RE: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe

So should I email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to stop these unsubscribe emails from coming to my inbox? :) What do people have their global USE variable these days for performance of various types of servers? I use ccache=2G for your run of the mill single amd64 with 2gigs of RAM. Any recommendations to ch

RE: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe

I can say that this little incident seems to have resurrected the list. We should be really grateful for that, but maybe we should change the list name to gentoo-unsubscribe :-) 2eric: Send something to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you need more help. Note: Replace 'listname' wit

RE: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe

pwned Original Message Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe From: PaulNM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, June 06, 2008 3:26 pm To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org eric@kelsoes.com wrote: > how do i unsubscribe from this? > > Original Message >

Re: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe

2008/6/6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > how do i unsubscribe from this? As Florian pointed out: In other words: RTFM http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml Alex -- gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how do i unsubscribe from this? Original Message Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe From: Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .net> Date: Fri, June 06, 2008 2:30 pm To: gentoo-performance@lists

RE: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe

how do i unsubscribe from this? Original Message Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe From: Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED].net> Date: Fri, June 06, 2008 2:30 pm To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:45:35 +0200 Dirk Wende

Re: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe

Florian Philipp wrote: On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:45:35 +0200 Dirk Wende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: *sigh* How many people have to try it before the last one _finally_ recognizes that it doesn't work that way? In other words: RTFM http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml To be fair to those

Re: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe

On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:45:35 +0200 Dirk Wende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > *sigh* How many people have to try it before the last one _finally_ recognizes that it doesn't work that way? In other words: RTFM http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-performance] unsubscribe

-- gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-performance] TCP perfomance

Miguel Sousa Filipe wrote: There is no such thing has a TCP timestamp: http://freebie.fatpipe.org/~mjb/Drawings/TCP_Header.png so, that doesn't make any sense... Your right and I'm wrong. Its not in the header, its thrown on at the end try doing cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps http:/

Re: [gentoo-performance] TCP perfomance

There is no such thing has a TCP timestamp: http://freebie.fatpipe.org/~mjb/Drawings/TCP_Header.png so, that doesn't make any sense... On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Kevin Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I also forgot that I had been subscribed to this list. > To get a topic going I w

[gentoo-performance] TCP perfomance

Yes, I also forgot that I had been subscribed to this list. To get a topic going I was at work and I argued that we should disable TCP timestamps. I was discussing in a meeting that this would cut back (perhaps very slightly) on the amount of work that the system has to do before sending a pack

[gentoo-performance] unsubscribe

Re: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe

Alex Howells wrote: I do have to wonder why all the ricers on -performance can't RTFM to the point they can even unsubscribe. Is this an accurate representation of all the users of this mailing list? :P My suspicion would be that they're people who subscribed a long time ago and completely fo