> Yesterday I updated from glibc-2.4-r1 to glibc-2.4-r2. Since then, > I've got problems with my UTF-8 locale. I suppose, that is because > the UTF-8 denomination seems to have changed from .UTF-8 to .utf8:
.UTF-8 changed from .utf8? That's not true. My glibc 2.3.6 (with userlocales turned off) never creates such locales. # equery f glibc|grep -i utf |grep CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/aa_DJ.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/af_ZA.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/an_ES.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_AE.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_BH.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_DZ.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_EG.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_IQ.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_JO.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_KW.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_LB.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_LY.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_MA.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_OM.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_QA.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_SA.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_SD.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_SY.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_TN.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ar_YE.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/az_AZ.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/be_BY.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/bg_BG.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/br_FR.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/bs_BA.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/ca_ES.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/cs_CZ.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/cy_GB.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/da_DK.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/de_AT.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/de_BE.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/de_CH.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/de_DE.utf8/LC_CTYPE /usr/lib/locale/de_LU.utf8/LC_CTYPE ... I also looked it up on a Redhat-System: no .UTF-8 locales. What might have been the last glibc-version with UTF-8 locales? (i don't remember to have seen that over the last few years)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
