On Tuesday 14 April 2009 11:06:03 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Dienstag 14 April 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 April 2009 10:48:09 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > > I don't like dolphin either, it reminds me too much of Nautilus. But
> > > > konqueror is showing it's age, and a
On Dienstag 14 April 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 April 2009 10:48:09 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > I don't like dolphin either, it reminds me too much of Nautilus. But
> > > konqueror is showing it's age, and as a browser it's now almost
> > > useless. It's JavaScript is horribly
On Tuesday 14 April 2009 10:48:09 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > I don't like dolphin either, it reminds me too much of Nautilus. But
> > konqueror is showing it's age, and as a browser it's now almost useless.
> > It's JavaScript is horribly broken and using flash is just too painful to
> > conte
On Dienstag 14 April 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 April 2009 08:56:51 Roy Wright wrote:
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 14 April 2009 02:19:47 Paul Hartman wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Paul Hartman
> > >>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>> The only app I am really dis
On Tuesday 14 April 2009 08:56:51 Roy Wright wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 April 2009 02:19:47 Paul Hartman wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Paul Hartman
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>> The only app I am really disappointed with is Amarok 2.
>
> Glad I'm not the only one who
090414 Roy Wright wrote:
> the change over to dolphin is disappointing.
> So far I've been able to mostly ignore it and use konqueror
> with one major exception, fish and sftp no longer work in konqueror.
> Only sftp works in dolphin. In the past (3.x),
> I always found fish bulletproof, while sft
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 April 2009 02:19:47 Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Paul Hartman
>>
>> wrote:
>>> The only app I am really disappointed with is Amarok 2.
Glad I'm not the only one who doesn't get Amarok 2...
Personally the change over to dolphin is
On Tuesday 14 April 2009 02:19:47 Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Paul Hartman
>
> wrote:
> > The only app I am really disappointed with is Amarok 2. I really liked
> > Amarok 1 and they started over for Amarok 2 and I dislike just about
> > everything they've done to it. T
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> The only app I am really disappointed with is Amarok 2. I really liked
> Amarok 1 and they started over for Amarok 2 and I dislike just about
> everything they've done to it. The tree-view collection list is
> awful, the UI is bad (middle
On Monday 13 April 2009 19:02:06 Philip Webb wrote:
> I'm quite willing to try new things, but KDE 4.2.1 is definitely a beta.
It's more than that. It's an experimental approach to a new way of thinking
about desktops.
KDE-4 is NOT a "New! Improved! KDE-3.5.x". It's so different that still
cal
On Monday 13 April 2009 19:14:25 Dale wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
> > I would suggest totally getting rid of everything KDE3 related before
> > trying to go KDE4... I also had lots of problems and conflicts with
> > both installed. Once I got rid of all traces of KDE3 and started
> > "fresh" with
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
>
>> I got KDE 4.2.1 installed with only a couple of bugs along the way.
>> I'm not impressed: there's some eye-candy, but usability is reduced.
>> There's a very limited choice of desktop backgrounds:
>> I like the 'No
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
> I also didn't mention that Kmahjongg 4.2.1 doesn't allow you
> to edit the layout & its "traditional" tiles are ugly.
Oh, I forgot about the games... Kolf is really really ugly now on
KDE4... they changed the colors for no apparent reason.
090413 Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
>> I got KDE 4.2.1 installed with only a couple of bugs along the way.
>> I'm not impressed: there's some eye-candy, but usability is reduced.
> I would suggest totally getting rid of everything KDE3 related
> before
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
> I got KDE 4.2.1 installed with only a couple of bugs along the way.
> I'm not impressed: there's some eye-candy, but usability is reduced.
> There's a very limited choice of desktop backgrounds:
> I like the 'No picture, pavement' choice in 3.
I got KDE 4.2.1 installed with only a couple of bugs along the way.
I'm not impressed: there's some eye-candy, but usability is reduced.
There's a very limited choice of desktop backgrounds:
I like the 'No picture, pavement' choice in 3.5.10 with different colors,
but there's nothing similar in 4.2
16 matches
Mail list logo
