On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 1:32:48 AM MSK, Mick wrote:
I agree with Neil. I can't really see what Dolphin offers that Konqueror
didn't already have.
It has Git and Mercurial plugins and split view.
Not that I actively use those features but Dolphin seems to be more
responsive anyway.
For
On 08/10/2014 01:39, walt wrote:
> On 10/05/2014 08:31 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, walt wrote:
>>>
>>> This machine (my nfsv3 file server) just got a new wireless adapter, which
>>> works fine for everything except serving files :(
>>>
>>> mount.nfs: requested NFS version o
On Wednesday 08 Oct 2014 05:46:40 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 09:18:04 PM Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:26:42 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > > I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and
> > > > occasionally as an Internet browser. Ho
On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 04:39:32 PM walt wrote:
> On 10/05/2014 08:31 PM, Tom H wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, walt wrote:
> >> This machine (my nfsv3 file server) just got a new wireless adapter,
> >> which
> >> works fine for everything except serving files :(
> >>
> >> mount.
On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 09:18:04 PM Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:26:42 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and
> > > occasionally as an Internet browser. However, I have set it up to
use
> > > WebKit as its browser e
On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 12:20:27 PM Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 10/07/2014 11:26 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > Why not use Dolphin as file manager?
>
> Dolphin is pretty buggy. I've found a few and one repeats itself
> frequently. I'm pretty sure I found an existing bug for the issue, but
> it's b
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 14:51:06 -0400
Todd Goodman wrote:
> * Gevisz [141006 00:19]:
> [SNIP]
> > I am going to post the question about it in vim mailing list
> > but I guess that the first question to me will be: "Was your
> > vim compiled with the +eval feature?"
> >
> > I guess that the answer i
On 10/05/2014 08:31 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, walt wrote:
>>
>> This machine (my nfsv3 file server) just got a new wireless adapter, which
>> works fine for everything except serving files :(
>>
>> mount.nfs: requested NFS version or transport protocol is not supported
>>
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 22:56:28 Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Mick wrote:
> > On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 17:08:11 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:39:11 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >> > > Check /etc/portage/repos.conf
> >> >
> >> > That's it! Many thanks, Br
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 17:08:11 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:39:11 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> > > Check /etc/portage/repos.conf
>> >
>> > That's it! Many thanks, Bruce.
>>
>> Indeed. That directory was either empty or absent on a
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 17:08:11 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:39:11 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > Check /etc/portage/repos.conf
> >
> > That's it! Many thanks, Bruce.
>
> Indeed. That directory was either empty or absent on all my systems.
> copying repos.conf from /usr/share
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 21:18:04 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:26:42 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and
> > > occasionally as an Internet browser. However, I have set it up to use
> > > WebKit as its browser engine inste
Am 06.10.2014 um 11:57 schrieb Michael Palimaka:
> On 10/06/2014 05:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> Am 04.10.2014 um 19:37 schrieb Michael Palimaka:
>>> On 10/04/2014 11:26 PM, behrouz khosravi wrote:
Hello everyone.
I was wondering if anyone has tried KDE5?
Do you know when it
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:26:42 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and
> > occasionally as an Internet browser. However, I have set it up to use
> > WebKit as its browser engine instead of KHTML.
>
> Why not use Dolphin as file manager?
Be
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:46:58 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > Is there any "shorter path" to what I am trying to do -- without the
> > > cascade of shells which do nothing but waiting of the child process
> > > to end?
> >
> > I have this in ~/.zshrc.
> >
> > if [[ "${TERM}" != "screen"
On 10/07/2014 11:26 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> Why not use Dolphin as file manager?
>
Dolphin is pretty buggy. I've found a few and one repeats itself
frequently. I'm pretty sure I found an existing bug for the issue, but
it's been happening to me since 4.0.
(When viewing things in tree view a
* Gevisz [141006 00:19]:
[SNIP]
> I am going to post the question about it in vim mailing list
> but I guess that the first question to me will be: "Was your
> vim compiled with the +eval feature?"
>
> I guess that the answer is "yes" but do not know it for sure.
You can see what features are co
On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 04:20:16 PM Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 15:48:33 Philip Webb wrote:
> > 141007 Pavel Volkov wrote:
> > > On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > >> I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months,
> > >> I get along just f
141007 Mick wrote:
> On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> Konqueror ... makes a fine file manager
> I still use Konqueror as file manager ...
I strongly recommend Krusader as file manager,
tho' it has only minimal development support.
--
,,==
Neil Bothwick [14-10-07 17:24]:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 06:34:55 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > for starting and running a script on a headless system for me "nohup"
> > works perfectly.
> > For interactive session via ssh screen/tmux turned out to be the
> > solution to detach from jobs st
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 10/07/2014 10:50:53 AM, Tomas Mozes wrote:
> > On 2014-10-07 10:13, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> dev-lang/perl-5.20.1 is in the tree (unmasked), but trying to upgrade
> >> gives me lots of blocks requiring versions which are not
> >> in the tree, yet, lik
On 10/07/2014 06:07:11 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Dienstag, 7. Oktober 2014, 17:41:11 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
> >
> > emerge -av1 perl-cleaner
> > emerge -av1O dev-lang/perl
>
> These two worked just fine, BUT
>
> > perl-cleaner --all
>
> fails miserably showing many blocks mentioning vers
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:39:11 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Check /etc/portage/repos.conf
>
> That's it! Many thanks, Bruce.
Indeed. That directory was either empty or absent on all my systems.
copying repos.conf from /usr/share/portage and modifying the path got rid
of the message.
--
Ne
Am Dienstag, 7. Oktober 2014, 17:41:11 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
> >
> > emerge -av1 perl-cleaner
> > emerge -av1O dev-lang/perl
>
> These two worked just fine, BUT
>
> > perl-cleaner --all
>
> fails miserably showing many blocks mentioning versions which are not
> in the (unstable) tree
Please
On 2014-10-07 17:57, Tomas Mozes wrote:
On 2014-10-07 17:09, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Afternoon all,
As a step towards exporting my portage tree over NFS I decided to move
/usr/portage to /var/portage, but leave /usr/portage/packages and
/usr/portage/distfiles where they are.
This is how it looks
Hinnerk van Bruinehsen [14-10-07 17:23]:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:29:11AM +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are two SDcards of the same brand and model.
> > The first one cariies a not so current Gentoo Linux.
> > The second one is empty.
> > Now the first one is image-c
On 2014-10-07 17:09, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Afternoon all,
As a step towards exporting my portage tree over NFS I decided to move
/usr/portage to /var/portage, but leave /usr/portage/packages and
/usr/portage/distfiles where they are.
This is how it looks now:
$ grep DIR= /etc/portage/make.conf
On 2014-10-07 17:41, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 10/07/2014 10:50:53 AM, Tomas Mozes wrote:
On 2014-10-07 10:13, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
dev-lang/perl-5.20.1 is in the tree (unmasked), but trying to upgrade
gives me lots of blocks requiring versions which are not
in the tree, yet, like
[bloc
Hinnerk van Bruinehsen [14-10-07 17:23]:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 06:34:06PM +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> >
> > Moin Hinnerk,
> > (hopefully have guessed this greet correctly...I am from that
> > part of Germany ;)
> >
> > I have the source of the driver exclusivly compiled for 3.8.1
On 10/07/2014 10:50:53 AM, Tomas Mozes wrote:
On 2014-10-07 10:13, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
dev-lang/perl-5.20.1 is in the tree (unmasked), but trying to upgrade
gives me lots of blocks requiring versions which are not
in the tree, yet, like
[blocks B ]
emerge -av1 perl-cleaner
emerge
On Wednesday 08 October 2014 01:29:59 Bruce Schultz wrote:
> Check /etc/portage/repos.conf
That's it! Many thanks, Bruce.
--
Regards
Peter
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:09:54 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> This seems to work OK, except for eix-update, which gives me this:
>
> $ eix-update
> Reading Portage settings ..
> Building database (/var/cache/eix/portage.eix) ..
> [0] "gentoo" /var/portage/ (cache: metadata-md5-or-flat)
> Readi
On 8 October 2014 1:09:54 AM AEST, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>Afternoon all,
>
>As a step towards exporting my portage tree over NFS I decided to move
>/usr/portage to /var/portage, but leave /usr/portage/packages and
>/usr/portage/distfiles where they are.
>
>This is how it looks now:
>
>$ grep D
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 15:48:33 Philip Webb wrote:
> 141007 Pavel Volkov wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months,
> >> I get along just fine with Firefox and Chromium.
> >> I believe Konqueror is essen
Afternoon all,
As a step towards exporting my portage tree over NFS I decided to move
/usr/portage to /var/portage, but leave /usr/portage/packages and
/usr/portage/distfiles where they are.
This is how it looks now:
$ grep DIR= /etc/portage/make.conf
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
PKGDIR="/
141007 Pavel Volkov wrote:
> On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months,
>> I get along just fine with Firefox and Chromium.
>> I believe Konqueror is essentially unmaintained these days
>> or at least on life support
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 06:34:55 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> for starting and running a script on a headless system for me "nohup"
> works perfectly.
> For interactive session via ssh screen/tmux turned out to be the
> solution to detach from jobs started from the commandline.
> Both are hints/
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 05:59:28 +0100, Mick wrote:
> The only feature that I can't get to work with my router is configuring
> a static address for the particular router MAC address, but using dhcpd
> for any other wired gateway I happen to connect to with my laptop.
Do you have admin access on the r
On 07/10/2014 10:13, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> dev-lang/perl-5.20.1 is in the tree (unmasked), but trying to upgrade
> gives me lots of blocks requiring versions which are not
> in the tree, yet, like
>
> [blocks B ] blocking virtual/perl-Socket-2.13.0)
>
> Has anybody tried to upgr
On 10/07/2014 06:41 PM, Pavel Volkov wrote:
> On Saturday, October 4, 2014 9:37:04 PM MSK, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> The KDE release structure has evolved[1], decoupling the release cycle
>> of the Platform, Workspace, and Applications. This means that there is
>> no longer a single Software Compi
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> dev-lang/perl-5.20.1 is in the tree (unmasked), but trying to upgrade
> gives me lots of blocks requiring versions which are not
> in the tree, yet, like
>
> [blocks B ] is blocking virtual/perl-Socket-2.13.0)
>
> Has anybody tried to upgrade to this ve
On 2014-10-07 10:13, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
dev-lang/perl-5.20.1 is in the tree (unmasked), but trying to upgrade
gives me lots of blocks requiring versions which are not
in the tree, yet, like
[blocks B ]
emerge -av1 perl-cleaner
emerge -av1O dev-lang/perl
perl-cleaner --all
On 07/10/2014 09:31, Kerin Millar wrote:
On 07/10/2014 09:13, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
dev-lang/perl-5.20.1 is in the tree (unmasked), but trying to upgrade
gives me lots of blocks requiring versions which are not
in the tree, yet, like
[blocks B ]
Here is a generically applicable app
Le Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:01:57 +0200,
"J. Roeleveld" a écrit :
>
> On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 09:50:04 AM hogren wrote:
> > Le Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:22:35 +0200,
> >
> > "J. Roeleveld" a écrit :
> > > On Monday, October 06, 2014 11:06:03 PM Mick wrote:
> > > > On Monday 06 Oct 2014 11:53:54 Neil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 07.10.2014 um 07:17 schrieb Joseph:
> On 10/06/14 21:22, Jc García wrote:
>> 2014-10-06 19:52 GMT-06:00 Joseph :
>>> I'm running Windows XP in VirtualBox.
>>> I can NX to the running VB - Windows XP as (shadow or new) session.
>>> But that doesn't h
On 07/10/2014 09:13, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
dev-lang/perl-5.20.1 is in the tree (unmasked), but trying to upgrade
gives me lots of blocks requiring versions which are not
in the tree, yet, like
[blocks B ]
Here is a generically applicable approach to handling upgrades in
situations
Hi,
dev-lang/perl-5.20.1 is in the tree (unmasked), but trying to upgrade
gives me lots of blocks requiring versions which are not
in the tree, yet, like
[blocks B ] is blocking virtual/perl-Socket-2.13.0)
Has anybody tried to upgrade to this version of Perl?
Many thanks for some hint
On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 08:50:14 AM Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 07/10/2014 07:12, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Monday, October 06, 2014 11:17:49 PM Joseph wrote:
> > > On 10/06/14 21:22, Jc García wrote:
> > > >2014-10-06 19:52 GMT-06:00 Joseph :
> > > >> I'm running Windows XP in VirtualBox.
>
On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 09:50:04 AM hogren wrote:
> Le Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:22:35 +0200,
>
> "J. Roeleveld" a écrit :
> > On Monday, October 06, 2014 11:06:03 PM Mick wrote:
> > > On Monday 06 Oct 2014 11:53:54 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 21:21:03 +0200, Alan McKinnon wr
On 07/10/2014 07:12, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Monday, October 06, 2014 11:17:49 PM Joseph wrote:
> On 10/06/14 21:22, Jc García wrote:
> >2014-10-06 19:52 GMT-06:00 Joseph :
> >> I'm running Windows XP in VirtualBox.
> >> I can NX to the running VB - Windows XP as (shadow or new) session.
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:29:10 -0400, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> Seems like it should work as long as you didn't update the kernel or any
> other files under /boot, but why not just dd it again? Then you can be
> sure it works.
Given the inherent fragility of SD cards, I would use dd each time, via
Le Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:22:35 +0200,
"J. Roeleveld" a écrit :
>
> On Monday, October 06, 2014 11:06:03 PM Mick wrote:
> > On Monday 06 Oct 2014 11:53:54 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 21:21:03 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > > nm has come a long way of late it seems. Perhaps I
On Saturday, October 4, 2014 9:37:04 PM MSK, Michael Palimaka wrote:
The KDE release structure has evolved[1], decoupling the release cycle
of the Platform, Workspace, and Applications. This means that there is
no longer a single Software Compilation in the same way there was with
KDE 4.
We (Gen
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:29:11AM +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are two SDcards of the same brand and model.
> The first one cariies a not so current Gentoo Linux.
> The second one is empty.
> Now the first one is image-copied to the second one with dd,
> which copies the cont
On Monday, October 06, 2014 11:06:03 PM Mick wrote:
> On Monday 06 Oct 2014 11:53:54 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 21:21:03 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > nm has come a long way of late it seems. Perhaps I should revise my
> > > stance on it :-)
> >
> > The main reason wicd dev
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 06:34:06PM +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> Moin Hinnerk,
> (hopefully have guessed this greet correctly...I am from that
> part of Germany ;)
>
> I have the source of the driver exclusivly compiled for 3.8.13
> as for 3.14.something (cant remember).
> 3.14.x has s
On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months, I get along
just fine with firefox and chromium. I believe konqueror is essentially
unmaintained these days or at least on life support. Make a fine file
manager though (kpar
57 matches
Mail list logo
