Re: [gentoo-user] media-gfx/graphviz-2.26.3-r3

2011-09-21 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 23:02:02 Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to install Graphviz but I get: > > centaur ~ # emerge graphviz > > make[3]: Entering directory > `/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphviz-2.26.3-r3/work/graphviz-2.26.3/plugin/ > gd' CC gvplugin_gd.lo > CC gvr

Re: [gentoo-user] libwx_base-2.8.so.0: cannot open shared object file.....

2011-09-21 Thread Adam Carter
> ./phes: error while loading shared libraries: libwx_base-2.8.so.0: > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory phes cant find libwx_base-2.8.so.0, If libwx_base has been updated to a newer version with a different library name, you will need to rebuild phes so that it calls the n

[gentoo-user] libwx_base-2.8.so.0: cannot open shared object file.....

2011-09-21 Thread Tamer Higazi
Hi people! Has any of you an idea what might be the problem that I get this message displayed in the console: ./phes: error while loading shared libraries: libwx_base-2.8.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory is it a program linking problem, or is it a setting that the

Re: [gentoo-user] hardened-sources reverted to 2.6.39-r8 :(

2011-09-21 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Sep 22, 2011 2:54 AM, "Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)" < klond...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > El 21/09/11 18:39, Pandu Poluan escribió: >> >> >> On Sep 21, 2011 9:13 PM, "Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)" < klond...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> > >> > Well deprecated version removal tend

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Btrfs "stable" enough?

2011-09-21 Thread Michael Mol
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Adam Carter wrote: >>> Ok for me so far, but still seems slower than ext4, and i'm using >>> compression, inode_cache and space_cache. >> >> Does ext4 have compression? I didn't know it did. If it doesn't, then, >> yeah, you're adding some serious overhead and real

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Btrfs "stable" enough?

2011-09-21 Thread Adam Carter
>> Ok for me so far, but still seems slower than ext4, and i'm using >> compression, inode_cache and space_cache. > > Does ext4 have compression? I didn't know it did. If it doesn't, then, > yeah, you're adding some serious overhead and real latency. Sorry I wasn't clear. Compression, inode_cache

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Btrfs "stable" enough?

2011-09-21 Thread Michael Mol
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Adam Carter wrote: > Ok for me so far, but still seems slower than ext4, and i'm using > compression, inode_cache and space_cache. Does ext4 have compression? I didn't know it did. If it doesn't, then, yeah, you're adding some serious overhead and real latency.

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Btrfs "stable" enough?

2011-09-21 Thread Adam Carter
Ok for me so far, but still seems slower than ext4, and i'm using compression, inode_cache and space_cache. However, I wouldn't use it on a system i didn't have a backup for.

Re: [gentoo-user] What is with the gnome overlay?

2011-09-21 Thread Allan Gottlieb
On Wed, Sep 21 2011, Paul Hartman wrote: > There were changes to layman lately, maybe you need to rename or > change your config. In layman.cfg I see this: > > In my layman.cfg I see: > > #--- > # The list of locally installed overlays > > in

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Btrfs "stable" enough?

2011-09-21 Thread William Kenworthy
Tried it one FS to test - looked good tried it on a few file systems - seemed to take punishment that killed the ext2/3 FS every time Then every one died within a month with unrecoverable errors of one type or another (power crash caused corruption that couldnt be fixed, unknown problems, long sta

[gentoo-user] media-gfx/graphviz-2.26.3-r3

2011-09-21 Thread Hilco Wijbenga
Hi all, I'm trying to install Graphviz but I get: centaur ~ # emerge graphviz make[3]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphviz-2.26.3-r3/work/graphviz-2.26.3/plugin/gd' CC gvplugin_gd.lo CC gvrender_gd.lo CC gvrender_gd_vrml.lo CC gvtextlayout_gd.lo CC

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer(2) ???

2011-09-21 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 09:19:39 Sebastian Beßler wrote: > > Does mplayer2 work with smplayer or kmplayer? > > I use mplayer2 with smplayer for a few month now and everything works > just fine for me. Any idea when ffmpeg-mt might make it to the main portage tree? -- Regards, Mick signature.

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Btrfs "stable" enough?

2011-09-21 Thread Alex Schuster
Jarry writes: > On 21-Sep-11 21:55, Doug Hunley wrote: > >>> I'd like to ask if anybody here has already some experience >>> with Btrfs? Is it usable (although not officialy stable)? >> >> I use it as my main fs here and have had no issues. Having said that, >> there is NO functional fsck at this

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Btrfs "stable" enough?

2011-09-21 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:12:35 +0200, Jarry wrote: > Really no fsck? I've heard fedora was going to use btrfs > as main filesystem in upcomming release 16 (to be released > in about a month). How could they do it without fsck? They can't, that's why they've postponed it until until 17. Btrfs will b

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Btrfs "stable" enough?

2011-09-21 Thread Jarry
On 21-Sep-11 21:55, Doug Hunley wrote: I'd like to ask if anybody here has already some experience with Btrfs? Is it usable (although not officialy stable)? I use it as my main fs here and have had no issues. Having said that, there is NO functional fsck at this time. And abrupt power issues t

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Btrfs "stable" enough?

2011-09-21 Thread Doug Hunley
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 15:48, Jarry wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to ask if anybody here has already some experience > with Btrfs? Is it usable (although not officialy stable)? > > I'd like to swich ext3 for something more modern, and none > of JFS/ZFS/Reiser/ext4 has all the features I'm looking for

Re: [gentoo-user] hardened-sources reverted to 2.6.39-r8 :(

2011-09-21 Thread Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
El 21/09/11 18:39, Pandu Poluan escribió: > > > On Sep 21, 2011 9:13 PM, "Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)" > mailto:klond...@gentoo.org>> wrote: > > > > Well deprecated version removal tends to happen because we are not going > > to aim for those versions stabilization AND there is a newe

[gentoo-user] Is Btrfs "stable" enough?

2011-09-21 Thread Jarry
Hi, I'd like to ask if anybody here has already some experience with Btrfs? Is it usable (although not officialy stable)? I'd like to swich ext3 for something more modern, and none of JFS/ZFS/Reiser/ext4 has all the features I'm looking for. Btrfs looks interesting, but I'm not sure if it is sui

Re: [gentoo-user] What is with the gnome overlay?

2011-09-21 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21 2011, Paul Hartman wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >>> Has something happened to the gnome overlay. >>> >>> It seems to exist >>> >>>    oldlap ~ # layman -L | grep gnome >>>     * gnome  

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev + /usr

2011-09-21 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 00:47:50 Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:13:36 +0100 > > > > James Broadhead wrote: > >> On 19 September 2011 15:22, Alan McKinnon > >> > >> wrote: > >>> :-) Example: > >>> Try run a browser on that Amiga. I doubt it would even manage to >

Re: [gentoo-user] Bcache

2011-09-21 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Am Mittwoch 21 September 2011, 12:40:14 schrieb Michael Mol: > Has anyone played with Bcache? (Volker, I'm looking sideways at you...) > > http://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/ hm, no updates to the website for almost a year and a gb+ git clone, no patches. I pass. -- #163933

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT rant] udev + /usr

2011-09-21 Thread Roman Dobosz
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:55:01 +0200 pk wrote: > Xmms, I believe it's called. And it's been working fine for quite a > while (I've actually have never encountered a bug with Audacious), for > me. Now, when I upgraded to 2.4.x dbus was forced on me (well, that and > Xfce4)... I'm used to Audacious b

[gentoo-user] Bcache

2011-09-21 Thread Michael Mol
Has anyone played with Bcache? (Volker, I'm looking sideways at you...) http://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/ -- :wq

Re: [gentoo-user] hardened-sources reverted to 2.6.39-r8 :(

2011-09-21 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Sep 21, 2011 9:13 PM, "Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)" < klond...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Well deprecated version removal tends to happen because we are not going > to aim for those versions stabilization AND there is a newer version > available AND upstream tends to ignore bugs happen

Re: [gentoo-user] What is with the gnome overlay?

2011-09-21 Thread Allan Gottlieb
On Wed, Sep 21 2011, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> Has something happened to the gnome overlay. >> >> It seems to exist >> >>    oldlap ~ # layman -L | grep gnome >>     * gnome                 [Git       ] (git://git.o.g.o/proj/gnome.git, >> h.

Re: [gentoo-user] What is with the gnome overlay?

2011-09-21 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > Has something happened to the gnome overlay. > > It seems to exist > >    oldlap ~ # layman -L | grep gnome >     * gnome                 [Git       ] (git://git.o.g.o/proj/gnome.git, > h...) >     * gnome-live            [Git       ] > (

Re: [gentoo-user] What is with the gnome overlay?

2011-09-21 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > Has something happened to the gnome overlay. > > It seems to exist > >    oldlap ~ # layman -L | grep gnome >     * gnome                 [Git       ] (git://git.o.g.o/proj/gnome.git, > h...) >     * gnome-live            [Git       ] > (

[gentoo-user] What is with the gnome overlay?

2011-09-21 Thread Allan Gottlieb
Has something happened to the gnome overlay. It seems to exist oldlap ~ # layman -L | grep gnome * gnome [Git ] (git://git.o.g.o/proj/gnome.git, h...) * gnome-live[Git ] (git://git.o.g.o/proj/gnome-live.g...) But it seems to not exist ol

Re: [gentoo-user] hardened-sources reverted to 2.6.39-r8 :(

2011-09-21 Thread Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
El 21/09/11 15:48, Alan McKinnon escribió: > On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:34:36 +0700 > Pandu Poluan wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 19:26, Alan McKinnon >> wrote: >>> On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:15:02 +0700 >>> Pandu Poluan wrote: >>> Hmm, just ran eix-sync followed by emerge -pvuD @world...

Re: [gentoo-user] hardened-sources reverted to 2.6.39-r8 :(

2011-09-21 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:34:36 +0700 Pandu Poluan wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 19:26, Alan McKinnon > wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:15:02 +0700 > > Pandu Poluan wrote: > > > >> Hmm, just ran eix-sync followed by emerge -pvuD @world... > >> > >> And I was unpleasantly surprised when I see

Re: [gentoo-user] Confuzzled about bug severity

2011-09-21 Thread Michael Mol
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On 09/21/2011 07:16 AM, Michael Mol wrote: >> In both cases, the severity of the bug is high, although perhaps the >> importance of the bug may not be so great. > > Yeah, I think I've been doing the wrong thing here. > >>> >>> Anyway, if you h

Re: [gentoo-user] Confuzzled about bug severity

2011-09-21 Thread Mike Gilbert
On 09/21/2011 07:16 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > In both cases, the severity of the bug is high, although perhaps the > importance of the bug may not be so great. Yeah, I think I've been doing the wrong thing here. >> >> Anyway, if you have a problem with the way I treat your bugs, feel free >> to ca

Re: [gentoo-user] Missing kernel config parameter

2011-09-21 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday 21 September 2011 13:35:15 Alex Schuster wrote: > It depends on CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME, in Power management and ACPI options. > You have to enable this first, then it will show up. Eek! Self-modifying code! Thanks Alex. -- Rgds Peter Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23

Re: [gentoo-user] Missing kernel config parameter

2011-09-21 Thread Adam Carter
> * CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND: is not set when it should be. > > But: > > $ grep SUSPEND /usr/src/linux/.config > > CONFIG_ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE=y > > CONFIG_SUSPEND=y > > CONFIG_SUSPEND_FREEZER=y > > # CONFIG_PM_TEST_SUSPEND is not set > > No trace of USB_SUSPEND. You cant search that way. Use the searc

Re: [gentoo-user] Missing kernel config parameter

2011-09-21 Thread Alex Schuster
Peter Humphrey writes: > Having just upgraded gcc from 4/4/5 to 4.5.3-r1 I recompiled > binutils-2.21.1-r1. Then, while emerging -e system, I got this: > > * Messages for package sys-fs/udisks-1.0.3-r1: > > * CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND: is not set when it should be. > > But: > > $ grep SU

Re: [gentoo-user] hardened-sources reverted to 2.6.39-r8 :(

2011-09-21 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 19:26, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:15:02 +0700 > Pandu Poluan wrote: > >> Hmm, just ran eix-sync followed by emerge -pvuD @world... >> >> And I was unpleasantly surprised when I see >> sys-kernel/hardened-sources going back from the currently installed >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Confuzzled about bug severity

2011-09-21 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 01:02:20 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On 09/20/2011 12:34 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > > I've filed two bug reports today[1][2]. Now, when filing bugs, the > > dropdown for 'severity' includes "Critical: The software crashes, > > hangs, or causes you to lose data." > > > > One bug

Re: [gentoo-user] Missing kernel config parameter

2011-09-21 Thread David W Noon
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:18:10 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about "[gentoo-user] Missing kernel config parameter": >What am I supposed to do about this? Ignore it? Yes. -- Regards, Dave [RLU #314465] == dwn...@ntlworld.com (David

Re: [gentoo-user] hardened-sources reverted to 2.6.39-r8 :(

2011-09-21 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:15:02 +0700 Pandu Poluan wrote: > Hmm, just ran eix-sync followed by emerge -pvuD @world... > > And I was unpleasantly surprised when I see > sys-kernel/hardened-sources going back from the currently installed > (and booting) 2.6.39-r13 to -r8 > > Changelog does not descr

[gentoo-user] Missing kernel config parameter

2011-09-21 Thread Peter Humphrey
Hello list, Having just upgraded gcc from 4/4/5 to 4.5.3-r1 I recompiled binutils-2.21.1-r1. Then, while emerging -e system, I got this: * Messages for package sys-fs/udisks-1.0.3-r1: * CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND: is not set when it should be. But: $ grep SUSPEND /usr/src/linux/.config CO

Re: [gentoo-user] Confuzzled about bug severity

2011-09-21 Thread Michael Mol
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On 09/20/2011 12:34 AM, Michael Mol wrote: >> I've filed two bug reports today[1][2]. Now, when filing bugs, the >> dropdown for 'severity' includes "Critical: The software crashes, >> hangs, or causes you to lose data." >> >> One bug did caus

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer(2) ???

2011-09-21 Thread Sebastian Beßler
> Does mplayer2 work with smplayer or kmplayer? I use mplayer2 with smplayer for a few month now and everything works just fine for me. Greetings Sebastian Beßler signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer(2) ???

2011-09-21 Thread Dale
Florian Philipp wrote: Another advantage: It abolished the horrible internationalization mechanism of mplayer1 and uses gettext now. This means I can finally post English output on mailing lists and bug trackers by executing it like 'LC_ALL=C mplayer2 foo' instead of recompiling it. It also do

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer(2) ???

2011-09-21 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 21.09.2011 07:19, schrieb Stroller: > > On 21 September 2011, at 02:37, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> On 09/21/2011 12:07 AM, Stroller wrote: >>> >>> On 20 September 2011, at 16:11, James wrote: ... I have not kept up with the mplayer developments. Now I see: media-video/