On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Brian Harring <ferri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > At the very least I'm after having the non-pms repos marked in some > fashion so that alt implementations don't have to assume the portage > standard (rather then the *agreed to* pms standard) to avoid > exploding, but that's a rather short sighted solution- something is > needed long term. >
And/or make Portage noisy on PMS violations. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: cooldw...@gmail.com