variable in my
> make.conf I assume a lot of packages won't support spanish
> translations, and I see no point on being informed about that for some
> packages using strip-linguas.
>
> What do you think?
+1, this warning is annoying.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nd also mutt
> then :)
GnuPG2 should work everywhere today, and if it doesn't work for some
app, then bug should reported for this app. (Although some crypto herd
member could take a voice here or at least confirm, what I wrote.)
Cheers,
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hm, I have just realised that we're not discussing it on ml, and
unnecessarily I've CC'ed it to ml, sorry.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Excerpts from Samuli Suominen's message of 2012-03-29 19:59:17 +0200:
> I've been told dracut is able to handle this. Unverified.
Dracut doesn't need anything built static.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
efore best would be to drop this plugin and support only
systemd which is supported by upstream ootb.
I'm happy to answer any question and help at the beginning with
maintaining it.
Cheers,
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Excerpts from Alex Legler's message of 2012-04-18 16:49:57 +0200:
> On Wednesday 18 April 2012 16:03:09 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > I no longer use plymouth and have no more will to work on it, but
> > because I believe many users use this package it would be good
Hi,
I'd like to add attached license to portage/licenses/. Any objections?
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
yEd
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
This license would go to EULA group. Is this correct?
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Excerpts from Duncan's message of 2012-04-27 15:38:20 +0200:
> No distribution allowed. You're going to be doing restrict=mirror,
> correct?
Why RESTRICT=mirror? I'd put RESTRICT=fetch, actually.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Excerpts from William Hubbs's message of 2012-04-27 16:34:05 +0200:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 02:26:07PM +, Duncan wrote:
> > Amadeusz Żołnowski posted on Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:45:36 +0200 as
> > excerpted:
> >
> > > Excerpts from Duncan's message
> I'd like to add attached license to portage/licenses/. Any objections?
Because there seem to be no objection wrt license itself, I've just
committed it. I'll wait with adding ebuild until we get some consensus
wrt RESTRICT=fetch/mirror.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.as
m> aidecoe: that would be another reason for mirror restriction ;)
<@aidecoe> ulm: i'll mail them about it
I have just sent nice e-mail to yWorks about this.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Excerpts from Pacho Ramos's message of 2012-05-15 13:33:04 +0200:
> net-misc/aiccu
I can take this one.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I have taken it recently, but realised I'm not going to use aiccu on
Gentoo any time soon. Sorry for mess-up.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: signature
Quoting Maciej Grela (2012-07-31 22:31:53)
> If you'd be interested in cooperating on this please let me know.
There's Proxy Maintaining Team [0] which is better for that, but I could
do it, too.
[0] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/proxy-maintainers/index.xml
--
Amade
least check if Y is already installed.
*) Other kind of information which appears after EVERY installation.
All howtos should go to Gentoo Docs!
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: signature
Quoting Ciaran McCreesh (2012-08-21 15:35:38)
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:24:57 +0200 Amadeusz Żołnowski
> wrote:
> > We have "has_version" function to check if user has actually updated
> > from relevant version. Please use this to not confuse users who
> > insta
ample could be
udev long elog message which ONE time has had hidden very important
message which I have unfortunately missed and ended up with unbootable
system. In current form these messages have no use.
I have already highlighted this problem on mailing list:
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Useless mes
Gokturk Yuksek writes:
> Overall, my impression is that people handle conf file changes in
> pkg_postinst() with REPLACING_VERSIONS rather than news items.
+1. And it could be automated for the user, couldn't be?
Cheers,
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
d to dev-erlang
and ejabberd. Toralf has reported lots of bugs.
Cheers,
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I am working at the moment on debundling ejabberd. It will come with ~30
packages and I will do "git merge --no-ff ejabberd-debundled" because it
will actually look less messy.
Thanks,
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
. Is there actual benefit
of using cp here?
> Also, wouldn't the absence of 'die' cause silent breakages?
I want to caller decide whether die or not and what error messge to
give.
Cheers,
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
;t it been introduced earlier than in
EAPI 6?
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
xample there is redundant.
Why redundant? I imagine we can call it like:
if ! nonfatal efoo; then
do_something_on_error
fi
can't we?
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
on
itself. And anyway isn't it true for any other command with careless
glob use?
I have documented that function takes a file, not files. The effect of
misuse eawk would be awk error. Although maybe it would be useful to
support multiple files? Then I'd go for variant (b) probably.
Cheers,
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
don't divert from the subject of the thread.
Thanks,
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
So one of these:
a) eawk
b) eawk --
c) eawk --
in (b) and (c) "--" is required. This makes it easy to separate options
From files without parsing args. With (c) we would have interface almost
similar to awk (only that we require "--"). (a) is simplest in
implementation and doesn't require "--". I am not sure which is most
intuitive. What do you think?
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
rindeal writes:
> Have you guys read
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16529716/awk-save-modifications-inplace
> ?
a) mawk doesn't support it.
b) 4.1 is not stabilized, yet.
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
.
>
> what's your real use case ? i've never once thought "man, i wish i could
> run an awk script and modify a file in place". and i write awk most days.
The same "sed -i" is used. I have some configs to edit in place in
src_prepare(). It's easier with a
ult call for EAPI 6. You should really
> test stuff before submitting it.
Shame I have forgot to test it, sorry. I have completely forgotten about
EAPI 6. Fixed - I have made it working with EAPI 6 and dropped EAPI 5.
>> +# @FUNCTION: rebar_src_install
>> +# @DESCRIPTION:
>> +# Install BEAM files, include headers, executables and native libraries.
>> +# Install standard docs like README or defined in DOCS variable. Optionally
>
> Optionally what? It looks like an unfinished sentence.
Nothing. (-: Some leftover.
>> +rebar_src_install() {
>> +debug-print-function ${FUNCNAME} "${@}"
>> +
>> +local bin
>> +local dest="$(get_erl_libs)/${P}"
>> +
>> +insinto "${dest}"
>> +doins -r ebin
>> +[[ -d include ]] && doins -r include
>> +[[ -d bin ]] && for bin in bin/*; do dobin "$bin"; done
>
> Please don't do inlines like this.
Is there a particular problem with this?
>> +[[ -d priv ]] && cp -pR priv "${ED}${dest}/"
>
> This is about preserving executable bits, correct?
Yes.
Thanks for review.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
gt; No popd on success?
Thanks for catching this up! Fixed.
>> +local tmpf="$(emktemp)"
>> +
>> +cat "${f}" >"${tmpf}" || return 1
>> +awk "$@" "${tmpf}" >"${f}"
>> +}
>
> Wouldn't it be ni
noisy to me. If someone would like to extend the inline version it could
be uninlined at that point.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Amadeusz Żołnowski writes:
> Indeed. So one of these:
>
> a) eawk
> b) eawk --
> c) eawk --
Ups, actually (c) wouldn't be correct either, so only (a) and (b) and
I'd just stick to (a) to not complicate things.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
aide...@gentoo.org writes:
> +tbegin "preserves permissions"
> +
> +cd "$(emktemp -d)"
tests-common.sh already creates tmp directory, so better would be:
cd "${tmpdir}" || tend $?
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
See rebar.eclass review where it is used. Later ejabberd ebuild I'm
going to add uses it as well. This function is too generic to be in
rebar.eclass, so I have decided to move it to eutils. What is the
problem with adding it to eutils?
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ve the same issue in tests for rebar.eclass. Thanks!
PS. As of discussion with robbat2, I am probably going to depend on
gawk-4.1 (which has in-place edit feature) and use it explicitely in
rebar.eclass and some other ebuilds where I meant to use eawk. robbat2
has already requested stabilization of gawk-4.1.
Thanks,
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
"failed to fix include paths in rebar.config"
OK.
>> +insinto "${dest}"
>> +doins -r ebin
>> +[[ -d include ]] && doins -r include
>> +[[ -d bin ]] && for bin in bin/*; do dobin "$bin"; done
>> +[[ -d priv ]] && cp -pR priv "${ED}${dest}/"
>
> Missing ||die. Just don't do it as one-liner :-P.
You've got me! ;-)
Thanks,
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ing I wanted to use sponge from moreutils
but I assumed it's not desired to depend on some tool not in @system or
specific gawk implementation and version (which is not even stabilized
yet) just for eclass/ebuild internals. But apparently it's fine, so I
did that, as I've said in so
I think I have no further comments, so the two things above
> considered, looks good to go.
Thank you for review!
I have pushed eclass along with tests. Feel free to comment on tests
later.
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I'd like to add a new category for Erlang libraries:
dev-erlang. Initially it's going to have 27 packages.
Cheers,
Amadeusz Żołnowski
---
From 69b6a4f2449d420f02c6c9849885e37457cf9fbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Amadeusz=20=C5=BBo=C5=82nowski?=
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 201
Pacho Ramos writes:
> # Pacho Ramos (21 Aug 2016)
> # Unmaintained, all versions broken in several ways, bug #465604
> # Removal in a month.
> app-editors/gobby
That's a pity, because it's still developed and looks like a really
good, rich tool. No one uses it?
Quoting Pacho Ramos (2012-12-22 10:26:40)
> I thought that maybe this kind of information could be simply included
> in a canonical file under /usr/share/doc/ package dir called, for
> example, CONFIGURATION or SETUP.
>
> What do you think?
At last! +100
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
Quoting Pacho Ramos (2012-12-27 12:20:11)
> Steev contacted me few hours ago to tell me he won't maintain dbacl
> anymore and, then, it's now up for grabs.
>
> Thanks for taking care of it
If nobody is interested I can take it.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: signature
at case, should eclass look for either option (now
> DOC_CONTENTS variable or "${FILESDIR}/README.gentoo")
"${FILESDIR}/README.gentoo" seems to be most reasonable place since this
file is going to be installed. Putting it next to metadata.xml and
ChangeLog kills the ide
Quoting Pacho Ramos (2013-01-17 20:21:30)
> # Pacho Ramos
> # Still uses depend.php (#449820), upstream dead for ages and
> # newer versions don't work. Removal in a month.
> www-apps/online-bookmarks
Is there any goog alternative?
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: signature
ouldn't like to have any breakage, so if you're going to break
compatibility, do it in git-2-r1 or whatever new version, please.
Regards,
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
pgpSWifNxR8xL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dion Moult writes:
> # Dion Moult (19 Jan 2014)
> # Mask for removal in 30 days. usleep is actually provided part of
> # app-admin/killproc (bug #467212)
> sys-apps/usleep
Veto. app-admin/killproc isn't even keyworded, yet. (Bug #494254).
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
OpenRC, but it was really time
consuming to guess what does what...
We cannot let OpenRC die. It cannot happen that systemd and upstart are
the only init systems.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
pgpQ46M0fXYSk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ing documentation, but that could just as easily result in
> fewer commits and not more documentation.
Yup, that's right, unfortunately.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
pgpkHcxq9buzj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
exist so Nothing Happens.
>
> i'd say doing a loop is worse than a `ls` hack. and this has quoting
> problems, but that's ancillary ...
> -mike
What about defining following function?
any_exists() {
local f
for f; do
[[ -e $f ]] && return 0
done
return 1
}
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Wed Oct 13 16:13:58 +0200 2010:
> On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 04:23:16 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Tue Oct 12 22:57:11 +0200 2010:
> > > On Tuesday, October 12, 2010 16:26:31 Jero
$f ]] && return 0
> > > done
> > >
> > > return 1
> > > }
> >
> > perhaps if it had a better name and were in a common location (eclass)
>
> has_file()?
What it would mean? „Has”?
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
$p ]]
((r+=$?))
done
>
> case ${opt} in
> -a) return $(( r != 0 )) ;;
> -o) return $(( r == $# )) ;;
> esac
> }
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
gt; -o) return $(( r == $# )) ;;
> > esac
> > }
And why putting different tasks into one function? My suggestion:
any_paths() {
local f
for f; do
[[ -e $f ]] && return 0
done
return 1
}
all_paths() {
local f
for f; do
[[ -e $
Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Wed Oct 13 23:46:43 +0200 2010:
> On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 15:57:17 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > And why putting different tasks into one function?
>
> for the same reason we dont have separate test binaries: test_exist,
> t
Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Thu Oct 14 00:32:40 +0200 2010:
> On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 18:13:18 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Wed Oct 13 23:46:43 +0200 2010:
> > > On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 15:57
Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Sun Oct 17 23:33:57 +0200 2010:
> On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 19:08:55 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Thu Oct 14 00:32:40 +0200 2010:
> > > On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 18:13
osted under bug #255196 [0].
[0] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255196
Cheers,
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
eeded. If you can help once more, that would
> be very appreciated.
OK, I'll fix it tomorrow.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
/base/make.defaults and commit the
ebuild.
That ebuild is already posted in bug #353577[0].
[0] https://bugs.gentoo.org/353577
Cheers,
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
d be good idea to list packages using
that flag with meaning described by its maintainers and your proposal.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
that CONFIRMED is set by the
package maintainer and the one who assigns bugs leaves the status.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Excerpts from Paweł Hajdan, Jr.'s message of Mon Mar 21 13:07:33 +0100 2011:
> My suggestion is to make the src_test empty (I think the default one
> still calls make). I can produce a patch if needed.
>
> What do you think?
Maybe restrict? https://bugs.gentoo.org/298014
--
A
flag while you already know what flag does.
Maybe it should even become our policy and not just recommendation?
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Excerpts from Angelo Arrifano's message of Tue Mar 29 17:14:48 +0200 2011:
> On Ter, 2011-03-29 at 17:08 +0200, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > I'm actually describing even global USE flags in my package's
> > metadata.xml if their purpose might not be clear and I&
would compare it with “Adds support for
printing text on splash screen and text prompts, e.g. for password”?
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Excerpts from Olivier Crête's message of Wed Mar 30 22:14:30 +0200 2011:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 21:56 +0200, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > The main problem is that user might not know what kind of “foo” support
> > it is. For example I have “pango” USE flag in sys-boot/plym
unpack the archive, check configure's help,
read the README, INSTALL and so, and analyze source code to eventually
find out what the flag does? This that what user is supposed to do for
every package?
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Excerpts from Dmitry Dzhus's message of Sun Apr 10 13:00:42 +0200 2011:
> When will Gentoo switch over to glorious and progressive Jabber from
> outdated and obsolete IRC?
You made my day. Thanks! :-)
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 453
hangeLogs are useful to us. CVS sucks and it's more
comfortable to read ChangeLog file than cvs log.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
f and /var/tmp/
for bigger which would be good to have preserved between reboots. And
this is somehow correct with FHS afaik.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Excerpts from Michal Januszewski's message of Sun Jun 12 15:21:25 +0200
2011:
> I have a number of packages in which I have lost interest and which I
> no longer want to maintain:
>
> app-admin/hddtemp
I'd take this one. I still have some hard disks, unfortunately. ;-)
asily possible to workaround the problem with initramfs,
it's really bad issue that the world is breaking FHS instead of
designing something new. (Yes, I know it's so big deal that's
impossible… but… doh…)
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
rootfs. I'm still busy with my diploma to write Gentoo docs
about it and push Dracut into stabilization process, but as soon as I
finish I can move it forward.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
lliamH's prototype seems to mostly work, I just want to polish it
> some and then release it. I think we can offer it as an easy default
> to users, since it doesn't need to be rebuilt when the kernel is
> rebuilt at all.
Dracut doesn't need either if we skip to include kernel
; -mike
> > The only uses I have seen for cpio are:
> >
> > 1. Working with initramfs archives
> >
> > Genkernel already has the correct dep. Does dracut need it?
> Yes, looks like dracut does need it added.
Done.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C
llowing additional files:"
> debug-print "${ADDITIONAL_FILES}"
> exeinto /usr/lib/obs/service/${OBS_SERVICE_NAME}.files
> for i in ${ADDITIONAL_FILES}; do
> doexe ${DISTDIR}/$i
"" just in case.
> done
> fi
> }
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
udo POSIX compatibility, but
what is the benefit of bash3 compatibility while bash4 is stable
already?
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
y're actually affected by this.
>
> If you read the quoted council log, you'll find that the retroactive
> change was done because usage of bash 3.2 features in the tree was
> already widespread at that time. This is very different from the
> current situation, therefore it is
static binaries than busybox. And
> > I don't think I use any specific configuration which makes me need
> > static binaries;
>
> by default, tools that are needed to easily recover a system
> (busybox/cryptsetup/lvm/etc...) are IUSE=+static, and every binary
> that goe
ion, it is also nice to just a quick look into the console to
> see, what and where it failed.
When it fails, it prints tail of build.log.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
wont
> care about the total state either.
Build output hardly ever says about current state of a compile. If you
can tell from the output how much is left for example for firefox -
respect.
> Beside the point, that you can see the total state in the terminal bar
> (i hope, i got
r something I can google for.
If it fails you get tail of build.log, so you see it anyway.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Excerpts from Dale's message of 2011-11-14 13:43:36 +0100:
> Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > Excerpts from Dale's message of 2011-11-14 13:17:28 +0100:
> > > Here is some feedback then. I liked it the way it was. When a
> > > build fails, I do a one of
C.UTF-8. Which differs from C only
> > in that the charset is utf-8.
>
> In my opinion we should set a default environment with the following
> values:
>
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> LC_ALL=
> LC_COLLATE=C
This is only on my setups or this is "xy_XY.utf8" inst
Hi,
I have just removed myself from maintainers and assigned bugs to
maintainer-needed.
-- aidecoe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I have removed myself from maintainers and dev-erlang has no more
maintainers. I removed myself from ejabberd maintainers as well, but
that is still maintained by Hanno.
Hanno, given that you are the only maintainer of ejabberd now, you may
need to look at dev-erlang/* packages. I'm happy to help
be loudly announced.
> There is already gentoo-dev-help@, but it's /very/ quiet. If we could
> all agree to subscribe and do reviews there, that would work as well.
I didn't even know about gentoo-dev-help and maybe it's not just me.
Cheers,
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
p rule either to
delete or to put to specific maildir.
Moreover one sometimes gets mail that sounds like advertisement but is
for example an amazing job offer. I wouldn't like to miss that one.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ted packages instead.
Thanks,
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
prometheanfire, chutzpah and Alexander will take care of Dracut. I will
just serve with advice and keep an eye on changes.
Thanks,
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Pacho Ramos writes:
> # Pacho Ramos (06 Jan 2016)
> # Unmaintained, upstream dead, doesn't work, bug #548920. Removal in a
> # month.
> app-admin/checkrestart
I am taking the package.
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Michał Górny writes:
> Packages currently in herd along with their other maintainers:
> [...]
>
> net-im/ejabberd :
I have not much knowledge about erlang stuff, but I will take ejabberd
if noone else wants. Co-maintainers are welcome.
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
s
Alex Brandt writes:
> * app-backup/rdiff-backup
Wasn't it meant for removal?
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ined again :-)
Lovely! I have added myself and you to maintainers. (-:
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
95 matches
Mail list logo
