> x11-libs/libvdpau
> selected: 1.4
>protected: none
> omitted: none
>
I'm guessing that would be pulled in by USE +vdpau, so if you've removed it
then done an emerge with -N or -U it won't be required anymore.
>
> x11-drivers/xf86-video-amdgpu
> selected: 19.1.0
>protecte
On 5/7/21 6:57 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I'm trying to clean up packages on a remote computer and running emerge
> --depclean list some packages that I am not sure about:
>
>[snip]
>
> Many of these packages are I see on my other systems and I think they are
> needed like:
> acct-gro
I'm trying to clean up packages on a remote computer and running emerge
--depclean list some packages that I am not sure about:
acct-group/video
selected: 0-r1
protected: none
omitted: none
dev-libs/jansson
selected: 2.13.1-r1
protected: none
omitted: none
virt
On 06-Dec-14 18:25, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
If 3.4.1 gets removed, I will have to run python-updater and
compile all against 3.3. But why? 3.4.1 is stable, so why
does Portage want to remove it???
Check out this thread from a day or two ago:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/2791
On 12/06/2014 12:18 PM, Jarry wrote:
> Hi Gentoo-users,
>
> I just updated my box (iirc, there was something python-related)
> but depite of having python 3.4 active, emerge wants to remove it:
>
> # eselect python list
> Available Python interpreters:
> [1] python2.7
> [2] python3.3
> [
Hi Gentoo-users,
I just updated my box (iirc, there was something python-related)
but depite of having python 3.4 active, emerge wants to remove it:
# eselect python list
Available Python interpreters:
[1] python2.7
[2] python3.3
[3] python3.4 *
# emerge --pretend --depclean
Calcula
On 10/21/13 19:05, Randolph Maaßen wrote:
Have you set --verbose (-v) in make.conf as emerge default opts?
References
1. mailto:syscon...@gmail.com
Yes, that was it.
Thanks :-/
--
Joseph
On Oct 21, 2013 6:59 PM, "Joseph" wrote:
>
> When I run: emerge --depclean entire portage tree scrolling by what is
causing it?
>
> It should be something like this:
> emerge --depclean -p
>
> * Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for any obvious
> * mistakes. Packages that are part of
When I run: emerge --depclean
entire portage tree scrolling by what is causing it?
It should be something like this:
emerge --depclean -p
* Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for any obvious
* mistakes. Packages that are part of the world set will always
* be kept. They can be man
On 06/20/13 01:33, Randolph Maaßen wrote:
On Jun 20, 2013 12:31 AM, "Joseph" <[1]syscon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When I run: emerge --depclean -p
> The system lists all packages on my system (no it doesn't want to
remove them); they are just scrolling by eg:
>
> xfce-extra/xfce4-sc
On Jun 20, 2013 12:31 AM, "Joseph" wrote:
>
> When I run: emerge --depclean -p
> The system lists all packages on my system (no it doesn't want to remove
them); they are just scrolling by eg:
>
> xfce-extra/xfce4-screenshooter-1.8.1 pulled in by:
>@selected requires xfce-extra/xfce4-screensho
When I run: emerge --depclean -p
The system lists all packages on my system (no it doesn't want to remove them);
they are just scrolling by eg:
xfce-extra/xfce4-screenshooter-1.8.1 pulled in by:
@selected requires xfce-extra/xfce4-screenshooter
xfce-extra/xfce4-sensors-plugin-1.2.5 pulled
On 04/20/13 22:10, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:56:42 -0600, Joseph wrote:
>> No I'm not putting any "-v" on the command line, I use "|more" as the
>There are multiple ways to have "verbose" enabled.
>
>What are the contents of your "make.conf" file?
Below is my "env" output,
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:56:42 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> >> No I'm not putting any "-v" on the command line, I use "|more" as the
> >There are multiple ways to have "verbose" enabled.
> >
> >What are the contents of your "make.conf" file?
> Below is my "env" output, and make.conf
>
> What should I b
On 04/20/13 16:41, J. Roeleveld wrote:
No I'm not putting any "-v" on the command line, I use "|more" as the
catch the beginning:
--
# emerge --depclean -p |more
* Depclean may break link level dependencies. Thus, it is
* recommended to use a tool such as `revdep-rebuild` (from
*
On Sat, April 20, 2013 15:39, Joseph wrote:
> On 04/20/13 07:32, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
>>Joseph schrieb am 20.04.2013 03:09:
>>> On 04/19/13 21:34, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:27:25 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> Can someone explain me why am I getting long list of packages
On 04/20/13 07:32, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Joseph schrieb am 20.04.2013 03:09:
On 04/19/13 21:34, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:27:25 -0600, Joseph wrote:
Can someone explain me why am I getting long list of packages when I
run: emerge --depclean
Please post the exact command
Joseph schrieb am 20.04.2013 03:09:
> On 04/19/13 21:34, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:27:25 -0600, Joseph wrote:
>>
>>> Can someone explain me why am I getting long list of packages when I
>>> run: emerge --depclean
>>
>> Please post the exact command you used and the complete out
On 04/19/13 21:34, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:27:25 -0600, Joseph wrote:
Can someone explain me why am I getting long list of packages when I
run: emerge --depclean
Please post the exact command you used and the complete output.
--
Neil Bothwick
Hors d'oeuvres: 3 sandwiche
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:27:25 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> Can someone explain me why am I getting long list of packages when I
> run: emerge --depclean
Please post the exact command you used and the complete output.
--
Neil Bothwick
Hors d'oeuvres: 3 sandwiches cut into 40 pieces.
signature.asc
D
Can someone explain me why am I getting long list of packages when I run:
emerge --depclean
.
xfce-base/xfdesktop-4.10.2 pulled in by:
xfce-base/xfce4-meta-4.10 requires >=xfce-base/xfdesktop-4.10
xfce-base/xfwm4-4.10.0-r1 pulled in by:
x11-themes/xfwm4-themes-4.10.0 requires >=
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:10:11 +0200, Stefan Hübner wrote:
> Everytime 'emerge --depclean' drops dev-lang/ekopath it is reinstalled
> on the next world update.
Are you using --with-bdeps=y?
--
Neil Bothwick
Windows Error #10: Insufficient money spent in hardware.
signature.asc
Description: PG
Hi,
Everytime 'emerge --depclean' drops dev-lang/ekopath it is reinstalled
on the next world update.
I guess dev-lang/ekopath is pulled in by dev-lang/R in my case (I do not
USE fortran). ekopath provides virtual/fortran which in turn is required
by R.
--8<---cut here---s
On 12/23/2011 12:33 AM, Jarry wrote:
But it was the same in the last week, and yet portage could
live with it. Why it suddenly wants to uninstall something
that is part of system profile? And at the same time it says
it might damage my system. Really nice...
I believe the base, default pager i
On 23-Dec-11 8:47, Alan McKinnon wrote:
# eselect pager show
PAGER variable in profile:
/usr/bin/less
emerge --depclean
Calculating dependencies... done!
>>> Calculating removal order...
!!! 'sys-apps/less' (virtual/pager) is part of your system profile.
!!! Unmerging it may be damaging
Because eselect's setting of pager does not correlate with emerge's
world file. You should add less to the world file e.g. by running
"emerge --noreplace less".
2011/12/23 Jarry :
> On 23-Dec-11 2:12, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>>
>> 'eselect pager list' and 'eselect editor list' will show what
>> alt
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:43:33 +0100
Jarry wrote:
> On 23-Dec-11 2:12, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >
> > 'eselect pager list' and 'eselect editor list' will show what
> > alternatives are available (with a write-in candidate support).
>
> # eselect pager show
> PAGER variable in profile:
>/usr/bin/l
On 23-Dec-11 2:12, Pandu Poluan wrote:
'eselect pager list' and 'eselect editor list' will show what
alternatives are available (with a write-in candidate support).
# eselect pager show
PAGER variable in profile:
/usr/bin/less
# more /etc/env.d/99pager
# Configuration file for eselect
# Thi
On Dec 23, 2011 2:42 AM, "Mick" wrote:
>
> On Thursday 22 Dec 2011 19:07:02 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:58:32 +0100
> >
> > Jarry wrote:
> > > On 22-Dec-11 19:38, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > > >> Why does portage want to unmerge sys-apps/less when it is
> > > >> a part of system?
>
On Thursday 22 Dec 2011 19:07:02 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:58:32 +0100
>
> Jarry wrote:
> > On 22-Dec-11 19:38, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > >> Why does portage want to unmerge sys-apps/less when it is
> > >> a part of system?
> > >
> > > I didn't like it either so I've been adding
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:58:32 +0100
Jarry wrote:
> On 22-Dec-11 19:38, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >>
> >> Why does portage want to unmerge sys-apps/less when it is
> >> a part of system?
> >
> > I didn't like it either so I've been adding it to
> > /var/lib/portage/world just to stop it. I've seen this
On 22-Dec-11 19:38, Mark Knecht wrote:
Why does portage want to unmerge sys-apps/less when it is
a part of system?
I didn't like it either so I've been adding it to
/var/lib/portage/world just to stop it. I've seen this on one machine
or another for 6 months to a year I think.
Some time ago
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Jarry wrote:
>
> Why does portage want to unmerge sys-apps/less when it is
> a part of system?
>
> Jarry
I didn't like it either so I've been adding it to
/var/lib/portage/world just to stop it. I've seen this on one machine
or another for 6 months to a year I t
Hi,
after updating my system I tried "emerge --depclean as
recommended by portage, and I received this warning:
--
Calculating dependencies... done!
Calculating removal order...
!!! 'sys-apps/less' (virtual/pager) is part of your system profile.
!!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your syst
On 04-Jul-11 19:03, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Jarry wrote:
obelix ~ # emerge --depclean
Calculating dependencies... done!
Calculating removal order...
!!! 'app-editors/nano' (virtual/editor) is part of your system profile.
!!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your sy
Do you have another editor installed? If yes, portage tell you a remotion of
virtual/editor.
Unless you won't take to remove nano, it's possible to put him in @world
with this command: emerge --noreplace app-editors/nano.
Andre Lucas
2011/7/4 Jarry
> Hi,
> I have this strange problem for a few
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Jarry wrote:
> Hi,
> I have this strange problem for a few days: after normal
> updates (I think glib has been updated) I tried to run
> "emerge --depclean" (as recommended) but got these messages:
>
> ---
> obelix ~ # emerge --depclean
>
Hi,
I have this strange problem for a few days: after normal
updates (I think glib has been updated) I tried to run
"emerge --depclean" (as recommended) but got these messages:
---
obelix ~ # emerge --depclean
Calculating dependencies... done!
>>> Calculating removal
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:48 PM, dhk...@optonline.net wrote:
Correct, not in world.
Sent from my LG phone
Mick wrote:
On Friday 03 Jun 2011 19:36:19 dhk wrote:
libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib64/libcurl.la' or
unhandled
Only to add that I haven't got this file in my amd64
Correct, not in world.
Sent from my LG phone
Mick wrote:
>On Friday 03 Jun 2011 19:36:19 dhk wrote:
>> libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib64/libcurl.la' or
>> unhandled
>
>Only to add that I haven't got this file in my amd64 system either:
>
>$ ls -la /usr/lib64/libcurl.la
>ls: ca
On Friday 03 Jun 2011 19:36:19 dhk wrote:
> libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib64/libcurl.la' or
> unhandled
Only to add that I haven't got this file in my amd64 system either:
$ ls -la /usr/lib64/libcurl.la
ls: cannot access /usr/lib64/libcurl.la: No such file or directory
--
Reg
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:44 AM, dhk...@optonline.net wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul Hartman
Date: Thursday, June 2, 2011 11:24 am
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --depclean - libcurl.la
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:54 AM, wrote:
emerge
- Original Message -From: Paul Hartman Date: Thursday, June 2, 2011
11:24 amSubject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --depclean - libcurl.laTo:
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:54 AM, wrote:> >
emerge --depclean removed libcurl.la a few days ago. I have a
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:54 AM, wrote:
> emerge --depclean removed libcurl.la a few days ago. I have a program
> that's not in world that uses it when built: libtool complains that it's
> missing. In /usr/lib64 there are libcurl .so files but no .la files.
>
> How can I get the libcurl.la libr
emerge --depclean removed libcurl.la a few days ago. I have a program that's
not in world that uses it when built: libtool complains that it's missing. In
/usr/lib64 there are libcurl .so files but no .la files.How can I get the
libcurl.la library back and keep it so emerge --depclean doesn't
On 15 April 2011 04:16, dhk wrote:
> After a recent update I got python 2.7 installed. The emerge --depclean
> command removed python 2.6 which I thought would be alright since I now
> have 2.7. I also used eselect python to set 2.7 as my default. Now
> revdep-rebuild has a load of broke links
On 04/15/2011 06:20 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 8:16 PM, dhk wrote:
>
>> After a recent update I got python 2.7 installed. The emerge --depclean
>> command removed python 2.6 which I thought would be alright since I now
>> have 2.7. I also used eselect python to set 2.7 as
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 8:16 PM, dhk wrote:
> After a recent update I got python 2.7 installed. The emerge --depclean
> command removed python 2.6 which I thought would be alright since I now
> have 2.7. I also used eselect python to set 2.7 as my default. Now
> revdep-rebuild has a load of br
After a recent update I got python 2.7 installed. The emerge --depclean
command removed python 2.6 which I thought would be alright since I now
have 2.7. I also used eselect python to set 2.7 as my default. Now
revdep-rebuild has a load of broke links that are due to 2.6 being
missing. Now vi a
2010/10/21 Michael Hampicke :
>
>> May I just unmerge my old gcc ?
>> Is it save ?
>
> Yes it's save to unmerge your old gcc.
> You could also - using quickpkg - create a binary package of your old
> gcc before unmerging (for backup puropses).
>
>From the strictly Gentoo side of things, it's safe
Thank you for help.
Everything went smoothly.
To be on a save side I would like to unemerge old version of gcc with
--depclean switch. How can I revert my previous --noreplace operation
cleanly
besides emerge --unemerge =gcc-4.3.4.
Dnia 21-10-2010 o godz. 16:17 Paul Hartman napisał(a):
> 2010/1
2010/10/21 :
> Hi
> I have upgraded my gentoo recently.
> New version of gcc-4.4.3-r2 has been emerged.
> Now I have 2 versions of gcc:
> gcc-4.3.4
> gcc-4.4.3-r2
>
> There are still many packages compiled with the old version of gcc and
> now I don't want to rebuild them all with a new version.
>
> May I just unmerge my old gcc ?
> Is it save ?
Yes it's save to unmerge your old gcc.
You could also - using quickpkg - create a binary package of your old
gcc before unmerging (for backup puropses).
Hi
I have upgraded my gentoo recently.
New version of gcc-4.4.3-r2 has been emerged.
Now I have 2 versions of gcc:
gcc-4.3.4
gcc-4.4.3-r2
There are still many packages compiled with the old version of gcc and
now I don't want to rebuild them all with a new version.
emerge --depclean wants to uneme
2009/11/4 Alex Schuster :
> Hi there!
>
> Again, this is just something I am curious about, not a real problem.
> emerge -p --depclean gives me this output:
>
> [...]
> Calculating dependencies... done!
Checking for lib consumers...
Assigning files to packages...
> * In order to avoid br
Alex Schuster schrieb:
Hi there!
[snip]
Still, this is ugly I think. Another part of the emerge --depclean output
is:
* media-sound/esound-0.2.41 pulled in by:
* app-office/gnucash-2.2.9-r1 needs libesd.so.0
* gnome-extra/gnome-media-2.26.0-r1 needs libesd.so.0
* gnome-extra/
Hi there!
Again, this is just something I am curious about, not a real problem.
emerge -p --depclean gives me this output:
[...]
Calculating dependencies... done!
>>> Checking for lib consumers...
>>> Assigning files to packages...
* In order to avoid breakage of link level dependencies, one or
Krzysztof Poc schrieb:
Great thanks to all of you for immediate help.
"emenrge -n" solved the problem.
By the way "gcc-config -l" shows:
[1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6
[2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardened
[3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopie
[4] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopiessp
[5
Great thanks to all of you for immediate help.
"emenrge -n" solved the problem.
By the way "gcc-config -l" shows:
[1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6
[2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardened
[3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopie
[4] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopiessp
[5] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6
Please, *do not* send HTML emails in the list, as they looks like below.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 01:00:41PM +0200, Krzysztof Poc wrote:
> HelloI found that "emerge --depclean" removes the packages
> that are necessary for my system:gcc-4.1.2font-cursor-misc />font-misc-miscI have also gcc-3.4.6-r
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 13:00:41 Krzysztof Poc wrote:
> Hello
>
> I found that "emerge --depclean" removes the packages that are necessary
> for my system: gcc-4.1.2
> font-cursor-misc
> font-misc-misc
>
> I have also gcc-3.4.6-r2 installed. It does not remove gcc-3.4.6-r2.
> After unmergin
2009/9/15 Krzysztof Poc :
> Hello
>
Hi,
> I found that "emerge --depclean" removes the packages that are necessary for
> my system:
> gcc-4.1.2
> font-cursor-misc
> font-misc-misc
>
> I have also gcc-3.4.6-r2 installed. It does not remove gcc-3.4.6-r2.
> After unmerging gcc-4.1.2 I cannot compile
Krzysztof Poc schrieb:
Hello
I found that "emerge --depclean" removes the packages that are necessary
for my system:
gcc-4.1.2
font-cursor-misc
font-misc-misc
I have also gcc-3.4.6-r2 installed. It does not remove gcc-3.4.6-r2.
After unmerging gcc-4.1.2 I cannot compile anything of course.
Af
HelloI found that "emerge --depclean" removes the packages that are necessary for my system:gcc-4.1.2font-cursor-miscfont-misc-miscI have also gcc-3.4.6-r2 installed. It does not remove gcc-3.4.6-r2.After unmerging gcc-4.1.2 I cannot compile anything of course.After unmerging font-misc-misc I can't
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:12:39 -0400, David Relson wrote:
> However, revdep-rebuild still insists ati-drivers-8.552 is needed. The
> following message seems to be at the heart of the problem:
>
> broken /usr/lib64/libAMDXvBA.so.1.0 (requires libstdc++.so.5)
Are these the binary or open source d
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:17:39 -0500
Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, David Relson
> > wrote:
> >> As a "cleanup" test, I've run "emerge --depclean" and
> >> "revdep-rebuild".
> >>
> >> "emerge --depclean" removed approx 85 files, which seemed
> >> reasonable.
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, David Relson
> wrote:
>
>> As a "cleanup" test, I've run "emerge --depclean" and "revdep-rebuild".
>>
>> "emerge --depclean" removed approx 85 files, which seemed reasonable.
>>
>> "revdep-rebuild" then rebuilt 7 or 8 packages -- also reaso
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, David Relson wrote:
> As a "cleanup" test, I've run "emerge --depclean" and "revdep-rebuild".
>
> "emerge --depclean" removed approx 85 files, which seemed reasonable.
>
> "revdep-rebuild" then rebuilt 7 or 8 packages -- also reasonable.
>
> When I run the commands
As a "cleanup" test, I've run "emerge --depclean" and "revdep-rebuild".
"emerge --depclean" removed approx 85 files, which seemed reasonable.
"revdep-rebuild" then rebuilt 7 or 8 packages -- also reasonable.
When I run the commands again, "emerge --depclean" removes the packages
that "revdep-reb
Zac Medico wrote:
Dale wrote:
> Calculating dependencies... done!
These are the packages that would be unmerged:
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
>selected: 2.6.23-r8
> protected: none
> omitted: 2.6.23-r3 2.6.24-r4
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
>selected: 2.6.23-r9
> protected:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale wrote:
> Calculating dependencies... done!
>
>
These are the packages that would be unmerged:
>
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
>selected: 2.6.23-r8
> protected: none
> omitted: 2.6.23-r3 2.6.24-r4
>
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
>
Hi,
I run --depclean on occasion just to clean out some old cruft. I got
this output a bit ago and it is well . . . confusing me. Here it is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -p --depclean
*** WARNING *** Depclean may break link level dependencies. Thus, it is
*** WARNING *** recommended to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Schuster wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> Any idea why emerge --depclean wants to remove
> app-shells/bash-completion-config? It it needed by some installed packages:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ --> equery depends app-shells/bash-completion-config
> [ Search
On 7/20/07, Alex Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there!
Any idea why emerge --depclean wants to remove
app-shells/bash-completion-config? It it needed by some installed
packages:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ --> equery depends app-shells/bash-completion-config
[ Searching for packages depending
Hi there!
Any idea why emerge --depclean wants to remove
app-shells/bash-completion-config? It it needed by some installed packages:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ --> equery depends app-shells/bash-completion-config
[ Searching for packages depending on app-shells/bash-completion-config... ]
app-editors/v
On 2/27/07, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Mark Knecht wrote:
[ snip lots of useful bacground info]
> > 2. If you never had gnome installed but did have evo installed,
> > then removed evo, everything looks proper.
> >
> > So, let --depclean do it's thing.
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 16:47:15 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > You have a bunch of packages that --depclean wants to remove. It
> > > looks like they should not be removed.
> >
> > A bit curious how you've reached that conclusion? Why shouldn't they?
>
> The OP said in his original mail
>
> "when
On Monday 26 February 2007, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Monday 26 February 2007 20:43:09 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > You have a bunch of packages that --depclean wants to remove. It
> > looks like they should not be removed.
>
> A bit curious how you've reached that conclusion? Why shouldn't they?
On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Mark Knecht wrote:
[ snip lots of useful bacground info]
> > 2. If you never had gnome installed but did have evo installed,
> > then removed evo, everything looks proper.
> >
> > So, let --depclean do it's thing. Then emerge -uND world and run
> > revder-rebuild to f
On 2/26/07, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 25 February 2007, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been cleaning up a machine trying to fix a problem with
> Evolution crashing. I'm down to the point where all the dependencies
> (emerge -DuN and revdep-rebuild) are clean but when I r
On Monday 26 February 2007 20:43:09 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> OK, so I read this thread and you and Bo both seem to have gotten way
> off track...
Hmm.
> You have a bunch of packages that --depclean wants to remove. It looks
> like they should not be removed.
A bit curious how you've reached that c
On Sunday 25 February 2007, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been cleaning up a machine trying to fix a problem with
> Evolution crashing. I'm down to the point where all the dependencies
> (emerge -DuN and revdep-rebuild) are clean but when I run emerge
> --depclean wants remove packages that wo
On Monday 26 February 2007 18:49:52 Mark Knecht wrote:
> 2) You answered in this thread but seemed to finish asking the
> question "Why do you think this matters?" As a user type the answer is
> because we don't want to see warnings that we users don't understand.
Well, regardlessly they are irrel
On 2/26/07, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At this point you really should know not to top-post, Mark.
A childish plea for attention. Sorry! (But it worked!) ;-) Really sorry!
> > libtool: link: warning:
> > `/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/../../..//libbonobo-activatio
At this point you really should know not to top-post, Mark.
On Monday 26 February 2007 17:27:31 Mark Knecht wrote:
> > I re-emerged evolution and watched the compile. I'm seeing a number of
> > what appear to be link errors. Maybe that has something to do with
> > this?
> >
> > What causes this pr
Bo,
I'm wondering if you (or anyone else) have any comments on the
causes of the link warnings at the bottom of this post? What might the
cause be?
Did I not do something correctly in the gcc upgrade? I'm pretty
sure I did these steps:
fix_libtool_files.sh 3.4.6
emerge --oneshot -av libtool
Hi Bo,
Thanks for the response. Hopefully I'm approaching this correct.
On 2/25/07, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 18:50:47 Mark Knecht wrote:
>I've been cleaning up a machine trying to fix a problem with
> Evolution crashing. I'm down to the point
On Sunday 25 February 2007 18:50:47 Mark Knecht wrote:
>I've been cleaning up a machine trying to fix a problem with
> Evolution crashing. I'm down to the point where all the dependencies
> (emerge -DuN and revdep-rebuild) are clean but when I run emerge
> --depclean wants remove packages that
Hi,
I've been cleaning up a machine trying to fix a problem with
Evolution crashing. I'm down to the point where all the dependencies
(emerge -DuN and revdep-rebuild) are clean but when I run emerge
--depclean wants remove packages that would break dependencies.
I understand that I could fix
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Friday 27 October 2006 19:59, Dale wrote:
Ahhh, I see now what you are saying. Default is to use fftw unless I
turn it off. Gotcha now.
I haven't said anything about what the default is. Actually it's off by
default..
Hmm, looks like
On Friday 27 October 2006 19:59, Dale wrote:
> Ahhh, I see now what you are saying. Default is to use fftw unless I
> turn it off. Gotcha now.
I haven't said anything about what the default is. Actually it's off by
default..
--
Bo Andresen
pgpRXxLU6RORL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
I somehow get the feeling you haven't quite understood what I have said. So
I'll try again. media-libs/libsamplerate only depends on sci-libs/fftw if you
have the fftw use flag enabled.
# emerge -vp1 libsamplerate
[...]
[ebuild R ] media-libs/libsamplerate-0
On Friday 27 October 2006 14:56, Dale wrote:
> Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> >
> >
> > `equery depends` considers all use flags as enabled even if they aren't.
> > pquery and dep take your use flags into account.
> >
> >> All the pkgcore programs are masked. What version do you recommend I
> >> unm
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
`equery depends` considers all use flags as enabled even if they aren't.
pquery and dep take your use flags into account.
All the pkgcore programs are masked. What version do you recommend I
unmask? Equery shows these available:
[SNIP]
The
On Friday 27 October 2006 14:24, Dale wrote:
> Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> > Sounds like you've disabled the fftw use flag of libsamplerate.
> > --depclean is generally pretty safe when `emerge -DNp world` doesn't want
> > to do anything.
> >
> > Better to use `dep -L fftw` from app-portage/udept o
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
Sounds like you've disabled the fftw use flag of libsamplerate. --depclean is
generally pretty safe when `emerge -DNp world` doesn't want to do anything.
Better to use `dep -L fftw` from app-portage/udept or `pquery --vdb --revdep
sci-libs/fftw` from sys-apps/pk
On Friday 27 October 2006 13:06, Dale wrote:
> I am trying to keep my new install nice and clean, nothing useless
> lurking around. I run emerge -p --depclean world on occasion and I
>
> finally got this one:
> > >>> These are the packages that would be unmerged:
> >
> > sci-libs/fftw
> > sel
Hi,
I am trying to keep my new install nice and clean, nothing useless
lurking around. I run emerge -p --depclean world on occasion and I
finally got this one:
> >>> These are the packages that would be unmerged:
>
> sci-libs/fftw
> selected: 3.0.1-r2
>protected: none
> omitted: no
98 matches
Mail list logo
