On Jul 28, 2012 8:03 AM, "Michael Mol" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:30 PM, microcai
wrote:
--- >8 Major Snippage
> > As far as I can tell, AMD chip suffered with a lot of I/O. Their
> > Hyper-transport seems not competitive with Intel's ring bus
>
Wasn't Intel's answer to HyperTranspor
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:30 PM, microcai wrote:
> 2012/7/26 Michael Mol :
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Евгений Пермяков
>> wrote:
>>> On 07/26/2012 05:50 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Евгений Пермяков
wrote:
>
> On 07/26/2012 12:05 AM, P
Alecks Gates wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Michael Mol wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Dale wrote:
The point made about producing less heat with the smaller nm sounds
reasonable tho.
>>> Less heat with the smaller nm, but only if all other things r
CPU speed does not matter. what matters most is the I/O speed.
As far as I can tell, AMD chip suffered with a lot of I/O. Their
Hyper-transport seems not competitive with Intel's ring bus
2012/7/26 Michael Mol :
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Евгений Пермяков
> wrote:
>> On 07/26/2012 05:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Евгений Пермяков wrote:
> On 07/26/2012 05:50 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Евгений Пермяков
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/26/2012 12:05 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
I've listed what's available at the local store,
which I trust
On 07/26/2012 05:50 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Евгений Пермяков wrote:
On 07/26/2012 12:05 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
I've listed what's available at the local store,
which I trust to stock reliable items, tho' I wouldn't ask their advice.
All the AMD's are 32 nm , w
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:39 AM, microcai wrote:
> 2012/7/26 Philip Webb :
>> I've listed what's available at the local store,
>> which I trust to stock reliable items, tho' I wouldn't ask their advice.
>>
>> All the AMD's are 32 nm , while the Intel recommended by one commenter
>> -- Core i5-357
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Евгений Пермяков wrote:
> On 07/26/2012 12:05 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
>>
>> I've listed what's available at the local store,
>> which I trust to stock reliable items, tho' I wouldn't ask their advice.
>>
>> All the AMD's are 32 nm , while the Intel recommended by o
On 07/26/2012 12:05 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
I've listed what's available at the local store,
which I trust to stock reliable items, tho' I wouldn't ask their advice.
All the AMD's are 32 nm , while the Intel recommended by one commenter
-- Core i5-3570 4-Core Socket LGA1155, 3.4 Ghz, 6MB L3 Cach
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012, 16:24:42 schrieb Philip Webb:
> 120725 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012, 16:05:29 schrieb Philip Webb:
> >> I've listed what's available at the local store,
> >> which I trust to stock reliable items, tho' I wouldn't ask their advice.
> >> All t
2012/7/26 Philip Webb :
> I've listed what's available at the local store,
> which I trust to stock reliable items, tho' I wouldn't ask their advice.
>
> All the AMD's are 32 nm , while the Intel recommended by one commenter
> -- Core i5-3570 4-Core Socket LGA1155, 3.4 Ghz, 6MB L3 Cache, 22 nm --
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Dale wrote:
> Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Dale wrote:
>>> The point made about producing less heat with the smaller nm sounds
>>> reasonable tho.
>> Less heat with the smaller nm, but only if all other things remain equal!
>>
>> In reali
Michael Mol wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Dale wrote:
>> The point made about producing less heat with the smaller nm sounds
>> reasonable tho.
> Less heat with the smaller nm, but only if all other things remain equal!
>
> In reality, manufacturers use additional margin within their T
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Dale wrote:
> The point made about producing less heat with the smaller nm sounds
> reasonable tho.
Less heat with the smaller nm, but only if all other things remain equal!
In reality, manufacturers use additional margin within their TDP to
improve the product o
I'll add this. When I buy a CPU, I look at the speed, mine is 3.2Ghz,
and the cache that is on the chip, mine has 512Kb. Sometimes depending
on the process, having more cache can be just as important as the
speed. If I am looking at buying one of two identical CPUs but one has
more cache, I wou
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 25.07.2012 22:14, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
>> Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012, 16:05:29 schrieb Philip Webb:
>>> I've listed what's available at the local store,
>>> which I trust to stock reliable items, tho' I wouldn't ask their advice
Am 25.07.2012 22:14, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012, 16:05:29 schrieb Philip Webb:
>> I've listed what's available at the local store,
>> which I trust to stock reliable items, tho' I wouldn't ask their advice.
>>
>> All the AMD's are 32 nm , while the Intel recommended
120725 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012, 16:05:29 schrieb Philip Webb:
>> I've listed what's available at the local store,
>> which I trust to stock reliable items, tho' I wouldn't ask their advice.
>> All the AMD's are 32 nm , while the Intel recommended by one commenter
>
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012, 16:05:29 schrieb Philip Webb:
> I've listed what's available at the local store,
> which I trust to stock reliable items, tho' I wouldn't ask their advice.
>
> All the AMD's are 32 nm , while the Intel recommended by one commenter
> -- Core i5-3570 4-Core Socket LGA115
I've listed what's available at the local store,
which I trust to stock reliable items, tho' I wouldn't ask their advice.
All the AMD's are 32 nm , while the Intel recommended by one commenter
-- Core i5-3570 4-Core Socket LGA1155, 3.4 Ghz, 6MB L3 Cache, 22 nm --
is 22 nm : it costs CAD 230 &
20 matches
Mail list logo
