[gentoo-dev] Why don't you just ...

2007-04-10 Thread Benedikt Boehm
... don't care about an uber-vision or direction and just keep your friggin packages alive and working? I'm so sick to hear people crying that noone is around to tell them what to do.. So here is my proposal: ABSTAIN! That's it for now :) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: mod_auth_ldap

2007-05-23 Thread Benedikt Boehm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 # Benedikt Böhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (23 May 2007) # masked for removal as per #114453 net-www/mod_auth_ldap apache2 already has ldap authentication modules built-in, will be removed together with apache 1.1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuP

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-13 Thread Benedikt Boehm
Hi all, due to massive code duplication in netqmail, qmail-ldap, qmail-mysql, mini-qmail and other 3-rd party applications for qmail i have started to move functionality into a first qmail.eclass draft. It is basically netqmail split into much smaller chunks so they can be reused by other qmail v

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-13 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:34:26 +0200 Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > > due to massive code duplication in netqmail, qmail-ldap, > > qmail-mysql, mini-qmail and other 3-rd party applications

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-13 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:22:47 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 14:53 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: > > Michael Hanselmann napsal(a): > > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-14 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:02:00 +0200 Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > > qmail-ldap will not be removed for sure, since i maintain it > > currently. > > Okay, my status there was outdated.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-15 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:19:08 +0200 Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 03:07:28AM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > > As it seems, you do not have the time and/or interest to cleanup the > > qmail mess, but don't want anyone to touch (ne

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-20 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:52:02 +0200 Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Benedikt > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > > It is basically netqmail split into much smaller chunks so they can > > be reused by other qmail

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-23 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:17:46 +0200 Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > > > qmail_base_install should be split in smaller functions, maybe > > > with callbacks (if possible in

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-23 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:52:02 +0200 Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Benedikt > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > > It is basically netqmail split into much smaller chunks so they can > > be reused by other qmail

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-24 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:55:16 +0200 Benedikt Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:17:46 +0200 > Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > > > > qmail_base_insta

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for www-apache/mod_xslt

2007-07-29 Thread Benedikt Boehm
# Benedikt Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29 Jul 2007) # Masked for removal: Does not work with apache 2.2 # and no release since 2004, use mod_transform instead www-apache/mod_xslt will be removed in 30 days as usual. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-30 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:08:36 +0200 Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Benedikt > > Sorry for my long response times. > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:58:17PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > > i thought about this, but i'd really like to see t

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-30 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:23:52 +0200 Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 01:20:43PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > > > - I don't like the custom tarball. How do you want to build and > > > redistribute it without depending on a

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: mail-mta/qmail-mysql

2007-09-15 Thread Benedikt Boehm
Hi all, mail-mta/qmail-mysql is going to be removed in 14 days. Bug #20899 Regards, Bene -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: mail-mta/qmail-mysql

2007-09-15 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:17:24 +0300 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benedikt Boehm kirjoitti: > > Hi all, > > > > mail-mta/qmail-mysql is going to be removed in 14 days. Bug #20899 > > > > Regards, > > Bene > > https://bugs.gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: mail-mta/qmail-mysql

2007-09-15 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:48:52 +0300 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benedikt Boehm kirjoitti: > > On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:17:24 +0300 > > Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Benedikt Boehm kirjoitti: > >>> Hi all, > &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Valid Profiles

2005-07-31 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Sunday 31 July 2005 16:11, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > ka0ttic reminded me about the idea of adding all of the valid > profiles to profiles.desc now that portage 2.0.51.22 has gone > stable. Well, I need you guys to give me a list of what is valid or > not. I have a pretty good idea of what is v

Re: [gentoo-dev] Valid Profiles

2005-08-01 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Monday 01 August 2005 16:46, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 20:21 +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > > On Sunday 31 July 2005 16:11, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > ka0ttic reminded me about the idea of adding all of the valid > > > profiles to pro

[gentoo-dev] New Developer: Christian Heim

2005-08-07 Thread Benedikt Boehm
Hey everybody, please give a warm welcome to Christian Heim, our latest victim, poping in to support the german conspiracy, and to help me with vserver stuff. Christian currently is in his last third of vocational education and will hopefully finished on 25 Aug. Besides the education as managem

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Christian Heim

2005-08-07 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Sunday 07 August 2005 16:46, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > Hey everybody, > > please give a warm welcome to Christian Heim, our latest victim, poping in > to support the german conspiracy, and to help me with vserver stuff. > > Christian currently is in his last third of vocational

shish/dietlibc WAS: Re: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED on 20050928

2005-09-28 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 20:23, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > This is a summary of maintainer-wanted packages which are tagged as > REVIEWED. Please take a few moments to glance over this list and see > if there are any packages which your herd would like. > > The REVIEWED tag is used for ebuilds

[gentoo-dev] Consolidated Virtualization effort in Gentoo

2005-10-16 Thread Benedikt Boehm
Hi All, recently Stuart and I came up with idea to consolidate development of all Virtualization systems in Gentoo. Virtualization is a framework or methodology of dividing the resources of a computer into multiple execution environments. Virtualization techniques create multiple isolated part