Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Hiatus (sort of)

2007-06-24 Thread Will Briggs
Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Paul de Vrieze wrote: >> On Saturday 31 March 2007, you wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Me and my wife and son are moving to Australia. We are now waiting >>> for the >>> visa's to arrive, and after that will need some time to set >>> ourselves up. >>> Our computers however are b

Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes

2007-07-12 Thread Will Briggs
Mike Doty wrote: > All- > > We're going to change the -dev mailing list from completely open to where only > devs can post, but any dev could moderate a non-dev post. devs who moderate > in > bad posts will be subject to moderation themselves. in addition the > gentoo-project list will be crea

Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes

2007-07-14 Thread Will Briggs
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 19:51 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:44:03 -0400 >> "William L. Thomson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> To future devs and any new contributing users, they will see -dev as a >>> ml for developer interaction. They wi

Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes

2007-07-15 Thread Will Briggs
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > Fact is -dev's volume is getting to the point where it's productivity is > diminishing. Both with dev <-> dev and dev <-> world. The entire idea > here is to help correct that and makes things BETTER :) I hear you. (Although I disagree that there is a relationship

Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes

2007-07-15 Thread Will Briggs
Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Matthias Langer wrote: >> by banning non-dev contributors from this list some of you may feel >> better >> - but gentoo as a whole will probably suffer. silencing people doesn't >> make their opinions invalid. > > I keep seeing this argument over and over again. Many people

Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes

2007-07-16 Thread Will Briggs
Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 13:14 +1000, Will Briggs wrote: >> Oh dear. "slight delay" in an email list forum? That's like saying >> "you can take part in this face-to-face conversation but you have to >> wait 30 seconds before you can