Re: [gentoo-user] KDE version

2006-03-23 Thread Rafael Fernández López
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > On Tuesday 21 March 2006 16:40, "Hemmann, Volker Armin" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] KDE > version': >> On Tuesday 21 March 2006 22:12, Thierry de C

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE version

2006-03-23 Thread Petr Kocmid
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 08:31, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > On Wednesday 22 March 2006 02:42, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > > But the times, that gentoo was pretty actual in the stable tree are > > > over. > > You do realize the above sentence makes no freakin' sense, right? > nope. > If I

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE version

2006-03-22 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:31:14 +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > Gentoo was once VERY up to date, but than the 'stable mania' started > and since then, gentoo needs way to much time to get new versions into > the stable tree. That's because stable is for people who consider stable more importan

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE version

2006-03-21 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 02:42, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > > But the times, that gentoo was pretty actual in the stable tree are > > over. > > You do realize the above sentence makes no freakin' sense, right? > nope. If I had realized that, I would have not written it. Gentoo was once V

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE version

2006-03-21 Thread Uwe Thiem
On 21 March 2006 22:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi everybody. > To-day I installed kdebase using "emerge kdebase". > But the installed version was 3.4.3. > Is it right? Did not KDE reach 3.5 version? You did an "emerge --sync" in beforehand, didn't you? Uwe -- Why do consumers keep buying pr

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE version

2006-03-21 Thread Norman Rieß
Hemmann, Volker Armin schrieb: Is this so bad with gnome too? Yes. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE version

2006-03-21 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 16:40, "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] KDE version': > On Tuesday 21 March 2006 22:12, Thierry de Coulon wrote: > > On Tuesday 21 March 2006 21.13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > To-d

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE version

2006-03-21 Thread Philip Webb
060321 Thierry de Coulon wrote: > On Tuesday 21 March 2006 21.13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> To-day I installed kdebase using "emerge kdebase". >> But the installed version was 3.4.3. >> Is it right? Did not KDE reach 3.5 version? KDE 3.5.1 is in testing, ie stable upstream but ebuilds not fully

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE version

2006-03-21 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 22:12, Thierry de Coulon wrote: > On Tuesday 21 March 2006 21.13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi everybody. > > To-day I installed kdebase using "emerge kdebase". > > But the installed version was 3.4.3. > > Is it right? Did not KDE reach 3.5 version? > > > > emilio > > I

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE version

2006-03-21 Thread Thierry de Coulon
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 21.13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi everybody. > To-day I installed kdebase using "emerge kdebase". > But the installed version was 3.4.3. > Is it right? Did not KDE reach 3.5 version? > > emilio I did not sync recently but (on my amd64 machine) emerge --pretend =kde-3.5.

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE version

2006-03-21 Thread Petr Uzel
> Hi everybody. > To-day I installed kdebase using "emerge kdebase". > But the installed version was 3.4.3. > Is it right? Did not KDE reach 3.5 version? Hi, that's normal, because all kde-3.5 packages are still masked. You have to unmask them to get kde-3.5 installed. This link should help you :

Re: [gentoo-user] Kde version

2005-11-22 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:35:54 +1300, Nick Rout wrote: > In other words after kde.org (or any other software writer) releases a > new version, it takes some time for the gentoo devs to make sure it is > working ok before they release it on the masses of gentoo users who rely > on the devs to keep th

Re: [gentoo-user] Kde version

2005-11-21 Thread Douglas James Dunn
You would be amazed at how frustrated gentoo users make devs. Plus going from distribution to distribution not everything works 100% the same exact way. On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 14:35 +1300, Nick Rout wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:29:25 +0200 > Petteri Räty wrote: > > > Thiago Lüttig wrote: > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Kde version

2005-11-21 Thread Nick Rout
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:29:25 +0200 Petteri Räty wrote: > Thiago Lüttig wrote: > > Hi folks ! > > I upgrade my gentoo every day, and when I try to upgrade the kde, the > > portage always display the last version of kde as 3.4.1. But newer > > versions of kde has been launched (3.4.3). What´s the r

Re: [gentoo-user] Kde version

2005-11-21 Thread Robert Crawford
On Mon November 21 2005 1:33 pm, Thiago Lüttig wrote: > Hi folks ! > I upgrade my gentoo every day, and when I try to upgrade the kde, the > portage always display the last version of kde as 3.4.1. But newer versions > of kde has been launched (3.4.3). What´s the reason of this late version > still

Re: [gentoo-user] Kde version

2005-11-21 Thread Petteri Räty
Thiago Lüttig wrote: > Hi folks ! > I upgrade my gentoo every day, and when I try to upgrade the kde, the > portage always display the last version of kde as 3.4.1. But newer > versions of kde has been launched (3.4.3). What´s the reason of this > late version still remains in the portage list ?? >