walt gmail.com> writes:
> $l .ooo3/user/uno_packages/cache/
> -rw-r--r-- 1 wa1ter users 9511 2009-08-02 09:29 log.txt
> drwxr-xr-x 8 wa1ter users 4096 2008-10-19 18:13 registry/
> -rw-r--r-- 1 wa1ter users 1 2009-08-02 09:29 stamp.sys
> drwxr-xr-x 3 wa1ter users 4096 2008-12-07 15:30 uno_p
On 08/03/2009 08:25 AM, James wrote:
walt gmail.com> writes:
# ls -alg /usr/lib64/openoffice/share/uno_packages/cache
Hmm. Both my x86 machine and my ~amd64 machine have *nothing* in that
directory. All of those files and directories are in my ~/.ooo3 instead.
That's certainly not co
walt gmail.com> writes:
> > # ls -alg /usr/lib64/openoffice/share/uno_packages/cache
> Hmm. Both my x86 machine and my ~amd64 machine have *nothing* in that
> directory. All of those files and directories are in my ~/.ooo3 instead.
That's certainly not consistent?
Here's the files under my
On 08/03/2009 06:54 AM, James wrote:
Well here's what I found:
# ls -alg /usr/lib64/openoffice/share/uno_packages/cache
total 13
drwxr-xr-x 4 root 168 Aug 2 16:34 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root72 Mar 26 02:33 ..
drwx-- 8 root 520 Jul 17 08:13 registry
-rw--- 1 root 1 Aug 2 16:34 stam
James wrote:
> Mike Kazantsev gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
>>> access("/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../share/uno_packages/cache/registry/
>>> com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/registry/
>>> data/org/openoffice",
>>> F_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
>>>
>
walt gmail.com> writes:
> And 'grep -r 1.4.2 /etc/*' may turn up obsolete config files that you don't
> know you have. It's like rummaging through your attic :)
Hello Walt,
fixing the file permission under:
/usr/lib64/openoffice/share/uno_packages/cache
did the trick for me.
thanks,
Jam
Mike Kazantsev gmail.com> writes:
> > access("/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../share/uno_packages/cache/registry/
> > com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/registry/
> > data/org/openoffice",
> > F_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
> Why is that?
Good question, d
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 00:38:32 + (UTC)
James wrote:
> Mike Kazantsev gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > emerge -1 dev-util/strace && strace -f ooffice 2>strace.log
> > grep -2 -e EACCES -e EPERM strace.log
> > tail -500 strace.log | less (to see what happened last)
>
>
>
> OK, Here are the
Dale gmail.com> writes:
> Same here. Have you tried renaming the config directory and letting it
> recreate it fresh? Sometimes that helps. You know, the /home/≤user
> name>/.ooo3 directory? You can rename it, move it or something then
> restart OOo and see if it works.
OK,
Well I tried t
On 08/02/2009 01:42 PM, James wrote:
walt gmail.com> writes:
java-check-environment
Java environment is sane. Congratulations!
eselect java-vm list
Available Java Virtual Machines:
[1] sun-jdk-1.6 system-vm
But look here:
eix virtual/jdk
[I] virtual/jdk
Available versions:
James wrote:
> Dale gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
>> Usually if something runs as root but not a user, it's a permissions
>> issue. You running something special on your system? Hardened or
>> something more "secure"?
>>
>
>
> Nope,
>
> It's been a normal (stable) gentoo workstation
> with OO
Mike Kazantsev gmail.com> writes:
> emerge -1 dev-util/strace && strace -f ooffice 2>strace.log
> grep -2 -e EACCES -e EPERM strace.log
> tail -500 strace.log | less (to see what happened last)
OK, Here are the bottom lines:
[pid 28034]
stat("/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../share/u
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 23:45:16 + (UTC)
James wrote:
> Dale gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > Usually if something runs as root but not a user, it's a permissions
> > issue. You running something special on your system? Hardened or
> > something more "secure"?
>
>
> Nope,
>
> It's been a normal
walt gmail.com> writes:
> Ah, that was the jog my memory needed. For reasons I don't know,
> there was some old cruft remaining in either /etc/env.d or /etc/conf.d
> or /etc/java-config-2, or maybe all three, that confused java-config.
OK
> I had to hand-edit files in one/all of those places
Dale gmail.com> writes:
> Usually if something runs as root but not a user, it's a permissions
> issue. You running something special on your system? Hardened or
> something more "secure"?
Nope,
It's been a normal (stable) gentoo workstation
with OO for a couple of years. KDE4 and X
starte
On 08/02/2009 01:42 PM, James wrote:
But look here:
eix virtual/jdk
[I] virtual/jdk
Available versions:
(1.4) 1.4.1 1.4.2
(1.5) 1.5.0
(1.6) 1.6.0
Installed versions: 1.4.2(1.4)(14:13:11 07/07/09) 1.6.0(1.6)(14:10:01
Ah, that was the jog my memory
James wrote:
> walt gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
>> IMO unless you're doing some really unusual/obscure java thing,
>> you don't want or need the blacktown-jdk. I'm guessing that if
>> you delete that and run revdep-rebuild you'll probably see those
>> other packages get rebuilt against the sun-jd
walt gmail.com> writes:
> IMO unless you're doing some really unusual/obscure java thing,
> you don't want or need the blacktown-jdk. I'm guessing that if
> you delete that and run revdep-rebuild you'll probably see those
> other packages get rebuilt against the sun-jdk-1.6 and that will
> get
On 08/02/2009 12:42 PM, James wrote:
Calculating dependencies... done!
virtual/jdk-1.4.2 pulled in by:
dev-db/hsqldb-1.8.0.10
dev-java/jdbc-mysql-5.0.8
dev-java/jdbc-postgresql-8.3_p603-r1
dev-util/eclipse-sdk-3.2.1-r3
So it looks like I need this virtual/jdk-1.4.2 ???
19 matches
Mail list logo
