Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:31 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 11/21/2014 04:10 PM, Tim Harder wrote: >> On 2014-11-21 09:54, hasufell wrote: >>> There are users who seem to like it and the games team wants to keep it >>> as well, so I don't see a reason to push into that direction. >> >>> The main thing

[gentoo-dev] Reverted python3.4 defaults

Just a heads-up: I have reverted PYTHON_TARGETS to contain python2_7 and python3_3 (removing python3_4). The stable tree is not quite ready for python3_4; there are many packages that need to have python3_4 added to PYTHON_COMPAT, and a smaller set that need to be stabilized. If you would like to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sci-geosciences/mapserver: mapserver-5.4.2-r1.ebuild ChangeLog

On 12/23/2010 12:18 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > FYI: This adds no value to the ebuild. The default src_unpack is ran > when src_unpack() is not defined. Unless src_unpack() is exported in one of the many eclasses that ebuild inherits. In which case this would "un-export" it and bring the behavior ba

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 118 bugs

On 12/28/2010 04:11 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > 2. Bug is missing required info or seems vague. Immediately add a comment > stating what is needed, with link to website with bug submission procedure > that wasn't followed, and resolve invalid. Comment should welcome submitter > to re-open with the

Re: [gentoo-dev] making revdep-rebuild (partially) obsolete

On 12/31/2010 03:42 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > What do you think about this idea ? I think you should check out the preserve-libs feature in portage-2.2.

Re: [gentoo-dev] www-client/chromium icon theme dependencies, help needed

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:42 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > There is a bug about www-client/chromium icon theme dependencies > (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352263), and I'm not quite sure > what's the best way to solve it. > > The main issue is that in KDE only oxygen-icons work, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] www-client/chromium icon theme dependencies, help needed

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:42 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." > wrote: >> There is a bug about www-client/chromium icon theme dependencies >> (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352263), and I'm not quite sure &

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla - New Default Status Workflow

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:10:14PM +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: >> On 3/7/11 11:13 AM, Brian Harring wrote: >> > Re-read what he stated- it'll convert all existing NEW bugs to >> > CONFIRMED upon migration.  There's a fair number of bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: www-client/chromium-bin

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:04 PM, James Cloos wrote: >> "PH" == Paweł Hajdan, writes: > > PH> That's the chromium-bin, really. The difference is that chromium has > PH> more deps and takes more time to compile than grub. Also, it has much > PH> more frequent releases, and almost every stable r

Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned > Manifest's anymore ?  generating/posting/enabling a gpg key is > ridiculously easy and there's really no excuse for a dev to not have > done this already. > Is there some plan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav

On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Saturday, April 02, 2011 07:02:54 AM Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: >> On 3/31/11 9:37 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: >> > Ok two versioned virtuals (0.5 0.6) are now in the tree if people need >> > to specify the version. >> >> Thank you, but it's st

Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtual for tftp server

On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Maxim Koltsov wrote: > I'm going to add such a package to the tree tomorrow, > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365605. Can you write ebuild > for this virtual, because i'm not familliar with new-style virtuals > yet? > > Just create an package "virtual/tftp-

Re: [gentoo-dev] ACE gcc and libc dependency

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:53 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 5/3/11 5:27 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote: >> In the ebuild there is no mention of runtime dependency like gcc or glibc. > > See > > >> Why sys-d

Re: [gentoo-dev] nvidia-settings needs a maintainer (or something)

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > should have announced this before, but nvidia-settings needs an active > maintainer or it should be merged back to the nvidia-drivers > > the bugs idle on maintainer-needed@ now, you can find them easily by > search keyword of "nvidia-settin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Initial review for github-snapshot.eclass

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello all, > > As I suggested earlier, I'm attaching an example implementation > of github-snapshot.eclass. > case ${EAPI:-0} in 0|1) die "EAPI ${EAPI} unsupported.";; 2|3|4) ;; *) die "github-snapshot.eclass API in E

Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:37 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > Hi Rich, > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:04:50PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:42 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:06:48PM +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote: >> >> How does the tool that creates an i

[gentoo-dev] License for Google Chrome

I have been maintaining an ebuild for Google Chrome in an overlay. It basically extracts a deb file to /opt. This serves as an easy alternative for people who do not have the patience to compile Chromium. Now that I have developer access, I would like to move this to the tree. Before doing so, I n

Re: [gentoo-dev] License for Google Chrome

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: >> I think clause 2.2 (B) allows me to avoid a fetch restriction. > It is not clear to me how this clause has anything to do with fetch > restrictions. > Perhaps I used the wrong term here. I mean that 2.2 (B) allows the user to download and

Re: [gentoo-dev] License for Google Chrome

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > when you have doubts about a license and mail the gentoo-dev ml, also cc > the licenses alias. Will do. > I'm curious, but does Google release a pre-compiled binary that you can > use as chrome-bin? > That is exactly the sort

Re: [gentoo-dev] License for Google Chrome

On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Roy Bamford wrote: > On 2011.08.26 23:06, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> I have been maintaining an ebuild for Google Chrome in an overlay. It >> basically extracts a deb file to /opt. This serves as an easy >> alternative for people who do not

Re: [gentoo-dev] punt app-arch/cpio from system

On 9/9/2011 2:47 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > anyone have a good reason for keeping cpio around in the system profile ? > -mike The only uses I have seen for cpio are: 1. Working with initramfs archives Genkernel already has the correct dep. Does dracut need it? 2. Extracting rpm files (rpm2cpio

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing no-herd?

On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 10/09/2011 11:01 πμ, Michał Górny wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is there a real reason to have no-herd? As I see it, >> it's just an ugly hack which all programs have to learn and hack >> fo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Build dependencies and upgrades.

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote: > So, is there any reason for this behaviour? Shouldn't build dependencies > either be cleaned with --depclean after building or be upgraded to avoid > possible issues? > I agree: with-bdeps should either default to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Build dependencies and upgrades.

On 10/12/2011 12:54 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 10/11/2011 12:56 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> Or go with a saner defaults... > > So, are any of the following sane? > > 1) Pull in updates for packages even though those packages won't be used > for anything. > Francisco raised a possibly valid point

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: Most of the net-zope category and related packages

Per previous discussion, Arfrever will be maintaining these packages outside of the main tree. This entry was committed just under a month ago, but it seems the announcement was not sent at that time. # Mike Gilbert (15 Sep 2011) # Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (15 Sep 2011) # Zope

Re: [gentoo-dev] python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying

On 10/14/2011 5:28 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Matthew Summers > wrote: >> Its being worked on currently. There are many fairly difficult issues >> to be worked through here. > > That's kind of the question though. What's are the issues? The only issue that has been

Re: [gentoo-dev] python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying

On 10/14/2011 09:11 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 10/14/11 5:38 PM, Alec Warner wrote: >> I believe op's point is that there is no one to escalate the problem >> to; certainly the council members are not going to do the work >> themselves and we already have our best people on it. > > I'm aw

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rotating oversized ChangeLog files

On 11/02/2011 08:33 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > I currently count 19 relevant files. If we keep the 100k limit and rotate > yearly, this will be doable by hand in the foreseeable future and any attempt > at automating is a complete waste of time. > > Opinions, flames, ...? > Just an observ

Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-info.eclass: check_extra_config requires a configured kernel

On 11/4/2011 8:59 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > Thoughts? > Shouldn't chromium be dealing with this at run-time where it actually matters? This would be better than doing it in the ebuild where we can only do it at build and/or install-time. It is good that we warn users about this when they

[gentoo-dev] Re: Stop altering of current release ebuilds and propagate the changes slowly

On 11/11/2011 2:58 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Hi guys, > > In last 3 days i recompiled chromium 3x > > 1x rebuild for cups useflag > 1x update > 1x rebuild for cups useflag > > If you screw the ebuild up then always think if the change is worth > the stupid long recompile time. > Like it is not

Re: [gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default

On 11/12/2011 06:49 PM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote: > Then why not you and the other 2 guys that approved this change here > (and are the only people I saw approving this, TBH), add > --quiet-build=y to your default emerge opts and avoid this kind of > change? I like the new default. Anyone u

Re: [gentoo-dev] conversion of USE=nocxx to USE=cxx

On 11/13/2011 01:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > now that we have USE=cxx, and base/make.defaults has USE=cxx, i'd like to > migrate gcc away from USE=nocxx. > > since this can be a pickle, i'd propose toolchain.eclass grow the checks: > - use cxx && use nocxx && die > - use !cxx && us

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: conversion of USE=nocxx to USE=cxx

On 11/13/2011 10:49 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 16:42:39 -0500 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> www-client/google-chrome has RDEPEND=">=sys-devel/gcc-4.4.0[-nocxx]" to >> ensure that we have a recent version of libstdc++. We basically need to >

Re: [gentoo-dev] conversion of USE=nocxx to USE=cxx

On 11/13/2011 11:37 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 13 November 2011 16:42:39 Mike Gilbert wrote: >> If I understand you correctly, you are just going to add a "cxx" use >> flag to gcc for some transitional period? If so, I can simply switch it >> at some p

Re: [gentoo-dev] conversion of USE=nocxx to USE=cxx

On 11/14/2011 3:03 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 14 November 2011 14:00:01 Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On 11/13/2011 11:37 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Sunday 13 November 2011 16:42:39 Mike Gilbert wrote: >>>> If I understand you correctly, you are just going t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due ricmm retirement

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan > wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> Due ricmm retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: >>> >> [snip] >>> net-misc/youtube-dl >>> >> >> I

Re: [gentoo-dev] tkabber completely broken in stable

On 11/26/2011 04:15 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > Please see , tkabber is > completely broken in stable since February. > > * ERROR: net-im/tkabber-0.9.9 failed: > * dev-tcltk/tclxml-3.2-r1 does not actually support the expat USE flag! > * >

Re: [gentoo-dev] filter-mfpmath: has Gentoo out grown it ?

On 12/02/2011 05:57 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i'd like to think Gentoo has grown up now to the point where we don't bother > with trivial ricer behavior. to that end, i'd like to EOL `filter-mfpmath`. > > my main beef with filtering -mfpmath is that we use this only when someone > actually no

Re: [gentoo-dev] user management mitigation

On 12/04/2011 09:44 AM, Leho Kraav wrote: > So after a reading through a bunch of stuff [1][2][3][4][5], what I'm going > to do for the goal above is: > > * move to sys-apps/shadow trunk [6] > * fork my own user.eclass from v1.17, modify it to use --root $ROOT when > calling shadow stuff I th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Alec Warner wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Saturday 10 December 2011 08:15:10 octoploid wrote: >>> Mike Frysinger gentoo.org> writes: >>> >  - x32 is the default ABI >>> >>> Given that it's relatively easy to hit the 4GB ba

[gentoo-dev] python.eclass: export pkg_setup

python.eclass currently exports the pkg_setup function under the following circumstances: EAPI 2, 3: When ${PYTHON_USE_WITH} or ${PYTHON_USE_WITH_OR} are defined. EAPI 4: Always exported. I would like to modify python.eclass to export pkg_setup unconditionally, rather than checking EAPI and rando

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Dale wrote: > Michał Górny wrote: >> >> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:14:52 +0100 >> Enrico Weigelt  wrote: >> >>> * Micha?? Górny  schrieb: >>> Does working hard involve compiling even more packages statically? >>> >>> I guess, he means keeping udev in / ? >> >> Be

Re: [gentoo-dev] How help in arch testing work

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >  - you're confusing the literal @system with implicit system deps I don't quite follow here. By "implicit system deps", are you referring to the "common sense" set of essential packages that you have floating around in that brain of yours?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor?

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > That way, package maintainers could fix things up bit by bit, without having > to burden you alone with tinderbox troubles. How do I go about testing with PIE/ASLR on my own box? Is it just some CFLAGS? A link to some documentation wou

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor?

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > To check for PIE, > > readelf -h /bin/su | grep Type > > If it says EXEC, no PIE. If it says DYN, yes PIE. I'm asking "how does one enable PIE/ASLR", not how to check if it is enabled already.

[gentoo-dev] Understanding the LINGUAS variable and use-expand

I just want to sanity-check my brain here. LINGUAS seems to be mainly a variable to control the behavior of gettext's autoconf code, installed as /usr/share/aclocal/po.m4. If LINGUAS is set to a list of language codes, the build system will only build/install MO files for those languages. If LING

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-shells/ksh

On 02/10/2012 05:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > # Markos Chandras (10 Feb 2012) > # Unmaintained. If you want it take and bump it > # Bug #386339 > app-shells/ksh > > I'll take a crack at this. I've been supporting a Windows application that used MKS Korn shell for a decade or so, so its kind

Re: [gentoo-dev] Import CeDILL-1.1 License into Portage Tree

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Richard Yao wrote: > I would like to write an ebuild for some software that is CeDILL-1.1 > licensed, but the license is not in the portage tree. The CeDILL-2 > license is in the portage tree. If this is just going in an overlay, you can simply add it to the licen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Alec Warner wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 20:02 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió: >>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:17:30 -0800 >>> Zac Medico wrote: >>> >>> > On 02/20/2012 05:03 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: >>> > > On Mon, 2

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC patch for subversion.eclass (bug 401737)

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Matthew Summers wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue > wrote: >> Le dimanche 19 février 2012 à 12:06 +0100, Justin a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> >>> any objections against following patch for subversion.eclass? >>> Fixes bug 401737. Basically

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Requiring gentoo.git committers to use their @gentoo.org address

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 10:40:22 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail addresses >> for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of >> developers is using their

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] distutils-r1.eclass: Enable parallel builds in py3.5+

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Python 3.5+ introduces parallel build support in distutils. Take > advantage of that by passing appropriate -j option. Since distutils > does not support an equivalent of --load-average, default to the number > of CPUs+1 when unspecified. H

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What means bup?

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:26 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 18-07-18 09:16:07, Johannes Huber wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> english is not my mother language, so please clarify what bup means, just >> seen here: >> >> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=ee0e0401478cf30b3ced0405f6b89391e0

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] distutils-r1.eclass: Enable parallel builds in py3.5+

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu wto, 17.07.2018 o godzinie 10∶40 -0400, użytkownik Mike Gilbert > napisał: >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >> > Python 3.5+ introduces parallel build support in distutils. Take >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] distutils-r1.eclass: Enable parallel builds in py3.5+

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu czw, 19.07.2018 o godzinie 10∶06 -0400, użytkownik Mike Gilbert > napisał: >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >> > W dniu wto, 17.07.2018 o godzinie 10∶40 -0400, użytkownik Mike Gilbert &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] distutils-r1.eclass: Enable parallel builds in py3.5+

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Python 3.5+ introduces parallel build support in distutils. Take > advantage of that by passing appropriate -j option. Since distutils > does not support an equivalent of --load-average, default to the number > of CPUs+1 when unspecified. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] meson.eclass: require at least meson-0.41.1

On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 11:27 PM Zac Medico wrote: > > Require newer meson in order to avoid build failures triggered > if >=meson-0.41.1 is not installed soon enough. For example, > I experienced bug 649264 because I upgraded xorg-proto and > libxshmfence packages before meson. > > Fixes: https:/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding USE=udev to linux profiles

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:47 AM Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2018, 23:51:17 CEST schrieb Ben Kohler: > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to propose adding USE=udev to our linux profiles (in > > profiles/default/linux/make.defaults probably). This flag is already > > enabled on de

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding USE=udev to linux profiles

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:05 AM Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:03:34 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:47 AM Andreas K. Huettel > > wrote: > > > > > > Am Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2018, 23:51:17 CEST schrieb Ben Kohler

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding USE=udev to linux profiles

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:06 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 07/24/2018 11:39 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > You can run any system without udev, but you need to be very careful > > about what Linux features you utilize and how you have the system > > configur

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding USE=udev to linux profiles

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:32 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 07/24/2018 12:24 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > For example, dhcpcd integrates with udevd via libudev to ensure that > > udev has finished renaming your network interfaces before dhcpcd > > attempts to

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] install-functions: refer to ${ED} instead of ${D}

Since EAPI 3, the install functions use ${ED} instead of ${D}. --- function-reference/install-functions/text.xml | 9 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/function-reference/install-functions/text.xml b/function-reference/install-functions/text.xml index b6bd181

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/4] desktop.eclass: domenu, fix dying on non-existing files

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 7:35 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > The weird logic in domenu had an explicit separate clause > for unsuccessful return on non-existing files. This worked fine before > EAPI 4 since '|| die' was mandatory. However, since 'doins' started > dying on its own, developers have ass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] systemd.eclass: set BDEPEND for EAPI 7

--- eclass/systemd.eclass | 8 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/systemd.eclass b/eclass/systemd.eclass index 72f4845efc45..b822f54f8d06 100644 --- a/eclass/systemd.eclass +++ b/eclass/systemd.eclass @@ -26,11 +26,15 @@ inherit toolchain-funcs case $

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] udev.eclass: return unprefixed udevdir

On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 9:54 AM Guilherme Amadio wrote: > > Hi, > > This is a simple fix, but I'd like it to be reviewed. > > Without this get_udevdir returns the prefixed directory, leading > to double prefix on udev related packages (e.g. fuse-common). > > Even if not used in prefix, udev related

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] systemd.eclass: set BDEPEND for EAPI 7

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 3:35 PM Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > > В письме от понедельник, 6 августа 2018 г. 22:13:49 MSK пользователь Ulrich > Mueller написал: > > >>>>> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > -DEPEND="virtual/pkgconfig

[gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed: net-print/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr

I no longer own any Epson printers, so I'm dropping this package. net-print/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr There's also an open request to package a similar "escpr2" driver. https://bugs.gentoo.org/662364

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:34 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > Improve the description of USE=test to clearly indicate what the flag > does instead of claiming it workaround for Portage. > --- > profiles/use.desc | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/profiles/use.desc

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 9:21 PM Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > On 2018-08-21 18:23, Michał Górny wrote: > >> Wait, are you saying that I can set USE=-test while FEATURES=test is > >> enabled? Is that a valid combination? > > > > Yes. > > The only thing I still don't understand yet: Do we support th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo i486 support

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 8:26 AM Ben Kohler wrote: > > Hi guys, > > For some time now, we've been shipping broken i486 stage3s that do not > run on pre-i686 hardware [1]. Due to a change in catalyst [2], we no > longer set CXXFLAGS in the default make.conf, so the x86 profiles' (imho > wrong/broke

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo i486 support

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 9:19 AM Kent Fredric wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 07:26:24 -0500 > Ben Kohler wrote: > > > Thoughts? > > Is there a good reason we can't have a legacy profile for this? > > Or perhaps, a new (exp) arch entirely dedicated to legacy x86? Sounds like a lot of work for some

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 9:23 AM Kent Fredric wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 22:29:29 -0400 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > Setting RESTRICT="!test? ( test )" is generally sufficient. > > But that would require setting that virtually *everything* that has > both

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:37 AM Virgil Dupras wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:27:01 -0400 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 9:23 AM Kent Fredric > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 22:29:29 -0400 > > > Mike Gi

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:45 AM Kent Fredric wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:27:01 -0400 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > If you want to define behavior that can be relied upon in ebuilds, it > > should be specified in PMS. PMS does not define any meaning for the > >

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Add section about defining "Test Dependencies"

--- general-concepts/dependencies/text.xml | 38 ++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) diff --git a/general-concepts/dependencies/text.xml b/general-concepts/dependencies/text.xml index 2f10380..64be9dc 100644 --- a/general-concepts/dependencies/text.xml +++ b/general-conce

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Add section about defining "Test Dependencies"

On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 1:41 AM Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:24:06 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > > --- > > general-concepts/dependencies/text.xml | 38 ++ > > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/ge

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Add section about defining "Test Dependencies"

On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 10:11 PM Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 14:24:02 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > > PMS does not specify that behavior (skipping src_test with USE=-test). > > It is better to define the requrement explicitly rather than relying > &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Add section about defining "Test Dependencies"

On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 3:28 AM Zac Medico wrote: > > On 08/25/2018 07:11 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 14:24:02 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 1:41 AM Andrew Savchenko > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing policy about -Werror

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:56 PM Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > On 9/10/18 10:51 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > > Consider again the bug that started this. The maintainer had not built > > this configuration. None of the arch teams had built this > > configuration until I did for the last architecture

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing policy about -Werror

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 5:31 PM Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 5:01 PM Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:56 PM Kristian Fiskerstrand > > wrote: > > > > > > On 9/10/18 10:51 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > > &

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] cmake-utils.eclass: Make ninja default backend in EAPI >= 7

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 2:35 AM wrote: > > From: David Seifert > > * Using the ninja backend as a default is the only way to > massively improve src_compile core utilization, given that > it seems unlikely that CMake will ever produce non-recursive > Makefiles. I just want to bring your at

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] meson.eclass: add EAPI 7 support

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 8:40 PM Marty E. Plummer wrote: > It seems this is all that is needed, and all the eclasses inherited by > it are supported for EAPI 7. I could be missing something, so please do > comment if I have. I pushed this, thanks!

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] udev.eclass: support EAPI 7

Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/udev.eclass | 14 +- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/udev.eclass b/eclass/udev.eclass index 4f23c9ebbdf8..baf60584938f 100644 --- a/eclass/udev.eclass +++ b/eclass/udev.eclass @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ -# Copyright

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] udev.eclass: support EAPI 7

On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 3:33 PM M. J. Everitt wrote: > > On 23/09/18 16:20, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert > > --- > > eclass/udev.eclass | 14 +- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] xdg-utils.eclass: avoid duplicate leading slashes

Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/xdg-utils.eclass | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/xdg-utils.eclass b/eclass/xdg-utils.eclass index 2c2d2324c2b7..725b67316221 100644 --- a/eclass/xdg-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/xdg-utils.eclass @@ -67,7 +67,7

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/5] xdg.eclass: move deps to RDEPEND

update-desktop-database and update-mime-database are called from ROOT in pkg functions, so the related dependenices belong in RDEPEND. Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/xdg.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/xdg.eclass b/eclass/xdg.eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 5/5] xdg.eclass: support EAPI 7

Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/xdg.eclass | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/xdg.eclass b/eclass/xdg.eclass index 4f4a38b05cb3..cca9b34df957 100644 --- a/eclass/xdg.eclass +++ b/eclass/xdg.eclass @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ # freedesktop-b...@gentoo.org

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/5] xdg.eclass: look for files in ED and cleanup array syntax

Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/xdg.eclass | 10 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/xdg.eclass b/eclass/xdg.eclass index 36300dc5eaa2..4f4a38b05cb3 100644 --- a/eclass/xdg.eclass +++ b/eclass/xdg.eclass @@ -48,15 +48,13 @@ xdg_pkg_preinst

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/5] xdg-utils.eclass: support EAPI 7

Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/xdg-utils.eclass | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/xdg-utils.eclass b/eclass/xdg-utils.eclass index 725b67316221..fe1eef213ea4 100644 --- a/eclass/xdg-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/xdg-utils.eclass @@ -6,7 +6,7

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] profiles: unset USE=modules by default.

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 6:51 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > The "modules" USE flag was originally enabled by default in the base > profile so that any ebuild inheriting linux-mod.eclass would have its > kernel modules built by default. However, the name of that USE flag is > now controlled by the

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 3/5] xdg.eclass: move deps to RDEPEND

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:27 AM Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > Le lundi 01 octobre 2018 à 07:40 +0200, Rémi Cardona a écrit : > > Le 01/10/2018 à 00:50, Mike Gilbert a écrit : > > > update-desktop-database and update-mime-database are called from > > > ROOT in >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 3/5] xdg.eclass: move deps to RDEPEND

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:17 AM James Le Cuirot wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 09:00:38 -0400 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > The reason why it is in DEPEND though is that none of these tools > > > are required at runtime. They are needed at postinst and postrm >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:19 AM Zac Medico wrote: > > Hi all, > > The ~arch version of portage hs a new QA check that reports installation > of files outside of directories that have been whitelisted [1]. The > current whitelist includes: > > directories common to / and /usr >

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] xdg-utils.eclass: don't call binaries from ROOT

Avoid calling binaries that may have been compiled against different libraries or even cross-compiled for an incomatible arch. Instead, always call the binaries installed in BROOT (/), if available. Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/xdg-utils.eclass | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 3/5] xdg.eclass: move deps to RDEPEND

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 10:14 PM Marty E. Plummer wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 10:08:03AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:17 AM James Le Cuirot wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 09:00:38 -0400 > > > Mike Gilbert wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] xdg-utils.eclass: don't call binaries from ROOT

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:23 AM James Le Cuirot wrote: > > On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 09:33:53 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 22:16 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > Avoid calling binaries that may have been compiled against different > > > lib

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] xdg-utils.eclass: execute tools from PATH

Avoid calling binaries that may have been compiled against different libraries or even cross-compiled for an incomatible arch. Also drop the related eclass variables: these are currently unused by any ebuild. Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/xdg-utils.eclass | 28

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 3/5] xdg.eclass: move deps to RDEPEND

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 10:14 PM Marty E. Plummer wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 10:08:03AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:17 AM James Le Cuirot wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 09:00:38 -0400 > > > Mike Gilbert wrote:

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/netctl

# Mike Gilbert (10 Nov 2018) # Open bugs and no Gentoo maintainer. # Removal in 30 days. net-misc/netctl

Re: [gentoo-dev] AUTHORS file for portage repository

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:49 PM Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:59 AM Matt Turner wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 7:41 AM Rich Freeman wrote: > > > It makes sense to ensure that the solution actually solves the problem > > > before we simply implement it. > > > > > > I

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >