On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:02:37 +0100 (WEST), Jorge Almeida wrote:
$ /opt/vmware/workstation/bin/vmware-config.pl
[snip]
make: execvp: ./getversion.pl: Permission denied
Are you running vmware-config.pl as root? You should be.
Yep. But the
ogitech thingies with
Windows-oriented F-keys, with a "lock" key to enable normal F-key
behaviour. I checked with xev that the keys were enabled.
I just have no idea of what to do next...
The keyboard never gave me any troubles before.
--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
wkey' by not typing
anything
for ten seconds.
It's not clear (to me) what to do. Does equal "0xe0 0x2a 0xe0 0x37 0xe0
0xaa 0xe0 0xb7"?
And if so, is this a stable thing, i.e. a keyboard characteristic, not
bound to change unless the keyboard is replaced?
--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Should hotplug be removed from the boot runlevel?
The emerge warning "WARNING: The hotplug init script is now gone (dead
and buried)." doesn't make it clear.
--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Richard Fish wrote:
On 9/1/06, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should hotplug be removed from the boot runlevel?
Considering that the script is now (nearly) empty and useless, it
doesn't really matter. It just clutters up your boot messages, you
are
rsonalized. I also finished recompiling everything yesterday,
due to change to gcc-4.1.1, so I can't be sure that the problem is
caused by today's update.
Any suggestion?
--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 9/4/06, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can try restoring the previous version (6.4) and see if it is
> still a problem:
>
I already did. Can't be without vim, and syntax files are a must.
> emerge -
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Dimitris Kavadas wrote:
> On 9/4/06, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After my upgrade to vim 7 syntax colors changed too.
> The difference was that it autmatically sets the color scheme
> used with dark background.
> So just the follow
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Richard Fish wrote:
> Jorge,
>
> Could I convince you to file a bug report on bugs.gentoo.org about that?
>
Richard:
I tried, but the reproducibility issue is weird.
Take a look at this block of code:
sub reloadlist{
my $self=shift;
# my
linux-headers I must also recompile glibc. And then, anything else?
It leaves an unconfortable feeling that "emerge -pNDu world" may have
nothing to say and still the system may not be in a sane state.
Would revdep-rebuild take care of it?
--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Richard Fish wrote:
> > would keep popping out. As far as I understand, if I upgrade
> > linux-headers I must also recompile glibc. And then, anything else?
>
> Nope. (Almost) everything else is dynamically linked to glibc, so
> they will automatically use whatever changes ap
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Jorge Almeida wrote:
> > konsole: WARNING: Unable to use
> > /usr/kde/3.5/share/apps/konsole/mc.desktop
> > konsole: WARNING:
> > Unable to use /usr/kde/3.5/share/apps/konsole/sumc.desktop
> > I have no idea what t
k Twain: I rather decline two drinks than a German adjective.
http://www.SysEx.com.na
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
* deprecated? Of
course, these non-human users have /bin/false as shell, but extra
precautions wouldn't hurt...
Am I seeing something wrong?
--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
/shadow, not in /etc/passwd.
--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
ounts as well as for "service"
accounts. What I was saying is that a * in /etc/shadow will make logging
in impossible. Did I understand wrong?
--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Konqueror and there wasn't anything there. I checked that there are no
Wikipedia cookies in Firefox...
--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
file...
A low-level editing would be enough, even if Firefox doesn't provide an
interface to history editing.
--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Remy Blank wrote:
Jorge Almeida wrote:
Still, it would be nice to be able to edit the saved contents, since
some forms I might want to keep.
You can remove an entry by highlighting it and pressing "Shfit-Delete".
Thanks.
Not user-friendly, but still quite us
Cannot download it: 404
I emerge --sync'ed yesterday, and again just a few minutes ago, in
case the particular version of the package required by portage (
www-plugins/adobe-flash-27.0.0.170) was nuked.
What might be happening here?
Jorge Almeida
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 08:42:53AM +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote
>
> https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ shows 27.0.0.183 as the current
> Flash version. If you don't want to give up on Flash and uninstall it
> altogether
th -std=c11
You can guess what the output is.
Someone using it?
Jorge Almeida
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Freitag, 10. November 2017, 10:54:53 CET schrieb Jorge Almeida:
>> I'm trying to use memset_s() but the system (glibc?) doesn't know
>> about it. I also tried to compile against musl, same result.
>>
> I
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 4:25 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I'm having trouble finding the article again, but these functions look
> very similar to Microsoft's extensions to the C standard. There is a
> good case to be made that they are counterproductive.
Yes, it looks like it. No wonder, if
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:19 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 4:25 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
>
>>
>> http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2014-09-04-how-to-zero-a-buffer.html
>>
>
> I really think ther
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On L, 2017-11-11 at 00:10 +0000, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> Well, most programmers probably won't care about this stuff anyway,
>> and people who deal with cryptography tend to be more cautious than
>> average. But I&
r doesn't
>> solve the problem, according to the link in previous post.
>
>
> explicit_bzero() is available in glibc. It's in .
>
>
OK, thanks. dietlibc also has it, musl doesn't.
Jorge Almeida
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2014-09-04-how-to-zero-a-buffer.html
>
>
>>> Of course, what would really solve the optimize-into-oblivion problem
>>> is a pragma that when invoked on a particular block of code
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:42 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2014-09-04-how-to-zero-a-buffer.html
>>>
>>>
&g
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 14/11/17 19:36, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Jorge Almeida
>> wrote:
>>
>
> Unless you look at the assembly output, you can't be sure. Some optimization
> is
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:41 AM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:42 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
>> You can set your optimization preferences in make.conf, and still an
>> ebuild will override them if deemed unsa
ant
such stuff in my system.
(Of course, the aforementioned fingers are exceedingly sticky. We all
have to live with udev, after all...)
Regards
Jorge Almeida
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 6:12 AM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Saturday, 9 December 2017 12:00:12 GMT Jorge Almeida wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Mick wrote:
>>> > Thank you all for detailed and clear
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 09/12/17 12:08, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> I'm all in favour of Lennart-bashing, but let's keep the bashing to what
>> he's responsible for.
>
>
>
> As far as I can tell, the most egregious thing he's responsible for is
> for wanting a well-des
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-12-09 12:00, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
>> Are you sure you need udisks? And policykit? I'm guessing you have
>> some default USE variables which if removed would contribute to a
>> cleaner system. I just ch
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> [...]
Documentation not for "end-users", "just works" stuff, users should
not stress their little heads, we Drs. know best? I rest my case:
Windows
ask 0x2a, 2017-04-06, rev 0x005e, size 97280
018/002: sig 0x000906e9, pf_mask 0x2a, 2017-04-06, rev 0x005e, size 97280
So in this example "intel-ucode/06-9e-09" is what you'll write in the
kernel form.
There is a amd-ucode dir in /lib/firmware, so I assume it will be the same.
Jorge Almeida
I would just use iptables if I were iptables-wise enough.
Cheers
Jorge Almeida
inherited from 4.7.* via make oldconfig.
I will never ever again buy Nvidia, but I'm not ready yet to ditch
this low power, noiseless computer, and I would prefer not to get
stuck with 4.7.*.
TIA
Jorge Almeida
Reposting due to original getting lost in black hole.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jorge Almeida
Date: Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:06 AM
Subject: [OT] atom+nouveau
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
I have a problem I know is not Gentoo related (because it happens also
in Slackware
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Anton Shumskyi wrote:
>
> 3. Also there can be issues with xorg and nouveau firmware compatibility,
> and you can try to install/uninstall sys-firmware/nvidia-firmware package to
> test
> with that firmware you can have hardware acceleration enabled over vdpau,
>
30-urw-aliases.conf 60-latin.conf
TIA
Jorge Almeida
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 02:48:28 -0800 Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> I tried Ctrl+click (any button) on an xterm window, to bring up the
>> menu (which I never used before; after reading a recent thread about X
>> (in)secu
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 12/18/2016 07:25 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>>
>> The logs complain about helvetica, and I found similar stuff in the
>> net (not necessarilly about xterm). This appears to be a font problem,
>> which is esse
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 1:44 PM, lee wrote:
> Jorge Almeida writes:
>
>
> This works for me:
>
Nope. No change.
>
> Perhaps it has to do with a font not being available in the size needed
> for the menu?
>
Maybe, but I'm out of ideas.
>
>> ca
fonts/misc/ from the font path? Will it not
break something else?
And what is the standard way to set the font path? I know I can do it
via the -fp flag of Xorg (I start X via xinit), but I assume most
people don't do this.
Thanks,
Jorge Almeida
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:46 AM, lee wrote:
>>
> I'm using fvwm. I was having trouble with xterm once when I still used
> Fedora, and though I'm not sure, results might be different with
> different WMs (I seem to remember something about that).
I tried fvwm and there was no difference. Not a
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
Jorge
>>
>
> Actually, I just had a thought. I stumbled onto a very weird fonts bug
> some years ago where Firefox would crash on loading certain pages. It
> was something very stupid, all fonts need to have world-readable
> permissions. If a f
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:40 PM, lee wrote:
> Jorge Almeida writes:
>
>>
>> It is a voodoo (i.e. fonts) problem. Things work for me now, with -fp
>> in the Xserver command line and /usr/share/fonts/Type1/ before
>> /usr/share/fonts/misc/. I would prefer to und
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 7:49 PM, lee wrote:
>>>
>> The menu has the same fonts when the first in the path is
>> /usr/share/fonts/100dpi or /usr/share/fonts/Type1/; when
>> /usr/share/fonts/75dpi it uses smaller fonts. So it seems that it
>> wants /usr/share/fonts/?dpi. But if /usr/share/fonts/mis
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 2:39 PM, lee wrote:
> Jorge Almeida writes:
>>> Even when there is a buggy font it picks, it shouldn't crash.
>>>
>> Sure, but it doesn't seem to happen to anyone else. I'm reluctant to
>> blame the software if I'm no
dy using, into the systemd collective!
>
Wasn't gummiboot the brain child of a certain systemd developer who
got kicked off the kernel due to attitude issues?
And keep those taglines coming.
Jorge Almeida
opic and make
> PR action?
>
I have a feeling this thread was started by the author Himself. (Hint,
to the less attentive readers: "Dominus Mundi" means "Lord of the
World") ~_^
Jorge Almeida
ed with updated libraries (old versions kept?).
I tried logging out. The problem persists after logging in in a getty,
with no X process active.
I'm updating the system with
emerge -NDu world
and then
emerge @preserved-rebuild
Maybe I'm missing something obvious re updating?
Ideas, similar experiences?
Thanks
Jorge Almeida
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 05:35:09 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>> app-admin/checkrestart-0.47-r3 (/usr/sbin/checkrestart)
>
> There's also needrestart that is a little more intelligent, can
Dale and Neil, thanks for the hints. I'll take a look at checkr
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Michael Morak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a similar setup. The problem is that some of your services may still
> have open handles on files that no longer exist after updating (i.e. the
> service, when originally started, opened an .so library file that it needs
> to r
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Michael Morak wrote:
> On 13 January 2017 at 23:04, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
> Almost, but not quite. The problem is that the POSIX standard requires that
> any file *must* continue to exist until all file handles pointing to it are
> closed. T
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Dale wrote:
> Jorge Almeida wrote:
>>
>> It would be great a program that goes through all processes and
>> checks for old libraries in use. If the program assumes a particular
>> setup ( sysv/ systemd or even supporting both) then i
s are suggestive enough, but I have no clue about what does it
mean to use 8304 instead of just plain 8300 for /.
Any insight?
TIA
Jorge Almeida
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Bicno wrote:
>> The names are suggestive enough, but I have no clue about what does it
>
>> mean to use 8304 instead of just plain 8300 for /.
>
>
>
> The reason is that with efi bootloader the partitions with that GUID in the
> GPT table are automatically mounted
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> restart them automatically if you like to live dangerously ;-)
>
Underdocumented python scripts running as root and messing with
services? What could possibly go wrong? ;-)
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 4:05 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 01:57:11 -0800, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> Aside from the minor details that needrestart is written on Perl and well
> documented, I couldn't agree with you more ;-)
>
OOPS, my bad. I was really thinking of
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> Run it with '-r l' and you will find out, harmlessly.
>
>
OK, done that. I can't really check it until next time an update makes
remounting ro to fail. For now,
$ needrestart -r l
Scanning processes...
Scanning linux images...
Failed to r
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Dale wrote:
> Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> Failed to retrieve available kernel versions.
>>
>> I use a custom kernel, off-portage. What would the output line about
>> kernel mean?
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> I get s
$ fatrace
Cannot initialize fanotify: Function not implemented
Up–to–date system. Maybe the ebuild misses some dependency?
Or some kernel configuration?
Jorge Almeida
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> $ fatrace
>> Cannot initialize fanotify: Function not implemented
>>
>
> Check CONFIG_FANOTIFY.
>
That's it. Thank you.
Jorge Almeida
It is OK if I have to recompile
basic libraries, as long as this is stable...)
TIA
Jorge Almeida
but still...
I couldn't find the name of the maintainer. Maybe different devs are
in charge of vim and gvim?
just
> use emacs...
What do[es] the maintainer[s] use?
Regards
Jorge Almeida
a few cords. Even if it was said with a grain of salt, the fact
is that updating a stable system after sync'ing is not expected to be
a surprising experience, at least regarding packages that are not part
of a huge bundle like KDE.
Regards
Jorge Almeida
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 1:55 AM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 4:22 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> Is it possible?
>>
>
> Yes, the most straightforward way I know of is to use crossdev to
> create an i[3456]86 GCC and compile it with the corresponding
> cross-emer
generation one?)
Any input is appreciated
Jorge Almeida
I'm resending this because "HD 630" is a title bound to elicit no
response at all. Sorry, I was tired.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> This may be a stupid question, for one of two possible reasons, but
> here it goes:
>
> I'm thinking o
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:02 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On March 28, 2017 10:39:22 AM GMT+02:00, Jorge Almeida
> wrote:
>>>
>
> My laptop uses the integrated GPU 95÷ of the time. For the occasional game I
> want to play, I can enable the NVidia chip.
>
> Suppor
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:39 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On March 28, 2017 11:19:00 AM GMT+02:00, Jorge Almeida
> wrote:
>>
>>Maybe someone with a 7th generation can share experience?
>>
>
>
> If you just want 2D, then any GPU should work. Intel has very
imary router is thottling speed when in bridge mode? Is
this possible at all? (And if so, what could be the purpose of such
measure? *spooky*)
Someone has a similar setup? Any experience with that (TP-link) router?
Thanks,
Jorge Almeida
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 03/28/2017 01:19 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> The point is: I connected the computers to the lan ports of my
>> secondary router (with original firmware, but I intended to install
>> ddwrt), and the setup works, except
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:52:25 -0700, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
>
> It's more a privacy issue that security for me. I have a similar setup
> with a virgin cable router, which I set to what they call modem mode,
> wher
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 Mar 2017 22:52:25 Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
> Many ISPs today implement TR-069 (a standard of the DSL forum) to access
> customer equipment remotely for service provisioning. They use configuration
> servers to imple
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:59 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>>
>
> The next hop after the ISP supplied router is another piece of the ISPs
> network equipment, so the ISP access to your data is equivalent, since the
> geograph
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:28 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
> http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/graphics-drivers/05520.html
> ev says that everything up to Intel HD 620 is supported. It is
> probably reasonable to a
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Todd Goodman wrote:
> * Jorge Almeida [170327 18:04]:
>
>
> I've built a number of desktop machines using Intel i7 (mostly) CPUs
> with integrated GPU and all have been supported well in my
> gentoo-sources kernels.
>
> I find Intel
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:19:29 +0100
> schrieb Jorge Almeida :
>
>
> I'm using a 400 MBps cable link here, directly connected, I can get 48
> MBytes/s out of it (which should be very close if not even little above
>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:52:08 -0700
> schrieb Jorge Almeida :
>
>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Neil Bothwick
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:52:25 -0700, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> >
>>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 03/29/2017 12:07 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> I think I need wan-to-lan. Anyway, those numbers seem too good to be
>> true. 919Mbps with a $61 TP-Link AC1200? What would explain my poor
>> results?
>>
>
>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> I have a similar setup here in Frontier territory. The ADSL circuit
> connects to their Netgeat/Westell B90
> which has wifi and 4 ethernet ports. One ethernet port connects to my
> "internal" DLink-615 which serves
> the rest of the uni
lumina-support.desktop: error: value
"Lumina;" for key "OnlyShowIn" in group "Desktop Entry" contains an
unregistered value "Lumina"; values extending the format should start
with "X-"
??
Jorge Almeida
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:43:20 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
>
> It seems fairly clear, some .desktop files contain invalid values. It
> shouldn't stop them working but they should have been fixed before being
> install
first with "X" USE flag, same problem.
Jorge Almeida
cores=4 threads=4
(...)
Was I ripped off?
Can someone with the same cpu check the output of the above commands?
Thanks...
Jorge Almeida
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Poison BL. wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
> While I don't have anything that new handy, the 6MB cache checks out against
> intel's specs for the i5-7600. The broadwell i5-5675 lists off at a 4MB
> cache
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
>> Thanks. I suppose it's just a gcc thing, then. I just emerged
>> gcc-5.4.0 and the output is the same, though.
>
>
> My skylake comes up as broadwell too, with gcc 5.4
>
> Looks like gcc 6 has a skylake arch, but not a kabylake.
> https://gcc.
I wouldn't want my dog to die for lack
of cgroups support.)
thanks
Jorge Almeida
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Rasmus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it's possible to use htop without the cgroup config in your kernel, but htop
> is able to display cgroups (which it obviously isn't able to if those aren't
> enabled in the kernel), so emerge throws this warning. If you don't want to
> displ
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 09:26:16 -0700
> schrieb Jorge Almeida :
>
> Well, it says "should be" enabled. It's not a requirement. You may not
> use some of htop's features like proper process grouping.
Yes, and th
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 04/30/2017 08:33 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
>>>
>>> Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 09:26:16 -0700
>>> schrieb Jorge Almeida :
>
> You can
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:36:03 -0700
> schrieb Jorge Almeida :
>> The warnings don't bother me that much, I just feel they are Bad
>> Policy. Enabling cgroups would add unnecessary complexity to the
>> kernel configu
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Kai Krakow wrote:
>> Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 10:33:05 -0700
>> schrieb Jorge Almeida :
>>
>>> It makes sense that the kernel has it. Should it be enabled? For a
>>> server,
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 05/01/2017 08:01 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Kai Krakow wrote:
>>>> Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 10:33:05 -0
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 04/05/2017 09:36, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
> Now, can you please get over yourself so we can move on?
> We get it, we really do. You don't like the message.
>
In case you didn't notice, the thread is completed,
from kernel.org, off
portage (hence the OT in the title).
thanks
Jorge Almeida
301 - 400 of 558 matches
Mail list logo
