On Sunday 02 August 2009 01:31:14 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> > On Saturday 01 August 2009 23:19:52 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> >> I've been trying to get a few recalcitrant packages to build
> >> (evolution-data-server, openoffice) but they seem to r
On Sunday 02 August 2009 00:59:22 John covici wrote:
> Hi. On my latest update attempt, I get the following message: !!! All
> ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-fs/udev-145[extras]" have been
> masked.
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> request:
> - sys-fs/ud
on Sunday 08/02/2009 Alan McKinnon(alan.mckin...@gmail.com) wrote
> On Sunday 02 August 2009 00:59:22 John covici wrote:
> > Hi. On my latest update attempt, I get the following message: !!! All
> > ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-fs/udev-145[extras]" have been
> > masked.
> > !!! One of t
On Sunday 02 August 2009 10:45:46 John covici wrote:
> on Sunday 08/02/2009 Alan McKinnon(alan.mckin...@gmail.com) wrote
>
> > On Sunday 02 August 2009 00:59:22 John covici wrote:
> > > Hi. On my latest update attempt, I get the following message: !!! All
> > > ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys
Howdy,
While attempting to try the latest version of ruby-gnome2 (0.19.1), I
copied the 0.19.0 ebuilds to my local overlay then renamed them to the
new version. I then downloaded the ruby-gnome2-all-0.19.1.tar.gz,
placed it in /usr/portage/distfiles, then used "ebuild ruby-...
digest" fo
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:45:46 -0400, John covici wrote:
> > run the emerge with the -t option to see what is pulling in
> > udev-
>
> I get the same thing if I emerge udev145, so its not unique to 999.
That's because both are masked, it doesn't have any bearing on the reason
for udev-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roy Wright wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> While attempting to try the latest version of ruby-gnome2 (0.19.1), I
> copied the 0.19.0 ebuilds to my local overlay then renamed them to the
> new version. I then downloaded the ruby-gnome2-all-0.19.1.tar.gz,
> place
on Sunday 08/02/2009 Neil Bothwick(n...@digimed.co.uk) wrote
> On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:45:46 -0400, John covici wrote:
>
> > > run the emerge with the -t option to see what is pulling in
> > > udev-
> >
> > I get the same thing if I emerge udev145, so its not unique to 999.
>
> Tha
I've had trouble building dev-util/duma and discovered this morning that
-j2 was the culprit. duma's build compiles and runs createconf.c in
order to create duma_config.h which is needed by dumapp.cpp. With -j2,
the cpp compilation is starting before createconf finishes running and
this causes th
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 02 August 2009 01:31:14 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>> > On Saturday 01 August 2009 23:19:52 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>> >> I've been trying to get a few recalcitrant packages to build
This must be a known issue, but I don't see recent messages that
appear to be about this problem with firefox.
Over the last few updates I'm unable to run firefox at all.
If called from cmdline I see:
firefox
Couldn't load XPCOM.
I read somewhere it might have something to do with Xulrunner. B
Harry Putnam writes:
> This must be a known issue, but I don't see recent messages that
> appear to be about this problem with firefox.
>
> Over the last few updates I'm unable to run firefox at all.
>
> If called from cmdline I see:
> firefox
> Couldn't load XPCOM.
>
> I read somewhere it might
On 8/2/09, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> checking for GL/glu.h... yes
> checking for glVertex3d in -lGLcore... no
Starting from here, libGLcore.so on my current desktop system belongs
to nvidia-drivers:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 2.8. 17:13 /usr/lib64/libGLcore.so ->
opengl/nvidia/lib/libGLcore.so
On Sunday 02 August 2009 13:31:41 John covici wrote:
> on Sunday 08/02/2009 Neil Bothwick(n...@digimed.co.uk) wrote
>
> > On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:45:46 -0400, John covici wrote:
> > > > run the emerge with the -t option to see what is pulling in
> > > > udev-
> > >
> > > I get the same thi
I noticed that my 'emerge world' wants to replace python 2.6.2 with
python 3.1 (I run ~x86). Is it safe to do so or will portage (and
everything else) freak out? If it is, in fact, safe are there any
extra (special) steps needed to ensure continued operation of things?
Thanks.
--
Douglas J Hunley
On 08/02/2009 04:20 PM, David Relson wrote:
I've had trouble building dev-util/duma and discovered this morning that
-j2 was the culprit. duma's build compiles and runs createconf.c in
order to create duma_config.h which is needed by dumapp.cpp. With -j2,
the cpp compilation is starting before
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 07:31:41 -0400, John covici wrote:
> (dependency required by "sys-apps/devicekit-power-010" [ebuild])
> (dependency required by
> "gnome-extra/gnome-power-manager-2.26.3" [ebuild])
Neither of these are in portage. Which overlay are you using for them?
--
Neil Bothwick
PC DO
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:20:37 -0400, David Relson wrote:
> I've had trouble building dev-util/duma and discovered this morning that
> -j2 was the culprit. duma's build compiles and runs createconf.c in
> order to create duma_config.h which is needed by dumapp.cpp. With -j2,
> the cpp compilation i
On 08/02/2009 06:17 PM, Doug Hunley wrote:
I noticed that my 'emerge world' wants to replace python 2.6.2 with
python 3.1 (I run ~x86).
Nope, it does not :) It only wants to install it alongside 2.6.x, not
replace it.
Is it safe to do so or will portage (and
everything else) freak out? If
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:17:22 -0400, Doug Hunley wrote:
> I noticed that my 'emerge world' wants to replace python 2.6.2 with
> python 3.1 (I run ~x86). Is it safe to do so or will portage (and
> everything else) freak out? If it is, in fact, safe are there any
> extra (special) steps needed to ensu
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 11:17 -0400, Doug Hunley wrote:
> I noticed that my 'emerge world' wants to replace python 2.6.2 with
> python 3.1 (I run ~x86).
It doesn't "replace" 2.6.2. It's slotted.
> Is it safe to do so or will portage (and
> everything else) freak out?
I would think (hope) that t
Albert Hopkins writes:
> On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 11:17 -0400, Doug Hunley wrote:
> I would think (hope) that the python maintainers were smart enough to
> know whether installing Python 3 would break portage. Then again, this
> is Gentoo ;-)
Just installing it doesn't break portage. But using it
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Dan Farrell wrote:
hmm... network booting? network mounting? install packages once on
one system, share them with everyone. Share passwd/shadow files and
the like manually, or symlink them to skeletal versions symlinked to
somewhere that can be obscured and replaced by a
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 17:23:40 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:20:37 -0400, David Relson wrote:
>
> > I've had trouble building dev-util/duma and discovered this morning
> > that -j2 was the culprit. duma's build compiles and runs
> > createconf.c in order to create duma_config.h
On 08/02/2009 08:37 PM, David Relson wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 17:23:40 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:20:37 -0400, David Relson wrote:
I've had trouble building dev-util/duma and discovered this morning
that -j2 was the culprit. duma's build compiles and runs
createconf.c
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 08/02/2009 08:37 PM, David Relson wrote:
>> On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 17:23:40 +0100
>> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:20:37 -0400, David Relson wrote:
>>>
I've had trouble building dev-util/duma and discovered this morning
that -j2 was the culpri
on Sunday 08/02/2009 Neil Bothwick(n...@digimed.co.uk) wrote
> On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 07:31:41 -0400, John covici wrote:
>
> > (dependency required by "sys-apps/devicekit-power-010" [ebuild])
> > (dependency required by
> > "gnome-extra/gnome-power-manager-2.26.3" [ebuild])
>
> Neither of thes
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 21:10:49 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> echo 'MAKEOPTS="-j1"'>/etc/portage/env/dev-util/duma
> >
> > Exactly what I was looking for!
>
> Note that by doing so you will be using -j1 for every future version of
> duma. That means, if the problem gets fixed, you'll st
Hello,
So following this doc:
2009-04-18-java-config-wrapper-0.16
I ran: java-check-environment
then: rm /etc/env.d/20java ; env-update && source /etc/profile
and finally: emerge -av --depclean dev-java/java-config:0
Calculating dependencies... done!
virtual/jdk-1.4.2 pulled in by:
dev
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:53:48 -0400, John covici wrote:
> I am using the gnome overlay from layman.
It might have been helpful to menyion that :(
> If I comment out the source line for layman in /etc/make.conf I get
> the following:
>
>
>
> [nomerge ] gnome-base/gnome-2.26.3 [2.26.2]
> [
On 08/02/2009 12:42 PM, James wrote:
Calculating dependencies... done!
virtual/jdk-1.4.2 pulled in by:
dev-db/hsqldb-1.8.0.10
dev-java/jdbc-mysql-5.0.8
dev-java/jdbc-postgresql-8.3_p603-r1
dev-util/eclipse-sdk-3.2.1-r3
So it looks like I need this virtual/jdk-1.4.2 ???
walt gmail.com> writes:
> IMO unless you're doing some really unusual/obscure java thing,
> you don't want or need the blacktown-jdk. I'm guessing that if
> you delete that and run revdep-rebuild you'll probably see those
> other packages get rebuilt against the sun-jdk-1.6 and that will
> get
James wrote:
> walt gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
>> IMO unless you're doing some really unusual/obscure java thing,
>> you don't want or need the blacktown-jdk. I'm guessing that if
>> you delete that and run revdep-rebuild you'll probably see those
>> other packages get rebuilt against the sun-jd
=== On Sun, 08/02, Christer Ekholm wrote: ===
> Just installing it doesn't break portage. But using it does! :)
===
That's probably why it's there now. ;-)
Thanks for the clarification everyone. I was wondering the same thing.
-- Keith Dart
--
--
Keith Dart
On 08/02/2009 01:42 PM, James wrote:
But look here:
eix virtual/jdk
[I] virtual/jdk
Available versions:
(1.4) 1.4.1 1.4.2
(1.5) 1.5.0
(1.6) 1.6.0
Installed versions: 1.4.2(1.4)(14:13:11 07/07/09) 1.6.0(1.6)(14:10:01
Ah, that was the jog my memory
on Sunday 08/02/2009 Neil Bothwick(n...@digimed.co.uk) wrote
> On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:53:48 -0400, John covici wrote:
>
> > I am using the gnome overlay from layman.
>
> It might have been helpful to menyion that :(
>
> > If I comment out the source line for layman in /etc/make.conf I ge
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 17:07, Keith Dart wrote:
>> Just installing it doesn't break portage. But using it does! :)
>
Exactly. When I ran this (and then went for breakfast and coffee):
/usr/bin/eix-sync
/usr/bin/emerge --update --newuse --deep --keep-going --with-bdeps
y/usr/bin/emerge --update --n
Dale gmail.com> writes:
> Usually if something runs as root but not a user, it's a permissions
> issue. You running something special on your system? Hardened or
> something more "secure"?
Nope,
It's been a normal (stable) gentoo workstation
with OO for a couple of years. KDE4 and X
starte
Doug Hunley wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 17:07, Keith Dart wrote:
>
>>> Just installing it doesn't break portage. But using it does! :)
>>>
>
> Exactly. When I ran this (and then went for breakfast and coffee):
> /usr/bin/eix-sync
> /usr/bin/emerge --update --newuse --deep --keep-going
walt gmail.com> writes:
> Ah, that was the jog my memory needed. For reasons I don't know,
> there was some old cruft remaining in either /etc/env.d or /etc/conf.d
> or /etc/java-config-2, or maybe all three, that confused java-config.
OK
> I had to hand-edit files in one/all of those places
> Just installing it doesn't break portage. But using it does! :)
>
> 19:14:44 poke:~ $ eselect python list
> Available python interpreters:
> [1] python2.6
> [2] python3.1
> 19:17:24 poke:~ $ sudo eselect python set 2
> 19:17:31 poke:~ $ emerge --info
> File "/usr/bin/emerg
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:01:20 -0500
Dale wrote:
> Most likely the --depclean removed it. As someone else found out the
> hard way, not all Gentoo package managers need python. Therefore python
> can be unmerged which causes a mess. This is a good reason to NEVER
> trust --depclean without givin
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 23:45:16 + (UTC)
James wrote:
> Dale gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > Usually if something runs as root but not a user, it's a permissions
> > issue. You running something special on your system? Hardened or
> > something more "secure"?
>
>
> Nope,
>
> It's been a normal
Adam Carter writes:
>> Just installing it doesn't break portage. But using it does! :)
>>
>> 19:14:44 poke:~ $ eselect python list
>> Available python interpreters:
>> [1] python2.6
>> [2] python3.1
>> 19:17:24 poke:~ $ sudo eselect python set 2
>> 19:17:31 poke:~ $ emerge --i
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:15:19 +1000
Adam Carter wrote:
> > Just installing it doesn't break portage. But using it does! :)
> >
> > 19:14:44 poke:~ $ eselect python list
> > Available python interpreters:
> > [1] python2.6
> > [2] python3.1
> > 19:17:24 poke:~ $ sudo eselect python
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 18:18:59 -0400, John covici wrote:
> > Incidentally, unless you are a developer, you don't normally need
> > the doc use flag.
>
> OK, thanks for the advise -- I wish there were a devel-doc flag to
> distinguish between use and development docs, but I guess you can't
> have
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 19:35:52 -0400, Doug Hunley wrote:
> Please enlighten me where I went
> wrong as I'd rather not have such surprises in the morn. :)
Updating world without first checking to see what will happen is asking
for trouble, running emerge --depclean without checking is sending it a
h
Mike Kazantsev gmail.com> writes:
> emerge -1 dev-util/strace && strace -f ooffice 2>strace.log
> grep -2 -e EACCES -e EPERM strace.log
> tail -500 strace.log | less (to see what happened last)
OK, Here are the bottom lines:
[pid 28034]
stat("/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../share/u
James wrote:
> Dale gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
>> Usually if something runs as root but not a user, it's a permissions
>> issue. You running something special on your system? Hardened or
>> something more "secure"?
>>
>
>
> Nope,
>
> It's been a normal (stable) gentoo workstation
> with OO
On 08/02/2009 01:42 PM, James wrote:
walt gmail.com> writes:
java-check-environment
Java environment is sane. Congratulations!
eselect java-vm list
Available Java Virtual Machines:
[1] sun-jdk-1.6 system-vm
But look here:
eix virtual/jdk
[I] virtual/jdk
Available versions:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Arttu V. wrote:
> On 8/2/09, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>> checking for GL/glu.h... yes
>> checking for glVertex3d in -lGLcore... no
>
> Starting from here, libGLcore.so on my current desktop system belongs
> to nvidia-drivers:
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 2.8. 17:
On Aug 2, 2009, at 5:49 AM, ABCD wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roy Wright wrote:
Howdy,
While attempting to try the latest version of ruby-gnome2 (0.19.1), I
copied the 0.19.0 ebuilds to my local overlay then renamed them to
the
new version. I then downloaded the
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Arttu V. wrote:
>> On 8/2/09, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>>> checking for GL/glu.h... yes
>>> checking for glVertex3d in -lGLcore... no
>>
>> Starting from here, libGLcore.so on my current desktop system belongs
>>
=== On Mon, 08/03, Christer Ekholm wrote: ===
> I think that the comma on line 41 in /usr/bin/emerge is simply not
> valid in python-3
===
Right.
http://docs.python.org/3.1/whatsnew/3.0.html
-- Keith Dart
--
--
Keith Dart
===
54 matches
Mail list logo
