> As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html
I like it - well done Marius.
--
Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Crypto/PPC/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon
pgpD3JojbdJir.pgp
Description: PGP signature
torsmo.
I recommend passing it directly to him for inclusion.
> > add a patch to bugs.g.o? pass it directly to
> > torsmo? or something else.
> >
Direct to conky is prefered. http;//conky.sf.net
> > I'm still writing it, so nothing pressing yet.
I'm hoping s
.xml may be
considered.
--
Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Crypto/PPC/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon
pgpihV2nntyQf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
now have a more functional product that does the same
thing and more with the same good interface.
be happy that another gentoo package doesn't need horrible patching and all
the stuff that Brenden and joemyre fixed up with Conky.
--
Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Crypto/PP
his package ... and i'm pretty sure Ned feels the
> same way
Ditto - please take it away
> ... i'm 100% uClibc now ;)
>
> > If no one complains, I'll take this package.
>
> check with hansmi/dragonheart, but i know i dont care
> -mike
I
--
Da
I've taken the simple approach and just removed torsmo. It was in the
package.mask for 2-3 weeks.
Users can emerge conky and rename their configuration file (~/.torsmorc to
~/.conkyrc) and should get similar result.
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:08 pm, Daniel wrote:
> Torsmo has been inactive
plugins in addition to
kxdocker and kxdocker-resources (currently under kde-misc).
http://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=124159
Rather than littering kde-misc with more applications I propose using
kde-kxdocker instead.
Any objections/thoughts/sporadic opinions?
--
Daniel Black <[EM
prepares for some more fun exams.
--
Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Stuff
pgpkPKEbM0ddI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
will be a lot easier to use for non-devs and budding devs.
> Either solutions works for me however, mainly after the file being in
> the tree for majority of users.
> ~harring
I'd be really happy to see it added. Since there really no objection who
controls the staging serve
etperf-2.4.0-rc3.tar.gz
net-wireless/aircrack-2.1 aircrack-2.1.tgz fetcher return no uris succeeded
http://www.cr0.net:8040/code/network/aircrack-2.1.tgz
Problem with ftp/no port 80 parsing?
--
Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Crypto/PPC/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon
pgpqvPbgGVd
On Tue, 17 May 2005 04:30 am, Alin Nastac wrote:
> app-mobilephone category has emerged, maintained by the brand new
> mobile-phone herd. The herd currently has only one member... me. :)
> interested gentoo devs, feel free to join me!
thanks for taking sms :-)
--
Daniel Black <[EMA
) {
>
> Comments?
Sounds great! Good one Aaron.
>
> Aaron Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [ BSD | cron | forensics | shell-tools | commonbox | netmon | vim |
> web-apps ]
--
Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Crypto/PPC/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon
pgpbF7lXaWNTL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
image/partimage-0.6.4-r4.ebuild
Have fun and don't say I never think of you.
--
Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Crypto/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon/PPC
pgpJvE8no57am.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ok at consolidating the
bug fixes with an aim to take over maintenance of this package.
Please also take into the account the gentoo-dev thread titled
'/etc/profile.d/' that took place in July 2005.
Apologies for neglecting it so long.
--
Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Cr
ed to try it
out. Also DevStack is another common platform people use to test with.
Just throwing my 2 cents into the conversation
- Daniel
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Matthew Thode
wrote:
> On 06/08/2015 01:38 PM, wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
> > On 06/08/2015 10:30 AM, Matth
ce and the
forums. GWN announcements for example do not need to appear elsewhere...
While we're talking about replicating the front page, I just added the Gentoo
News rdf feed to Planet Gentoo and Gentoo Universe.
I hope this helps the overall situation a very little bit :)
Danie
ve to, link to further more detailed
*documentation*. Note then that what would go up on errata.g.o in this
case would be the *summary* (which would not necessarily be governed by
the GDP or it's policies) and *not* the full documentation. Said summary
would contain links to any relevant *d
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13748 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
up for, and worse send them info about your configuration),
so the filtering is done for you. We will *never* do something like
this, we have a client side tool that can identify what is installed
already...why not use it?
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
up for, and worse send them info about your configuration),
so the filtering is done for you. We will *never* do something like
this, we have a client side tool that can identify what is installed
already...why not use it?
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 14:02 -0500, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > After going through the list, I got the impression there is simply no
> > place where such messages clearly would go. gentoo-announce sounds as
> > the best option to go for, but its descript
eemant
> | Kulleen.
> |
> | The deadline for submitting items for the meeting agenda is set to
> | Sunday, November 13th, 20:00 UTC.
>
> Assuming there aren't any further comments between now and then, I'd
> like GLEP 34 (GLEP File Hosting) to be approved please.
>
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14406 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14544 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
tem build.
If RelEng ever does get to the point of removing stage's 1 & 2 from the
mirrors (something that has been discussed but isn't on the table at all
right now) end users and developers alike will still be able to generate
them on their own using catalyst and the provided
at you are proposing, and I understand
that the present CVS server cannot handle this sort of load but I
believe that this was the original intention at least...someone correct
me if I am wrong.
I think that this issue has to be nailed down *before* we get any
further in discussion.
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
the text links below each advertisement
graphic also be underlined. The implication of the current text is that
they are not links at all when they are.
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14890 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
(which will make you
very unpopular).
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14377 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
On Friday 09 December 2005 08:19 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 01:09:50AM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > >so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with
> > >a small enough subset of packages you can handle ?
> >
> > I'd rather
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13568 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
he hdd died :)
i too am frightened to see good working apps go, i still consider readding
kcpuload which worked then was gone, works still well from an overlay ;)
you get the idea
i will add your email to the dvd::rip filter in kmail so i hopefully do not
miss things
wife's surgery is friday, so i don't expect to do much before then
Thanks,
Daniel Goller
pgpzxz08W7VDT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13634 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
to use an
illegally licensed program, we would be facilitating such an act. That
is something we cannot and will not do.
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ng more,
nothing less. Sure we wouldn't be shipping the actual source, but what
we would be doing is facilitating your use of said source, which is
*illegal*.
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14140 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 17:18 +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> what you've done breaks runtime dependencies, if not for other packages so at
> least for KDE. Such a change should be announced on the gentoo-dev mailing
> list before you do it. Also a tracki
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13875 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13904 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
ery much like Gentoo the small 'Board of
Directors' in this book is.
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpD27FoRXXBc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e cases into a ${} for
people reading it that weren't involed in the implementaiton so that know
that unless the repo is actually named 'repoid' no such file will exist.
Thanks and +1,
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13973 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
that people maintaining external module
packages can fix any incompatibilities. I don't know of any specific
problems that you will run into, but there will probably be some.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Daniel Drake wrote:
This is mainly a heads-up so that people maintaining external module
packages can fix any incompatibilities. I don't know of any specific
problems that you will run into, but there will probably be some.
If there are already bugs filed for issues like this, please
I can't remember how I ended up maintaining this.
I'm not even too sure what it does - I don't use it. It's some kind of
web grabber thingy. Upstream is alive. http://pavuk.sourceforge.net/
Does anyone want to take this package? It also comes with 2 bonus bugs:
114189
Daniel Drake wrote:
Does anyone want to take this package? It also comes with 2 bonus bugs:
114189 and 118287.
vanquirius took it. Thanks!
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
you on bugzilla. But don't forget about this nice
ability that we have :)
That's all I can think of for now. I'd certainly be interested to hear
any comments on the above and similar suggestions that others may have.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ilar note, I received a very interesting book as a birthday
present last year. It's called "How to win friends and influence people"
by Dale Carnegie and can be picked up very cheaply at any decent
bookshop. That probably indirectly influenced some of the above - highly
recommended for people interested in motivating others.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
desirable for people with busy schedules.
Thanks for the feedback.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
bugzilla so that
it can be corrected :)
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Isn't XSESSION *only* used by display managers? I know for a fact that
it isn't used by "startx" or anything.
It is used by startx. The following commands have their expected effect:
# XSESSION="fluxbox" startx
# XSESSION="
y* encourage "overnight" bump requests (which
certainly isn't the intention), but in practice I think that won't
happen too much if you treat the contributor in the proper manner.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
workflow. Perhaps you could
just try this for a couple of bugs: reassign them to yourself and leave
the appropriate comments,then observing the users reaction. That way the
bug is hard to lose since it is on your "My Bugs" list.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14485 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
> I'll contact the council separately, and ask that they look at two
> things:
>
> a) What the QA team is and isn't empowered to do
> b) The approval process that the QA team must follow before imposing
> tree-wide changes on other developers.
According to prior council meeting logs:
15:14 <@vap
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 21:54 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 13:29 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Simply tell the user to download X and place it in $DISTDIR renaming it
> > to X-foo-bar, where's you've chosen X-foo-bar to avoid conflicts.
>
> That works for me.
>
> Best r
On Sunday 26 February 2006 16:58, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:22:17 -0500 Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | Yes, Gentoo is supposed to be fun, but we also have a responsibility
> | to our users to ensure we are providing them with the best possible
> | distro we can
On Sunday 26 February 2006 18:34, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 17:22 -0500, Mark Loeser wrote:
> > > * In case of emergency, or if package maintainers refuse to cooperate,
> > > the QA team may take action themselves to fix the problem.
>
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 22:17 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 17:02 -0500, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> > That would work for fetch restricted packages, not nomirrored ones.
> >
> > --Dan
>
> /me nods. That's what we'll have to do. Unfortun
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14452 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
all of us as a whole (even if
that sometimes means that the experiance for a particular package or two
needs to be a little worse). Tree QA is something that we have never had
before, at least not really (don't mean to trivialize the work that
Mr_Bones_ does). It is something that I believe
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14535 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
s that
automatically. That being the case portage would have change so that the
automatic lookup was mirror://gentoo/${firstchar}/. So that is at least one
portage change I can think of being required
Sure I can still see your point about needing to manually change the packages
that do ex
On Monday 06 March 2006 13:18, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> > Hrm, /me thinks you are missing something there, almost the entire tree
> > doesn't explicitly state the mirror://gentoo SRC_URI, portage handles
> > that automatically. That being the case po
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14662 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14731 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
p.mask Wed. March 21 and remove 30 days later.
Because I am working on the next version and this product is not dead ?
Daniel Glazman, Nvu engineering lead
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
block bug 126972.
Thanks!
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
uthor wouldn't be too happy.
resolvconf-gentoo would be a good choice
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
.
To get you thinking, I suggest reading the section titled "Open
Development Team" at
http://www.samspublishing.com/articles/article.asp?p=23200&seqNum=3
which is part of a (very good) larger article detailing why Linux kernel
development works so well.
Any ideas?
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
t the gap between the user community and the developer
community, and how the developer community can open up.
Thanks for the feedback - it's always interesting to read this kind of
thing, but it's not what I'm looking for at this point.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
re is so much that works reliably on here i do not miss that thus
far.
I do not have suspend to disk set up right now, swsusp worked fine,
suspend2 i always had a harder time getting working, what i typically
use is suspend to ram which now works flawless.
If you have any particular questions, let
the kind you see active on forums, take their occational
patch/ebuild
like less red tape, more acceptance of the occasional contribution
how about that as "proxy"?
Daniel
> Kind Regards,
>
> Simon Stelling
> Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
allowed for easy merging.
I agree, I'd love to see something like this, that way I could have my xfce
stuff someplace more public then my devspacethe only thing that would
have to be clear is how official the overlays actually were, e.g. how prone
the team looking after the ov
ve to be made VERY clear
to our users, e.g. a you use it you get to keep the pieces policy, and the
developer or team in question is the *only* point of contact for fixing
things) -or- it is an Official overlay with official support which means it
needs to abide by the rules...
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpQyEPKB2Xy4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 09:15 -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> Asking developers to "proxy" takes almost as much time as it does to
> ask them to maintain a package by themselves.
wrong
> The developer is
> directly responsible for anything he commits, so he will have to still
> test the ebuild, still
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 18:34 -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> On 3/23/06, Daniel Goller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 09:15 -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> > > Asking developers to "proxy" takes almost as much time as it does to
> > > a
eated
overlays in order to promote them.
Hope that helps,
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpKBvrnkBVTM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 24 March 2006 15:06, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> On Friday 24 March 2006 14:35, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > After reading through that fairly lengthy thread, I'm afraid that I can
> > no longer tell exactly what is being proposed. Who has read access?
> > Who h
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 08:40 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 20:04 -0600, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > As many are aware nss-3.11 and nspr-4.6.1 are in the tree. Many
> > packages still set the {nss|nspr}-libs and include
obviously planned a *long* time ago, and I have some doubts as to
whether a system would stand now. What are you thoughts on this? How
much of it do you think would still work in the present day?
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14963 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 19:18 +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Thursday 30 March 2006 01:55, Mark Loeser wrote:
> > Not directed specifically at you, but it seems a lot of people are
> > masking stuff and removing it very quickly, and I'd really like to see
> > everyone wait the 30 days to remove so
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 01:17 +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Monday 03 April 2006 00:29, foser wrote:
> > Already security related issues have been dropped by upstream for the
> > simple reason that it hasn't been maintained since the day gtk went
> > 2.0 .
>
> Why didn't you file (Gentoo) securi
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 21:20 +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Sunday 02 April 2006 04:48, Daniel Goller wrote:
> > exactly, what's the point of removing it so fast? give people a chance
> > to miss it, it does not matter if it's removed or masked only as far as
>
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15047 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
Linux 2.6.16 will be in the tree very soon. Assuming there aren't any
major problems, we'll hopefully be marking it stable in 2-3 weeks.
We're planning to mark it stable on 10th April. Maybe a few days later,
need to double check that we don'
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14512 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 09:36 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> Eldad Zack wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Sometimes it becomes a problem whenever a new release or a tricky bugfix
> > comes
> > up for a certain package.
> > To improve QA we can let our userbase help, especially people who use
> > certa
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 09:48 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> > didn't he ask for people who know a particular application very well?
>
> If you actually read the GLEP, you will note that there is a provision
> to expand the idea to include herd testers.
someone might like to help with testing o
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 01:15 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is my pleasure to announce publicly that ian! has passed all
> necessary quizzes to touch our holy gra^H^H^H portage tree.
>
> He'll be helping mcummings in his perpetuate combat with perl and its
> dependencies. May the sourc
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14762 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
I'm going to remove it a month from now.
Nice to see the back of this one.
For those that don't know, this hardware is supported through the
in-kernel snd-intel8x0 ALSA driver.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
d with some bugs just means maintainer
needed, not "buhbye!"
severly broken here would mean does not even compile, or gui comes up
but most functions just create a segfault.
In short, i would like to see the above sentence changed to something a
little less radical. (example provided)
Tha
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14970 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
ould also mean unmaintained
|| broken, not only unmaintained && broken, i really wish you would at
least consider not killing off unmaintained and not broken packages, and
word it in some way that this comes out clear in that paragraph
finally had some time to read this in mo
ry for not adding
this to the previous post, i really should have asked for that one
Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFETFpo/aM9DdBw91cRAsBvAKDABphEPy1zWVGaHqqZ8JhBYvOTEgCeNa5B
mwUCZpBBis2Tn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
> Daniel Goller posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
> Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:50:17 -0500:
>
>>> * In the case of disagreement on policy among QA members, the majority
>>> of established QA m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Loeser wrote:
> Daniel Goller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Mark Loeser wrote:
>>> Here is the newest revision of my proposal. Not much has changed, but I
>>> added and changed some small things. Constructive
1 - 100 of 959 matches
Mail list logo
