on 2010-07-06 at 13:14 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>The football competition where england, france and italy all got their
>asses handed to them recently :-)
not to mention argentina and brazil... did you notice the tiny uy in my
e-mail address? :-) :-)
(it's a real pity i don't give a sh*t about foot
On 6 July 2010 12:14, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 July 2010 12:38:48 Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Sunday 04 July 2010 10:02:37 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> > I thought the World Cup finished last weekend :(
>>
>> What world cup?
>
> The football competition where england, france and italy all g
On Tuesday 06 July 2010 12:38:48 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 04 July 2010 10:02:37 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > I thought the World Cup finished last weekend :(
>
> What world cup?
The football competition where england, france and italy all got their asses
handed to them recently :-)
I hear
On Sunday 04 July 2010 10:02:37 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I thought the World Cup finished last weekend :(
What world cup?
--
Rgds
Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.
On 2010-07-03 6:55 AM, Mick wrote:
>> Before TB implemented Reply-To-List, I preferred lists that munged
>> the Reply-To, but no longer.
> Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I
> have posted to the list. This seems to happen because the person
> that kindly responded h
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 21:42:36 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> never had any problems like that with kmail.
> Problems with stupid fingers - yeah, a lot.
But it's easier to blame the software!
--
Neil Bothwick
Unsolicited advice is the junk mail of life
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 21:34:42 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > When I replied, I hit "A" without thinking and only saw it after I
> > > pressed Ctrl-Enter to send. So my bad, my screw-up.
That's the likely explanation. I occasionally get direct replies from
you, and they always appear in the lis
On Samstag 03 Juli 2010, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:09:37 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:37:36 Mick wrote:
> > > > Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I
> > > > have posted to the list. This seems to happen because the person
> > > >
On Saturday 03 July 2010 19:44:27 Mick wrote:
> > Two things happened here on my end:
> >
> >
> > My kmail filters didn't kick in (kmail does that to me sometimes) so the
> > mail I replied to was in my inbox, not the gentoo-user folder where it
> > should have been. The list folder is the one tha
On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:09:37 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:37:36 Mick wrote:
> > > Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I have
> > > posted to the list. This seems to happen because the person that
> > > kindly responded has for some reason cc'd
On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:37:36 Mick wrote:
> > Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I have
> > posted to the list. This seems to happen because the person that kindly
> > responded has for some reason cc'd me in the reply. If I try to reply to
> > it the post will no
On Saturday 03 July 2010 11:55:02 Mick wrote:
> On Friday 02 July 2010 15:00:10 Tanstaafl wrote:
> > On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> > > I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing
> > > the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing list
On Friday 02 July 2010 15:00:10 Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> > I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing
> > the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I
> > use don't do that.
> >
> > It is usually bett
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> If I post to the list, I expect a reply via the list. Getting two replies
>> is annoying, especially if I don't realise the private one is a duplicate
>> and reply to it before checking
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:54:33 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>
> > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it permit
> > to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole mailing
> > list.
>
> If I post to the
On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing
> the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I
> use don't do that.
>
> It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy
-10 this is plain w
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 02:54:33AM +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing
> the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I
> use don't do that.
>
> It is usually better and prefer the "answer to
On Friday 02 July 2010 10:14:38 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:54:33 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it permit
> > to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole mailing
> > list.
>
> If I post to the lis
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:54:33 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it permit
> to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole mailing
> list.
If I post to the list, I expect a reply via the list. Getting two replies
is annoyin
On Friday 02 July 2010 02:54:33 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing
> the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I
> use don't do that.
>
> It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" polic
> Nicolas Sebrecht :
>It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all"
If the replier-to-all thinks of removing unwanted recipients, yes.
But most of the time, people "reply-to-really-all" and that annoys.
Among that, when replying-to-all, messages "To:" the mailing list are
"List-id"/"X-Mail
21 matches
Mail list logo
