Hi Pavel
On 2014-01-13, Pavel Kazakov wrote:
> According to 'euse -i d', the 'd' flag only shows up for
> '=sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6-r2' and '=sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2'. I'm assuming you
> are using a newer version of gcc that doesn't have the d use flag.
Indeed. Thank you for the explanation.
--
Gree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/13/2014 02:25 AM, Elias Diem wrote:
> On 2014-01-12, walt wrote:
>
>> I know absolutely nothing about D, which makes me qualified to ask
>> how you can tell if the 'd' useflag is working or not ;)
>
> Hehe. Good question.
>
> Well I enabled thi
On 2014-01-12, walt wrote:
> I know absolutely nothing about D, which makes me qualified to ask
> how you can tell if the 'd' useflag is working or not ;)
Hehe. Good question.
Well I enabled this USE flag for gcc but I don't have an
executable that starts with
gcc...
gdc...
And furthermore i
On 01/12/2014 10:14 AM, Elias Diem wrote:
> Hi all
>
> What's the best way to have a D compiler in Gentoo?
>
> I know that there is a USE flag for gcc which adds D, but
> apparently it doesn't work.
I know absolutely nothing about D, which makes me qualified to ask
how you can tell if the 'd' u
James wrote:
The biggest problem is I'm looking for a tool, gui, or automated
approach to discover documents (html, xml, doc-book etc) that
go with the myriad of software pacakges. I do not need a
tool to parse my directories, I'm looking for a tool that saves
me time by producing a unified deliv
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 22:28, James wrote:
> Francesco Talamona email.it> writes:
> > > > It seems like quite often I have to go on a search expedition
> > > > for docs
> > >
> > > beagle (I haven't looked a beagle since 0.0.10).
> >
> > Using 0.2.7, it's quite good.
>
> Yes this is the sort
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 03:27:30PM +, James wrote:
> Like man pages for ascii text, but which covers all of the various types
> and locations for docs. Collectively, a lot of time is wasted since
> each individual has to search ebuilds, lib, share, wikis, web sites
> and googling to find these
Roy Wright cisco.com> writes:
> Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> > wrong. C# is a dialect one can use to create .NET programs. .NET is a
> > bit similar to the Java concept. But there are numerous other languages
> > one can use to create .NET assemblies.
> > Mono is an attempt to create a .NET envi
Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 03:07:44 -0500 Roy Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Beagle is a mono application. Mono is the open source implementation
of C# which is a derivative of java aimed specifically at windoze by M
$.
wrong. C# is a dialect one can use to
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 03:07:44 -0500 Roy Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Beagle is a mono application. Mono is the open source implementation
> of C# which is a derivative of java aimed specifically at windoze by M
> $.
wrong. C# is a dialect one can use to create .NET programs. .NET is a
James wrote:
Boy this is interesting.
beagle: /etc/beagle /usr/lib/beagle /usr/share/beagle
/usr/lib/beagle show a mulitude of *.exe *.dll files
these are microsuck files (yuck)
Beagle is a mono application. Mono is the open source implementation
of C# which is a derivative of java
Francesco Talamona email.it> writes:
> > The closest
> > would be
> > beagle (I haven't looked a beagle since 0.0.10).
> Using 0.2.7, it's quite good.
Boy this is interesting.
beagle: /etc/beagle /usr/lib/beagle /usr/share/beagle
/usr/lib/beagle show a mulitude of *.exe *.dll files
these a
Francesco Talamona email.it> writes:
> > > It seems like quite often I have to go on a search expedition for
> > > docs
> > beagle (I haven't looked a beagle since 0.0.10).
> Using 0.2.7, it's quite good.
Yes this is the sort of tool I've been wanting. If one
considers the collective time
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 08:29, Roy Wright wrote:
> James wrote:
> > Ah, that brings up a follow up question. If many of the ebuild
> > packages have built in documentation, then is there a
> > tool/package/web_interface that allow the document perusal without
> > individual(admin) interaction? For
14 matches
Mail list logo
