On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 06:59 +, Neil Walker wrote:
> Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > I'm starting to stray OT here, but I'm considering a second-hand Adaptec
> > 2420SA - this is real hardware raid right?
> >
>
> It's a PCI-X card (not PCI-E). Are you sure that's right for your system?
yes, I have
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 03:29:50 Dale wrote:
Well, actually, if hal would have worked I wouldn't have cared if it
uses xorg.conf at all. That was the point of using hal. Thing is, I
followed the howto and it didn't wo
Hi,
has anybody a recipe on this upgrade hell each time KDE release a new
version?
This time existing KDE-4.3.5 packages block KDE-4.4 packages though they
go to different slots.
Even portage-2.2_rc62 is unable to cope with that.
Thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
--
Helmut Jarausch
Lehrstuhl fuer Num
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 07:31 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > > so long as you didn't have any non-detectable disk errors before
> > > removing the disk, or any drive failure while one of
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 07:31 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > > so long as you didn't have any non-detectable disk errors before
> > > removing the disk, or any drive failure while one of
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> has anybody a recipe on this upgrade hell each time KDE release a new
> version?
> This time existing KDE-4.3.5 packages block KDE-4.4 packages though they
> go to different slots.
> Even portage-2.2_rc62 is unable to cope with that.
>
On 10 Feb, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> has anybody a recipe on this upgrade hell each time KDE release a new
>> version?
>> This time existing KDE-4.3.5 packages block KDE-4.4 packages though they
>> go to different slots.
>> Even
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
Hi,
has anybody a recipe on this upgrade hell each time KDE release a new
version?
This time existing KDE-4.3.5 packages block KDE-4.4 packages though they
go to different slots.
Even portage-2.2_rc62 is unable to cope with that.
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 10 Feb, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> has anybody a recipe on this upgrade hell each time KDE release a new
> >> version?
> >> This time existing KDE-4.3.5 packages blo
On 10 Feb, Dale wrote:
> chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
>> Hi,
>>
>> has anybody a recipe on this upgrade hell each time KDE release a new
>> version?
>> This time existing KDE-4.3.5 packages block KDE-4.4 packages though they
>> go to different slots.
>> Even po
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On 10 Feb, Dale wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
Hi,
has anybody a recipe on this upgrade hell each time KDE release a new
version?
This time existing KDE-4.3.5 packages block
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:24:36 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > hal is a classic "Second System Effect" case
> > But I thought we thrashed this to death a while ago and all agreed to
> > never speak of this abomination again, while we await the Third
> > System Effect aka DeviceKit?
> From what I read it a
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 10:36:35 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> has anybody a recipe on this upgrade hell each time KDE release a new
> version?
> This time existing KDE-4.3.5 packages block KDE-4.4 packages though they
> go to different slots.
> Even portage-2.2_rc62 is unable to cope wit
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 11:38:52 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:24:36 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > > hal is a classic "Second System Effect" case
> > >
> > > But I thought we thrashed this to death a while ago and all agreed to
> > > never speak of this abomination again, while we a
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:24:36 -0600, Dale wrote:
hal is a classic "Second System Effect" case
But I thought we thrashed this to death a while ago and all agreed to
never speak of this abomination again, while we
On 10 Feb, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 February 2010 10:36:35 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> has anybody a recipe on this upgrade hell each time KDE release a new
>> version?
>> This time existing KDE-4.3.5 packages block KDE-4.4 packages though they
>> go to different slots.
>> Ev
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 12:32:11 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 10 Feb, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 February 2010 10:36:35 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> has anybody a recipe on this upgrade hell each time KDE release a new
> >> version?
> >> This time existing KDE-4.3.5
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 00:22:31 Iain Buchanan wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 08:47 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > I now only need to figure out the best way to configure LVM over this to
> > get the best performance from it. Does anyone know of a decent way of
> > figuring this out?
> > I go
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 08:08:44 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 February 2010 01:22:31 Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 08:47 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > I now only need to figure out the best way to configure LVM over this
> > > to get the best performance from it.
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> As for recovery, I always use "sysrescuecd" (http://www.sysresccd.org) and
> this has Raid and LVM support in it. (Same with the Gentoo-livecds)
sysrescuecd failed me hard two nights ago. 64bit kernel paniced with stack
corruptions, 32bit kernel
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 02:39:14PM -0500, dhk wrote:
> Do you have xfce-base/xfdesktop installed? Try installing it.
No, as it happens, I didn't. When I tried
# emerge xfdesktop
, the compiler threw a segfault. It does this reproducibly. Bother!
I don't have any fancy C\(XX\)?FLAGS set
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 02:28:59 Stroller wrote:
> On 9 Feb 2010, at 19:37, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > ...
> > Don't get me started on those ;)
> > The reason I use Linux Software Raid is because:
> > 1) I can't afford hardware raid adapters
> > 2) It's generally faster then hardware fakeraid
>
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 12:03:51 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > As for recovery, I always use "sysrescuecd" (http://www.sysresccd.org)
> > and this has Raid and LVM support in it. (Same with the Gentoo-livecds)
>
> sysrescuecd failed me har
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 February 2010 12:03:51 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > As for recovery, I always use "sysrescuecd" (http://www.sysresccd.org)
> > > and this has Raid and LVM support in it. (Sam
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
Also, are you aware that as of yesterday, KDE-4.4 was still hard masked in
$PORTDIR/profiles/package.mask? It may have been removed meanwhile since my
last sync.
Maybe some of us synced in the middle of a update then? I ge
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 11:38:52 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:24:36 -0600, Dale wrote:
hal is a classic "Second System Effect" case
But I thought we thrashed this to death a while ago and all agre
Hello list,
when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
kdelibs compiled with USE="semantic-desktop" and cannot be told to not
use it. But I do not like the idea of semantic desktop and I will not
install it. But I really like kmail as my mail client, so I give it a
last
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:27:32AM +, Neil Bothwick wrote
> but D-Bus provides a standard way for applications to communicate
> with one another and removing it can stop your desktop working as
> it should.
Then how did things manage to work on my systems for the past 9 years,
pray tell?
-
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 14:57:57 Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:27:32AM +, Neil Bothwick wrote
>
> > but D-Bus provides a standard way for applications to communicate
> > with one another and removing it can stop your desktop working as
> > it should.
>
> Then how did
Hello,
I booted up an old system off our a minimal 2006.1 cd
I'm looking for the kernel to copy it.
Is it this kcore file?
proc # file kcore
kcore: ELF 32-bit LSB core file Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), SVR4-style,
SVR4-style, from 'vmlinux'
If not does somebody know what the name, or th
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 14:51:26 James wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I booted up an old system off our a minimal 2006.1 cd
>
>
> I'm looking for the kernel to copy it.
>
>
> Is it this kcore file?
>
> proc # file kcore
> kcore: ELF 32-bit LSB core file Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), SVR4-style
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
Hello,
I booted up an old system off our a minimal 2006.1 cd
I'm looking for the kernel to copy it.
Is it this kcore file?
proc # file kcore
kcore: ELF 32-bit LSB core file Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), SVR4-style,
SVR4-st
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:57:57 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > but D-Bus provides a standard way for applications to communicate
> > with one another and removing it can stop your desktop working as
> > it should.
>
> Then how did things manage to work on my systems for the past 9 years,
> pray t
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:57:57 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
but D-Bus provides a standard way for applications to communicate
with one another and removing it can stop your desktop working as
it should.
Then how did t
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
> Hello list,
> when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
> kdelibs compiled with USE="semantic-desktop" and cannot be told to not
> use it. But I do not like the idea of semantic desktop and I will not
> install it.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> has anybody a recipe on this upgrade hell each time KDE release a new
> version?
> This time existing KDE-4.3.5 packages block KDE-4.4 packages though they
> go to different slots.
> Even portage-2.2_rc62 is unable to cope with that
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 02:39:14PM -0500, dhk wrote:
>
>> Do you have xfce-base/xfdesktop installed? Try installing it.
>
> No, as it happens, I didn't. When I tried
>
> # emerge xfdesktop
>
> , the compiler threw a segfault. It does t
On 2/10/2010 2:12 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 03:29:50 Dale wrote:
Well, actually, if hal would have worked I wouldn't have cared if it
uses xorg.conf at all. That was the point of using hal. Thing is, I
followed the howto and it didn't work. The fact that the confi
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 17:33:46 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 02:39:14PM -0500, dhk wrote:
> >> Do you have xfce-base/xfdesktop installed? Try installing it.
> >
> > No, as it happens, I didn't. When I tried
> >
>
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On 2/10/2010 2:12 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 03:29:50 Dale wrote:
Well, actually, if hal would have worked I wouldn't have cared if it
uses xorg.conf at all. That was the point of using hal. Thing i
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 23:58:10 Dale wrote:
> So, hal may be progress to you but it is a step backward for me. It's
> the opposite of progress.
You mean HAL = Congress?
Sorry, couldn't resist ;)
And now, back on topic :)
On 10 Feb 2010, at 11:14, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 02:28:59 Stroller wrote:
On 9 Feb 2010, at 19:37, J. Roeleveld wrote:
...
Don't get me started on those ;)
The reason I use Linux Software Raid is because:
1) I can't afford hardware raid adapters
2) It's generally fa
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 February 2010 17:33:46 Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> Is it just me? On a new install I always still to an emerge -e @world
>> once I get to a working text based boot and I've done any modification
>> to make.conf as I don't really
Hi there,
Upgrading some packages today I saw:
Qt3 is deprecated and unsupported, both upstream and by the Gentoo Qt
Project. x11-libs/qt:3 will be removed from portage soon. See
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_f988855f798764822704bbbd743ab6f7.xml
You are encouraged to use Qt4 instead.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Stroller wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Upgrading some packages today I saw:
>
> Qt3 is deprecated and unsupported, both upstream and by the Gentoo Qt
> Project. x11-libs/qt:3 will be removed from portage soon. See
>
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_f988855f7987
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Stroller wrote:
because qt-VERSION is being phased out. You are supposed to use the split qt
ebuilds. qt-VERSION is just a meta package.
And luckily, all qt-BLABLA-4.5.3 ebuilds are marked stable.
ALSO:
from the qt-4.5.3 ebuild:
KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 arm hppa ~ia6
- Original Message
> From: Volker Armin Hemmann
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Sent: Wed, February 10, 2010 12:18:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Qt3 deprecated, but Qt4 still not x86 (only
> ~x86)???
> ALSO:
> from the qt-4.5.3 ebuild:
>
> KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 arm hppa ~ia6
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 17:37:47 Stroller wrote:
> On 10 Feb 2010, at 11:14, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 February 2010 02:28:59 Stroller wrote:
> >> On 9 Feb 2010, at 19:37, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >>> ...
> >>> Don't get me started on those ;)
> >>> The reason I use Linux Software
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Stroller
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Upgrading some packages today I saw:
>
> Qt3 is deprecated and unsupported, both upstream and by the Gentoo Qt
> Project. x11-libs/qt:3 will be removed from portage soon. See
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_f988855f798764
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:59:16 +, Stroller wrote:
> The message posted to Gentoo-dev suggests that Qt3 is going away right
> about NOW, but this doesn't seem to add up to what I'm seeing.
The message says it will be masked on Feb 21st and removed on March 21st.
So you have eleven days to add
Am Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2010 schrieb Christian Apeltauer:
> Hello list,
> when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
> kdelibs compiled with USE="semantic-desktop" and cannot be told to not
> use it. But I do not like the idea of semantic desktop and I will not
> install it
Am Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2010 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
> Hi,
>
> has anybody a recipe on this upgrade hell each time KDE release a new
> version?
> This time existing KDE-4.3.5 packages block KDE-4.4 packages though they
> go to different slots.
> Even portage-2.2_rc62 is unable to cope with that.
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2010 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
> > Hi,
> >
> > has anybody a recipe on this upgrade hell each time KDE release a new
> > version?
> > This time existing KDE-4.3.5 packages block KDE-4.4 packages though they
> > go to
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 23:58:10 Dale wrote:
So, hal may be progress to you but it is a step backward for me. It's
the opposite of progress.
You mean HAL = Congress?
Sorry, couldn't resist ;)
And now, back on to
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:59:16 +, Stroller wrote:
>
>> The message posted to Gentoo-dev suggests that Qt3 is going away right
>> about NOW, but this doesn't seem to add up to what I'm seeing.
>
> The message says it will be masked on Feb 21
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:59:16 +, Stroller wrote:
> >> The message posted to Gentoo-dev suggests that Qt3 is going away right
> >> about NOW, but this doesn't seem to add up to what I'm se
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:30:19 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I seem to have them both installed with only my old version of MYthTV
> requiring qt-3.3.8
That's easy then, switch to MythTV 0.22, it's much better :)
--
Neil Bothwick
I do not like this dumb machine
I really ought to sell it.
It never
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:30:19 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >> I seem to have them both installed with only my old version of MYthTV
> >> requiring qt-3.3.8
> >
> > That's easy then, switch t
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:20:09 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> So am I at any great risk doing an emerge -C qt-3.3 and then expecting
> revdep-rebuild to fix up mythtv-0.21 with qt-4 using whatever it has
> ffor qt3-support?
>
> I'm __really__ not ready to upgrade my whole MythTV setup 0.22 if 0.21
> r
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:19:37 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> And I cannot update mythfrontend on my desktop machine without
> updating EVERY machine on the network to 0.22, so that's 2 desktops, 2
> dedicated machines hooked to TVs and the server. That's a lot of work
> just because someone decides th
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:30:19 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> I seem to have them both installed with only my old version of MYthTV
>> requiring qt-3.3.8
>
> That's easy then, switch to MythTV 0.22, it's much better :)
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Upgrading from 0.21 to 0.22 was painless AFAIR. I made a backup of the
> database but didn't need. You do need to upgrade all backends and
> frontends at the same time, but then it's just a matter of restarting
> them and you're OK. I did "e
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 19:22:01 BRM wrote:
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Volker Armin Hemmann
> > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> > Sent: Wed, February 10, 2010 12:18:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Qt3 deprecated, but Qt4 still not x86 (only
> > ~x86)??? ALSO:
> > from
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 18:37:00 Mark Knecht wrote:
> > gcc rebuilds itself twice to ensure that the binary is built with the
> > same version as the result, and verifies that the last two are bit-wise
> > identical. Then building the toolchain, then building the rest of world
> > gives you e
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Because nine years ago, Linux desktop software didn't use interprocess
> communication. Of course things will still work, but not necessarily
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter-process_communication
http://tldp.org/LDP/tlk/ipc/ipc.html
D-Bus is just a YAIPC (Yet-Another-I
On 10 Feb 2010, at 17:26, J. Roeleveld wrote:
...
The mainboard I use (ASUS M3N-WS) has a working hotswap support
(Yes, I tested
this) using hotswap drive bays.
Take a disk out, Linux actually sees it being removed prior to
writing to it
and when I stick it back in, it gets a new device assigned
On 10 Feb 2010, at 20:27, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
The qt- subpackages are very much alive and stable:
$ eix qt-gui
[I] x11-libs/qt-gui
Available versions: (4) 4.5.3-r2 (~)4.6.1 **4.6.-r1[1]
**4.-
r1[1]
{+accessibility aqua cups dbus debug exceptions +glib gtk
+kde-qt m
Am Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2010 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> > Well I only had some issues with packages that didn't have a 4.4 version,
> > like soliduiserver. So I guessed they don't need that anymore and a
> > removed it. Turned out it was a hard block because I had it in world.
>
> so? set -v
On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
>> Hello list,
>> when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
>> kdelibs compiled with USE="semantic-desktop" and cannot be told to not
>> use it. But I do not
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
> >> Hello list,
> >> when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
> >> kdelibs compiled with USE="semantic-desk
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
>> On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> > On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
>> >> Hello list,
>> >> when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that kmail-4.4.0 needs
>> >> kdel
On Feb 10, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
>> On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>> On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
Hello list,
when I synced my portage tree today, I saw that k
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
>>
>> Again, I cannot see the 0.22 gives me anything I care about but
>> there's no way to know until I commit to making the change.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mark
>
> if everything works, why are you even bothering with updates? Why do you car
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> wrote:
>
>
> >> Again, I cannot see the 0.22 gives me anything I care about but
> >> there's no way to know until I commit to making the change.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Mark
> >
> > if e
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
> >> On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >> > On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
> >> >> Hello list,
> >> >> when I synced
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
> >> On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >>> On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote:
> Hello lis
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> firefly ~ # emerge -pvg =x11-libs/qt-3.3.8b-r2
Ah, instead I should use
emerge --usepkg =x11-libs/qt-3.3.8b-r2
No errors or warnings.
Nice! Now Myth works no matter what happens in portage to qt...
Thanks,
Mark
On Feb 10, 2010, at 6:31 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
>>
>> OK, after reading several articles from the given starting point, I now
>> understand why semantic-desktop wastes so much cpu, memory, and storage
>> (really, if you organize your da
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:25:31 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> I don't know what load it creates because I never even have any
> negative impact. Yes, there is some nepomuk stuff sleeping in the
> background and it has zero impact on my desktop behaviour.
It's the Strigi indexer that can affec
On 11 Feb 2010, at 00:01, Jörg Schaible wrote:
...
your understanding is wrong. Completely wrong. Seriously it hurts.
start here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEPOMUK_(framework)
and then proceed with the links.
google-desktop is something completley different (and something
that can
be r
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:03:15 -0600, Roy Wright wrote:
> IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find another
> desktop manager (even after being my primary desktop for 7 years).
It's so mandatory it takes a whole mouse click to turn it off :(
--
Neil Bothwick
Old hitchhikers
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:34:06 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> emerge --usepkg =x11-libs/qt-3.3.8b-r2
>
> No errors or warnings.
>
> Nice! Now Myth works no matter what happens in portage to qt...
Except you won't get any updates to Qt is a security hole is discovered,
that's the main reason for addi
On 11 Feb 2010, at 01:14, Roy Wright wrote:
...
because to 'organize it properly' you would need a huge directory
tree plus
symlinks plus explaining notes to even simulate a small token of
the stuff
'semantic desktop' can do for you..
Haven't had a problem organizing my data in 25 years .
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 08:29 -0600, Dale wrote:
> chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:57:57 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > For example, Network Manager uses D-Bus to tell programs when
> > your Internet connection is available and not, so yo
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 08:29 -0600, Dale wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:57:57 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
For example, Network Manager uses
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 22:54 -0600, Dale wrote:
> chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
what _is_ that?! (Don't tell me, if we ignore it maybe it will go away)
> > On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 08:29 -0600, Dale wrote:
> I use Seamonkey 2 right now. You may be able to tell t
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 22:51:00 Stroller wrote:
> On 10 Feb 2010, at 20:27, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > ...
> > The qt- subpackages are very much alive and stable:
> >
> > $ eix qt-gui
> > [I] x11-libs/qt-gui
> >
> > Available versions: (4) 4.5.3-r2 (~)4.6.1 **4.6.-r1[1]
> >
> > **4
Hi collective,
I just upgraded from linux-2.6.32-tuxonice-r1 to r4 and my network card
no longer works. It is "Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5756ME
Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express" and previously I've downloaded firmware
from
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/dwmw2/linux-firmware-from-ke
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:18:43PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:57:57 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> > > but D-Bus provides a standard way for applications to communicate
> > > with one another and removing it can stop your desktop working as
> > > it should.
> >
> > The
89 matches
Mail list logo
