On 11/27/06, Mrugesh Karnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 06:38, Richard Fish wrote: > On 11/27/06, Mrugesh Karnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > udevd-event[3110]: rename_netif: error changing net interface name > > eth0_rename to eth1: No such device. > > Hmm, haven't seen this error, but these rules (based on > 70-persistent-net.rules) might work better: > > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ATTRS{address}=="00:13:d3:60:4a:a5", NAME="eth0" > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ATTRS{address}=="00:0d:88:45:c1:c9", NAME="eth1"Stupid question perhaps.. but does it matter in which files the rules go? I
Not really. The files are parsed in alphabetical order, so if you have a NAME= setting in 10-file, it will override anything in a "later" file. 10-local.rules is the normal place for your own rules to go.
can see a 75-persistent-net-generator.rules file in there..
Hmm, not sure how I got a 70-persistent-net.rules. There is some interaction between that and 75-persistent-net-generator.rules (and the /lib/udev/write_net_rules script), but I'm a bit too tired to figure it out ATM. It looks like 70-... should be created by the write_net_rules script... -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
