On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 01:25:26PM -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > VO: [gl] 320x240 => 320x240 Planar YV12
> > *** glibc detected *** mplayer: malloc(): memory corruption:
> > 0x01957a60 ***
>
> try with "-vo xv" to see if perha
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> VO: [gl] 320x240 => 320x240 Planar YV12
> *** glibc detected *** mplayer: malloc(): memory corruption:
> 0x01957a60 ***
try with "-vo xv" to see if perhaps it is gl-related... Sometimes I
have videos crash mplayer using vdpau b
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:05:23 +0200
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:51:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:41:20 +0200
> > Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> >
> > > Hi List
> > >
> > > Every once in a while, my mplayer can't play a video from the
> > > i
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:51:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:41:20 +0200
> Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
>
> > Hi List
> >
> > Every once in a while, my mplayer can't play a video from the
> > intertubes. It just crashes on load, it really drives me mad
> > sometimes. I
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:41:20 +0200
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Hi List
>
> Every once in a while, my mplayer can't play a video from the
> intertubes. It just crashes on load, it really drives me mad
> sometimes. I then need to x-kill the window, and if I started from
> the console, I can't ev
On 09/12/2012 12:41:20 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Hi List
Every once in a while, my mplayer can't play a video from the
intertubes. It
just crashes on load, it really drives me mad sometimes. I then need
to
x-kill the window, and if I started from the console, I can't even
get back
i
On Thursday 22 Sep 2011 08:53:46 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 21.09.2011 23:58, schrieb Mick:
> > On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 09:19:39 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> >>> Does mplayer2 work with smplayer or kmplayer?
> >>
> >> I use mplayer2 with smplayer for a few month now and everything works
> >> just f
Am 21.09.2011 23:58, schrieb Mick:
> On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 09:19:39 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
>>> Does mplayer2 work with smplayer or kmplayer?
>>
>> I use mplayer2 with smplayer for a few month now and everything works
>> just fine for me.
>
> Any idea when ffmpeg-mt might make it to the main po
On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 09:19:39 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> > Does mplayer2 work with smplayer or kmplayer?
>
> I use mplayer2 with smplayer for a few month now and everything works
> just fine for me.
Any idea when ffmpeg-mt might make it to the main portage tree?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.
> Does mplayer2 work with smplayer or kmplayer?
I use mplayer2 with smplayer for a few month now and everything works
just fine for me.
Greetings
Sebastian Beßler
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Florian Philipp wrote:
Another advantage: It abolished the horrible internationalization
mechanism of mplayer1 and uses gettext now. This means I can finally
post English output on mailing lists and bug trackers by executing it
like 'LC_ALL=C mplayer2 foo' instead of recompiling it. It also
do
Am 21.09.2011 07:19, schrieb Stroller:
>
> On 21 September 2011, at 02:37, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
>> On 09/21/2011 12:07 AM, Stroller wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20 September 2011, at 16:11, James wrote:
...
I have not kept up with the mplayer developments.
Now I see: media-video/
On 21 September 2011, at 02:37, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 09/21/2011 12:07 AM, Stroller wrote:
>>
>> On 20 September 2011, at 16:11, James wrote:
>>> ...
>>> I have not kept up with the mplayer developments.
>>>
>>> Now I see: media-video/mplayer2
>>> and media-video/mplayer
>>> Avail
On 20 September 2011, at 16:11, James wrote:
> ...
> I have not kept up with the mplayer developments.
>
> Now I see: media-video/mplayer2
> and media-video/mplayer
> Available versions: 1.0_rc4_p20101114
>
>
> Any quick education on mplayer 2 would be appreciated.
I believe this would
On Tue 20 Sep 2011 08:41:13 PM IST, James wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I have not kept up with the mplayer developments.
>
> Now I see: media-video/mplayer2
> and media-video/mplayer
> Available versions: 1.0_rc4_p20101114
>
>
> Any quick education on mplayer 2 would be appreciated.
>
>
> James
>
>
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 22:43, Indi wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 04:40:01AM +0200, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:21, Paul Hartman
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Andrey Moshbear
>> > wrote:
>> >> Is there a patch for mplayer (1.0-rc4) that adds id3v2 s
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 04:40:01AM +0200, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:21, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Andrey Moshbear
> > wrote:
> >> Is there a patch for mplayer (1.0-rc4) that adds id3v2 support?
> >> Googling the mailinglist archives, it
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:21, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
>> Is there a patch for mplayer (1.0-rc4) that adds id3v2 support?
>> Googling the mailinglist archives, it was said that the previous
>> implementation had vulns and was hence scrapped, b
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
> Is there a patch for mplayer (1.0-rc4) that adds id3v2 support?
> Googling the mailinglist archives, it was said that the previous
> implementation had vulns and was hence scrapped, but it sucks not
> having it.
libavformat, which mplayer
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:10:02PM +0200, Mick wrote:
>
> Are you running KMS in the kernel and have you emerged x11-drivers/radeon-
> ucode (not sure if your card needs it) as per:
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
>
No. I have a pretty straight kernel, and my video card specifie
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 14:34:05 Indi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:30:02AM +0200, Mick wrote:
> > On Monday 25 April 2011 23:38:04 Indi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:50:01PM +0200, Indi wrote:
> > > > ...using the directfb for vo gives
> > > > sterling results, with the worst file
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:30:02AM +0200, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 25 April 2011 23:38:04 Indi wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:50:01PM +0200, Indi wrote:
> > > ...using the directfb for vo gives
> > > sterling results, with the worst files playing happily in sync just like
> > > I always dream
On Monday 25 April 2011 23:38:04 Indi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:50:01PM +0200, Indi wrote:
> > ...using the directfb for vo gives
> > sterling results, with the worst files playing happily in sync just like
> > I always dreamed -- but only as root!
> >
> > Obviously there's a permissions
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:50:01PM +0200, Indi wrote:
>
> ...using the directfb for vo gives
> sterling results, with the worst files playing happily in sync just like
> I always dreamed -- but only as root!
>
> Obviously there's a permissions issue somewhere...
Oh jeepers, I've made a silly
On Wednesday 03/30/11 17:14:00 CST, John Campbell wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 01:35 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>
> > I am not seeing mplayer2 in the tree -- unless it came in the last day
> > or so -- and which config takes the threads=5 parameter?
>
> It's in the multimedia overlay.
>
> The "t
John Campbell wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 01:35 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>
> > I am not seeing mplayer2 in the tree -- unless it came in the last day
> > or so -- and which config takes the threads=5 parameter?
>
> It's in the multimedia overlay.
>
> The "threads=#" (where # less than total
John Campbell wrote:
On 03/30/2011 01:35 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I am not seeing mplayer2 in the tree -- unless it came in the last day
or so -- and which config takes the threads=5 parameter?
It's in the multimedia overlay.
The "threads=#" (where # less than total threads available
On 03/30/2011 01:35 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I am not seeing mplayer2 in the tree -- unless it came in the last day
or so -- and which config takes the threads=5 parameter?
It's in the multimedia overlay.
The "threads=#" (where # less than total threads available on processor)
parame
John Campbell wrote:
> On 03/29/2011 08:01 AM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
>
> > While I've been quite pleased with mplayer as tweaked by Nikos
> > Chantziaras to allow Multi threading on my core-I7 (Nvidia) (and I
> > realize that MT will now be in the upstream distribution), I'm wondering
> > if mpla
On 03/29/2011 08:01 AM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
While I've been quite pleased with mplayer as tweaked by Nikos
Chantziaras to allow Multi threading on my core-I7 (Nvidia) (and I
realize that MT will now be in the upstream distribution), I'm wondering
if mplayer2 is now stable and better enough to me
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:32:42 +0100
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Freitag 19 März 2010 schrieb Arnau Bria:
> > On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:34:09 +0100
> >
> > Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > > Has this worked before? As fas a I know, AVI does not officially
> > > support srt subs.
> >
> > It worked for
Am Freitag 19 März 2010 schrieb Arnau Bria:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:34:09 +0100
>
> Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > Has this worked before? As fas a I know, AVI does not officially
> > support srt subs.
>
> It worked for me:
>
> mencoder ITC0101.avi -oac pcm -ovc xvid -xvidencopts bitrate=886 -su
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:34:09 +0100
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Has this worked before? As fas a I know, AVI does not officially
> support srt subs.
It worked for me:
mencoder ITC0101.avi -oac pcm -ovc xvid -xvidencopts bitrate=886 -sub
ITC0101.srt -subfont-text-scale 3 -o video_final.avi
my pr
Am Donnerstag 18 März 2010 schrieb Arnau Bria:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to add some sub to a video with menconder (following a
> receipt).
>
> I run something like:
>
> mencoder mi_video.avi -oac pcm -ovc lavc -lavcopts
> vcodec=xvid:mbd=2:trell:autoaspect -sub mis_subs.srt -subfont-text-scale 3
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:54:12 +0100
Norman Rieß wrote:
> Um...it is not the exact command you should use in your case with the
> subs, it is an example on how to bypass the lavc problem.
> Producing a working command, that suits _your_ needs is still your
> job ;-).
Oh! thanks, going to see into
Am 03/18/10 13:14, schrieb Arnau Bria:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:38:01 +0100
Norman Rieß wrote:
Hello,
Hi Norman,
i allways had problems with lavc so i used xvid in mplayer directly:
mencoder sourcefile -ovc xvid -xvidencopts bitrate=vbitrate -oac
mp3lame -lameopts abr:br=abitrat
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:38:01 +0100
Norman Rieß wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Norman,
> i allways had problems with lavc so i used xvid in mplayer directly:
> mencoder sourcefile -ovc xvid -xvidencopts bitrate=vbitrate -oac
> mp3lame -lameopts abr:br=abitrate -o result_path
I don't get it source file
Am 03/18/10 12:20, schrieb Arnau Bria:
Hi all,
I'm trying to add some sub to a video with menconder (following a
receipt).
I run something like:
mencoder mi_video.avi -oac pcm -ovc lavc -lavcopts
vcodec=xvid:mbd=2:trell:autoaspect -sub mis_subs.srt -subfont-text-scale 3 -o
video_final.avi
b
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Xi Shen wrote:
> hi,
>
> my system is gentoo amd64. my /etc/env.d/01locale is empty. after i
> compiled mplayer, the output info is chinese, and i cannot read it
> console, even though i can read it in the xterm. how to make the
> output to english?
>
> in my /etc/
Got it. I clicked on the tri-color balls on the lower rt and it just
gave me a list of sites where downloads may be found. The balls also
appear above and to the left of the video window where the movie is
supposed to appear. When I clicked on it I got the save-as window. But
then I had to stop the
Maxim Wexler wrote:
If you have Firefox installed, you can use 'download helper' to grab
those videos really easy. It works on youtube and other sites really well.
I'm using it but can only download from a link to youtube in another
web page or google, for example. Shouldn't there be a bu
> If you have Firefox installed, you can use 'download helper' to grab
> those videos really easy. It works on youtube and other sites really well.
I'm using it but can only download from a link to youtube in another
web page or google, for example. Shouldn't there be a button on
Youtube itself,
2009/11/23 Helmut Jarausch :
> On 23 Nov, Mick wrote:
>> 2009/11/22 Daniel Pielmeier :
>>> I am not able to play the Apple Trailers by clicking at the link to the
>>> movie (maybe a problem with the java script popup). When I open the link
>>> in a new window I can watch/download with gecko-mediap
On 23 Nov, Mick wrote:
> 2009/11/22 Daniel Pielmeier :
>> Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 20:02:
>>> On Sunday 22 November 2009 17:27:26 Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 14:48:
> http://www.amd.com/us-
> en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/T64X2_animation.wmv
Wo
2009/11/22 Daniel Pielmeier :
> Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 20:02:
>> On Sunday 22 November 2009 17:27:26 Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
>>> Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 14:48:
http://www.amd.com/us-
en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/T64X2_animation.wmv
>>> Works fine with gecko-mediaplayer
Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 20:02:
> On Sunday 22 November 2009 17:27:26 Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
>> Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 14:48:
>>> http://www.amd.com/us-
>>> en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/T64X2_animation.wmv
>> Works fine with gecko-mediaplayer and download-helper.
>
> Yes, thank
Mick wrote:
On Sunday 22 November 2009 14:06:57 Dale wrote:
I went to that link and downloaded the video with no problem at all.
Once it started to playing, I hit the download button and saved it to my
desktop. It plays fine with splayer which uses mplayer as the back
end. It even converted
On Sunday 22 November 2009 17:27:26 Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 14:48:
> > http://www.amd.com/us-
> > en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/T64X2_animation.wmv
>
> Works fine with gecko-mediaplayer and download-helper.
Yes, thank you. I've installed it now and it loo
Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 14:48:
> http://www.amd.com/us-
> en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/T64X2_animation.wmv
>
Works fine with gecko-mediaplayer and download-helper.
--
Daniel Pielmeier
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sunday 22 November 2009 14:06:57 Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > On Sunday 22 November 2009 12:47:57 Dale wrote:
> >> Mick wrote:
> >>> On Sunday 22 November 2009 10:43:01 Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I was using mplayerplug-in until it was substituted in the tree
Mick wrote:
On Sunday 22 November 2009 12:47:57 Dale wrote:
Mick wrote:
On Sunday 22 November 2009 10:43:01 Dale wrote:
Mick wrote:
Hi All,
I was using mplayerplug-in until it was substituted in the tree for
gnome- mplayer. I was happier with mplayerplug-in because I
On Sunday 22 November 2009 12:47:57 Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > On Sunday 22 November 2009 10:43:01 Dale wrote:
> >> Mick wrote:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> I was using mplayerplug-in until it was substituted in the tree for
> >>> gnome- mplayer. I was happier with mplayerplug-in because I could a
Mick wrote:
On Sunday 22 November 2009 10:43:01 Dale wrote:
Mick wrote:
Hi All,
I was using mplayerplug-in until it was substituted in the tree for
gnome- mplayer. I was happier with mplayerplug-in because I could also
access the stream/file in /tmp/ and save it, resize it, replay it,
On Sunday 22 November 2009 10:43:01 Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I was using mplayerplug-in until it was substituted in the tree for
> > gnome- mplayer. I was happier with mplayerplug-in because I could also
> > access the stream/file in /tmp/ and save it, resize it, replay it, et
Mick wrote:
Hi All,
I was using mplayerplug-in until it was substituted in the tree for gnome-
mplayer. I was happier with mplayerplug-in because I could also access the
stream/file in /tmp/ and save it, resize it, replay it, etc.
With gnome-mplayer all I get is a socket in /tmp which I can'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i had trouble with console mplayer after the last update as mplayer was
built against another version of /usr/lib/libx264.so revdep-rebuild
fixed that.
k.
Harry Putnam wrote:
> I didn't notice that mplayer wasn't working in firefox right away but
> I
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 01:49:15 Harry Putnam wrote:
> I've installed mplayer and am able to play back online vidoes like
> quicktime. However, I get no sound.
>
> Playing the same file retrieved from browser cache, directly with
> mplayer, works with sound.
>
> What do I need to do with
2009/1/14 Michael P. Soulier
> On 13/01/09 Paul Hartman said:
>
> > After getting fed up with emerge/compile issues with mplayerplug-in i
> > switched to net-www/gecko-mediaplayer and it seems to work okay.
>
> Hmm. I would but
>
> msoul...@anton:~$ emerge --pretend net-www/gecko-mediaplayer
>
>
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 21:02:20 Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On 13/01/09 Paul Hartman said:
> > After getting fed up with emerge/compile issues with mplayerplug-in i
> > switched to net-www/gecko-mediaplayer and it seems to work okay.
>
> Hmm. I would but
>
> msoul...@anton:~$ emerge --pretend
On 13/01/09 Paul Hartman said:
> After getting fed up with emerge/compile issues with mplayerplug-in i
> switched to net-www/gecko-mediaplayer and it seems to work okay.
Hmm. I would but
msoul...@anton:~$ emerge --pretend net-www/gecko-mediaplayer
These are the packages that would be merged, in
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
So, I interpret this as the mplayer plugin not being available for firefox
3.0, which is why it's pulling in the 2.0 stream. So, my best solution is
probably just to uninstall the mplayer plugin, is that right?
It seems to work fine in firefox 3.0. If I want to run the
At Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:37:21 + Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:57:40 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
>> > It's because you're trying to emerge it with the firefox USE flag.
>> > Remove that from make.conf and use xulrunner instead.
>>
>> I have both USE flags and have *noticed
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:57:40AM -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> I have both USE flags and have *noticed* any problems. However, I
> prefer to avoid rather than fix problems. Can you point me at
> documentation for when one should have firefox and/or xulrunner USE
> flags?
>
C.f. this thread
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:57:40 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> > It's because you're trying to emerge it with the firefox USE flag.
> > Remove that from make.conf and use xulrunner instead.
>
> I have both USE flags and have *noticed* any problems. However, I
> prefer to avoid rather than fix pro
At Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:00:41 + Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:19:04 -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>
>> So, I interpret this as the mplayer plugin not being available for
>> firefox 3.0, which is why it's pulling in the 2.0 stream. So, my best
>> solution is probably just to
Michael P. Soulier schrieb:
> So, I noticed this on an emerge
>
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>
> www-client/mozilla-firefox:0
>
> ('ebuild', '/', 'www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.19',
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:19:04 -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> So, I interpret this as the mplayer plugin not being available for
> firefox 3.0, which is why it's pulling in the 2.0 stream. So, my best
> solution is probably just to uninstall the mplayer plugin, is that
> right?
It's because you
2009/1/14 Michael P. Soulier
> So, I noticed this on an emerge
>
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
> pulled
> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>
> www-client/mozilla-firefox:0
>
> ('ebuild', '/', 'www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Michael P. Soulier
wrote:
> So, I noticed this on an emerge
>
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>
> www-client/mozilla-firefox:0
>
> ('ebuild', '/', 'www-cl
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 00:07:40 Stroller wrote:
> On 22 Dec 2008, at 17:51, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> ...
> >> I would prefer it if Portage handled this without USE flag masking
> >> being necessary. If the required package is masked, or needs some
> >> other keyword, then IMO `emerge -p mplay
On 12/22/08, Willie Wong wrote:
> HAHA! Arttu, you also have a typo! ;)
>
> The file should be in
>
> /etc/portage/profile/package.use.mask
>
> Note that 'profile' is singular, not plural.
Sorry, must've been the fever and cold I've been having for the last
couple of days. But true, fever or no f
On 22 Dec 2008, at 17:51, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
I would prefer it if Portage handled this without USE flag masking
being necessary. If the required package is masked, or needs some
other keyword, then IMO `emerge -p mplayer` should simply give an
"unable to fulfil this USE - packages may be m
On Monday 22 December 2008 15:43:24 Stroller wrote:
> On 22 Dec 2008, at 11:33, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> > ...
> > The problem was that the dvdnav USE-flag was masked and you unmasked
> > the mplayer and dvdnav packages in the first place. This did not
> > affect the mplayer package that was built
On 22 Dec 2008, at 11:33, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
...
The problem was that the dvdnav USE-flag was masked and you unmasked
the mplayer and dvdnav packages in the first place. This did not
affect the mplayer package that was built without dvdnav support as
the flag was still deactivated. Here [1]
2008/12/22 Stroller :
>
> On 22 Dec 2008, at 05:36, Willie Wong wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 04:52:54AM +, Penguin Lover Stroller squawked:
>>>
>>> On 20 Dec 2008, at 04:34, Arttu V. wrote:
>>>
On 12/20/08, Willie Wong wrote:
>
> I think you can try use unmasking the flag:
On 22 Dec 2008, at 05:36, Willie Wong wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 04:52:54AM +, Penguin Lover Stroller
squawked:
On 20 Dec 2008, at 04:34, Arttu V. wrote:
On 12/20/08, Willie Wong wrote:
I think you can try use unmasking the flag:
add a line to /etc/portage/package.use.mask
It's
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 04:52:54AM +, Penguin Lover Stroller squawked:
>
> On 20 Dec 2008, at 04:34, Arttu V. wrote:
>
>> On 12/20/08, Willie Wong wrote:
>>> I think you can try use unmasking the flag:
>>> add a line to /etc/portage/package.use.mask
>>
>> It's profiles related stuff, so I thin
On 20 Dec 2008, at 04:34, Arttu V. wrote:
On 12/20/08, Willie Wong wrote:
I think you can try use unmasking the flag:
add a line to /etc/portage/package.use.mask
It's profiles related stuff, so I think
/etc/portage/profiles/package.use.mask will be the right place. At
least if one trusts po
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 03:43:05PM +, Penguin Lover Stroller squawked:
>> libdvdnav-4.1.3 is keyworded ~x86, while mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 is
>> keyworded x86. The USE cannot be satisfied.
>
> I'm really sorry, I don't understand.
The dvdnav mask was added when the libdvdnav was hardmasked.
On 20 Dec 2008, at 03:46, Willie Wong wrote:
...
Yet the ebuild seems to say:
dvdnav? ( >=media-libs/libdvdnav-4.1.3
>=media-libs/libdvdread-4.1.3 )
...
I think I have emerged the appropriate versions of libdvdnav &
libdvdread:
$ eix -I -c libdvd
[I] media-libs/libdv
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 06:34:56AM +0200, Penguin Lover Arttu V. squawked:
> On 12/20/08, Willie Wong wrote:
> > I think you can try use unmasking the flag:
> > add a line to /etc/portage/package.use.mask
>
> It's profiles related stuff, so I think
> /etc/portage/profiles/package.use.mask will be
On 12/20/08, Willie Wong wrote:
> I think you can try use unmasking the flag:
> add a line to /etc/portage/package.use.mask
It's profiles related stuff, so I think
/etc/portage/profiles/package.use.mask will be the right place. At
least if one trusts portage's man page.
--
Arttu V.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 02:16:09AM +, Penguin Lover Stroller squawked:
> Anyone see what I'm doing wrong here, please?
Yes. See below.
> I can't seem to get mplayer to accept the dvdnav USE flag, which is always
> (-bracketed) out when I pretend to emerge it:
>
> Yet the ebuild seems to s
dhk wrote:
I recently started using tovid again and it seems to be having a lot of
problems with the programs it uses. The last time I used it was in
November and all worked well.
First there was a problem with libGL.so.1, it didn't seem to be on my
system. ldd `which mplayer` said it wasn'
I found in
media-video/mplayer/mplayer-1.0_rc1_p20070824.ebuild
the following:
RDEPEND= ...
...
encode? (
aac? ( media-libs/faac )
mp2? ( media-sound/twolame )
mp3? ( media-sound/lame )
)
...
My USE flag looks like:
+ encode
+ mp3
- mp2
My configure shows the following:
Checking for libmp3lam
> > MPlayer was compiled without libmp3lame support.
> > -lameopts is not an MEncoder option
>
> Try to recompile it with "lame" use flag.
My mplayer-1.0_rc1_p20070824 doesn't have "lame" (or
similar) flag.
I use "equery uses mplayer" to retrieve the USE flag
settings.
thank You for help
_
Hi!
> MPlayer was compiled without libmp3lame support.
> -lameopts is not an MEncoder option
Try to recompile it with "lame" use flag.
--
Szénási István
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:45:18PM +0200, Arnau Bria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is not a 100% Gentoo related issue, so sorry if someone feels
> spammed.
> trying to watch a dvd iso I get this error:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ mplayer -dvd-device ocio/G.5\ DVD.iso dvd://1
> MPlayer dev-SVN-rUNKNOWN-
On July 15, 2007 04:00:21 am Daniel Iliev wrote:
> My guess is that there isn't enough memory in the system. I'm using an
> integrated nvidia card and I have 1GB RAM installed on my PC. So my
> video card uses (some of the) system memory. When I run beryl with too
> many applications open there com
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 02:33:18 -0400
Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought I'd try out the new i810 driver for my intel card (IBM X41
> Tablet) and while most of X seems to work just fine, even with
> compiz, mplayer is just plain busted (see mplayer output followed by
> xvinfo output below)
On 7/14/07, Tim Allingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What output driver are you using in mplayer? I've seen the same issue
occur with a couple of output drivers running on beryl machines, I
personally have it configured with the gl output driver and have never
had an issue (running on nvidia hard
What output driver are you using in mplayer? I've seen the same issue
occur with a couple of output drivers running on beryl machines, I
personally have it configured with the gl output driver and have never
had an issue (running on nvidia hardware with beryl enabled) while my
brothers machine had
On 7/14/07, Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought I'd try out the new i810 driver for my intel card (IBM X41 Tablet)
and while most of X seems to work just fine, even with compiz, mplayer is
just plain busted (see mplayer output followed by xvinfo output below) in
that it shows a black wind
--- Redouane Boumghar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Did you try "<" and ">" to move back and forward in
> the playlist ?
No, I didn't but I see it doesn't work in shuffle
mode.
-Maxim
Do you Y
Hi Maxim,
Did you try "<" and ">" to move back and forward in the playlist ?
maxim wexler wrote:
Hi group,
This should be easy but I can't seem to find the
answer.
Just started using mplayer from the command line. I
see it has lot's of possibilities. Right now just
using it to play tunes but
It works now.
The driver wasn't loaded successfully.
regards
Fred
Dale wrote:
> Fred Kastl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I cannot start mplayer because of :
>>
>> mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libGL.so.1: cannot open
>> shared object file: No such file or directory
>>
>> Any suggestions ?
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 01:46:35 -0500, Dale wrote:
Replying here because I didn't get the original.
> Fred Kastl wrote:
> > I cannot start mplayer because of :
> >
> > mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libGL.so.1: cannot open
> > shared object file: No such file or directory
mplayer i
Fred Kastl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cannot start mplayer because of :
>
> mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libGL.so.1: cannot open
> shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> Any suggestions ?
>
> regards
>
> Fred Kastl
>
> ### ldd:
> ..
> libGL.so.1 => not found
> ...
>
> ### ldcon
On 05 September 2006 14:15, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> Encrypted VOB file! Read DOCS/HTML/en/cd-dvd.html.
> Encrypted VOB file! Read DOCS/HTML/en/cd-dvd.html.
>
> and it continues like this until I kill it.
>
> Again, these aren't ripped from DVD's or anything like that - they're
> captured with kino
Daniel Iliev wrote:
Blaah! It is all my fault. "bindist" was on. And I can't even remember
why and when I have done this. Strange.
Can't think why you would either. It's meant for when you're building
GRP packages. You should probably turn it off if that isn't your intention.
In any case,
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
