El dom, 31-10-2010 a las 03:32 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto escribió: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi. > > As outlined in the global email about this issue, this email is to start > a thread about the QA document. Please reply to this thread if you > have any comments about this point. > > > 3. Add a page to the QA project space (unless they're not interested) > about la files and how to deal with them > > I think we can ask Diego to use large parts of his blog posts and charts > about .la files[1], [2], [3], [4] as a source for the document. We can > also add some basic info from the autobook[5], [6]. The goal would be to > have a document similar to our own --as-needed guide [7] and to other > distributions[8], [9]. > Anyone wishes to volunteer for this task? > QA would such a document be welcomed in your project space? > > > [1] - http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2008/04/14/whatabout-those-la-files > [2] - > http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2008/07/02/again-about-la-files-or-why-should-they-be-killed-off-sooner-rather-than-later > [3] - > http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2009/07/06/identifying-pointless-la-files-for-plugins > [4] - > http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2009/09/28/removing-la-files-for-dum-w-uncertain-people > [5] - http://sources.redhat.com/autobook/autobook/autobook_11.html#SEC11 > [6] - http://sources.redhat.com/autobook/autobook/autobook_68.html#SEC68 > [7] - http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/asneeded.xml > [8] - http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Libtool_archives#shared_build > [9] - http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Overlinking > > > - -- > Regards,
I rely a lot on devmanual, then, I think would be interesting to create a section on it telling us when should we remove .la files and how to do it properly. Thanks a lot :-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
