Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-02 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 02-11-2014 a las 13:07 +, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió: > > > How do you strip the html code? I was unsure about to do that :/ > > You should have asked. There is no need to strip. I upload both HTML > and text alike. > Ah, ok. Anyway, if AxS can tell me how was doing that would be

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-11-04 Thread Pacho Ramos
Due kingtaco lack of time this package is now up for grab: net-misc/rwhoisd

[gentoo-dev] Java7 stabilization

2014-11-10 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello I would like to see if we could finally try to stabilize java7 on Gentoo as some external tools start to require it. There is currently this tracker opened: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384609 I am unsure why: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483018 should block the sta

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unify keyring related USE flags

2014-11-13 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 12-10-2014 a las 10:38 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El dom, 12-10-2014 a las 00:13 +0400, Alexander Tsoy escribió: > [...] > > > > > > I think we should simply have a "keyring" USE flag to enable what most > > > people will want -> key

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unify keyring related USE flags

2014-11-13 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 13-11-2014 a las 14:12 +0300, Alexander Tsoy escribió: > В Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:53:56 +0100 > Pacho Ramos пишет: > > > El dom, 12-10-2014 a las 10:38 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > > El dom, 12-10-2014 a las 00:13 +0400, Alexander Tsoy escribió: > > > [

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deps on slotted executables (implicit @system tangent)

2014-11-14 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 14-11-2014 a las 19:23 +, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: [...] > It *also* isn't an issue on any other source based distribution. This > is entirely down to Gentoo libstdc++ silliness. > > > However, the right way to do this isn't to toggle some global setting > > - it is to just apply spec

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-21 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 20-11-2014 a las 23:04 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: [...] > Here's how games-r1 would look like. However, now that I think about it, > it may be actually useful to commit such an eclass. Otherwise people > will keep thinking games.eclass is the way to go. > Why isn't games.eclass depreca

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-21 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 21-11-2014 a las 11:03 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El jue, 20-11-2014 a las 23:04 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: > [...] > > Here's how games-r1 would look like. However, now that I think about it, > > it may be actually useful to commit such an eclass. Otherwi

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-21 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 21-11-2014 a las 10:10 -0500, Tim Harder escribió: > On 2014-11-21 09:54, hasufell wrote: > > There are users who seem to like it and the games team wants to keep it > > as well, so I don't see a reason to push into that direction. > > > The main thing is that you cannot turn off all the p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverted python3.4 defaults

2014-11-24 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 23-11-2014 a las 20:56 -0500, Mike Gilbert escribió: > Just a heads-up: I have reverted PYTHON_TARGETS to contain python2_7 > and python3_3 (removing python3_4). > > The stable tree is not quite ready for python3_4; there are many > packages that need to have python3_4 added to PYTHON_COMP

[gentoo-dev] Wondering if a news item is needed for NM update

2014-11-29 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello We are wondering if a news item will be needed for people updating to latest networkmanager to remember them that they will need to reconfigure their networks *after* NM is updated. We currently show this messages in ebuild itself: ewarn "Ifnet plugin is now disabled because of it being u

[gentoo-dev] Lastrites: net-im/linpopup, app-office/teapot, net-irc/bitchx, sys-power/cpufrequtils, x11-plugins/gkrellm-cpufreq, media-sound/gnome-alsamixer, sys-devel/ac-archive, net-misc/emirror, ne

2014-12-01 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (01 Dec 2014) # Doesn't work ok, upstream dead since 2007 (#321277). # Removal in a month. net-im/linpopup # Pacho Ramos (01 Dec 2014) # Multiple pending bugs, #380435, #460508, #481150, # #481310, #481312, #530856. Removal in a month (#380435) app-office/teapot # Pacho

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-12-01 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 14-11-2014 a las 04:02 +0100, Tom Wijsman escribió: > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:59:46 +0200 > Pavlos Ratis wrote: > > > I will also drop myself from the net-proxy herd. > > Drawing extra attention to this sentence; it looks like the herd is > (once again) going to be empty, as the result of

Re: [gentoo-dev] scheme herd needs your help (or maybe be dissolved?)

2014-12-01 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 02-11-2014 a las 12:59 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > I have hit this: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465348 > > that is present for really a long time, apart of that is the guile:2 > migration that never ends and still blocks aisleriot from being > unmas

Re: [gentoo-dev] scheme herd needs your help (or maybe be dissolved?)

2014-12-01 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 01-12-2014 a las 13:16 +0200, Panagiotis Christopoulos escribió: > On 12:01 Mon 01 Dec , Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El dom, 02-11-2014 a las 12:59 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > > I have hit this: > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465348 >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please unmask app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-*-20081109

2009-07-12 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 05-07-2009 a las 14:14 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > I sent months ago: > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=254577 > > but I didn't get any reply yet. emul packages seem to be a bit > unmaintained, also, there are no updates since months, guide for making > em

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About time to unify 'cdda' and 'cdaudio' USE flags and make the remaining one global?

2009-07-22 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 22-07-2009 a las 18:45 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: > Lars Wendler wrote: > > Let's finally move on regarding this topic. As I'm also in favour of > > the "cdda" USE flag I'd like to know if there's any objection against the > > decision to unify/convert the "cdaudio" USE flag into "c

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About time to unify 'cdda' and 'cdaudio' USE flags and make the remaining one global?

2009-07-23 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 23-07-2009 a las 03:06 +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto escribió: > Please don't. > Instead of having an ever larger collection of default use flags in the > desktop profile, we should be taking advantage of EAPI-1 IUSE defaults > and EAPI-2 use dependencies. It's other way to go, of cour

Re: [gentoo-dev] Amount of useflags enabled by default

2009-10-24 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 23-10-2009 a las 22:54 +0300, Petteri Räty escribió: > Thomas Sachau wrote: > > > > In addition, i see a trend to enabled more more more USE flags (either over > > profiles or via IUSE > > +flag). Whats the reason for forcing a big load of default enabled USE > > flags on every user incl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastrite (part 1): KDE3-only applications that won't build when KDE4 is installed

2009-11-04 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 04-11-2009 a las 07:55 -0600, Dale escribió: > > I mention because I have already downloaded Mandriva and plan to install > it as a temporary fix if needed. I think I can suffer through Mandriva > for a couple months while this gets sorted out. I'm planning to install > the same for my b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastrite (part 1): KDE3-only applications that won't build when KDE4 is installed

2009-11-04 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 04-11-2009 a las 15:48 -0600, Dale escribió: > Ben de Groot wrote: > > 2009/11/4 Dale : > > > >> Is it possible to just mask and maybe keyword KDE 3? > >> > > > > This has already been decided. We are moving it to an overlay. > > I can't think of a valid reason why you would not use

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2010-01-02 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 01-01-2010 a las 13:31 +, Mike Frysinger escribió: > This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically > the 3rd Thursday at 1800 UTC / 2000 CET / 1400 EST), same bat channel > (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) ! > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2010-01-09 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 07-01-2010 a las 15:59 -0700, Denis Dupeyron escribió: > 2010/1/2 Pacho Ramos : > > [...] I failed to see if, finally, an approval > > from the council is needed for merging [multilib] to portage-2.2 or not > > The only approval that's required to merge anythin

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 14-01-2010 a las 18:04 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." escribió: > > It would be nice to post that info to a webpage. That could increase a > chance of a volunteer contributing some help. I agree, maybe that way other people (from forums for example) could help if they know about git (or elect

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again)

2010-01-16 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 16-01-2010 a las 17:16 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan escribió: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: > >> It's just impossible to choose perfect location that suits all needs and > >> it should stay user-configurable. So again, do not change this default > >> we no real need ano

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-libs/gtk+extra

2010-02-21 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (21 Feb 2010) # Upstream is dead since years, doesn't compile against # gtk+-2.18 and nobody want to maintain it (#292211) # Masked for removal in 60 days x11-libs/gtk+extra Best regards signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to make_desktop_entry in eutils.eclass

2010-02-24 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 23-02-2010 a las 20:26 -0500, Jonathan Callen escribió: > Attached is a patch to properly comply with the part of the FDO Desktop > Menu Specification pertaining to Categories (namely, always ensuring > that the list ends in a ";") and the part of the FDO Desktop Entry > Specification and I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to make_desktop_entry in eutils.eclass

2010-02-24 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 24-02-2010 a las 19:40 +0100, Ulrich Mueller escribió: > >>>>> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > Would be nice if you would have time to look at the following old > > make_desktop_entry bug: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to make_desktop_entry in eutils.eclass

2010-02-24 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 24-02-2010 a las 19:55 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > I agree with you bad... bad -> but (sorry for the typo) signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to make_desktop_entry in eutils.eclass

2010-02-24 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 24-02-2010 a las 20:33 +0100, Ulrich Mueller escribió: > >>>>> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > >> Why should "Science" be a sub-category of "Education"? > >> That doesn't make sense to me. > > &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to make_desktop_entry in eutils.eclass

2010-02-24 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 24-02-2010 a las 14:53 -0500, Jonathan Callen escribió: > On 02/24/2010 01:16 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El mar, 23-02-2010 a las 20:26 -0500, Jonathan Callen escribió: > >> Attached is a patch to properly comply with the part of the FDO Desktop > >> Menu

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve circular deps

2010-03-05 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 05-03-2010 a las 19:03 +0100, Dawid Węgliński escribió: > On Friday 05 March 2010 17:12:23 Roy Bamford wrote: > > > > > That's not a new install as per the handbook. Neither are you a new > > user as you have a premade make.conf and world file and some experience > > with Gentoo. > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve circular deps

2010-03-06 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 05-03-2010 a las 22:06 +0100, Ben de Groot escribió: > > > If no, I can split off utils from poppler - with CMake it's effortless. > > We just rejoined the split poppler into one package again. So if you > are going to split it up again, you will have some explaining to do to > our users.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 25-03-2010 a las 11:37 -0400, Richard Freeman escribió: > On 03/24/2010 11:47 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote: > > Even then, it'll likely get > > installed first, as users will probably learn about p.masking it only > > *after* they install it. > > I don't have strong feelings on whether having

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 26-03-2010 a las 05:10 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: > > Hello > > > > Maybe I have misunderstood anything (since I don't know much about > > python stuff) but, what would occur if I forget to mask python-3 and > > don't run python-updater. My plans would be to try to delay > > python-update

Re: [gentoo-dev] misc packages up for grabs

2010-03-29 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 23-03-2010 a las 21:40 +, Jeremy Olexa escribió: > I will be moving these to maintainer-needed in a few days. I no longer use > them and have little motivation to fix incoming bugs. Don't bother to ask, > just feel free to change metadata.xml to yourself. > > Thanks, > Jeremy ... > > s

Re: [gentoo-dev] [looking-for-man-power] Packaging RedHat/Fedora tools and libs

2010-04-10 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 09-04-2010 a las 21:41 +0200, Fabio Erculiani escribió: > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > > On 04/09/2010 04:34 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > >> They are available in the "sabayon" overlay. Is there anybody > >> interested in helping me out for the integration and, pe

[gentoo-dev] Gnome 2.28 stabilization news item

2010-04-23 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello Please see attached news item for reviewing :-) Thanks Title: Upgrade to GNOME 2.28 Author: Pacho Ramos Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2010-04-23 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: http://gnome.gentoo.org/howtos/gnome-2.28-upgrade.xml signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass eautomake update

2010-05-25 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 25-05-2010 a las 16:45 +0400, Peter Volkov escribió: > В Втр, 25/05/2010 в 12:12 +, Duncan пишет: > > Peter Volkov posted on Tue, 25 May 2010 11:46:12 +0400 as excerpted: > > >> sources.gentoo.org/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.97&r2=1.98 > > > Why "" is required at the end of file list?

Notify people about empty herds (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] FTR: media-opti...@g.o has no developers)

2010-06-03 Thread Pacho Ramos
indicating something like, for example: 41. gnome - Description GNOME Desktop and related packages - Herd maintainers' email address gn...@gentoo.org - Maintainers ... pa...@gentoo.org (Pacho Ramos) (Devway) But I am not sure if it would be possible :-/ Also, maybe we should consider change

[gentoo-dev] Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name when becoming "devaway"

2010-06-10 Thread Pacho Ramos
"(Devaway)", for example: "Pacho Ramos" would be changed to "Pacho Ramos (Deavaway)" Then, people could simply search "devaway" in google and would get proper information (gentoo devway page is the first shown) Thanks signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name when becoming "devaway"

2010-06-10 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 10-06-2010 a las 12:23 -0600, Joe Peterson escribió: > I think a better solution, if we need to indicate this, is to have > bugzilla grab the status from devaway and display it next to the dev's > name in bug reports. Changing the user's name seems a bit cumbersome, > and I don't agree tha

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name when becoming "devaway"

2010-06-10 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 11-06-2010 a las 00:38 +0200, Christian Ruppert escribió: > On 06/10/2010 07:07 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Hello > > > > Currently, we only need to set a proper message in ~/.away (as talked in > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/roll-call/devaway.xml )

[gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy

2010-06-11 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello Let my explain the problem and my suggestion to handle it better (at least from my point of view) with an example: Sometime ago I bumped bluez version from 4.39-r2 to 4.60, with that bump, a new and *optional* RDEPEND on sys-libs/libcap-ng was added. Since libcap-ng was not keyworded in all

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: net-wireless/bluez-{libs,utils}

2010-06-11 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (11 Jun 2010) # Drop old and deprecated bluez-libs and bluez-utils. Use bluez instead. # Masked for removal in 30 days. # See bug 301630. net-wireless/bluez-libs net-wireless/bluez-utils And really thanks a lot to Samuli for taking care of the hard work (cleaning deps

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy

2010-06-13 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:16 +0300, Petteri Räty escribió: > On 06/11/2010 12:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > > > From my point of view, I would prefer to: > > 1. Mask "caps" for net-wireless/bluez on affected arches, letting us to > > keep bluez keywor

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy

2010-06-13 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:43 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:16 +0300, Petteri Räty escribió: > > On 06/11/2010 12:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > > > > > > From my point of view, I would prefer to: > > > 1. Mask "

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy

2010-06-14 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 14-06-2010 a las 04:59 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribió: > What is the problem? The files in place ask you to file a bug report > instead of fiddling with the files yourselves. I put that in place > because I got (fucking) tired of seeing the after effects of people > fiddling with the arch p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy

2010-06-14 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 14-06-2010 a las 11:30 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribió: > On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:08:58 +0200 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > The problem is that, at least regarding gnome related bugs, there are > > a lot of keywords dropped for your arch that could be prevented > &g

[gentoo-dev] Does libtool really support parallel make installs?

2010-06-16 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello Trying to move the following bug to upstream: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253862 He replied the following: "libtool doesn't support parallel make installs. Please file a bug upstream." https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28108#c1 Is it true? Should -j1 be forced then f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Does libtool really support parallel make installs?

2010-06-16 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 16-06-2010 a las 15:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Trying to move the following bug to upstream: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253862 > > > > He replied the following: > > "

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy

2010-06-17 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 17-06-2010 a las 06:07 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribió: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:39:01 -0400 > Joseph Jezak wrote: > > > Your preferred method is exactly how (as a ppc keyworder) I like to > > see these kind of bugs handled. Dropping keywords makes an awful lot > > more work for us and hur

Re: [gentoo-dev] Does libtool really support parallel make installs?

2010-06-17 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 17-06-2010 a las 01:26 +0400, Peter Volkov escribió: > В Срд, 16/06/2010 в 17:21 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет: > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Peter Volkov wrote: > > > В Срд, 16/06/2010 в 13:41 +0200, Pacho Ramos пишет: > > >> Trying to move the followin

[gentoo-dev] Re: New global USE flag: introspection

2010-06-20 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 20-06-2010 a las 20:12 +0530, Arun Raghavan escribió: > Hi folks, > I'd like to propose a new global USE-flag: introspection. > > The purpose of the flag is to enable the building of GIR for the > package using dev-libs/gobject-introspection. gobject-introspection is > going to be quite im

[gentoo-dev] Re: New global USE flag: introspection

2010-06-20 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 21-06-2010 a las 03:05 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan escribió: > > I agree with having it as a new global USE-flag, but I am unsure about > > enabling it by default just now, since some automagic dependency > > problems appeared some time ago :-/, but I will leave this decision to > > other Gnome

[gentoo-dev] Should "orphan" package without any "stable" version be stabilized?

2010-06-24 Thread Pacho Ramos
I have just seen this: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323265 app-office/ledger doesn't have any maintainer and has no stable version, also, seems that no other app requires this to be stabilized. I would prefer to keep this in testing until a maintainer really maintains it downstream, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should "orphan" package without any "stable" version be stabilized?

2010-06-24 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 24-06-2010 a las 17:44 +0200, Christian Faulhammer escribió: > Hi, > > Pacho Ramos : > > app-office/ledger doesn't have any maintainer and has no stable > > version, also, seems that no other app requires this to be > > stabilized. I would prefer to keep th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding --as-needed to LDFLAGS in profiles/default/linux/make.defaults

2010-06-28 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 28-06-2010 a las 06:39 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan escribió: > Hello everyone, > > I'm sure at least half of you are thinking "Oh no, not this again...", > and I agree. However, I'm /also/ thinking "Why the heck haven't we > done this yet?" > > We've been discussing this since 2008, and proba

[gentoo-dev] dotnet herd is "empty"

2010-06-30 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello I noticed some time ago that mono stuff is a bit unmaintained, looking at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/metastructure/herds/herds.xml#doc_chap32 I confirmed that the only dotnet herd member is retiring ( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149480 ) Would be nice if anybody could join to

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 04-07-2010 a las 16:29 +0200, Lars Wendler escribió: > Hi list, > > now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be > honest I was really looking forward for openrc/baselayout-2 finally becoming > stable in Gentoo but this seems to be quite implausible now that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 05-07-2010 a las 19:38 +0200, Harald van Dijk escribió: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 07:01:27PM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis > wrote: > > 2010-07-05 18:36:09 Tomáš Chvátal napisał(a): > > > Dne 5.7.2010 18:34, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napsal(a): > > > > python.eclass u

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: dev-dotnet/heap-buddy

2010-07-07 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (07 Jul 2010) # Dead upstream, no new release since 2006, no longer builds (bug #316623). # Masked for removal in 30 days dev-dotnet/heap-buddy signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: dev-libs/gnome-build

2010-07-09 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (09 Jul 2010) # Masked for removal in 30 days since it's no longer needed now that we # don't have old anjuta versions in the tree, see bug #327593 dev-libs/gnome-build signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: gnome-base/eel, gnome-extra/nautilus-cd-burner, dev-python/nautilus-cd-burner-python

2010-07-12 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (12 Jul 2010) # Masked for removal in 30 days. # No longer developed by upstream, fails with forced as-needed (bug #277169), # does not compile against gnome-desktop-2.30 (bug #311563). gnome-base/eel gnome-extra/nautilus-cd-burner dev-python/nautilus-cd-burner-python

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libunique: ChangeLog libunique-1.1.6.ebuild

2010-07-12 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 12-07-2010 a las 12:13 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue escribió: > > This revision should be masked. It is a development series release. The > only reason you might need this currently is because of packages passing > bad compile options for release packages like -DG_DISABLED_DEPRECATED > and

Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: gnome-base/eel, gnome-extra/nautilus-cd-burner, dev-python/nautilus-cd-burner-python

2010-07-12 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 12-07-2010 a las 12:18 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > # Pacho Ramos (12 Jul 2010) > # Masked for removal in 30 days. > # No longer developed by upstream, fails with forced as-needed (bug > #277169), > # does not compile against gnome-desktop-2.30 (bug #311563). > gnom

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-07-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 19-07-2010 a las 21:05 +0300, Alex Alexander escribió: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:01:38PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:50:00 +0300 > > Markos Chandras wrote: > > > > > The queue is almost 100 bugs long again. We could really use some > > > help here. Thanks >

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-themes/smooth-themes and x11-themes/smoothgnome

2010-09-02 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (2 Sep 2010) # They don't work since >=x11-themes/gtk-engines-2.16 lost # support for Smooth engine (bug #330181). # Removal on 2010-10-01 x11-themes/smooth-themes x11-themes/smoothgnome signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs & editbugs users

2010-09-07 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 08-09-2010 a las 01:44 +0400, dev-ran...@mail.ru escribió: > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:30:34PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > This implies that the upstream is alive enough to fix it. > > > > I feel it should mean that the bug has been reported to upstream, and > > that state is docum

Re: [gentoo-dev] CUPS 1.4 and FFMpeg 0.6

2010-09-09 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 09-09-2010 a las 10:20 +0200, Christian Faulhammer escribió: > Hi, > > a security stabilisation for Chromium [1] wants Cups 1.4 stable. My > test requests on Planet Gentoo and via identi.ca revealed no real > blockers, although people report that they needed to readd their > printers in o

Re: [gentoo-dev] CUPS 1.4 and FFMpeg 0.6

2010-09-09 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 09-09-2010 a las 15:25 +0200, Timo Gurr escribió: > The plan is to release an updated revision incorporating the QA fixes > from bug #332591 (huge thanks to Tomáš Chvátal (scarabeus) for doing > the actual work here!) Great! Thanks a lot to all people involved :-D > Apart from that there'

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-libs/phlib

2010-09-12 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (12 Sep 2010) # No upstream update since 2004, looks to be no longer supported # by them. Unable to locate any distribution still shipping it # but PLD (with last update in 2007), nothing in the tree needs it, # does not respect LDFLAGS (bug #335227). # Removal on 2010-10-12 dev

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-accessibility/gnopernicus

2010-09-12 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (12 Sep 2010) # No developed by upstream since years, orca replaces it, # fails to compile (bug #221283). # Removal on 2010-10-12 app-accessibility/gnopernicus signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-libs/diacanvas

2010-09-13 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (13 Sep 2010) # Upstream says is no longer developed, no updates since 2007, # nothing in the tree uses it, build failures (bug #276918). # Removal on 2010-10-13 x11-libs/diacanvas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-libs/gtkscintilla2

2010-09-13 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (13 Sep 2010) # Nothing in the tree requires this, unable to see # any major distribution still shipping this, unable to find any # upstream update since a lot of time, does not respect LDFLAGS # (bug 333957) and doesn't have an autotools based build system. x11-libs/gtkscint

[gentoo-dev] About wormo's situation?

2010-09-16 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello I have seen some package metadatas still referring to wormo as their maintainer: $ grep -r wormo */*/metada* app-admin/ulogd/metadata.xml: wo...@gentoo.org app-arch/pdv/metadata.xml: wo...@gentoo.org www-client/lynx/metadata.xml: wo...@gentoo.org But, reading http://bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] About wormo's situation?

2010-09-17 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 16-09-2010 a las 16:20 -0500, Jeremy Olexa escribió: > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:12:10 +0200, Pacho Ramos > wrote: > > Hello > > > > I have seen some package metadatas still referring to wormo as their > > maintainer: > > $ grep -r wormo */*/meta

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-wireless/bluez-gnome

2010-09-24 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (24 Sep 2010) # Broken since more than a year when using nvidia-drivers (bug #260433), # upstream no longer develops neither maintains it, most common # distributions have already dropped it. # Please use net-wireless/gnome-bluetooth:2 instead. Will be removed at 24 Nov 2010

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-voip/cohoba

2010-09-29 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (29 Sep 2010) # Unmaintained since a lot of time by upstream also suffers # some bugs like bug #339096 and upstream discourages its # usage. Masked with Peper's approval. # # Removal on 2010-10-29 net-voip/cohoba signature.asc Description: This is a digitally s

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-libs/libtelepathy

2010-09-30 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (30 Sep 2010) # Unmaintained since a lot of time by upstream, it's # replaced by net-libs/telepathy-glib (bug #338681) and # Masked with Tester's approval. # # Removal on 2010-10-30 net-libs/libtelepathy Also fix cohoba package.ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: please use the latest Portage/repoman version to commit to tree

2010-09-30 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 30-09-2010 a las 09:41 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman escribió: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:36, Andreas K. Huettel > wrote: > > What is the general opinion on this? > > Do you (developers) all use ~arch portage? > > How big is the risk? > > As another dev who generally runs stable (except thing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: please use the latest Portage/repoman version to commit to tree

2010-09-30 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 30-09-2010 a las 10:09 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > And I would also ask, Where a portage-2.1.9 version will be stabilized? > > Thanks a lot for the info :-) Where -> When signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: please use the latest Portage/repoman version to commit to tree

2010-09-30 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 30-09-2010 a las 08:19 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: > If we don't find any really annoying regressions in portage-2.1.9.12 > then that release will be stabilized about 30 days from now. We > haven't been finding many regressions lately [1], so there's a > reasonable probability of this relea

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-libs/libproxy: ChangeLog libproxy-0.4.6.ebuild

2010-10-01 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 01-10-2010 a las 17:15 +0400, Peter Volkov escribió: > В Срд, 29/09/2010 в 20:43 +0000, Pacho Ramos (pacho) пишет: > > pkg_setup() { > > if use python; then > > python_set_active_version 2 > > fi > > It's much shorte

[gentoo-dev] Help on f-spot-0.8 problem

2010-10-01 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello Since Calchan doesn't have much time for f-spot and dotnet team is conformed basically by me, I would welcome any help for trying to bump f-spot to its 0.8 version. The problem is that eautoreconf doesn't run, even running "autoreconf" on unpacked upstream sources fails with the following e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help on f-spot-0.8 problem

2010-10-02 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 02-10-2010 a las 21:36 +0400, Peter Volkov escribió: > Hi, Pacho. > > В Птн, 01/10/2010 в 20:14 +0200, Pacho Ramos пишет: > > Since Calchan doesn't have much time for f-spot and dotnet team is > > conformed basically by me, I would welcome any help for trying

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-dotnet/ant-dotnet

2010-10-07 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (7 Oct 2010) # Unmaintained since 2006 by upstream, no required by # any package in the tree (bug #340039) and most # distributions have already dropped it. # # Removal on 2010-11-07 dev-dotnet/ant-dotnet signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-text/gnome-spell

2010-10-09 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (09 Oct 2010) # Removal of app-text/gnome-spell as it's no used by # anything in the tree and its functionality is in # gtkhtml through enchant (bug #339771) # Removal on 2010-11-09 app-text/gnome-spell signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-cpp/gtkmm:2

2010-10-30 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (30 Oct 2010) # Build failures (bug 244543) and not required by # anything in the tree. # Pending Removal: 2010-11-30 =dev-cpp/gtkmm-2.2.12 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's plan to remove .la files

2010-10-31 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 31-10-2010 a las 03:25 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto escribió: > 3. Add a page to the QA project space (unless they're not interested) > about la files and how to deal with them > > I think we can ask Diego to use large parts of his blog posts and charts > about .la files[1], [2], [3],

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's plan to remove .la files: QA document

2010-10-31 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 31-10-2010 a las 03:32 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto escribió: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi. > > As outlined in the global email about this issue, this email is to start > a thread about the QA document. Please reply to this thread if you > have any comment

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo's plan to remove .la files: wording about when and how to drop .la files

2010-10-31 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 31-10-2010 a las 14:56 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió: > Il giorno dom, 31/10/2010 alle 03.30 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto > ha scritto: > > As agreed in the meeting, as a first draft, we have that "the motion > > is > > to drop la files, when appropriate, through the use of a func

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: mesa.eselect

2010-11-01 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 31-10-2010 a las 23:30 +0100, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn escribió: > Hi, > > media-libs/mesa-7.9 has been sitting in the X11 overlay for some time > and the X11 team are planning to move it to portage soon. > The new release brings a number of improvements, including much better > Gall

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: gnome-base/gnome-volume-manager

2010-11-05 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (06 Nov 2010) # No longer maintained neither developed by upstream since # a lot of time. Nothing in the tree needs it (bug #344331) # Replaced by gnome-base/nautilus. Removal 2010-12-06. gnome-base/gnome-volume-manager signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: global USE lzma

2010-11-06 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 06-11-2010 a las 16:12 +0100, justin escribió: > HI, > > has there are no objections I will add it to global as > > "Support for LZMA/XZ (de)compression algorithm" > > > justin > I would vote for calling that new global USE flag "xz" instead of "lzma" since, if I don't misremember, lz

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: global USE lzma

2010-11-06 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 06-11-2010 a las 17:44 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal escribió: > Dne 6.11.2010 16:49, Pacho Ramos napsal(a): > > El sáb, 06-11-2010 a las 16:12 +0100, justin escribió: > >> HI, > >> > >> has there are no objections I will add it to global as > >> > &

Re: [gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage

2010-12-02 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 01-12-2010 a las 19:57 +0100, Thomas Sachau escribió: > Hi, > > i have already written about this some months ago and updated the code in > relation to the comments > especially from vapier. > > Basicly, it does now first set abi-specific vars (like CC, CFLAGS and others > (setup_abi_en

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-im/gossip

2010-12-28 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (28 Dec 2010) # Masked for removal in 30 days, abandoned by # upstream and crashers like bug #337210 # Use net-im/empathy as a replacement net-im/gossip signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-dotnet/ndoc

2011-01-25 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (25 Jan 2011) # Doesn't work with mono-2.8, upstream died since 2005, # nothing in the tree uses it (bug #342023). # Removal in 30 days. dev-dotnet/ndoc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-sound/last-exit

2011-01-26 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (26 Jan 2011) # It simply crashes (bug #352801), upstream is dead since # a lot of time and most of major distributions have already # dropped it. Removal in 30 days media-sound/last-exit signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >