gevisz wrote: > > After Gentoo devs decided to switch back to ffmpeg default, > > I set libav USE flag at my /etc/portage/make.conf > > and was happy with that so f

Re: [gentoo-user] libav and ffmpeg on the same computer issue once again

2015-05-15 Thread gevisz
2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk : > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz wrote: >> >> On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:45:35 -0400 Gregory Woodbury >> wrote: >> >> > I had a similar problem with some packages wanting virtual/ffmpeg and >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] libav and ffmpeg on the same computer issue once again

2015-05-16 Thread gevisz
2015-05-16 9:44 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon : > On 16/05/2015 07:52, gevisz wrote: >> 2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk : >>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:45:35 -0400 Gregory Woodbury >>&

Re: [gentoo-user] libav and ffmpeg on the same computer issue once again

2015-05-16 Thread gevisz
2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz : > 2015-05-16 9:44 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon : >> On 16/05/2015 07:52, gevisz wrote: >>> 2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk : >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On F

Re: [gentoo-user] libav and ffmpeg on the same computer issue once again

2015-05-16 Thread gevisz
2015-05-16 11:55 GMT+03:00 Mick : > On Saturday 16 May 2015 09:26:14 gevisz wrote: >> 2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz : > >> >So, if I get no better suggestions, I will enable abi_x86_32 >> >globally and try to update the world once more. >>

Re: [gentoo-user] libav and ffmpeg on the same computer issue once again

2015-05-16 Thread gevisz
2015-05-16 13:10 GMT+03:00 gevisz : > 2015-05-16 11:55 GMT+03:00 Mick : >> On Saturday 16 May 2015 09:26:14 gevisz wrote: >>> 2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz : >> >>> >So, if I get no better suggestions, I will enable abi_x86_32 >>> >

Re: [gentoo-user] libav and ffmpeg on the same computer issue once again

2015-05-16 Thread gevisz
2015-05-16 13:20 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick : > On Sat, 16 May 2015 13:10:21 +0300, gevisz wrote: > >> > I'm afraid I cannot agree with you on this. On older PCs I would >> > rather did not have to install abi_x86_32 for packages that I don't >> > need to.

Re: [gentoo-user] libav and ffmpeg on the same computer issue once again

2015-05-16 Thread gevisz
2015-05-16 13:33 GMT+03:00 Mick : > On Saturday 16 May 2015 11:10:21 gevisz wrote: >> 2015-05-16 11:55 GMT+03:00 Mick : > >> > I'm afraid I cannot agree with you on this. On older PCs I would rather >> > did not have to install abi_x86_32 for packages that

Re: [gentoo-user] libav and ffmpeg on the same computer issue once again

2015-05-16 Thread gevisz
2015-05-16 11:26 GMT+03:00 gevisz : > 2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz : >> 2015-05-16 9:44 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon : >>> On 16/05/2015 07:52, gevisz wrote: >>>> 2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk : >>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gev

Re: [gentoo-user] libav and ffmpeg on the same computer issue once again

2015-05-16 Thread gevisz
2015-05-16 15:50 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon : > On 16/05/2015 09:51, gevisz wrote: >> 2015-05-16 9:44 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon : >>> On 16/05/2015 07:52, gevisz wrote: >>>> 2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk : >>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM

Re: [gentoo-user] libav and ffmpeg on the same computer issue once again

2015-05-16 Thread gevisz
2015-05-16 17:12 GMT+03:00 Rich Freeman : > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:53 AM, gevisz wrote: >> >> I am inattentive today. :( >> >> Some blockers remained but I hope it will not broke the system. >>... >> [blocks b ] > (">... >> Would you

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Question for users of the Firefox browser

2015-05-17 Thread Gevisz
On Mon, 18 May 2015 06:26:31 +0100 Mick wrote: > On Monday 18 May 2015 02:56:43 Daniel Frey wrote: > > On 05/17/2015 02:54 PM, Mick wrote: > > >> Chromium now selects the whole URL when you click in the address bar. > > >> I'm not sure when it started doing this but it was quite recently. > > >

[gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-28 Thread gevisz
In my everyday work at the computer, I read and type at three or even four different languages. However, I do want to have all program menues and system messages only in English. So, when I found out that it can be achieved by setting -nls USE flag at my make.conf file, I did it, recompiled the s

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-28 Thread Gevisz
On Fri, 29 May 2015 00:41:08 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > Am 28.05.2015 um 17:35 schrieb gevisz: > > In my everyday work at the computer, I read > > and type at three or even four different languages. > > > > However, I do want to have all program menues >

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-28 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 28 May 2015 20:07:55 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann > wrote: > > Am 28.05.2015 um 17:35 schrieb gevisz: > >> In my everyday work at the computer, I read > >> and type at three or even four different lang

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-29 Thread gevisz
2015-05-29 17:46 GMT+03:00 Mick : > On Friday 29 May 2015 05:24:49 Gevisz wrote: >> On Fri, 29 May 2015 00:41:08 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann > wrote: >> > Am 28.05.2015 um 17:35 schrieb gevisz: >> > > In my everyday work at the computer, I read >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-29 Thread gevisz
2015-05-29 10:08 GMT+03:00 Volker Armin Hemmann : > just set LANGUAGE and LC_ALL. Thank you for your suggestion. I have just re-read the Gentoo Localization Guide. It does not mention the LANGUAGE environment variable and do not recommend to set LC_ALL. All the other is done as described in the Ge

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-29 Thread gevisz
2015-05-29 19:36 GMT+03:00 Mick : > On Friday 29 May 2015 17:20:13 gevisz wrote: >> 2015-05-29 17:46 GMT+03:00 Mick : > >> > Do you get anything unexpected when you run 'locale'? >> >> Nothing. (Thank you for your question.) >> >> I ha

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-29 Thread gevisz
2015-05-29 10:08 GMT+03:00 Volker Armin Hemmann : > just set LANGUAGE and LC_ALL. This does not work. Just tried to be sure. > 2015-05-29 6:35 GMT+02:00 Gevisz : >> >> On Thu, 28 May 2015 20:07:55 -0400 Mike Gilbert >> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, May 28

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-29 Thread gevisz
2015-05-29 21:45 GMT+03:00 gevisz : > 2015-05-29 19:36 GMT+03:00 Mick : >> On Friday 29 May 2015 17:20:13 gevisz wrote: >>> 2015-05-29 17:46 GMT+03:00 Mick : >> >>> > Do you get anything unexpected when you run 'locale'? >>> >>> Not

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-29 Thread gevisz
2015-05-29 20:34 GMT+03:00 Marc Joliet : > Am Fri, 29 May 2015 19:34:03 +0300 > schrieb gevisz : > >> Firefox is compiled without any linguas set. >> NLS support disabled globally in make.conf. >> And still, while right-clicking on youtube videos >> in firefox

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-30 Thread gevisz
2015-05-29 23:33 GMT+03:00 gevisz : > 2015-05-29 21:45 GMT+03:00 gevisz : >> 2015-05-29 19:36 GMT+03:00 Mick : >>> On Friday 29 May 2015 17:20:13 gevisz wrote: >>>> 2015-05-29 17:46 GMT+03:00 Mick : >>> >>>> > Do you get anything unexpected wh

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-30 Thread gevisz
2015-05-30 12:32 GMT+03:00 Marc Joliet : > Am Sat, 30 May 2015 11:36:28 +0300 > schrieb gevisz : > > [...] >> As I still had a suspicion that those non-English entries in the Firefox >> menu remain because of some cash issues, I have just launched another >> instance

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-30 Thread gevisz
2015-05-30 13:02 GMT+03:00 : > On 30/05/15 11:36, gevisz wrote: >> >> P.S. As I have already described it earlier, this issue with the Firefox >> menu is only related to the menu I get while right-clicking on >> a youtube video in Firefox. (All the other menu

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-30 Thread gevisz
2015-05-30 13:57 GMT+03:00 gevisz : >> I strongly suspect that the application doing the translating doesn't >> even use gettext. > > May be, but I cannot think of a better explanation. > >> Besides which, I'm surprised you're not getting crashes fr

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-30 Thread gevisz
2015-05-30 14:31 GMT+03:00 : > On 30/05/15 14:07, gevisz wrote: >> >> I do not know how to do that. > > Go to [1], scroll to the bottom. There should be some settings for yt > language. > >> Yes, but according to the link, provided by Marc, it contains gettext &

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-30 Thread gevisz
2015-05-30 14:36 GMT+03:00 Marc Joliet : > Am Sat, 30 May 2015 13:57:34 +0300 > schrieb gevisz : > >> > This document shows how websites can localise their content: >> > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web_Localizability/Creating_localizable_web_applications. &

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-30 Thread gevisz
2015-05-30 15:02 GMT+03:00 gevisz : > > So, I can update the system and see if the unneeded > gettext package will be emerged again. :-) Yes, it was merged back. Why ... to keep an unneeded dependency in the portage tree?

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-30 Thread gevisz
2015-05-30 18:54 GMT+03:00 Peter Humphrey : > On Saturday 30 May 2015 13:57:34 gevisz wrote: >> 2015-05-30 12:32 GMT+03:00 Marc Joliet : >> > Am Sat, 30 May 2015 11:36:28 +0300 >> > schrieb gevisz : >> > [...] >> > (Note: the word you are looking

Re: [gentoo-user] Unwelcomed non-native language support

2015-05-30 Thread gevisz
2015-05-30 18:56 GMT+03:00 : > On 30/05/15 16:56, gevisz wrote: >> >> 2015-05-30 15:02 GMT+03:00 gevisz : >>> >>> >>> So, I can update the system and see if the unneeded >>> gettext package will be emerged again. :-) >> >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:48:24 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:38:43 +0200, Stephan Müller wrote: > > > As a wild guess into the blue, it could be related to readline. As I > > see gentoo's bash uses the standalone readline from coreutils, while > > the original bash source main

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:07:40 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 09/07/15 15:01, Gevisz wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:48:24 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:38:43 +0200, Stephan Müller wrote: > >> > >>> As a wild guess i

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-09 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 17:07:43 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:07:40 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > > >> I can't test it myself as a use a superior shell to > > >> Bash > > > > > > Which one? And why is it superior to bash? > > > > Don't ask such questions ;-) > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-10 Thread Gevisz
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:16:01 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:36:50 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > > > I tried it [zsh], for exactly 10 seconds. My home/end keys didn't > > > work. This gave me the impression of an unfinished project. Why on > > > earth would anyone relea

[gentoo-user] Will emerge-webrsyc work in the future?

2015-08-12 Thread gevisz
Already for the third day, emerge-webrsyc says me that my "current local timestamp is possibly identical to the * timestamp of the latest snapshot," so I began to worry if this way of syncing my portage tree still works and will work in the future. # emerge-webrsync Fetching most recent snapshot

Re: [gentoo-user] Will emerge-webrsyc work in the future?

2015-08-12 Thread gevisz
c-type = webrsync > --- > > Then use: > > # emerge --sync > > > On 12 August 2015 at 11:01, gevisz wrote: >> Already for the third day, emerge-webrsyc says me that >> my "current local timestamp is possibly identical to the >> * timestamp of the latest snaps

Re: [gentoo-user] Will emerge-webrsyc work in the future?

2015-08-12 Thread Gevisz
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:25:09 +0300 Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 12 August 2015 at 11:20, gevisz wrote: > > 2015-08-12 11:10 GMT+03:00 Alon Bar-Lev : > >> I am waiting as well... :) > >> > >> In the meantime, please do not use this script directly any mo

Re: [gentoo-user] Will emerge-webrsyc work in the future?

2015-08-12 Thread Gevisz
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 06:47:30 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:01 AM, gevisz wrote: > > Already for the third day, emerge-webrsyc says me that > > my "current local timestamp is possibly identical to the > > * timestamp of the latest snapshot,&q

[gentoo-user] curses of ncurses :(

2015-08-27 Thread gevisz
I do not understand: 1) why portage wants to upgrade ncurses-5.9-r3 to ncurses-5.9-r101 (because it is marked), 2) why it can not, 3) what to do with this block. $ eix ncurses [I] sys-libs/ncurses Available versions: (0)5.9-r3 ~5.9-r4 ~6.0(0/6) (5)~5.9-r101(5/5)

Re: [gentoo-user] curses of ncurses :(

2015-08-27 Thread gevisz
2015-08-27 17:43 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk : > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:34 PM, gevisz wrote: >> I do not understand: >> 1) why portage wants to upgrade ncurses-5.9-r3 to ncurses-5.9-r101 >> (because it is marked), >> 2) why it can not, >> 3) what to do wit

Re: [gentoo-user] curses of ncurses :(

2015-08-27 Thread gevisz
2015-08-27 17:52 GMT+03:00 Marc Joliet : > Am Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:34:24 +0300 > schrieb gevisz : > >> I do not understand: >> 1) why portage wants to upgrade ncurses-5.9-r3 to ncurses-5.9-r101 >> (because it is marked), >> 2) why it can not, >> 3)

Re: [gentoo-user] curses of ncurses :(

2015-08-27 Thread gevisz
2015-08-27 18:18 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk : > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:16 PM, gevisz wrote: >> 2015-08-27 17:43 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk : >>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:34 PM, gevisz wrote: >>>> I do not understand: >>>> 1) why portage wants to

Re: [gentoo-user] curses of ncurses :(

2015-08-27 Thread gevisz
2015-08-27 20:21 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick : > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:33:33 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> Fix the real error, and all that junk on the screen goes away. No reason >> to stop updating. > > And the "fix" is to resync, it's a fixed bug > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558856

Re: [gentoo-user] curses of ncurses :(

2015-08-28 Thread gevisz
2015-08-28 7:03 GMT+03:00 gevisz : > 2015-08-27 20:21 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick : >> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:33:33 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >>> Fix the real error, and all that junk on the screen goes away. No reason >>> to stop updating. >> >>

[gentoo-user] Lost tabs links in Firefox

2015-08-31 Thread gevisz
I have a bad habit of leaving too many tabs open when closing Firefox relying on its feature to open them again next time I start it. But yesterday, when I opened Firefox during the system update (the updated packages were sys-devel/gcc-4.8.5, sys-devel/gdb-7.9.1, net-libs/gnutls-3.3.17.1, and med

Re: [gentoo-user] Lost tabs links in Firefox

2015-09-01 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 08:56:01 +0200 Peter Weilbacher wrote: > On 2015-09-01 08:33, gevisz wrote: > > I have a bad habit of leaving too many tabs open > > when closing Firefox relying on its feature to open them > > again next time I start it. > [...] > > I still b

Re: [gentoo-user] Lost tabs links in Firefox

2015-09-01 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 08:56:01 +0200 Peter Weilbacher wrote: > On 2015-09-01 08:33, gevisz wrote: > > I have a bad habit of leaving too many tabs open > > when closing Firefox relying on its feature to open them > > again next time I start it. > [...] > > I still b

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Lost tabs links in Firefox

2015-09-01 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 12:23:06 -0500 »Q« wrote: > On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:20:40 +0300 > Gevisz wrote: > > > On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 08:56:01 +0200 Peter Weilbacher > > wrote: > > > > > On 2015-09-01 08:33, gevisz wrote: > > > > I have a bad habit of

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Lost tabs links in Firefox

2015-09-01 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 13:06:29 -0500 Dale wrote: > »Q« wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:20:40 +0300 > > Gevisz wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 08:56:01 +0200 Peter Weilbacher > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On 2015-09-01 08:33, gevisz wrot

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Lost tabs links in Firefox

2015-09-01 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 17:09:01 -0500 Dale wrote: > Gevisz wrote: > > On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 13:06:29 -0500 Dale wrote: > > > > > >> Either that, or backup your .mozilla directory before > >> starting Firefox after a update, just in case. > > Will

Re: [gentoo-user] audacity-2.0.5 failed to compile

2015-09-02 Thread Gevisz
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:55:00 -0400 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > On Wednesday, September 02, 2015 12:57:37 PM wraeth wrote: > > On 02/09/15 12:23, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > > > On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 9:22:44 PM Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > > >> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:05:09PM -0600, the..

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new computer : any advice ?

2015-09-10 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:20:39 + (UTC) james wrote: > Fernando Rodriguez outlook.com> writes: > > > > albeit in it's infancy. Naturally it's going to take a while to > > > become mainstream useful; but that more like a year or 2, at most. > > > > The value I see on that technology for deskt

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new computer : any advice ?

2015-09-10 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 21:12:37 + (UTC) james wrote: > Gevisz gmail.com> writes: > > > on-board video card. Just to avoid extra heating and aircraft noise > > produced by R4770. > > Fanless video cards are wonderful. I have had many over the years but thi

[gentoo-user] Why ghc-bin is pulled in by portage update?

2015-09-24 Thread gevisz
I have dev-lang/ghc in my world file. Today, while updating the system, the portage wanted to update it. Ok. But why it pulles in ghc-bin-7.8.4-amd64.tbz2? # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculat

Re: [gentoo-user] Why ghc-bin is pulled in by portage update?

2015-09-24 Thread gevisz
2015-09-24 14:38 GMT+03:00 Alec Ten Harmsel : > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:27:43PM +0300, gevisz wrote: >> I have dev-lang/ghc in my world file. >> >> Today, while updating the system, the portage >> wanted to update it. Ok. But why it pulles in >> ghc-bin-7.

[gentoo-user] A direct keyboard layout switch for xfce4

2015-10-11 Thread Gevisz
I am asking this question here after discussing it at vim_use mailing list (as an slight off topic to the "vim and touch typing" thread) and after an extensive google search earlier. Below is some resumee from that discussion but for those of you how do not want to read all that I just formulate m

[gentoo-user] preventing keyboard layout files from being overritten during system upgrades

2015-12-04 Thread gevisz
Recently, I finally created my own keyboard layout by edining /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/ru file. In the nearest future, I also will edit the corresponding xml file that provides the menu for the xfce4 keyboard layout switch plugin file deleting from it all the entries about keyboard layouts for th

Re: [gentoo-user] preventing keyboard layout files from being overritten during system upgrades

2015-12-04 Thread gevisz
2015-12-04 14:10 GMT+02:00 Peter Humphrey : > On Friday 04 December 2015 13:55:30 gevisz wrote: > >> So, my main question is How can I ensure that the already >> edited /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/ru file will not be overwritten >> during the next system update. > &g

Re: [gentoo-user] preventing keyboard layout files from being overritten during system upgrades

2015-12-04 Thread gevisz
2015-12-04 14:38 GMT+02:00 Stroller : > >> On Fri, 4 December 2015, at 12:10 p.m., Peter Humphrey >> wrote: >> >> On Friday 04 December 2015 13:55:30 gevisz wrote: >> >>> So, my main question is How can I ensure that the already >>> ed

[gentoo-user] VirtualBox failed to rebuild

2017-01-07 Thread gevisz
>>> Failed to emerge app-emulation/virtualbox-4.3.38, Log file: >>> '/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/virtualbox-4.3.38/temp/build.log' * Messages for package app-emulation/virtualbox-4.3.38: * ERROR: app-emulation/virtualbox-4.3.38::gentoo failed (compile phase): * emake failed * * If you

[gentoo-user] Re: VirtualBox failed to rebuild

2017-01-07 Thread gevisz
keeps track of Linux kernel changes and recompiles the vboxdrv kernel module if necessary. as well. :( Earlier, that is, before a few updates everything worked well. # /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup bash: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv: No such file or directory $ eix dkms No matches found 2017-01-07 14

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: VirtualBox failed to rebuild

2017-01-07 Thread gevisz
2017-01-07 15:19 GMT+02:00 Alan McKinnon : > On 07/01/2017 15:01, gevisz wrote: >> The installed version fails to launch Win7x64 >> with the following messages: >> >> Failed to open a session for the virtual machine Win7x64. >> >> The virtual machine '

Re: [gentoo-user] VirtualBox failed to rebuild

2017-01-07 Thread gevisz
2017-01-07 15:14 GMT+02:00 Alan McKinnon : > On 07/01/2017 14:50, gevisz wrote: >>>>> Failed to emerge app-emulation/virtualbox-4.3.38, Log file: >> >>>>> '/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/virtualbox-4.3.38/temp/build.log' > > please post th

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: VirtualBox failed to rebuild

2017-01-07 Thread gevisz
2017-01-07 16:32 GMT+02:00 J. Roeleveld : > On January 7, 2017 3:06:26 PM GMT+01:00, gevisz wrote: >>2017-01-07 15:19 GMT+02:00 Alan McKinnon : >>> On 07/01/2017 15:01, gevisz wrote: >>>> The installed version fails to launch Win7x64 >>>> with the foll

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: VirtualBox failed to rebuild

2017-01-07 Thread gevisz
2017-01-07 16:53 GMT+02:00 gevisz : > 2017-01-07 16:32 GMT+02:00 J. Roeleveld : >> On January 7, 2017 3:06:26 PM GMT+01:00, gevisz wrote: >>>2017-01-07 15:19 GMT+02:00 Alan McKinnon : >>>> On 07/01/2017 15:01, gevisz wrote: >>>>> The installed v

Re: [gentoo-user] VirtualBox failed to rebuild

2017-01-07 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 07:55:13 +0800 Bill Kenworthy wrote: > On 08/01/17 07:18, Bill Kenworthy wrote: > > On 08/01/17 01:41, gevisz wrote: > >> 2017-01-07 18:41 GMT+02:00 J. Roeleveld : > >> > >>> > >>> Please attach the full file. Yo

Re: [gentoo-user] VirtualBox failed to rebuild

2017-01-08 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 13:17:30 +0800 Bill Kenworthy wrote: > On 08/01/17 09:32, Gevisz wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 07:55:13 +0800 Bill Kenworthy wrote: > > > >> On 08/01/17 07:18, Bill Kenworthy wrote: > >>> On 08/01/17 01:41, gevisz wrote: > >&

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd good or bad?

2017-01-08 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 11:47:24 -0600 Dale wrote: > wabe wrote: > > Dominus Mundi wrote: > > > >> I read in the history feeds that the universal init system (formerly > >> known as systemd) was controversial when introduced. I would like the > >> opinions of people from your time. -- Securely sent

[gentoo-user] ffmpeg and libav: a slot conflict

2017-02-18 Thread gevisz
Yet, a week ago, I updated my system without any problem but just now, trying to update my system, I have got the following error message: # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask world --verbose-conflicts --exclude chromium These are the packages that would be merge

Re: [gentoo-user] ffmpeg and libav: a slot conflict

2017-02-18 Thread Gevisz
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:02:22 +0100 Johannes Rosenberger wrote: > On 18.02.2017 12:21, gevisz wrote: > > Yet, a week ago, I updated my system without any problem but just now, > > trying to update my system, > > I have got the following error message: > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] ffmpeg and libav: a slot conflict

2017-02-18 Thread Gevisz
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:15:33 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:01:52 +0200, Gevisz wrote: > > > > I think the problem is that you don't allow chromium to be rebuilt, > > > because all your blocking packages depend on the installed slot > > &

Re: [gentoo-user] ffmpeg and libav: a slot conflict

2017-02-18 Thread Gevisz
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:20:46 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 18/02/2017 17:01, Gevisz wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:02:22 +0100 Johannes Rosenberger > > wrote: > > > >> On 18.02.2017 12:21, gevisz wrote: > >>> Yet, a week ago, I updated

[gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

2017-03-04 Thread gevisz
$ eix gvim [I] app-editors/gvim Available versions: 8.0.0106 ~8.0.0386 ** {acl aqua cscope debug gnome gtk gtk3 lua luajit motif neXt netbeans nls perl python racket ruby selinux session tcl PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 python3_5 python3_6"} Installed versions: 8.0.0106(05:36

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

2017-03-04 Thread Gevisz
On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 16:37:13 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 18:21:23 +0200, gevisz wrote: > > > $ eix gvim > > [I] app-editors/gvim > > Available versions: 8.0.0106 ~8.0.0386 ** {acl aqua cscope > > debug gnome gtk gtk3 lua luajit motif

[gentoo-user] Updating media-libs/mesa failed

2017-03-11 Thread gevisz
Today, updating my system, I have got: # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask world --exclude chromium These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild U ] media-libs/mesa-13.0.5 [12.0.1] USE="nettle%* -gcrypt% (

Re: [gentoo-user] Updating media-libs/mesa failed

2017-03-11 Thread gevisz
2017-03-11 19:59 GMT+02:00 Alan Mackenzie : > Hello, Gevisz. > > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 19:31:25 +0200, gevisz wrote: >> Today, updating my system, I have got: > >> # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask >> world --exclude chromium &g

[gentoo-user] colord failed to upgrade

2014-07-31 Thread Gevisz
In my today's system update I have got the following error message: * ERROR: x11-misc/colord-1.2.1-r1::gentoo failed (configure phase): * econf failed * * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 93: Called src_configure *environment, line 3551: Called gnome2_src_configure '-

Re: [gentoo-user] colord failed to upgrade

2014-07-31 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:36:38 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 31/07/2014 15:29, Gevisz wrote: > > In my today's system update I have got the following error message: > > > > * ERROR: x11-misc/colord-1.2.1-r1::gentoo failed (configure phase): > > * econf fail

Re: [gentoo-user] colord failed to upgrade

2014-07-31 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:03:09 -0400 Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > I can't comment on a long-term, real, proper solution, but for right > now > > emerge --oneshot dev-perl/XML-Parser > > should at least allow you to continue building colord. It seems that it helped, but not the suggestions from

Re: [gentoo-user] colord failed to upgrade

2014-07-31 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:18:35 +0200 "J. Roeleveld" wrote: > On 31 July 2014 15:58:17 CEST, Gevisz wrote: > >On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:36:38 +0200 > >Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > >> On 31/07/2014 15:29, Gevisz wrote: > >> > In my today's sy

Re: [gentoo-user] colord failed to upgrade

2014-07-31 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:17:54 +0200 "J. Roeleveld" wrote: > On 31 July 2014 16:19:21 CEST, Gevisz wrote: > >On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:03:09 -0400 > >Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > > > >> I can't comment on a long-term, real, proper solution, but for >

Re: [gentoo-user] colord failed to upgrade

2014-08-01 Thread Gevisz
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 10:07:18 +0200 "J. Roeleveld" wrote: > On Friday, August 01, 2014 07:11:59 AM Gevisz wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:17:54 +0200 > > > > "J. Roeleveld" wrote: > > > On 31 July 2014 16:19:21 CEST, Gevisz wrote: > > &

Re: [gentoo-user] unclear (to me) errors from portage

2014-08-07 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 23:33:34 -0400 gottl...@nyu.edu wrote: > I was away for two weeks and now one of my systems cannot be updated > due to conflicts. The entire (long) emerge output is at the end of > this msg. > > > -- The first conflict is --- > > > !!! Mul

[gentoo-user] Do I really need to install new packages during upgrade?

2014-08-26 Thread Gevisz
I have just tried to upgrade my system (which I do almost every day) and found out that portage wants to install 6 new python packages that seem to be unnecessary because for example # equery depends dev-python/pyopenssl reports that no other package depends on this one. The same situation is wi

Re: [gentoo-user] Do I really need to install new packages during upgrade?

2014-08-26 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:42:01 +0100 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday 26 August 2014 12:21:35 Gevisz wrote: > > I have just tried to upgrade my system (which I do almost every day) > > and found out that portage wants to install 6 new python packages > > that seem to be un

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do I really need to install new packages during upgrade?

2014-08-26 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:34:42 + (UTC) Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:21:35 +0300, Gevisz wrote: > > > I have just tried to upgrade my system (which I do almost every > > day) and found out that portage wants to install 6 new python > > packages tha

Re: [gentoo-user] Do I really need to install new packages during upgrade?

2014-08-26 Thread Gevisz
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:30:58 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 26/08/2014 12:00, Gevisz wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:42:01 +0100 > > Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > >> On Tuesday 26 August 2014 12:21:35 Gevisz wrote: > >>> I have just tried to

[gentoo-user] unix2dos blocks dos2unix

2014-09-14 Thread Gevisz
I have just installed unix2dos utility (never had a need to use it before) and just after that tried to install dos2unix but the installation of dos2unix failed complaining on the fact that "app-text/unix2dos" is blocking app-text/dos2unix-6.0.5 I find it very strange as I think that if someone n

Re: [gentoo-user] unix2dos blocks dos2unix

2014-09-14 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 12:57:37 +0530 Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > On Sun, 2014-09-14 at 10:24 +0300, Gevisz wrote: > > I have just installed unix2dos utility > > (never had a need to use it before) and > > just after that tried to install dos2unix > > but the inst

Re: [gentoo-user] unix2dos blocks dos2unix

2014-09-14 Thread Gevisz
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:32:40 +0200 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Gevisz [14-09-14 09:28]: > > I have just installed unix2dos utility > > (never had a need to use it before) and > > just after that tried to install dos2unix > > but the installation of dos2unix failed

Re: [gentoo-user] unix2dos blocks dos2unix

2014-09-14 Thread gevisz
2014-09-14 10:59 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon : > On 14/09/2014 09:47, Gevisz wrote: >> On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 12:57:37 +0530 >> Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 2014-09-14 at 10:24 +0300, Gevisz wrote: >>>> I have just installed unix2dos utility &g

[gentoo-user] Depends or not depends? That is the question. :)

2014-09-25 Thread Gevisz
Running #emerge --depclean --backtrack=60 --ask after updating my system today, I have got the following: >>> These are the packages that would be unmerged: dev-lang/tk selected: 8.5.15 protected: none omitted: none dev-lang/tcl selected: 8.5.15-r1 protected: none

Re: [gentoo-user] Depends or not depends? That is the question. :)

2014-09-25 Thread Gevisz
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:10:00 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 25/09/2014 11:02, Gevisz wrote: > > Running > > #emerge --depclean --backtrack=60 --ask > > after updating my system today, I have got the following: > >>>> These are the packages that woul

[gentoo-user] Was Vim compiled with +eval feature?

2014-10-05 Thread Gevisz
I have downloaded the snippet plugin from http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=361 and have done all the steps described there to install it but, unfortunately, it does not work. My first thought was that a plugin should be somehow loaded into Vim but Vim documentation says that "Vim

<    1   2   3   4   5   >