ding in such matters. Still, from what I read, TUP
warrants monitoring as new code contributions keep moving this blazingly
fast build system tool forward. If others have first hand experience
with TUP, I'd very much like to read about their comments and
experiences with TUP.
hth,
James
to share) there shall be many stage-4 minimal gentoo images
to install from and go from there. So as much as all issues can be
minimized, standardized, documented and look like other arches, the "mo
better" imo.
hth,
James
brances. CoreOS is taking this approach, as their bare metal
bootstrapping occurs completely and well before systemd or any other
PID1 schema is invoked or becomes a defacto requirement. Gentoo is all
about freedom, right?
hth,
James
On 02/02/2017 04:05 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:35 PM, james wrote:
I think that unikernels are something everyone should be aware of
as they purport to be the latest trend in securing all sorts of systems.
(a brief read).
Not really for all sorts, more for servers
On 02/02/2017 04:40 PM, David Seifert wrote:
On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 15:35 -0500, james wrote:
On 02/02/2017 01:01 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Michael Orlitzky
wrote:
If (base == minimal), then all of the upstream defaults need to
be added
to package.use for the
ist into the
same area of the profile tree. We can then share ideas and results of
testing.
I really need to apologize to many devs. But, I'm getting very close to
having something absolutely wonderful, about 90% thanks to the gentoo
devs. I do not want to appear to be childish throwing a tantrum about
this, but, well, I just really cannot help it; as y'all can imagine?
hth,
James
On 02/03/2017 12:39 PM, james wrote:
So imagine flags are a giant 'sparse matrix' that I need to 'mollify'
individually periodically, then run CI on that complete-set of packages,
and then test against automated attack vectors.
So, were we to want to 'enhance&#x
e guidexml page for empi is old, so where do I read up on it's
projected usage (just not familiar with that empi project/package).
James
On 06/03/2016 12:02 PM, Justin Bronder wrote:
On 02/06/16 10:42 -0500, james wrote:
On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote:
> Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these packages
> anymore, they are all up for grabs.
>
> - media-gfx/ope
nt from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Well, my question is very basic. In the past, I've used euscan, the site
on gentooexperimental.org, or app-portage/euscan the software to
determine freshness of a package, for a variety of reasons. Is euscan
going to be tied-in or at least coordinated with CI for consistency?
James
On 06/07/2016 09:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 7 czerwca 2016 16:16:38 CEST, Ian Stakenvicius
napisał(a):
On 07/06/16 05:18 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Robin H. Johnson mailto:robb...@gentoo.org>> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 09:44:42AM +0200, Dirkj
ill
be a (cook)book for self paced study for user==>dev, without the noise
of irc.
ps, I already completed the ebuild quiz and most of the end-o-mentoring
quiz. The things not finished are in flux due to changes. Still, I have
holes in both my 'big picture comprehension of gentoo-b
ccomplishes the same for Gentoo.
Do NOT - I repeat NOT - tie "user repos" to GitHub Inc., please do
not even bother working on a prototype there (looking at you James),
because if it is good enough it will stick, and as the social
contract rightfully states, it's important to remain i
in this
direction too, imho.
3) needs (desires) gentoo managed repos, not github
For now, we can use github for users. A glep or 2 can solved 1 and
(2), well I was politely turned down, so suggestions on documentation
to achieve this? Data-mining of emails and irc could easily provide
the first-draft of the docs for need (2).
James
On 06/10/2016 10:20 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
On 10/06/16 17:16, james wrote:
And this effort needs a documentation collection to support users,
post installation to their target (ideal stage-4?) collection of
packages; many of which they maintain themselves even if a strong-user
or dev
helps
On 06/10/2016 10:09 PM, konsolebox wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:53 PM, james wrote:
The grandiose-ness you propose should only come upon graduating from proxy
school, imho.
user-->strong-users-->proxy-->dev pathway.
Pedantic, bureaucratic, procedure-oriented, monolithic, re
On 06/11/2016 03:59 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 06/11/2016 01:58 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
On 06/11/2016 10:53 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 06/11/2016 07:48 AM, james wrote:
There is also a gentoo-proxy-ma...@lists.gentoo.org list for these kinds
of questions that is likely more
On 06/11/2016 05:52 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:58:35PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote
On 06/11/2016 10:53 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 06/11/2016 07:48 AM, james wrote:
[snip]
Good/Bad idea, posting proxy-maintainer questions to gentoo-user?
(recall irc
On 06/11/2016 08:29 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
On 06/12/2016 04:20 AM, james wrote:
Is there an archive to this wonderful list? I cannot seem to find the
archive?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581370
So I read this bug, but it did not illuminate an active archive, but the
On 06/12/2016 01:10 AM, konsolebox wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 11:09:39 +0800
konsolebox wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:53 PM, james wrote:
The grandiose-ness you propose should only come upon graduating from proxy
school, imho.
user
On 06/12/2016 04:01 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:42:03 -0500 james wrote:
On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote:
> Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these packages
> anymore, they are all up for grabs.
>
> - media
and characterized and could be auto interrogated with
extensions to wget, git, ftp and a host of other protocols employed to
download source files.
James
really asking is/will the gentoo-ci be
packaged up for the gentoo community to use, on a small set of packages?
Is that idea too difficult at this time?
Is there even a glep, or standard or part of PMS that will allow the
gentoo-ci solution to become a routine tool for all to use?
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
curiously,
James
On 06/16/2016 10:04 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 08:59:44 -0500
james wrote:
On 06/16/2016 02:51 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 16/06/16 09:39, Daniel Campbell wrote:
I guess what I mean is these outside developers could
hese codes, it just another mechanism
to distinguish our distro, imho.
So I would ask (beg if necessary) the kind folks that are the gentoo
devs to figure out a way to archive those old codes, and document how to
retrieve them, via github, as the attic too is probably like sunrise and
such, headed towards deprecation and the chopping block.
Thanks,
James
t forward and consistent should
others need to retrieve old ebuilds and source files.
Thanks for the info and ideas.
James
On 07/05/2016 01:17 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
On 07/05/2016 09:07 AM, james wrote:
On 07/05/2016 06:25 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Aaron Bauman wrote:
The subject of this particular mailing list post is a little alarming
and
over reactive. We are not running around
erested in learning about ebuilds can ponder
proxy-maintenance of a few packages as an opportunity?
Surely there is a wider audience that will see some packages they like
are going away because there are not enough maintainers, and thus
respond by 'stepping up' to maintain a few packages?
hth,
James
ent status via
labeling of packages. For example, all of these issues could be added
to a simple tool like app-portage/eix to show, for example security, age
of last update and maintainer status, and any other issues deemed
significant.
Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko
hth,
James
many currently selling products, just so you know.
I like old codes, that is for sure, and the graying of codes does not
mean they are useless. Far from it. ymmv.
hth,
James
distinctions which are now being ignored.
HTH & thanks as always to all of you for making Gentoo work since 2003.
Likewise. I appreciated the devs and the gentoo distro, immensely. But,
we need a well documented pathway from start to finish on the
proxy-maint (regardless of what the deta
net-misc/ntp a hard requirement ?
I just use the default (gentoo) time servers, for now, but perhaps
using specified servers in different regions might work too?
hth,
James
DEs in a project together.
+1
James
y
with java, however they like (in a VM, or a container image or a stage-4).
You have to look at CoreOS and conclude that even folks with deep
expertise and deep pockets want an easy install (even roll-back) OS.
hth,
James
On 08/07/2016 08:32 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 08:24:51 -0500
james wrote:
As a team, we could have a simple default program for a simple default
disk format, and a variety of 'stage-4' images, maybe updated every 3
months, to get a gentoo system up, quickly. Not a
der.
Some education providers may not touch Java at all, and focus
predominantly on C.
You can't satisfy everyone out of the box.
I have no idea where James gets his information from, but I suspect it's
a niche market where uni students do "clustering" - whatever that is.
On 08/07/2016 09:09 AM, Consus wrote:
On 08:24 Sun 07 Aug, james wrote:
On 08/07/2016 02:38 AM, Consus wrote:
On 08:48 Sun 07 Aug, Michał Górny wrote:
Sure we do. In the meantime, nobody uses gentoo anymore because it
still can't deal with accepting contributions and in the meantime th
On 08/07/2016 09:47 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:24 AM, james wrote:
As a team, we could have a simple default program for a simple default
disk format, and a variety of 'stage-4' images, maybe updated every 3
months, to get a gentoo system up, quickly. Not an an
On 08/07/2016 11:21 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 12:24:37 -0500
james wrote:
Let them use java* codes, as that is what all the universities are
teaching and promoting. I agree
with gentoo proper on severely restricting java*, on
gentoo-proper, but that sort of thing is
On 08/07/2016 12:49 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:47 PM, james wrote:
On 08/07/2016 09:47 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
Sounds great. What's stopping you?
Why Rich, thanks for the triple compliments; is that a vote that the basic
idea(s) have merit, or sarcasm?
I&#
re we aught to go.
They're less "Limits", more "guides", often enough.
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 12:24:37 -0500
james wrote:
Sure, I agree here, but, statistically these "hi level" languages are
being taught, in lieu of C; and that is really sad. I'm sure
On 08/07/2016 03:04 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 07/08/2016 19:36, james wrote:
The interesting apps out there are mostly running python, go and
(sometimes) lua. And that's what I observe in my day job -
business/mobile ISP.
Look at the job listing on stackoverflow and elsewhere (jav
them after
they are fixed, or with a mentor that knows more about java than I.
(that's not difficult at all).
BGO-510912 (Apache-Mesos) and BGO-523412 (Apache-Spark)
Publicly or privately, you'd get much more than my gratitude...
(seriously).
I also use euscan frequently (just so you know).
curiously,
James
On 08/07/2016 10:22 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 16:49:01 -0500
james wrote:
After that feat is accomplished, then a similar deployment of a
gentoo cluster on a those just installed gentoo minimal images, via a
few keystrokes (I am flexible on the cluster codes that comprise
ost of those are still
commercial, but, pressure over time could very likely see many of those
compilers going the open source route, confounding the choice issue for
a more open naming convention for gcc-config?
hth,
James
m, when the time comes, with instructions on migration to
lxqt or a listing of other light weight replacement options, with a wee
bit of migration detail
hth,
James
On 08/10/2016 09:44 AM, Nathan Zachary wrote:
On 10/08/16 07:12, james wrote:
On 08/10/2016 12:46 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
Hey, just a heads up as a user. I'm currently using LXDE.
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Pacho Ramos mailto:pa...@gentoo.org>> wrote:
On 08/10/2016 01:46 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mié, 10-08-2016 a las 07:12 -0500, james escribió:
On 08/10/2016 12:46 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
Hey, just a heads up as a user. I'm currently using LXDE.
+_1
(correctly located).
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Pacho Ramos mail
On 08/10/2016 04:07 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:06 PM, james wrote:
I have not had the time to migrate things to lxqt, despite tinkering
around with it. The next system I install, will go direct to lxqt. I
left KDE for many bloated reasons. I sure hope lxqt is light weight
On 08/10/2016 06:10 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote:
Hello all,
We, like almost everyone else and presumably upstream, install PCRE 8
as libpcre.so.1. Debian, for reasons best known to themselves, install
it as libpcre.so.3. With Ubuntu still being the most widely accepted
"standard" Lin
On 08/11/2016 11:32 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 11.08.2016 kell 11:23, kirjutas james:
Whilst devs are discussing the future of Valve's offerings on
gentoo,
it'd be wise to consider the effects of "Vulcan" as it is FOSS where
all
video card vendors ca
into WW3,
if folks do not 'wise up' and 'pull together'.
(also, I'm not hung up on 'Jentoo' as a name; perhaps 'Gintoo'?
(peace && hth),
James
On 08/12/2016 10:39 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:12:22 -0500
james wrote:
(also, I'm not hung up on 'Jentoo' as a name; perhaps 'Gintoo'?
(peace && hth),
James
Way outside the scope needed here. However we pull off Zhenchoo, its
going to b
lks to 'take ownership' which leads to better quality
and increases in productivity, imho.
The ability for other members of the gentoo community to read and learn,
at their own pace:: *priceless*.
ymmv,
James
Main_Page
{arm32 and arm64 needs should be considered, where practical within BGO}
Arm64 is already hitting Datacenters, around the globe; and is a very
large point of excitement particularly related to Green and low-cost
efforts.
hth,
James
f complete stage-4 images for gentoo
clusters, that are very use specific, highly tuned and minimized,
including openrc, the base profile and old codes necessary for the work
at hand, for the target hardware node.
hth,
James
for technical growth or the gentoo
community?
Access to there and other dev tools might be a powerful incentive, if
packaged up attactively, for the gentoo user community to participate
more in the less risky parts of gentoo development workflows?
hth,
James
_Summer_of_Code/2016/Ideas/kernelconfig
hth,
James
imho. Heterogeneous and open HPC is where is at, imho. If
there is a forum where the community and pathscale folks discuss issues,
point that out as I could not find one for deeper reading
hth,
James
tons of money, but, things
have changed and the change is accelerating, rapidly. Perhaps too much
off those Cray patents that your company owns are leaking toxins into
the brain-trust where you park?
Vendor walk-back is sad, imho. ymmv.
Best of luck to your company's 5-yea
On 08/19/2016 05:05 PM, C Bergström wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 4:52 AM, james wrote:
You removed your rude remark:::
" Sorry to be the party crasher, but..."
So let's put it back, just for clarity.
Back to my own glass house.. It will take a few years, but I am tr
er dive::
BGO: 5932218
or these links::
https://github.com/coreos/coreos-baremetal
https://coreos.com/blog/introducing-ignition.htm
https://github.com/coreos/ignition/blob/master/doc/getting-started.md
https://github.com/coreos/ignition/blob/master/doc/supported-platforms.md
Thanks,
James
irs of
most CIO/CT0. But for the youthful devs, it would be very cool if a
mechanism/system was deployed at Gentoo for those aspiring devs to
enhance their resumes, kinda like a personally attributable changelog or
such.
Story telling comes with age and wisdom. knowing when to give the
credit to another..
hth,
James
rested in gentoo clusters (expecially without systemd) and there are
a myriad of gentoo dev needs that could be solve if there was a
companion (gentoo-cluster) solution that was simultaneously support.
(gentoo?) CLUSTERS are where it's at! So get hip, get real and get
current. (this comes from an 'old_fart)
hth,
James
wing the technical talent base of gentoo.
hth,
James
On 12/03/2016 10:39 AM, james wrote:
On 12/03/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 12/03/2016 09:25 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
Then a stage-4 image could be made available so anyone can install
gentoo cluster nodes quickly and a bit of ansible code to load the
framework onto a
ng software is robust, under active development and even the
devs 'chime in' on routine basis. All in all, gnucash is an
outstanding piece of FOSS software; much better than Quickbooks as many
on the discussion lists attest to on a routine basis. It is in portage
and it runs on wi
have you read about 'tup'?
http://gittup.org/tup/
I'm not sure you are interested in a streamlined build system, just for
CI/tinderbox, but tup is as smart/fast as it gets.
hth,
James
On 12/04/2016 05:55 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
(OT accounting systems)
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 01:10:16PM -0500, james wrote:
GNUcash is superior to Quickbooks, as it is a 'double entry' accounting
system. Last time I check Quickbooks was not 'double entry' and t
ec 4, 2016 at 6:18 PM james wrote:
Hello gnucash users.
I use gnucash for my small business, for years and I'm quite happy
with it. Recently, I was ask if Gnucash has as good of support for
501(c)3 non-profits as does ledger (www.ledger-cli.org)?
Any and all comments
ine and easy with GNUcash
hth,
James
On 12/04/2016 10:10 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
On 05/12/16 03:06, james wrote:
On 12/04/2016 06:49 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 11:07:59PM +, M. J. Everitt wrote:
I gather both Quickbooks and Sage have a more modular approach to
"proper" accounting software
bastards'.
P.S. Never give up on Gentoo, as that would be unwise, imho.
Peace and Best of luck to you, Craig.
James
Cheers,
Craig
On 12/06/2016 07:29 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:13:12PM -0500, james wrote:
A while back, we we were promised an email channel for gentoo-proxy
folks that did not get on well with IRC. It never materialized,
The mail alias proxy-ma...@gentoo.org (same alias as proxy
On 12/06/2016 09:17 PM, Sam Jorna wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 08:59:11PM -0500, james wrote:
On 12/06/2016 07:29 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:13:12PM -0500, james wrote:
A while back, we we were promised an email channel for gentoo-proxy
folks that did not get on
On 12/06/2016 09:09 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
James
With the creation of the Mentors project
(https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Mentors) a bit of clarification
has occurred to help prospective developers outside the IRC and/or
proxy-maintainers project).
Am I to understand that the
On 12/06/2016 09:20 PM, Sam Jorna wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:17:54PM +1100, Sam Jorna wrote:
have a look at the new [0]Mentors project, or even send a mail to -dev
I forgot the link, sorry:
[0] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Mentors
On this page, the string 'quiz' occurs (3)
On 12/06/2016 09:52 PM, Sam Jorna wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:44:12PM -0500, james wrote:
On 12/06/2016 09:09 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
James
With the creation of the Mentors project
(https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Mentors) a bit of clarification
has occurred to help prospective
On 12/07/2016 02:44 AM, Duncan wrote:
james posted on Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:10:16 -0500 as excerpted:
Really, for someone like me, it is just best to avoid irc.
FWIW, some 12 years ago now, in 2004, I started using gentoo, with the
intent of contributing and potentially eventually becoming a
are warmly received.
James
The the most recent reply:
>
> [1] http://www.ledger-cli.org/
I regard cli accounting as a friend of GnuCash rather than the
competition, there isn't anything one can do that the other can't in
accounting terms, also not
On 12/07/2016 01:31 PM, james wrote:
Hello,
There was some discussion before about the software used for gentoo the
charity (501)(c). It seems to have perked up a bit of discussion on
gnucash, where all of the posting I have read suggest that gnucash is a
wonderful accounting system for
Gentoo developers.
References:
[gentoo-proxy-ma...@lists.gentoo.org]
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-proxy-maint/
Thanks Robin. All good to know. Maybe these details and the other
aforementioned details can be clarified and documented in the wiki,
for the benefit of all to know.
hth,
James
hat worked mostly like that is currently working.
For me, as the interface (web based) is a huge plus over anything I
looked at in the past.
On Dec 7, 2016 10:32, "james" mailto:gar...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Hey Jigme,
I think gentoo is under a social contract limits our use o
folk, who are interested can read what is
discussed via the list? I'm sure I'm not the only one interested in
our goals and management infrastructures.
James
On 12/07/2016 04:39 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 04:01:53PM -0500, james wrote:
Can you cross post to gentoo-dev? I'm not subscribed to that list.
Should not a wider community, particularly devs be part of the discussion?
Please DO subscribe.
Nope. I strongly be
On 12/08/2016 02:15 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2016, 15:08:17 schrieb james:
On 12/07/2016 04:39 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 04:01:53PM -0500, james wrote:
Can you cross post to gentoo-dev
On 12/09/2016 03:58 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2016 3:24:44 PM EST james wrote:
On 12/08/2016 02:15 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Even if I'm repeating myself... Please keep the mailing lists on topic.
Problems caused by gentoo developer behaviors, ar
terpreting here, as there is only this
fragmented thread in my inbox:: no prior postings. But perhaps folks
should look at "app-portage/elogv"
Already in place, easy to use, and should be updated with EAPI (5/6)
based parsing features?
hth,
James
IMO, emailing elogs to root sh
been threads about coreboot and other related topics,
even recently. At the least a wiki page itemizing known issues
and possible workarounds, or is that appropriate for the gentoo-wiki?
curiously,
James
[1] http://hackaday.com/blog/page/49/
On 01/01/2017 04:12 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
On 01/01/17 21:01, james wrote:
Is there a group of gentoo devs interested in the security aspects of
internal, and often non-disclosed, hardware, as I cannot seem to find
such a group, if it exists?
Is there any interest in such a gentoo-dev
betting that these old codes are much more useful than most have
figured, but it's going to take some time to establish this performance
and superior security postulate, as I use 'old-fart' methodologies.
hth,
James
[1] http://unikernel.org/blog/2015/unikernels-meet-docker
ntire lifetime. The most prolific designer of
them all, is simple referred to as 'doctor bitch' by her subordinates
and friends. Some, more respectfully refer to her as the queen of
assembler, as she has fixed thousands of compiler bugs from a myriad of
compiler vendors, not for compensation, but because the bugs got in her
way...
hth,
James
On 01/17/2017 01:05 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 01/13/2017 08:06 AM, james wrote:
On 01/13/2017 02:45 AM, Sven Eden wrote:
Btw.: Even "embedded experts" wholeheartedly agree that they disagree
what
"embedded" actually is. But I do think SoCs actually *do* qualify, at
rwise identical hardware can change rapidly. Lofty goals, yes, but
since the subject of local documentation on embedded systems came up,
naturally it is quite reasonable to seek the fastest possible diverse
usage with the least footprint on resources.
hth,
James
On 01/23/2017 04:23 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hi, everyone.
I've written a short proposal that aims to provide basic infrastructure
for defining mix-in profiles in Gentoo. I've tried to keep it simple,
and backwards compatible. The main goal is to be able to start defining
some mix-ins without hav
ot quite be
ready for this level of promotion, but, I am anxiously awaiting that
possibility.
hth,
James
atform, unique among distros, imho. Flag minimization
and freedom is a core need shared by all forms of gentoo, imho.
hth,
James
On 01/28/2017 08:27 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:57:00PM -0500, james wrote
Exactly:: simplify the flags, profiles and associated constructs down to
the bare bones. Even embedded (arm/mips/etc) builds could benefit from a
really minimized gentoo as a starting point
rly
gentoo-style unikernel types of clusters and how to cluster up a variety
of gentoo-embedded systems, which are actually quite similar to
unikernel based clusters.
A state-diagram of just how all of these profiles are intertwined, would
help to clarify the details and thus be keenly appreciate, when a final
verdict is reached.
hth,
James
idea,
as long as nothing is conflated by systemd.
- --arw
hth,
James
- --
A. Wilcox (awilfox)
Project Lead, Adélie Linux
http://adelielinux.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYjiTOAAoJEMspy1GSK50UCgYP/j7zBRAiL6w7fACER+A+J/3x
keXe4OsBzlNsUxq
1 - 100 of 1779 matches
Mail list logo
