On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Brian Harring <ferri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At the very least I'm after having the non-pms repos marked in some
> fashion so that alt implementations don't have to assume the portage
> standard (rather then the *agreed to* pms standard) to avoid
> exploding, but that's a rather short sighted solution- something is
> needed long term.
>

And/or make Portage noisy on PMS violations.

Regards,
-- 
Santiago M. Mola
Jabber ID: cooldw...@gmail.com

Reply via email to