On Saturday 03 July 2010 11:55:02 Mick wrote: > On Friday 02 July 2010 15:00:10 Tanstaafl wrote: > > On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > > > I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing > > > the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists > > > I use don't do that. > > > > > > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy > > > > -10 this is plain wrong... > > > > Use a mail client that has 'Reply-To-List' function. > > > > Thunderbird's works very well no, so there is an excellent > > cross-platform mail client available that implements this > > functionality... > > > > > as it permit to be notified of an answer without having to track the > > > whole mailing list. > > > > > > What do you think about changing of policy? > > > > +1, but not for the same reasons... > > > > Before TB implemented Reply-To-List, I preferred lists that munged the > > Reply-To, but no longer. > > Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I have > posted to the list. This seems to happen because the person that kindly > responded has for some reason cc'd me in the reply. If I try to reply to > it the post will not go to the list, but the person that emailed me. > Pressing 'l' in kmail just brings up an empty to field. This seems to > happen only with some replies. Will keep an eye out for it to see if it > is consistent.
OK, just got this baby from Alan: ================================================== From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Flash stopped working after Firefox 3.6.3- >3.6.4 update. Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 13:37:53 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.34-ck-r1; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> References: <i0gk73$kj...@dough.gmane.org> <20100702095121.76fe5...@core2duo.fabnetwork> <201007031230.55562.michaelkintz...@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201007031230.55562.michaelkintz...@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201007031337.53868.alan.mckin...@gmail.com> Status: R X-Status: N X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: X-KMail-MDN-Sent: ================================================== and amidst the headers there's no usual mailing list IDs et al, as is usually the case: ================================================== List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+h...@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscr...@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org ================================================== So, when I enter "l" the response is set directly to Alan, instead of Gentoo Users M/L. Alan, any idea why this is so? Do you intentionally copy me in your responses to the list? -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
