Le Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:01:57 +0200, "J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> a écrit :
> > On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 09:50:04 AM hogren wrote: > > Le Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:22:35 +0200, > > > > "J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> a écrit : > > > On Monday, October 06, 2014 11:06:03 PM Mick wrote: > > > > On Monday 06 Oct 2014 11:53:54 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 21:21:03 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > > > > nm has come a long way of late it seems. Perhaps I should > > > > > > revise my stance on it :-) > > > > > > > > > > The main reason wicd development has stopped is that the > > > > > developer started using NetworkManager. > > > > > > > > Am I the only one still using /etc/conf.d/net and wpa_cli / > > > > wpa_gui? > > > > > > For wired desktops, I use the /etc/conf.d/net file. > > > For laptops, where I need to connect to different WIFI networks > > > regularly, I like the way NM just seems to work. > > > I always had issues with wpa_cli/wpa_gui, even when following > > > how-tos online. > > > > > > Never mind trying to connect to different VPNs. > > > > > > -- > > > Joost > > > > Hello, > > > > Like Joost, I think that it's a good thing to just > > use /etc/conf.d/net where you always use the same WiFi network(s). > > Actually, that is not what I said. > I use /etc/conf.d/net for wired desktops. > All wireless is done using NM. yes, sorry, I mixed two ideas in my mind before to write ^^. > > When you are mobile, you > > should use a network manager (wicd, Network Manager, or other). > > You should use whatever you prefer. For ease-of-use, a working GUI > can be preferable. > > -- > Joost > Hogren
