[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] New developer: Thomas Sachau (tommy)

2008-03-21 Thread Santiago M. Mola
ntributed > to the Freenet project. On his free time he likes listening to music and > attending concerts. On IRC you can find him as Tommy[D]. > Welcome Tommy! -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] escaping variables in sed expressions

2008-04-15 Thread Santiago M. Mola
x = /usr/local_!{p;d}' -e "iprefix = ${D}" -i Makefile > > Comments? > Currently is use ':' as sed delimiter when paths are involved. I'd also like to hear from you about proper delimiters if you think ':' is not safe enough. AFAIK, the only corner c

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: escaping variables in sed expressions

2008-04-17 Thread Santiago M. Mola
/tmp/port\/age we'll just stab him, if someone releases a tarball with such filenames we'll stab him, too. -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Early stabilisation

2008-04-17 Thread Santiago M. Mola
nd can strictly focus on testing. Of course, everyone could continue with the "do it" style, but keep in mind that adding info like I described above can save a lot of AT work and, as a result, make stabilization process faster. [1] http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/emacs/wiki/test%20pla

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies that're available at pkg_*inst

2008-04-20 Thread Santiago M. Mola
we're going to do six years from now. > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201499 -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: New global USE flag: keyring

2008-04-20 Thread Santiago M. Mola
for 'gnome-keyring' and will choose another name ('foo-keyring'). -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ���^�X�����(��&j)b�b�

Re: [gentoo-dev] lastrite: sys-apps/systrace (security/treecleaners)

2008-04-21 Thread Santiago M. Mola
pps/systrace > -- > gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > > http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/systrace/systrace-1.6e.tar.gz 1.6e solves the security problem. Just in case someone wants to fix it. -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Nazi symbols on Gentoo (and other offending content)

2008-04-27 Thread Santiago M. Mola
omething else, this is directly a discussion about Nazi symbols. [1] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-480537.html -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: OT: [gentoo-dev] Nazi symbols on Gentoo (and other offending content)

2008-04-27 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Santiago M. Mola kirjoitti: > > > > > Thoughts? Isn't there anyone else willing to keep Nazi symbols outside > > forums? If yes, at the expense of punting all politics or just as a > &

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: language bindings as separate packages

2008-05-01 Thread Santiago M. Mola
the upstream and solve it there. > Yes, sometimes it makes sense for upstream to split packages, anyone is free to push them for doing so. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for May

2008-05-08 Thread Santiago M. Mola
~coldwind/pms.pdf It's not that hard to extract the relevant paragraph from the tex sources, though. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for May

2008-05-08 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 01:44:53PM +0200, Santiago M. Mola wrote: > > > > Here you have latest pms revision built without kdebuild-1 spec: > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~coldwind/pms.pdf > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage

2008-05-08 Thread Santiago M. Mola
. > Note that we're also speaking about downstream lzma archives. Like in sys-apps/net-tools, where lzma hasn't been adopted even by upstream. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: dedicated USE-flag is inconsequent and confusing

2008-05-16 Thread Santiago M. Mola
ovided by it. IIRC, system packages are an exception, but it's perfectly ok for the rest. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] am I ready to step into Gentoo?

2008-05-20 Thread Santiago M. Mola
I think he can do good work on tcltk, and who knows if he'll work on bringing PureData to Gentoo too! Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About herds and their non-existant use

2008-05-23 Thread Santiago M. Mola
e nice to preserve a method for allowing lurkers on aliases. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?

2008-05-30 Thread Santiago M. Mola
at all. If we choose to support --as-needed by default we'd get testing from maintainers when adding new ebuilds, and from arch teams before ebuilds hit stable. --as-needed breaking legitimate code is a problem, though. I wonder if we have that kind of code in any application in the tree and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for June

2008-06-02 Thread Santiago M. Mola
word the whole tree, that's the difference ;-) I think we have not enough feedback from users about this. Either Bugzilla is not the right tool, or we don't encourage users enough to ask for keywords when they need them. Currently, some people assume that "if a user from $arch needed this package, he'd have requested keywords", but that's wrong. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ���^�X�����(��&j)b�b�

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations for council

2008-06-07 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Fernando J. Pereda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to nominate: > > ColdWind > ferdy, thanks for the nomination. astinus, thanks for your support and inspiration, which almost convinced me for running for Council. I decline. Reg

Re: [gentoo-dev] die/QA notice for do* failure?

2008-06-08 Thread Santiago M. Mola
ie since we currently add die calls for all emake occurences. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] die/QA notice for do* failure?

2008-06-08 Thread Santiago M. Mola
. (Replying to a random snippet) There has been previous discussion on https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138792 Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55

2008-06-10 Thread Santiago M. Mola
my opinion it's totally discarded. The concept of shebang doesn't apply here at all. Plus /usr/bin/ebuild is a binary provided by portage which has nothing to do with the process of sourcing ebuilds nor even with the internals of portage (not to speak of other package managers). Regard

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2 - Let's get it started

2008-06-11 Thread Santiago M. Mola
t cause problems are HP's unbundled compilers and GCC, in particular Apple's GCC releases.) " Upstream clearly states that a gmp build which tests have failed shouldn't be used. I bet they deny support for users who fail to follow that indication ;-) Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55

2008-06-11 Thread Santiago M. Mola
re bash scripts, they'd have .bash extension. The .ebuild extension means a specific kind of bash script and it doesn't seem wrong to change the extension if that "specific kind" changes, even if bash is still the interpreter. Even if we switched to sh or zsh I doubt we'

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55

2008-06-11 Thread Santiago M. Mola
sn't seem to make the problem simpler. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June

2008-06-12 Thread Santiago M. Mola
ny further major issues and removed kdebuild-1 from the PDF >> to be approved. > > he was told to remove kdebuild-1 from the repo and this has yet to happen > This shouldn't block PMS discussions. There's an up to date copy in pdf of PMS built without kdebuild at http://dev.g

[gentoo-dev] Packages broken by phase ordering change

2008-06-13 Thread Santiago M. Mola
x27;s possible to use has_version in pkg_setup or other phase and cache the result in a global variable. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees

2008-06-14 Thread Santiago M. Mola
ve me the latest 2.0 version available, not 1.4's. With the current proposal, .live ebuilds should be changed after every minor release, unless we use the number of the next release. Next release isn't always known, and it's doesn't always make sense. This puts us

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages broken by phase ordering change

2008-06-15 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Matthias Schwarzott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Freitag, 13. Juni 2008, Santiago M. Mola wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> As discussed in bug #222721, portage has changed the execution order >> of phases. It seems the change was i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What to do when Python 2.5 is blocking your package from entering stable? (Agenda for next council meeting?)

2008-06-20 Thread Santiago M. Mola
we might want to wait to 1.8.1) * dev-python/soappy-0.12.0 (bug #216385) Needs fix: * x11-misc/qterm (bug #216466) * dev-db/rekall (bug #141068) - needs bump, probably this is going to be p.masked and eventually removed from the tree Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ���^�X�����(��&j)b�b�

Re: [gentoo-dev] When the version scheme changes

2008-06-29 Thread Santiago M. Mola
other variables (P, S...) consistent. Also, this would imply an EAPI bump. I doubt this change is worth the trouble. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Multislot dependencies

2008-07-01 Thread Santiago M. Mola
#x27;t continue with these points in this thread. Thanks, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tags vs. categories (was: sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scip)

2008-07-08 Thread Santiago M. Mola
permail/exherbo-dev/2008-May/000149.html There was similar discussions in @g-dev but I'm too lazy to start serching the relevant threads. Best regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008

2008-07-14 Thread Santiago M. Mola
ebuild with equal category, package name, and version." > In other words, disregarding its other real world deficiencies like an > immediate goal, GLEP 55 fails to describe a keywording policy for > architecture developers Keywording policy wouldn't change. Regards, -- Sant

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New RESTRICT=live value for identification of live ebuilds?

2008-08-02 Thread Santiago M. Mola
don't see the need of using suboptimal hacks in order to avoid an EAPI bump. Furthermore, EAPI 2 is supposed to be done in the near future, right? Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New RESTRICT=live value for identification of live ebuilds?

2008-08-03 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Santiago M. Mola wrote: >> >> I don't think we're in a hurry for this feature, so I don't see the >> need of using suboptimal hacks in order to avoid an EAPI bump. >> Furthe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for August 7

2008-08-08 Thread Santiago M. Mola
enced from other official documentation. There's already one GLEP which had to get references to PMS removed because of this. And it will become a bigger problem when we have more EAPIs and we can't rely on any spec except short summaries posted to @dev-announce. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Retirement

2008-08-11 Thread Santiago M. Mola
.. > Good luck with that project! -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Retirement

2008-08-11 Thread Santiago M. Mola
l election indicates that most > current Gentoo developers appear to be satisfied with this current direction. > Therefore farewell. If anybody wants to reach me I can be reached at > bo.andresen at zlin.dk. > So long, and see you on the evil side ;-) -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP 56] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions [Clarifications]

2008-08-13 Thread Santiago M. Mola
criptions or > details but to just use the use.desc description. > > Further more, it would allow us in the future to make that mandatory and > repoman would only have to check metadata.xml for your USE flag. > > Comments, Suggestions, Input are all welcome. > What is the benefit? Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] The Plethora of Patches

2008-08-14 Thread Santiago M. Mola
portage until it's removed would be a huge work overhead... and I doubt it's worthy. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] The Plethora of Patches

2008-08-18 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Tobias Scherbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Santiago M. Mola wrote: > >> However, tracking the status of every patch since its inclusion in >> portage until it's removed would be a huge work overhead... and I >> doubt it'

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ability to pass arguments to src_configure/src_compile

2008-09-06 Thread Santiago M. Mola
quot; "heterogeneous" "threads mpi-threads" SRC_DEFAULT_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_PARAMS=( --sysconfdir=/etc/${PN} --without-xgrid --enable-pretty-print-stacktrace --enable-orterun-prefix-by-default --without-slurm ) -- You save some lines, but also you keep out all the use_* calls with their backslashes, myconf=$myconf crap, econf/emake || die... Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ability to pass arguments to src_configure/src_compile

2008-09-06 Thread Santiago M. Mola
ity and intuitiveness by a >> fair margin; how is it simpler? > > It may be 2 lines less, but it is 42 characters more. > Plus, I dislike caps. :-p In the example I posted it's 339 characters less. Almost half of the original ;-) Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ability to pass arguments to src_configure/src_compile

2008-09-07 Thread Santiago M. Mola
ns on all phases. Implementing it only for src_{configure,compile} won't feel so useful as implementing similar variables for most phases. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ability to pass arguments to src_configure/src_compile

2008-09-08 Thread Santiago M. Mola
you just define the phase, make the little change, and then call the 'default' function. Clean and simple. In any case, I guess people are not considering this change for EAPI-2. I think we'll come up with a more extense proposal which could be targeted for EAPI-3. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ability to pass arguments to src_configure/src_compile

2008-09-08 Thread Santiago M. Mola
$(for s in "${DEFAULT_SRC_CONFIGURE_OPTION_ENABLES}" ; do \ option_enable ${s} ; \ done ) \ $(for s in "${DEFAULT_SRC_CONFIGURE_OPTION_WITHS}" ; do \ option_with ${s} ; \ done )

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ability to pass arguments to src_configure/src_compile

2008-09-08 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Vaeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Santiago M. Mola wrote: >> Vaeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > [...] The suggestion violates in an extreme way the golden design >> > rule that small changes in effect should r

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug wrangling

2008-09-08 Thread Santiago M. Mola
at >> least). >> >> Thanks, Joe > > Yes, and usually that's how it's done. Eg eix' metadata.xml says: > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Martin Väth > > Yep. And for more completeness you can add something like Proxied maintainer. Although, it's quite obvious when it's a non-Gentoo email. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for September

2008-09-11 Thread Santiago M. Mola
roblem of the order change (using has_version in pkg_postinst), all of them were quickly fixed by Zac. But there may be more packages affected not included there. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=226505 [2] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_27feec8fc563e406b174386d24c39fdc.xml Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Preventing $ARCH flags in USE

2008-09-15 Thread Santiago M. Mola
ke an acceptable workaround. For future EAPIs, ARCH could be a regular USE_EXPANDed flag as you suggest, and package managers could filter any flag in USE which is not listed in IUSE. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request for feedback on GNU Patch change

2008-09-17 Thread Santiago M. Mola
ou're at it, you can create a profile.bashrc with the required modifications. I don't see any reason to not do the gpatch change, but it looks like unecessary to me because you already have simpler ways to solve the problem. So, requiring others to do a significant useless amount of work when you can solve it with just a line is not fair. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Default src_install for EAPI-2 or following EAPI

2008-09-24 Thread Santiago M. Mola
El mié, 24-09-2008 a las 02:35 +0200, Robert Buchholz escribió: > > Let's go with an even simpler default implementation: > > default_src_install() { > if [ -f Makefile ] || [ -f GNUmakefile ] || [ -f makefile ]; then > emake DESTDIR="${D}" install || die "emake install failed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: "Slacking" arches - which are stable, which aren't?

2008-10-07 Thread Santiago M. Mola
El lun, 06-10-2008 a las 23:13 +, Duncan escribió: > Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], > excerpted below, on Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:07:14 -0500: > > > AFAIK, it is incorrect right now to exclude s390, arm, sh, etc on > > stablereqs right now..But, I ask this question to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilize ebuilds which use EAPIs only supported by ~arch PMs

2008-10-15 Thread Santiago M. Mola
El mar, 14-10-2008 a las 18:24 -0700, Alec Warner escribió: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > > There's no need to commit straight to stable. Just make two different > > new revisions for each EAPI. Then the arch teams can test it like usual. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] DEFAULT_* proposal

2008-11-09 Thread Santiago M. Mola
Hello, El dom, 09-11-2008 a las 15:39 +0300, Peter Volkov escribió: > > 1. Functions we have now are much more flexible then proposed arrays. Do > I need to think of some example of code that is impossible to do with > arrays but still possible with functions? > The same concern was raised in t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for how to handle stable ebuilds

2008-11-10 Thread Santiago M. Mola
El lun, 10-11-2008 a las 13:13 -0500, Mark Loeser escribió: > > Ebuild Stabilization Time > > Arch teams will normally have 30 days from the day a bug was filed, keyworded > STABLEREQ, the arch was CCed, and the maintainer either filed the bug or > commented that it was OK to stabilize (clock sta

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-26 Thread Santiago M. Mola
re everyone in this list state his opinion about what communication methods are more effective. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-11-30 Thread Santiago M. Mola
El dom, 30-11-2008 a las 14:23 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò escribió: > I have a very quick proposal: why don't we move the packages' homepage > in metadata.xml (since it's usually unique for all the versions) and we > get rid of the variable for the next EAPI version? > > > Please submit al

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-admin/eselect needs YOUR help

2008-12-08 Thread Santiago M. Mola
(I'm replying to Ciaran's email, but my reply is for Donnie too) El lun, 08-12-2008 a las 17:44 +, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: > On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:37:42 -0800 > Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Open and public debate about the right way to do things does take > > longer, and i

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-31 Thread Santiago M. Mola
El mié, 31-12-2008 a las 15:33 +0100, Fabio Rossi escribió: > On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Marius Mauch wrote: > > > Well, the impact is about the same wether you want to change one or the > > other (btw, what about other admin tools on Gentoo, e.g. > > paludis/pkgcore, by your definition they'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] RDEPEND definition in docs differ from official PMS specs

2009-01-17 Thread Santiago M. Mola
El sáb, 17-01-2009 a las 16:41 +0100, Thomas Sachau escribió: > Marius Mauch schrieb: > > On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:09:49 +0100 > > Thomas Sachau wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> as specified in the PMS spec [1] and stated in #gentoo-portage, > >> RDEPEND will be set to DEPEND, if it is not defined in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting Baselayout2/openrc - no-symlink profiles leading to breakage

2009-01-19 Thread Santiago M. Mola
igher versions for new features. Otherwise, it's very likely that we need to solve the same problem again in the near future. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: cooldw...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Usage of cp -i to prevent overwriting upstream files

2009-01-21 Thread Santiago M. Mola
El mar, 20-01-2009 a las 21:04 +0200, Petteri Räty escribió: > d) something else e) use a hook around unpack on your local system to detect new build.xml for a list of packages. AFAIK, checking changes is part of the bump process, so I think that's a check you can do either at hand, with a scrip

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2009-02-11 Thread Santiago M. Mola
-misc/dzen (low maintainance) x11-misc/lsw (maintainance close to zero) Packages that I've been taking care of and could use a maintainer: app-shells/bash-completion net-p2p/nicotine+ Best regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: cooldw...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for February 26

2009-02-24 Thread Santiago M. Mola
ding, but that's a rather short sighted solution- something is > needed long term. > And/or make Portage noisy on PMS violations. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: cooldw...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] when the music's over

2009-03-09 Thread Santiago M. Mola
urn. I'm sorry to let you down. > So when the fun^Wmusic's over, turn off gentoo^Wthe lights. > > Ah.. the reasons? there are no reasons, who needs reasons when you got > exherbo? Good luck with Exherbo and Sydbox ;-) Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: cooldw...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives

2009-03-10 Thread Santiago M. Mola
bugz: $ bugz attachment that will download it with the proper name. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: cooldw...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Real multilib support for Gentoo

2009-04-04 Thread Santiago M. Mola
ild tons of unneeded 32bit libraries for every user. [1] http://dev.exherbo.org/~pioto/abi-ideas.html [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145737 Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: cooldw...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] =dev-lang/{tcl,tk}-8.5* unmask

2009-04-17 Thread Santiago M. Mola
t took Python 2.5 to get out p.mask ;-) After various heads up on the bug and on @g-dev, I think it's time to unmask. Incompatible packages should be fixed ASAP (after unmasking) or punted from the tree if they can't keep up with tcl/tk development. Best regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: cooldw...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Santiago M. Mola (coldwind)

2007-06-27 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On 6/27/07, Luis Francisco Araujo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bienvenido Santiago! One more developer from our #gentoo-es conspiracy! Fear us! Thanks all for the warm welcome. -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Pierre-Yves Rofes (p-y)

2007-07-14 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On 7/14/07, Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's a joint pleasure for me and diox to introduce to you Pierre-Yves "py" Rofes. Instead of the snake people he will be joining our security team. Please give him the usual flamy welcome. PyWelcome! -- Santiago M. M

Re: [gentoo-dev] Zombie: Sven Vermeulen (swift)

2007-07-18 Thread Santiago M. Mola
of bug #27727, comment #2 ;-) -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Jason Smathers (jsin)

2007-08-19 Thread Santiago M. Mola
n as a new fellow developer among us ! > Welcome! -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Christian Hoffmann (hoffie)

2007-08-19 Thread Santiago M. Mola
llow developer among us ! Welcome! -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages of for grabs

2007-09-05 Thread Santiago M. Mola
. > > Wasn't that going to be removed due to a dispute re its licence ? > Perhaps that got resolved without my noticing (smile). > There's no problem with ion2. That's with ion3. -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages of for grabs

2007-09-06 Thread Santiago M. Mola
dvent of ion3 stable in my overlay there's no use to keep it. > x11-wm/ion2 (and "ion1") is under desktop-wm herd maintainance now. Let's file a bug, write to @desktop-wm or come to #-desktop if you still want to remove it. -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Possible USE="gnome" abusing in ebuilds.

2007-10-12 Thread Santiago M. Mola
think it's an optimal solution, but adding a new local USE for every tiny feature would be annoying, and USE="gnome-panel" or USE="gnome-applets" flag is pretty senseless. -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for a developer with Logitech Quickcam Messenger (using media-video/qc-usb-messenger)

2007-10-21 Thread Santiago M. Mola
to test it. > > If you own this hardware, please take maintainership of this package. > I took its maintainership. Regards, Santiago -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI feature suggestion: OBSOLETES (was: gentoo-x86 commit in profiles/updates: 4Q-2007)

2007-11-07 Thread Santiago M. Mola
d at any time (not only after installing a package). It'd be more reliable than current pkg_postinst messages. Regards, Santiago -- Santiago M. Mola -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-print/cups: ChangeLog cups-1.3.4-r1.ebuild cups-1.3.4.ebuild

2007-11-10 Thread Santiago M. Mola
they are going to use? > Are they inconditional runtime deps? This looks like another case where RECOMMENDS would be useful. -- Santiago M. Mola

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Features and documentation

2007-11-29 Thread Santiago M. Mola
a bug asking for doc update for the commited changes. -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Features and documentation

2007-11-29 Thread Santiago M. Mola
better examples, but those are the ones I have right now. Regards, Santiago -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] .desktop file cleanup

2007-12-07 Thread Santiago M. Mola
r/portage/net-p2p/bittornado/files/bittornado.desktop * desktop-file-validate /usr/portage/net-p2p/mldonkey/files/mldonkey-gui.desktop Fixed. -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE flags documentation

2007-12-09 Thread Santiago M. Mola
ycle (as other people pointer out... ignoring the community). So, I agree with people asking for freezing the use of the new features until a GLEP is proposed, discussed and approved. Regards, Santiago -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling branch strings

2007-12-10 Thread Santiago M. Mola
s to show you which branch you're getting. > Too tricky. It would confuse package managers and would break the meaning of SLOT. An use expanded SCM_BRANCH combined with use dependencies makes more sense and, hopefully, would be something manageable. Regards, Santiago -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling branch strings

2007-12-11 Thread Santiago M. Mola
ning behind them. > > [...] For my reasoning... just read Ciaran's reply ;-) -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI placement

2007-12-12 Thread Santiago M. Mola
egal in global scope. So is it desirable? If portage masks ebuilds with an unsupported EAPI, what's the point? It'd be enough to be able to check EAPI compatibility in eclasses quickly so repoman and others can print a nice error. -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gnupg-2 stable plans

2007-12-12 Thread Santiago M. Mola
called gpg2 and not just gpg. * Again, it's upstream choice and, after considering the possibilities, there's no major reason for not following it. What else is needed for using SLOTs? -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI placement

2007-12-12 Thread Santiago M. Mola
lot of confusion and eclass bloat, especially since > we still can't remove stale eclasses afaik. > Yep, that issue should be addresses as it is in paludis and pkgcore. [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/pms.xml -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuilds I lastrited month ago for treecleaners, time to look at them once more.

2007-12-15 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Dec 15, 2007 8:00 AM, Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > x11-wm/flwm (Coldwind promised to take a look at this, it needs a > patched fltk.) Both fltk and flwm fixed. x11-wm/flwm should go out of p.mask when fltk and flwm get proper keywords again. -- Santiago M. Mo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-18 Thread Santiago M. Mola
MO, keeping us away from improvements to Gentoo because they break backwards compatibility with third party scripts is a no-go. Of course, this kind of changes can't happen once a month, but they can happen from time to time. Regards, Santiago -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Some new global USE-flags

2007-12-20 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Dec 20, 2007 7:57 PM, Markus Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > raw: Add support for raw image formats > keyring: Enable gnome-keyring support for storing passwords > These are potentially ambiguos. I have no objections for the others. -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID

Re: EAPI definition Was: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-20 Thread Santiago M. Mola
rate all of them. We can switch EAPI on an as needed basis. > Other than that we can only have one working EAPI which all package managers > conforms to. Read above, and other discussions. That's also pointless because we don't need to force all third party overlays to upgrade EAPI everytime we have a new one... -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Some new global USE-flags

2007-12-21 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Dec 20, 2007 10:48 PM, Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Santiago M. Mola wrote: > > These are potentially ambiguos. > > Could you please elaborate a bit about the raw one? > Just that "raw" could mean more things. Anyway, I have no problem with that

Re: EAPI definition Was: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-28 Thread Santiago M. Mola
itto for naming rules. > Errr... so should we use new files in profiles for such new formats? (for example, p.masking an ebuild with a new version format). -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: EAPI definition Was: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-28 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Dec 28, 2007 1:28 PM, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:25:13 +0100 > "Santiago M. Mola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 28, 2007 1:03 PM, Ciaran McCreesh > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ther

[gentoo-dev] Improving use.desc

2008-01-02 Thread Santiago M. Mola
SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics). +svg - Adds support for SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) -tiff - Adds support for the tiff image format +tiff - Adds support for the TIFF image format -vim-syntax - Pulls in related vim syntax scripts. +vim-syntax - Pulls in related vim syntax scripts Regards, Santiago

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC available for testing.

2008-01-02 Thread Santiago M. Mola
ulaw multi null plug rate route share shm softvol" APACHE2_MODULES="actions alias auth_basic authn_alias authn_anon authn_dbm authn_default authn_file authz_dbm authz_default authz_groupfile authz_host authz_owner authz_user autoindex cache dav dav_fs dav_lock deflate dir disk_cache env e

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC available for testing.

2008-01-03 Thread Santiago M. Mola
gain on this list. > I'm sure most people here want to hear major announcements about OpenRC. At the moment, I'm emailing my OpenRC issues directly to you ;-) Best regards, Santiago -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

  1   2   >