On Thursday 29 May 2014 00:05:16 William Kenworthy wrote:
> On 29/05/14 06:28, Mick wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 May 2014 20:02:29 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> On 28/05/14 21:42, Mick wrote:
> >>> Hmm ... am I alone in this quest?
> >>
> >> See here, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505362
> >
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:36:28PM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote
> Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> Yep, its the same, but when I tried to restore as a regular user (which
> I normally don't do) it complained about the .lock file and restored to
> some strange values which involved so much feedback th
On 29/05/14 06:28, Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 May 2014 20:02:29 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 28/05/14 21:42, Mick wrote:
>>> Hmm ... am I alone in this quest?
>>
>> See here, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505362
>
> Thanks! I missed this bug when I glanced earlier. However, it does n
Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:06:44AM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote
> > Hi. Since I booted into systemd, if I try to run amixer from a normal
> > user I get very different results than if I run amixer as root. The
> > directory /dev/snd is world rw and I would like to k
On Wednesday 28 May 2014 20:02:29 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 28/05/14 21:42, Mick wrote:
> > Hmm ... am I alone in this quest?
>
> See here, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505362
Thanks! I missed this bug when I glanced earlier. However, it does not
mention rfcomm is now missing, or t
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:06:44AM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote
> Hi. Since I booted into systemd, if I try to run amixer from a normal
> user I get very different results than if I run amixer as root. The
> directory /dev/snd is world rw and I would like to know what is
> happening. The
On 28/05/14 21:42, Mick wrote:
> Hmm ... am I alone in this quest?
See here, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505362
On Sunday 27 Apr 2014 08:27:31 William Kenworthy wrote:
> On 04/27/14 11:14, William Kenworthy wrote:
> > On 04/27/14 02:33, Mick wrote:
> >> On Thursday 24 Apr 2014 02:11:57 William Kenworthy wrote:
> >>> I was able to get it working manually - gentoo's init scripts are out
> >>> of date with blue
On Wednesday 28 May 2014 14:46:30 Time Lucky wrote:
> Now I change the VIDEO_CARDS to "intel i965"
> Everything seems OK too.
> Gnome can detect Intel® Sandybridge Mobile rather than Gallium 0.4 for
> i915 I dont know the difference between classic and gallium but i965's
> classic mode works well.
Hi. Since I booted into systemd, if I try to run amixer from a normal
user I get very different results than if I run amixer as root. The
directory /dev/snd is world rw and I would like to know what is
happening. The numbers are very different for instance the Master
volume as a regular user i
Now I change the VIDEO_CARDS to "intel i965"
Everything seems OK too.
Gnome can detect Intel® Sandybridge Mobile rather than Gallium 0.4 for i915
I dont know the difference between classic and gallium but i965's classic
mode works well.
By the way, I think i965 is just for HD3000, why does i915
#emacs /etc/portage/make.conf
VIDEO_CARDS="intel i915"
# emerge -av xorg-drivers mesa
# reboot
# eselect mesa list
915 (Intel 915, 945)
[1] classic
[2] gallium *
i965 (Intel GMA 965, G/Q3x, G/Q4x, HD)
r300 (Radeon R300-R500)
r600 (Radeon R600-R700, Evergreen, Northern Islands)
sw (Softwar
On 28/05/2014 13:42, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
>>> Currently, I do the following:
>>> > > Every year, a full backup
>>> > > Then, every month, I have an incremental based on either the yearly or
>>> > > previous monthly.
>>> > > Ditto for the weekly (but then based on monthly or weekly)
>>> > > And ag
On Wednesday 28 May 2014 13:07:49 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 28/05/2014 11:58, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 May 2014 23:35:26 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> On 27/05/2014 17:12, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >>> I have a yearly (full), monthly, weekly and daily. Each incremental is
> >>> against the
-Original Message-
From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:n...@digimed.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 3:58 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Odd Update Issue
On Tue, 27 May 2014 20:58:56 -0400, Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
Can you fix whatever you are using to post thi
On 28/05/2014 11:58, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 May 2014 23:35:26 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 27/05/2014 17:12, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> I have a yearly (full), monthly, weekly and daily. Each incremental is
>>> against the most recent one of itself or longer period.
>>> That means having
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> "app-backup/dar" uses catalogues for the incrementals. I think I will stick to
> that for the foreseeable future.
>
I used to use that and sarab (which is a wrapper). I moved on to
duplicity. The problem with dar is that it uses quite a
On Tuesday 27 May 2014 11:28:17 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:12 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:31:26 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> btrfs wouldn't have any issues with this at all. You'd have an
> >> advantage in that you wouldn't have to unmount the file
On Wed, 28 May 2014 12:03 +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> Always important. I just saw the other email which states that the
> latest sysresccd supports it. That is fine for me.
Sysresccd has supported btrfs for some time. I realise my mail could have
been read otherwise, but the reason for keepi
On Tuesday 27 May 2014 11:32:22 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:21 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > Does anyone know how these will handle (and perform) with a possible 300+
> > snapshots per filesystem (or volume, as I think it's called)?
>
> I can't speak for zfs. I had upwards of
On Tuesday 27 May 2014 22:41:32 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 27/05/2014 18:20, Time Lucky wrote:
> >
> >
> > VIDEO_CARDS="intel radeon -freedreno -i915 -i965 -ilo -nouveau -r100
> > -r200 -r300 -r600 -radeonsi -vmware"
> >
> >
> > Solved!
> >
> > I realized that your VIDEO_C
On Tuesday 27 May 2014 23:35:26 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 27/05/2014 17:12, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > I have a yearly (full), monthly, weekly and daily. Each incremental is
> > against the most recent one of itself or longer period.
> > That means having to keep multiple snapshots active, which I pre
On Tue, 27 May 2014 20:58:56 -0400, Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
Can you fix whatever you are using to post this. Portage output is
difficult enough to parse without you adding extra layers of obfuscation.
> * Cannot find $EPATCHSOURCE! Value for $EPATCHSOURCE is: * *
> /usr/portage/media-libs/mesa/f
23 matches
Mail list logo
