on 2010-07-06 at 13:14 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>The football competition where england, france and italy all got their
>asses handed to them recently :-)
not to mention argentina and brazil... did you notice the tiny uy in my
e-mail address? :-) :-)
(it's a real pity i don't give a sh*t about foot
On 6 July 2010 12:14, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 July 2010 12:38:48 Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Sunday 04 July 2010 10:02:37 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> > I thought the World Cup finished last weekend :(
>>
>> What world cup?
>
> The football competition where england, france and italy all g
On Tuesday 06 July 2010 12:38:48 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 04 July 2010 10:02:37 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > I thought the World Cup finished last weekend :(
>
> What world cup?
The football competition where england, france and italy all got their asses
handed to them recently :-)
I hear
On Sunday 04 July 2010 10:02:37 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I thought the World Cup finished last weekend :(
What world cup?
--
Rgds
Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.
On 2010-07-03 6:55 AM, Mick wrote:
>> Before TB implemented Reply-To-List, I preferred lists that munged
>> the Reply-To, but no longer.
> Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I
> have posted to the list. This seems to happen because the person
> that kindly responded h
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 21:42:36 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> never had any problems like that with kmail.
> Problems with stupid fingers - yeah, a lot.
But it's easier to blame the software!
--
Neil Bothwick
Unsolicited advice is the junk mail of life
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 21:34:42 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > When I replied, I hit "A" without thinking and only saw it after I
> > > pressed Ctrl-Enter to send. So my bad, my screw-up.
That's the likely explanation. I occasionally get direct replies from
you, and they always appear in the lis
On Samstag 03 Juli 2010, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:09:37 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:37:36 Mick wrote:
> > > > Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I
> > > > have posted to the list. This seems to happen because the person
> > > >
On Saturday 03 July 2010 19:44:27 Mick wrote:
> > Two things happened here on my end:
> >
> >
> > My kmail filters didn't kick in (kmail does that to me sometimes) so the
> > mail I replied to was in my inbox, not the gentoo-user folder where it
> > should have been. The list folder is the one tha
On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:09:37 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:37:36 Mick wrote:
> > > Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I have
> > > posted to the list. This seems to happen because the person that
> > > kindly responded has for some reason cc'd
On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:37:36 Mick wrote:
> > Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I have
> > posted to the list. This seems to happen because the person that kindly
> > responded has for some reason cc'd me in the reply. If I try to reply to
> > it the post will no
On Saturday 03 July 2010 11:55:02 Mick wrote:
> On Friday 02 July 2010 15:00:10 Tanstaafl wrote:
> > On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> > > I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing
> > > the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing list
On Friday 02 July 2010 15:00:10 Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> > I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing
> > the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I
> > use don't do that.
> >
> > It is usually bett
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> If I post to the list, I expect a reply via the list. Getting two replies
>> is annoying, especially if I don't realise the private one is a duplicate
>> and reply to it before checking
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:54:33 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>
> > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it permit
> > to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole mailing
> > list.
>
> If I post to the
On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing
> the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I
> use don't do that.
>
> It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy
-10 this is plain w
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 02:54:33AM +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing
> the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I
> use don't do that.
>
> It is usually better and prefer the "answer to
On Friday 02 July 2010 10:14:38 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:54:33 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it permit
> > to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole mailing
> > list.
>
> If I post to the lis
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:54:33 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it permit
> to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole mailing
> list.
If I post to the list, I expect a reply via the list. Getting two replies
is annoyin
On Friday 02 July 2010 02:54:33 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing
> the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I
> use don't do that.
>
> It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" polic
> Nicolas Sebrecht :
>It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all"
If the replier-to-all thinks of removing unwanted recipients, yes.
But most of the time, people "reply-to-really-all" and that annoys.
Among that, when replying-to-all, messages "To:" the mailing list are
"List-id"/"X-Mail
Hi all,
I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing
the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I
use don't do that.
It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it permit
to be notified of an answer without having to track the
22 matches
Mail list logo
