Re: [gentoo-user] Internet slow at times. Can't figure out why. ISP??

J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Tuesday, April 7, 2020 5:14:14 AM CEST Dale wrote: >> Hey, >> >> As some may recall I bought a new router and modem. I was sort of >> hoping one or both of those would solve a issue I've noticed for a good >> long while. At times, my internet gets really slow, slower than

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet slow at times. Can't figure out why. ISP??

On Tuesday, April 7, 2020 5:14:14 AM CEST Dale wrote: > Hey, > > As some may recall I bought a new router and modem. I was sort of > hoping one or both of those would solve a issue I've noticed for a good > long while. At times, my internet gets really slow, slower than it > should be at least.

[gentoo-user] Internet slow at times. Can't figure out why. ISP??

Hey, As some may recall I bought a new router and modem.  I was sort of hoping one or both of those would solve a issue I've noticed for a good long while.  At times, my internet gets really slow, slower than it should be at least.  I have DSL and it isn't to fast to begin with.  At times tho, I'm

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

On Monday 09 Sep 2013 20:24:56 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 09/09/2013 02:07 PM, Mick wrote: > > On Monday 09 Sep 2013 14:42:28 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> On 09/09/2013 01:28 AM, Mick wrote: > >>> Are you saying that 2048 RSA keys are no good anymore? > >> > >> They're probably fine, but when yo

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

On Monday 09 September 2013 10:00:25 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > No. There's a GLEP for some of these issues: > > https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0057.html > > The relevant part is, > > ...any non-Gentoo controlled rsync mirror can modify executable code; > as much of this code is p

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/09/2013 02:07 PM, Mick wrote: > On Monday 09 Sep 2013 14:42:28 Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> On 09/09/2013 01:28 AM, Mick wrote: >>> Are you saying that 2048 RSA keys are no good anymore? >> >> They're probably fine, but when you're making them you

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

On Monday 09 Sep 2013 14:42:28 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 09/09/2013 01:28 AM, Mick wrote: > > Are you saying that 2048 RSA keys are no good anymore? > > They're probably fine, but when you're making them yourself, the extra > bits are free. I would assume that the NSA can crack 1024-bit RSA[1],

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/09/2013 01:36 PM, Pavel Volkov wrote: > > I noticed there's another GLEP which eliminates the mirror problem: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0058.html > > It's marked as accepted. I hope they'll implement it in reasonable > time. >

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

On 09/09/2013 05:04 PM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 04:30:31PM +0100, thegeezer wrote: >> >> Interesting, I didn't realise LSM provisioned hooks for SELinux - >> thought it it was more modular (and less 'shoehorned') than that. >> I need to go read about that some more

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

Dale wrote: > Someone found this and sent it to me. > > http://news.yahoo.com/internet-experts-want-security-revamp-nsa-revelations-020838711--sector.html > > > SNIP > > Am I right on this, wrong or somewhere in the middle? > > Dale > > :-) :-) > I got this in my email today. https:

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

>> i read in slashdot that there is a question mark over SELinux because it came >> from the NSA [4] but this is nonsense, as it is a means of securing processes >> not network connections. i find it difficult to believe that a backdoor in a >> locked cupboard in your house can somehow give access

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 04:30:31PM +0100, thegeezer wrote: > >> i read in slashdot that there is a question mark over SELinux because it > >> came > >> from the NSA [4] but this is nonsense, as it is a means of securing > >> processes > >> not network connections. i find it difficult to believe

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:36:09AM +0100, thegeezer wrote: > There's a lot FUD out there and equally there is some truth.  the NSA "we can > decrypt everything" statement was really very vague, and can easily be done if > you have a lot of taps (ala PRISM) and start doing mitm attacks to reduce the

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

On 09/09/2013 03:19 AM, Pavel Volkov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Michael Orlitzky > wrote: > > The CA infrastructure was never secure. It exists to transfer money away > from website owners and into the bank accounts of the CAs and browser > m

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

On 09/09/2013 02:50 AM, Adam Carter wrote: > [2] > > http://michael.orlitzky.com/articles/why_im_against_ca-signed_certificates.php > . > > > I like to state some of what you say here as "website certificates are > only as trusted as the LEAST trustworthy CA in the trusted certificat

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/09/2013 01:28 AM, Mick wrote: > > Are you saying that 2048 RSA keys are no good anymore? > They're probably fine, but when you're making them yourself, the extra bits are free. I would assume that the NSA can crack 1024-bit RSA[1], so why not

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

> When a top-post is that long did you read it before noticing? > > Well, if you opened this email, "All ur base r belong to us!" :$ oops, was more focussed on my rant than the etiquette

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:36:09AM +0100, thegeezer wrote: > There's a lot FUD out there and equally there is some truth. the NSA > "we can decrypt everything" statement was really very vague, and can > easily be done if you have a lot of taps (ala PRISM) and start doing > mitm attacks to reduce t

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

There's a lot FUD out there and equally there is some truth. the NSA "we can decrypt everything" statement was really very vague, and can easily be done if you have a lot of taps (ala PRISM) and start doing mitm attacks to reduce the level of security to something that is crackable. for 'compatibi

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > The CA infrastructure was never secure. It exists to transfer money away > from website owners and into the bank accounts of the CAs and browser > makers. Security may be one of their goals, but it's certainly not the > motivating one. > W

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

> > [2] > > http://michael.orlitzky.com/articles/why_im_against_ca-signed_certificates.php > . > I like to state some of what you say here as "website certificates are only as trusted as the LEAST trustworthy CA in the trusted certificate store"

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

On Monday 09 Sep 2013 02:33:48 Dale wrote: > Someone found this and sent it to me. > > http://news.yahoo.com/internet-experts-want-security-revamp-nsa-revelations > -020838711--sector.html > > > I'm not to concerned about the political aspect of this but do have to > wonder what this means when

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

On Monday 09 Sep 2013 03:05:57 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 09/08/2013 09:33 PM, Dale wrote: > > Someone found this and sent it to me. > > > > http://news.yahoo.com/internet-experts-want-security-revamp-nsa-revelatio > > ns-020838711--sector.html > > > > > > I'm not to concerned about the politi

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.

On 09/08/2013 09:33 PM, Dale wrote: > Someone found this and sent it to me. > > http://news.yahoo.com/internet-experts-want-security-revamp-nsa-revelations-020838711--sector.html > > > I'm not to concerned about the political aspect of this but do have to > wonder what this means when we use si

[gentoo-user] Internet security.

Someone found this and sent it to me. http://news.yahoo.com/internet-experts-want-security-revamp-nsa-revelations-020838711--sector.html I'm not to concerned about the political aspect of this but do have to wonder what this means when we use sites that are supposed to be secure and use HTTPS.

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On 2011-06-17 3:36 AM, Cahn Roger wrote: > Since this night I found something important: the little box > put in the socket wall from where the cable goes out, doesn't > no more work!!! Wow... All of this wasted bandwidth and you are just *now* getting around to mentioning that you are using a po

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

All hail to that. Gentoo is the best. By far. --Original Message-- From: Roger Cahn To: Gentoo ReplyTo: Gentoo Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Internet Sent: 17 Jun 2011 12:32 > Well, as long as your connection problem is now solved you can carry on with > using your Gentoo! :) Ye

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> Well, as long as your connection problem is now solved you can carry on with > using your Gentoo! :) Yes, I'm very happy to be able to use it again on my desktop. Long life to Gentoo, indeed!!!

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Friday 17 Jun 2011 10:56:30 Roger Cahn wrote: > > You've been using powerline networking and never thought to mention it > > throughout this entire thread, even when people were saying it had to be > > a hardware problem? > > Excuse me Neil, and the others, but you're right, > I should have men

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> You've been using powerline networking and never thought to mention it > throughout this entire thread, even when people were saying it had to be > a hardware problem? Excuse me Neil, and the others, but you're right, I should have mentionned it.

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:29:48 +0200, Cahn Roger wrote: > Thanks a lot to you all who tried to help me. > It was a hard way to obtain the solution. > The problem was really a hardware one, > not the cable, but just the little box connected > to the wall socket for my connection to the router > throu

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> But, on my desktop I don't have yet internet connection. > Is the network card even so out??? I don't know why, but my desktop is now connected to internet! The only thing I did was a reboot! Thanks a lot to you all who tried to help me. It was a hard way to obtain the solution. The problem wa

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> If the PC has wireless it would be a quick test to run to prove if the eth0 > NIC on the mobo is borked. Yesterday night, under Win XP (!), I could connect to internet with wifi.

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

>>> 1. are the lights on or flashing with a cable plugged in and pinging >>> something valid? >> No. They are stable > That indicates a problem - if a packet is going out/in, the lights > shouls flash Excuse me; I looked only half a second!!! Yes they are flashing. Since this night I found so

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 16:10 +0200, Cahn Roger wrote: > > Apologies if I missed someone already asking these: > > No problem! Thanks to try to help me. > > > 1. are the lights on or flashing with a cable plugged in and pinging > > something valid? > > No. They are stable > That indicates a prob

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> Wait 5 minutes and then restart the whole thing. I did it, but without success :-(

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Thursday 16 June 2011 17:20:10 Thanasis wrote: > on 06/16/2011 05:11 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following: > >> Reset the switch too? > > > > Excuse me Thanasis but I don't understand what you mean ;-( > > Reset, or power-off and power-on the switch/hub. Or simply, shut down everything that's

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/16/2011 05:11 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following: > >> Reset the switch too? > > Excuse me Thanasis but I don't understand what you mean ;-( > > > Reset, or power-off and power-on the switch/hub.

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> Reset the switch too? Excuse me Thanasis but I don't understand what you mean ;-(

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> Apologies if I missed someone already asking these: No problem! Thanks to try to help me. > 1. are the lights on or flashing with a cable plugged in and pinging > something valid? No. They are stable > 2. can you ping yourself (both 127.0.0.1 and the nic IP) - cable plugged > in They work bo

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/16/2011 10:50 AM Cahn Roger wrote the following: > Or someone's standing on the cable :-) > > Yes, a bad spirit!!! > > I resume. > 1-The problem occured after I tried to share my Epson printer > between my three PCs: Gentoo+XP (twice) and W7 > 2-The NIC is included in the motherboard (Asu

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Thursday 16 Jun 2011 09:02:01 Cahn Roger wrote: > > OK, let's look at this from the router side ... what router make & model > > do you have? > > It's a box through which I get internet, telephone. > The name is Neuf-Box and given by access supplier SFR. > It continue to work well on my two oth

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

Apologies if I missed someone already asking these: 1. are the lights on or flashing with a cable plugged in and pinging something valid? 2. can you ping yourself (both 127.0.0.1 and the nic IP) - cable plugged in 3. do you have IP tables installed - "iptables -vnL" and check you have not firewa

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> Based on all the information provided already, there is a very good chance > that the network card on your mainboard is no longer working correctly. I'm afraid you're right, because neither Gentoo nor XP work and they're on two different HD. > I am, to be honest, hoping that it is caused by in

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Thursday 16 June 2011 10:28:47 Cahn Roger wrote: > > Can you get hold of a PCI* NIC to try, it will appear as eth1. > > Excuse me, I don't understand what you mean " get hold of a PCI* NIC" :-( > > A lspci gives: > > 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 PCI-E >

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Thursday 16 June 2011 09:50:00 Cahn Roger wrote: > Or someone's standing on the cable :-) > > Yes, a bad spirit!!! > > I resume. > 1-The problem occured after I tried to share my Epson printer > between my three PCs: Gentoo+XP (twice) and W7 Is the printer still connected and switched on? I

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> Can you get hold of a PCI* NIC to try, it will appear as eth1. Excuse me, I don't understand what you mean " get hold of a PCI* NIC" :-( A lspci gives: 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 12)

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:06:19 +0200, Cahn Roger wrote: > This really sounds like broken hardware and if the > > cable is fine, the NIC is suspect. > > I'm afraid you're right! > But, as I just wrote, the NIC is included in the motherboard... > > PERHAPS a solution: try a restore from the > exter

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

This really sounds like broken hardware and if the > cable is fine, the NIC is suspect. I'm afraid you're right! But, as I just wrote, the NIC is included in the motherboard... PERHAPS a solution: try a restore from the external HD where I have saved a week ago with fsarchiver on SystemRescueCD.

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:50:00 +0200, Cahn Roger wrote: > 2-The NIC is included in the motherboard (Asus P5K-E) Can you get hold of a PCI* NIC to try, it will appear as eth1. If it works the problem is with the motherboard NIC. I'd also check the BIOS to make sure the pixies haven't disabled the NI

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

Or someone's standing on the cable :-) Yes, a bad spirit!!! I resume. 1-The problem occured after I tried to share my Epson printer between my three PCs: Gentoo+XP (twice) and W7 2-The NIC is included in the motherboard (Asus P5K-E) 3-The cable from the dektop, where the problem exists, works f

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Wednesday 15 June 2011 23:38:01 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:14:28 +0100, Mick wrote: > > > > If not please change the ethernet cable. > > > > > > I did it, it was even a new one! > > > > > > > This seems s much like a hardware failure > > > > > > > > I can't think of an

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Tuesday 14 June 2011 16:30:54 Thanasis wrote: > on 06/14/2011 05:45 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following: > >> Can you check the network cable and connections to ensure that is > >> actually correct? > > > > The cable and connections are well. > > NIC became faulty? After reading this thread, I'

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:14:28 +0100, Mick wrote: > > > If not please change the ethernet cable. > > > > I did it, it was even a new one! > > > > > This seems s much like a hardware failure > > > > > > I can't think of anything else. > > > > I would like this was the key, but... :-(

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Wednesday 15 Jun 2011 22:49:46 Cahn Roger wrote: > > Can you ping your machine from any other PC on your LAN? > > No: Destination Host Unreachable > (from 192.168.1.22 to 192.168.1.20) > > > If not please change the ethernet cable. > > I did it, it was even a new one! > > > This seems s

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> Can you ping your machine from any other PC on your LAN? No: Destination Host Unreachable (from 192.168.1.22 to 192.168.1.20) > If not please change the ethernet cable. I did it, it was even a new one! > This seems s much like a hardware failure > I can't think of anything else. I w

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Wednesday 15 Jun 2011 17:44:40 Cahn Roger wrote: > > Can you please try to ping your router: > > > > ping -c 3 192.168.1.1 > > It fails: Destination Host Unreachable > > > if this fails try to ping other PCs in your LAN. > > I can't get other PCs > > If that fails too can you use arping ins

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> So try the following and post output: > # ping -c 3 192.168.1.1 ; arp -a ping -c 3 192.168.1.1 ; arp -a PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. >From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable >From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable >From 192.168.1.20

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/15/2011 08:31 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following: >> Assign one manually. > >> ifconfig eth0 down 0 >> ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.111 up >> ifconfig >> route -n >> ping 192.168.1.1 >> arp -a > > It works as well with SystemRescueCD as on a terminal > But ping to another PC gives Destination Hos

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> Assign one manually. > ifconfig eth0 down 0 > ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.111 up > ifconfig > route -n > ping 192.168.1.1 > arp -a It works as well with SystemRescueCD as on a terminal But ping to another PC gives Destination Host Unreachable

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/15/2011 07:26 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following: > >> Once you are inside the SystemRescueCD (has finished booting) try to >> start the network. It should get an IP from the router's dhcp server. >> If it doesn't, then try to assign manually one to eth0, and test. > > OK. I make an ifconfig

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> Can you please try to ping your router: > ping -c 3 192.168.1.1 It fails: Destination Host Unreachable > if this fails try to ping other PCs in your LAN. I can't get other PCs If that fails too can you use arping instead: > > arping -c 3 -I eth0 192.168.1.1 > > or the same with the IP a

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> Once you are inside the SystemRescueCD (has finished booting) try to > start the network. It should get an IP from the router's dhcp server. > If it doesn't, then try to assign manually one to eth0, and test. OK. I make an ifconfig and the adress is: 169.264.240.204 and of course Firefox has no

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Wednesday 15 Jun 2011 16:53:58 Cahn Roger wrote: > Now I have emerged iproute2 and I can give also the last answer > > > route -n > > > > and what does ip show: > > ip link show dev eth0 > > route add default gw 192.168.1.1 > Bureau cahn # route -n > Table de routage IP du noyau > Destinati

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/15/2011 06:47 PM Thanasis wrote the following: > on 06/15/2011 05:55 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following: >> > open a root terminal and type > ifconfig > and > route -n >>> Try to boot from a rescue or live CD (like ubuntu maybe) and see what >>> you get. >> >> After the Sy

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

Now I have emerged iproute2 and I can give also the last answer > route -n > > and what does ip show: > > ip link show dev eth0 route add default gw 192.168.1.1 Bureau cahn # route -n Table de routage IP du noyau Destination Passerelle Genmask Indic Metric RefUse Iface 19

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> If you have another device with Internet connection you can download > the missing files and place it into your /usr/portage/distfiles Thank you Paul for the tip :-) Roger

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/15/2011 05:55 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following: > open a root terminal and type ifconfig and route -n >>> >> Try to boot from a rescue or live CD (like ubuntu maybe) and see what >> you get. > > After the SystemRescueCD was launched, ifconfig > gave for etho a bad adres

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Cahn Roger wrote: > Yes and I haven't it emerged. > But I can't do it because...I have no connection to internet! I'm sorry. :) I didn't read the entire thread. If you have another device with Internet connection you can download the missing files and place it i

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

Le 15/06/2011 16:52, Paul Hartman a écrit : > It is in package sys-apps/iproute2 Yes and I haven't it emerged. But I can't do it because...I have no connection to internet! Thanks Paul for helping me Roger

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

>>> open a root terminal and type >>> ifconfig >>> and >>> route -n >> > Try to boot from a rescue or live CD (like ubuntu maybe) and see what > you get. After the SystemRescueCD was launched, ifconfig gave for etho a bad adress: fe00:: and route -n gave "kernel IP routing table" but

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Cahn Roger wrote: > Bureau cahn # ip link show dev eth0 > bash: ip : commande introuvable It is in package sys-apps/iproute2

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> When you then run: > route add default gw 192.168.1.1 > to define a route manually what do you get in response and then what does it > show: > route -n > and what does ip show: > ip link show dev eth0 Here it is. But the last command not found! route add default gw 192.168.1.1 Bureau

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/15/2011 04:55 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following: >> open a root terminal and type >> ifconfig >> and >> route -n > Try to boot from a rescue or live CD (like ubuntu maybe) and see what you get.

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/15/2011 04:55 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following: >> open a root terminal and type >> ifconfig >> and >> route -n > I wanted to see those when you have booted from a rescue CD.

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Wednesday 15 Jun 2011 14:55:00 Cahn Roger wrote: > > open a root terminal and type > > ifconfig > > and > > route -n > > Here it is: > > ifconfig > eth0 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1e:8c:4a:44:db > inet adr:192.168.1.20 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Masque:255.255.255.0 > a

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> open a root terminal and type > ifconfig > and > route -n Here it is: ifconfig eth0 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1e:8c:4a:44:db inet adr:192.168.1.20 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Masque:255.255.255.0 adr inet6: fe80::21e:8cff:fe4a:44db/64 Scope:Lien UP BROADCAST RU

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Wednesday 15 Jun 2011 09:04:09 Cahn Roger wrote: > >> If you have ethtool installed on the problematic pc, post the output of: > >> > >> ethtool eth0 > > No, I don't have it. > > > f you don't have ethtool, post the output of: > > > > # dmesg | grep eth > > dmesg | grep eth > [2.161822

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

>> If you have ethtool installed on the problematic pc, post the output of: >> ethtool eth0 No, I don't have it. > f you don't have ethtool, post the output of: > # dmesg | grep eth dmesg | grep eth [2.161822] sky2 :02:00.0: eth0: addr 00:1e:8c:4a:44:db [ 15.970632] sky2 :02:00.

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/15/2011 12:57 AM Thanasis wrote the following: > on 06/15/2011 12:33 AM Cahn Roger wrote the following: >>> Can you ping 192.168.1.1 from another machine? >> >> Yes, from my laptop with which I'm writing >> >> Portable cahn # ping 192.168.1.1 >> PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/15/2011 01:31 AM Thanasis wrote the following: > on 06/15/2011 01:24 AM Mick wrote the following: >> On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 23:01:09 Thanasis wrote: >>> on 06/15/2011 12:47 AM Mick wrote the following: >>> snip >>> You need to remove those lines that I asked you to type on the command >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/15/2011 01:24 AM Mick wrote the following: > On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 23:01:09 Thanasis wrote: >> on 06/15/2011 12:47 AM Mick wrote the following: >> snip >> >>> You need to remove those lines that I asked you to type on the command >>> line from the /etc/conf.d/net >> >> He should have already

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 23:01:09 Thanasis wrote: > on 06/15/2011 12:47 AM Mick wrote the following: > snip > > > You need to remove those lines that I asked you to type on the command > > line from the /etc/conf.d/net > > He should have already removed them (see the messages in the thread). > /etc

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

* Mick [110614 17:20]: > On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 20:45:30 Cahn Roger wrote: > > > # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop > > > # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up > > > > > > and post output of > > > > /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop > > * Caching service dependencies ... > > /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broad

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/15/2011 12:47 AM Mick wrote the following: snip > > You need to remove those lines that I asked you to type on the command line > from the /etc/conf.d/net He should have already removed them (see the messages in the thread). /etc/conf.d/net should be empty by now, which means it defaults

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/15/2011 12:33 AM Cahn Roger wrote the following: >> Can you ping 192.168.1.1 from another machine? > > Yes, from my laptop with which I'm writing > > Portable cahn # ping 192.168.1.1 > PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=3

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/15/2011 12:33 AM Cahn Roger wrote the following: >> Can you ping 192.168.1.1 from another machine? > > Yes, from my laptop with which I'm writing > > Portable cahn # ping 192.168.1.1 > PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=3

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 20:45:30 Cahn Roger wrote: > > # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop > > # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up > > > > and post output of > > /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop > * Caching service dependencies ... > /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable > /etc/init.d/

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 18:44:43 Cahn Roger wrote: > >>> Try setting an address manually: > >>> ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 broadcast 192.168.1.255 netmask > >>> 255.255.255.0 > >>> > >>> route add default gw 192.168.1.1 (assuming that this is your router) > > It doesn't work: error locating ho

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> Can you ping 192.168.1.1 from another machine? Yes, from my laptop with which I'm writing Portable cahn # ping 192.168.1.1 PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=3.86 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=3.86 ms 64

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/14/2011 11:36 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following: > Bureau cahn # ping 192.168.1.1 > PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. >>From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable >>From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable >>From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=4 Dest

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> Run these (in sequence) as root (and post output): > > # echo > /etc/conf.d/net > # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop > # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 zap > # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up > # ifconfig > # ping 192.168.1.1 Bad luck: it fails. Bureau cahn # echo > /etc/conf.d/net Bureau cahn # /etc/init.d/net.

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

on 06/14/2011 10:45 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following: >> # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop >> # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up >> >> and post output of > > /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop > * Caching service dependencies ... > /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable > /etc/init.d/

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop > # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up > > and post output of /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop * Caching service dependencies ... /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable SIOCADDRT: Le

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

>>> Try setting an address manually: >>> >>> ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 broadcast 192.168.1.255 netmask 255.255.255.0 >>> >>> route add default gw 192.168.1.1 (assuming that this is your router) It doesn't work: error locating host target (for route) Regards Roger

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

>> Try setting an address manually: >> >> ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 broadcast 192.168.1.255 netmask 255.255.255.0 >> >> route add default gw 192.168.1.1 (assuming that this is your router) > > I put this in /etc/conf.d/net; is it right? No. Run them from terminal as root. Then check.

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> Your DHCP server serves addresses for other hardware OK? Yes. A PC with W7, my laptop with XP and Gentoo Both work fine. The problem is on my desktop with two HD: XP and Gentoo Both OS can't connect to Internet. > When you say fixed addresses you mean the DHCP server gives out a > fixed IP add

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

> It depends on your router. Usually routers have at least a GUI control panel > access and one of the pages shows recent attempts to connect and authenticate. My router hasn't this! > Are your running some sort of an access control list on the router and have > not included your MAC address?

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 15:42:52 Cahn Roger wrote: > Hi Mick, > > > What does the router log show? > > Euh, how can I get it??? It depends on your router. Usually routers have at least a GUI control panel access and one of the pages shows recent attempts to connect and authenticate. Are your r

Re: [gentoo-user] Internet

* Cahn Roger [110614 09:31]: > Le 14/06/2011 15:15, Todd Goodman a écrit : > > Hi Todd, Hi Roger, > > Thank you for your quick answer. You're welcome (for what it's worth.) > > > It looks like your DHCP server isn't serving addresses. > > Well, it serves adresses for W7, and on the laptop

  1   2   >