Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0

2006-11-29 Thread Mrugesh Karnik
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 23:03, Richard Fish wrote: > The upshot of this is this: by far the easiest way to solve the > net-naming problem is to run > > /lib/udev/write_net_rules all_interfaces > > This will generate the rules for all interfaces, and then you can just > edit the file to change

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0

2006-11-29 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 17:33, Richard Fish wrote: > On 11/27/06, Mrugesh Karnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 28 November 2006 07:31, Richard Fish wrote: > > > > can see a 75-persistent-net-generator.rules file in there.. > > > > > > Hmm, not sure how I got a 70-persistent-net.ru

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0

2006-11-29 Thread Richard Fish
On 11/27/06, Mrugesh Karnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 28 November 2006 07:31, Richard Fish wrote: > > can see a 75-persistent-net-generator.rules file in there.. > > Hmm, not sure how I got a 70-persistent-net.rules. There is some > interaction between that and 75-persistent-net-gene

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0

2006-11-27 Thread Mrugesh Karnik
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 07:31, Richard Fish wrote: > > can see a 75-persistent-net-generator.rules file in there.. > > Hmm, not sure how I got a 70-persistent-net.rules. There is some > interaction between that and 75-persistent-net-generator.rules (and > the /lib/udev/write_net_rules script),

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0

2006-11-27 Thread Richard Fish
On 11/27/06, Mrugesh Karnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 28 November 2006 06:38, Richard Fish wrote: > On 11/27/06, Mrugesh Karnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > udevd-event[3110]: rename_netif: error changing net interface name > > eth0_rename to eth1: No such device. > > Hmm, haven't s

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0

2006-11-27 Thread Mrugesh Karnik
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 06:38, Richard Fish wrote: > On 11/27/06, Mrugesh Karnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > udevd-event[3110]: rename_netif: error changing net interface name > > eth0_rename to eth1: No such device. > > Hmm, haven't seen this error, but these rules (based on > 70-persistent

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0

2006-11-27 Thread Richard Fish
On 11/27/06, Mrugesh Karnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: udevd-event[3110]: rename_netif: error changing net interface name eth0_rename to eth1: No such device. Hmm, haven't seen this error, but these rules (based on 70-persistent-net.rules) might work better: SUBSYSTEM=="net", ATTRS{address}=="

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0

2006-11-27 Thread Mrugesh Karnik
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 04:16, Richard Fish wrote: > On 11/27/06, Mrugesh Karnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > # ethernet devices > > > ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:13:d3:60:4a:a5", > > > NAME="eth0" > > > ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:0d:88:45:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0

2006-11-27 Thread Richard Fish
On 11/27/06, Mrugesh Karnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # ethernet devices > ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:13:d3:60:4a:a5", > NAME="eth0" > ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:0d:88:45:c1:c9", > NAME="eth1" No go. They didn't swap. Just in case, you did

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0

2006-11-27 Thread Mrugesh Karnik
On 27/11/06, Richard Fish wrote: On 11/27/06, Mrugesh Karnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, how do I swap the two cards? I don't know how to write udev rules > yet. I was planning on learning that next week.. I guess I should > learn it as soon as the internet works.. Add the following to /et

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0

2006-11-27 Thread Richard Fish
On 11/27/06, Mrugesh Karnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now, how do I swap the two cards? I don't know how to write udev rules yet. I was planning on learning that next week.. I guess I should learn it as soon as the internet works.. Add the following to /etc/udev/rules.d/10-local.rules: # ethe

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0

2006-11-27 Thread Mrugesh Karnik
On 27/11/06, 7v5w7go9ub0o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FWIW, I also upgraded and find that my laptop, which previously had eth0 and eth1 for its two cards (one wired and one wireless) now has eth0 and eth2. After editing my scripts and configurations (e.g. wpa_supplicant startup and kismet conf),

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0

2006-11-27 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:36:38 -0500, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: > FWIW, I also upgraded and find that my laptop, which previously had > eth0 and eth1 for its two cards (one wired and one wireless) now has > eth0 and eth2. Do you have IEEE1394_ETH1394 set in your kernel? If so, it's possible that eth1 is

[gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0

2006-11-27 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
FWIW, I also upgraded and find that my laptop, which previously had eth0 and eth1 for its two cards (one wired and one wireless) now has eth0 and eth2. After editing my scripts and configurations (e.g. wpa_supplicant startup and kismet conf), things seem to work fine. HTH, newbie -- gento