Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc emerge error

On 01/12/2018 04:14 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > echo "$VULKAN_SDK/lib" > /etc/ld.so.conf.d/vulkan-loader.conf Found out what was giving me an extra slash in the output "...x86_64//lib" The $VULKAN_SDK PATH had a slash at the end. Works now. Thank you. Corbin

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc emerge error

On 12/01/18 18:31, Corbin Bird wrote: On 01/11/2018 08:29 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 11/01/18 15:28, Corbin Bird wrote: Why are you setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH system-wide to begin with? Don't do that. Unfortunately, I had to ( and didn't realize the implications. ) In .bashrc : export LD_L

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc emerge error

On 01/11/2018 08:29 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 11/01/18 15:28, Corbin Bird wrote: >>> Why are you setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH system-wide to begin with? Don't >>> do that. >> >> Unfortunately, I had to ( and didn't realize the implications. ) >> In .bashrc : >>> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$VULKAN_

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc emerge error

On 2018-01-11 07:28, Corbin Bird wrote: > > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$VULKAN_SDK/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH This is wrong, because it will put the current directory (as represented by the empty string) into the list even if it wasn't there originally. Try something like this (untested): export LD_LIBRA

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc emerge error

On 11/01/18 15:28, Corbin Bird wrote: Why are you setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH system-wide to begin with? Don't do that. Unfortunately, I had to ( and didn't realize the implications. ) In .bashrc : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$VULKAN_SDK/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH Required by the Vulkan Loader ( Mesa && Ch

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc emerge error

On 01/10/2018 01:53 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 10/01/18 19:55, Corbin Bird wrote: >> Is anyone else having a sys-libs/glibc emerge compile failure? >> >>> checking for python3... python3 >>> checking LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable... contains current directory >>> configure: error: >>> *** LD_LI

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc emerge error

On 10/01/18 19:55, Corbin Bird wrote: Is anyone else having a sys-libs/glibc emerge compile failure? checking for python3... python3 checking LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable... contains current directory configure: error: *** LD_LIBRARY_PATH shouldn't contain the current directory when *** building gl

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc upgrade and firefox/seamonkey issues

James wrote: Dale gmail.com> writes: I recently did a upgrade which included glibc. Now both Firefox and Seamonkey has problems starting. Well revdep-rebuild came back clean. I'm doing a emerge -e world at the moment. I'm hoping it is just something out of sync here. I use to use this st

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc upgrade and firefox/seamonkey issues

Dale gmail.com> writes: > >>> I recently did a upgrade which included glibc. Now both Firefox and > >>> Seamonkey has problems starting. > Well revdep-rebuild came back clean. I'm doing a emerge -e world at the > moment. I'm hoping it is just something out of sync here. I use to use this

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.17 fails and warning: setlocale: LC_ALL error

Hello, I think I can offer some some more clues to the problem in thread started by Dale, as archived here: https://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org/msg147315.html I too get the "Your old kernel is broken. You need to update it to a newer version as syscall() will break." mess

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.17 fails and warning: setlocale: LC_ALL error

walt wrote: > On 07/16/2014 10:21 AM, Dale wrote: >> I'm beginning to wonder about >> those stage3 tarballs for x86. Do they test those from time to time to >> make sure they work or do they just autobuild them and upload them? I'm >> following the install guide so I'm pretty sure I'm not doing a

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.17 fails and warning: setlocale: LC_ALL error

On 07/16/2014 10:21 AM, Dale wrote: > I'm beginning to wonder about > those stage3 tarballs for x86. Do they test those from time to time to > make sure they work or do they just autobuild them and upload them? I'm > following the install guide so I'm pretty sure I'm not doing anything > wrong bu

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc memory corruption

On 09/08/2011 10:10 AM, Bill Kenworthy wrote: What would cause this? bunyip rpm # /opt/vmware/lib/vmware/bin/vmware *** glibc detected *** /opt/vmware/lib/vmware/bin/vmware: malloc(): memory corruption: 0x09f35e80 *** ^C bunyip rpm # Ive tried doing a emerge -ep world glibc is * sys-libs/glib

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc 2.13 warning

Apparently, though unproven, at 04:07 on Thursday 10 February 2011, Keith Dart did opine thusly: > === On Wed, 02/09, Dale wrote: === > > > Now some of you know how much I hate windows. Of course, DOS wasn't > > much better, > > === > > Yep. I've been using Linux on my desktop since version 1

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc 2.13 warning

=== On Wed, 02/09, Dale wrote: === > Now some of you know how much I hate windows. Of course, DOS wasn't > much better, === Yep. I've been using Linux on my desktop since version 1.2, and UnixWare before that. Some Mac in there too. I avoid Windows like the plague that it is. -- Keith Dart --

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc 2.13 warning

Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 02:05 on Thursday 10 February 2011, Neil Bothwick did opine thusly: Or maybe Alan, if he's done polishing his humility plugin :p What make you think he's got one... or even know what it is :) Yeah, come to think of it, wh

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc 2.13 warning

Apparently, though unproven, at 02:05 on Thursday 10 February 2011, Neil Bothwick did opine thusly: > > Or maybe Alan, if he's done polishing his humility plugin :p > > What make you think he's got one... or even know what it is :) Yeah, come to think of it, what is that thing anyway? Must be

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc 2.13 warning

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:34:59 -0800, walt wrote: > On 02/09/2011 02:31 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:23:50 +0100, Nils Holland wrote: > > > >> Thanks a lot, I've read your mail just in time. Actually, glibc 2.13 > >> krept onto my first machine Monday night - I generally test n

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc 2.13 warning

On 02/09/2011 02:31 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:23:50 +0100, Nils Holland wrote: Thanks a lot, I've read your mail just in time. Actually, glibc 2.13 krept onto my first machine Monday night - I generally test new versions of such "far reaching" stuff as glibc on a single mac

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc 2.13 warning

On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 01:39:15 +0100, Holger Hoffstaette wrote: > > That's odd, it broke local deliveries for me - and others. > > Fortunately, nothing was lost, it just stayed in the queue while I > > recompiled glibc. > > Same here, but are you saying you fixed this by rebuilding 2.13? I ask >

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc 2.13 warning

On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 22:47:01 +, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:16:20 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > >> don't use prelink - but postfix still Works For Me(tm) > > That's odd, it broke local deliveries for me - and others. Fortunately, > nothing was lost, it just stayed in

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc update

Alan McKinnon wrote: IOW, the only real problem of using outdated kernel headers is not fully taking advantage of new features? Yes I did encounter strange bugs (programs not starting) until I updated the kernel headers, so instead of "yes" I'd say "no".

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc unmerged by accident

Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > He just wanted to copy over some files from backup. Specifically he > requested "common shell commands such as ls or cp" Well, he requested, that he wanted to do a merge: | I am thinking that to fix this I will have to boot from a cd and emerge | glib

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc unmerged by accident

Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 18:49 -0500, de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote: >> glibc was unmerged and now I can't use common shell commands such as ls >> or cp to list and copy files from a backup. >> >> I am thinking that to fix this I will have to boot from a cd

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.5

Thanks for all answers. It is always better to be sure to not break something, if you update the toolchain... Regards, Marc -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.5

In , Marc Blumentritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > after syncing portage yesterday, an update for glibc from 2.4-r4 to > 2.5 is shown. Is there anything special to do after this update? Last > time glibc was updated you had to rebuild world, if I remember > correct. IIRC,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc completed screwed my system

On 9/1/06, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David Grant gmail.com> writes: > > If anyone can help me I'm desperate to save this system and not have > > to reinstall. Well, I have lost xwindows/kde on (2) systems because of an upgrade of make.profile to point to 2006.1. I'm sure glibc was par

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc completed screwed my system

David Grant gmail.com> writes: > > If anyone can help me I'm desperate to save this system and not have > > to reinstall. Well, I have lost xwindows/kde on (2) systems because of an upgrade of make.profile to point to 2006.1. I'm sure glibc was part of the problem. A third syxtem, an amd64,

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc completed screwed my system

A very small step in the right direction...I unzipped the quickpkg I made into the /mnt/gentoo and now I am able to chroot in there. If I try to re-emerge glibc-2.3.6 though it complains that "downgrading" is a sure way to destruction. I'm pretty sure it would be safe for me to downgrade because I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.4-r2: Problems with UTF-8 locale

On 2006-05-05 19:11, Farhan Ahmed uttered these thoughts: > Well userlocales USE flag was there in glibc-2.4-r1 but it's absent in > glibc-2.4-r2.. But here's the weird thing, I had compiled glibc-2.4-r1 > with userlocales USE flag, in my /etc/locales.build I just have > > en_US/ISO-8859-1 > e

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.4-r2: Problems with UTF-8 locale

Farhan Ahmed wrote: > But here's the weird thing, I had compiled glibc-2.4-r1 > with userlocales USE flag, in my /etc/locales.build There *is* no file called /etc/locales.build. glibc-2.4-r2 uses /etc/locale.gen to determine, which locales are to be generated. > But with 2.4-r2 there is no such

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.4-r2: Problems with UTF-8 locale

Jeremy Olexa wrote: > Alexander Skwar wrote: >>> Sven Köhler wrote: My glibc 2.3.6 (with userlocales turned off) never creates such locales. >>> >>> There's no such flag as "userlocales". >>> > > Sorry, I cannot help with the issue but I do know there is a userlocales > flag, No, ther

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.4-r2: Problems with UTF-8 locale

Farhan Ahmed wrote: > Anyway have you changed your locale > settings from .UTF-8 to .utf8 Yep. But most importantly, I setup the /etc/locale.gen file. > (all environment variables etc.,)? Is your > system working fine now? Yes, it is. Alexander Skwar -- QOTD: "If I'm what I eat, I'm

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.4-r2: Problems with UTF-8 locale

Jeremy Olexa wrote: > Alexander Skwar wrote: > > Sven Köhler wrote: > >> My glibc 2.3.6 (with userlocales turned off) never > >> creates such locales. > > > > There's no such flag as "userlocales". > > > > Sorry, I cannot help with the issue but I do know there is a userlocales > flag, I use thi

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.4-r2: Problems with UTF-8 locale

Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> > What might have been the last glibc-version with UTF-8 locales? > >> > >> 2.3.6-r3 or 2.4-r1 > > > > No. Glibc-2.4-r1 used .utf8 locales. > > That might be. Then I wonder, why I had no problems with .UTF-8 > when I was using 2.4-r1. As I wrote, it might be, that my

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.4-r2: Problems with UTF-8 locale

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexander Skwar wrote: > Sven Köhler wrote: >> My glibc 2.3.6 (with userlocales turned off) never >> creates such locales. > > There's no such flag as "userlocales". > Sorry, I cannot help with the issue but I do know there is a userlocales flag, I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.4-r2: Problems with UTF-8 locale

Farhan Ahmed wrote: > Alexander Skwar wrote: >> Sven Köhler wrote: >> (snip) >> >> > What might have been the last glibc-version with UTF-8 locales? >> >> 2.3.6-r3 or 2.4-r1 > > No. Glibc-2.4-r1 used .utf8 locales. That might be. Then I wonder, why I had no problems with .UTF-8 when I was using

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.4-r2: Problems with UTF-8 locale

Alexander Skwar wrote: > Sven Köhler wrote: > (snip) > > > What might have been the last glibc-version with UTF-8 locales? > > 2.3.6-r3 or 2.4-r1 No. Glibc-2.4-r1 used .utf8 locales.. Just as an example of .utf8 usage even before glibc-2.4 read this Gentoo Weekly NewsLetter: http://www.gentoo

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.4-r2: Problems with UTF-8 locale

Farhan Ahmed wrote: > Sven Köhler wrote: >> (snip) >> >> I also looked it up on a Redhat-System: no .UTF-8 locales. >> >> >> What might have been the last glibc-version with UTF-8 locales? >> (i don't remember to have seen that over the last few years) > > I think some .UTF-8 locales were used

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.4-r2: Problems with UTF-8 locale

Sven Köhler wrote: >> Yesterday I updated from glibc-2.4-r1 to glibc-2.4-r2. Since then, >> I've got problems with my UTF-8 locale. I suppose, that is because >> the UTF-8 denomination seems to have changed from .UTF-8 to .utf8: > > .UTF-8 changed from .utf8? Yep. > That's not true. Wrong, it i

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.4-r2: Problems with UTF-8 locale

Sven Köhler wrote: > (snip) > > I also looked it up on a Redhat-System: no .UTF-8 locales. > > > What might have been the last glibc-version with UTF-8 locales? > (i don't remember to have seen that over the last few years) I think some .UTF-8 locales were used uptil recently.. I read the "Usin

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc-2.4-r2: Problems with UTF-8 locale

> Yesterday I updated from glibc-2.4-r1 to glibc-2.4-r2. Since then, > I've got problems with my UTF-8 locale. I suppose, that is because > the UTF-8 denomination seems to have changed from .UTF-8 to .utf8: .UTF-8 changed from .utf8? That's not true. My glibc 2.3.6 (with userlocales turned off) n

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc

NO , I meant  that  POSIX and C locales must be in /etc/locales.build not in /etc/env.d/02locale ;)  You should add your_locale to /etc/env.d/02locale Then you will have something similar to this [ ~ ] pavel $ locale LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE="ru_RU.UTF-8" LC_NUMERIC="ru_RU.UTF-8" LC_TIME="r

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc

* On Apr 29 23:41, Pavel (gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org) wrote: > Why you have POSIX locale ? > Did you edit /etc/env.d/02locale ? > You should add > > LC_ALL="" > LANG=your locale.UTF-8 Honestly I've never understood locales terribly well, but POSIX must be the default because the output of my `

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc

yep i used localepurge yesterday and then rebuilt glibc. do i need to replace 'LC_...="POSIX" with en_us, etc? i prefer the english translations but i would like also portuguese suport. thanks, vida root # locale -a C POSIX de_DE [EMAIL PROTECTED] en_HK en_PH en_US en_US.utf8 es_MX fa_IR fr_FR [

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc

What did you put in locales.build ? And post your $ locale -a On 4/29/05, Jose Moreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i think my sistem is a little messed up, because of locales:vida root # localeLANG=LC_CTYPE="POSIX"LC_NUMERIC="POSIX"LC_TIME="POSIX"LC_COLLATE="POSIX" LC_MONETARY="POSIX"LC_MESSAGES

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glibc

i think my sistem is a little messed up, because of locales: vida root # locale LANG= LC_CTYPE="POSIX" LC_NUMERIC="POSIX" LC_TIME="POSIX" LC_COLLATE="POSIX" LC_MONETARY="POSIX" LC_MESSAGES="POSIX" LC_PAPER="POSIX" LC_NAME="POSIX" LC_ADDRESS="POSIX" LC_TELEPHONE="POSIX" LC_MEASUREMENT="POSIX" LC_IDE

[gentoo-user] Re: glibc

* On Apr 29 13:06, Jose Moreira (gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org) wrote: > Is this normal? It's normal for an emerge -e system, yes, but you don't need to do that for simply recompiling glibc. Tom pgpaxZMuQVDUN.pgp Description: PGP signature