-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Sunday 24 April 2005 23:35, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>>They're
>>supposed to do that for the first month or so (depending upon how long
>>it is before it becomes obvious that you're safe).
>
> I was talking about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:37:10 -0400
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>On Wednesday 27 April 2005 08:29 pm, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
>>
>>>- How well is it expected to work?
>>
>>it's expected to work just fine
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The only dish I have is what if a new profile doesn't support what they
are attempting to do? If something is profile masked ( gcc fex ) there
is no way currently for a user to unmask it, even in /etc/portage.
In the end they just might symlink make.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Jackson wrote:
> Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>
>
>>Hi ebuild devs,
>>
>>Here's a glep draft now for (a part of) the long-term portage-goal
>>"act as a secondary package manager" ...
>>
>>Comments welcome,
>> haubi
>>
>>
>
> It's fancy, but w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 02 May 2005 08:45 pm, Alec Warner wrote:
>
>>The only dish I have is what if a new profile doesn't support what they
>>are attempting to do? If something is profile masked ( gcc fex ) there
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
> Martin Schlemmer posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> excerpted below, on Tue, 10 May 2005 11:02:07 +0200:
>
>
>>Problem with flat tree, is the search times might then suck even more, as
>>last I heard, too many dirs/files in one directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 06:01:17PM +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
>
>>maillog: 11/05/2005-03:40:04(-0500): Brian Harring types
>>
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:46:03AM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
Here's my suggestion, for w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stroller wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2005, at 10:11 am, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 23:58 +0100, Stroller wrote:
>>
>>> On May 11, 2005, at 8:10 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>>
* Unique ID strings for packages, zynot style. Mes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 16 May 2005 08:01 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 16 May 2005 19:45:05 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>wrote:
>>| On Monday 16 May 2005 07:08 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>| > What, so that you can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
| Hi,
| ok another problem for Gentoo/FreeBSD project :P
| Currently there are a few places where, to fix permissions of files, the
| ebuilds does a chown -R root:root ${D} or something similar.
| Unfortunately such a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonas Geiregat wrote:
> I gave this a quick look, and aren't you talking about bash scripts in
> general rather then .bashrc files using /etc/portage/bashrc as reference
> for this document.
> Also I can't see the real use , that's why I started readi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As suggested by SpanKY in the bug report itself but never done until now
I'll gladly start up the discussion.
The bug report[1] is a request from the embedded team to change how
DEPEND and REDEPEND are assigned in an ebuild. At present the
documentat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 31/05/2005-17:48:21(+0900): Chris White types
>
>>Hi all,
>
> ...
>
> Shouldn't this go to gentoo-user?
>
Maybe Ciaranm's guide; I doubt all devs are shell wizards ;)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dylan Carlson wrote:
> On Monday 06 June 2005 16:55, Aron Griffis wrote:
>
>>I think that attempting to take Gentoo in the "enterprise" direction
>>is a mistake. I think that we are a hobbyist distribution. This
>>doesn't mean that we should not str
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
Many Gentoo developers have written articles about Linux and Gentoo on
third-party sites. The articles page [1] was originally meant to provide
links to those articles. However, it frequently occurs that
Sven Wegener wrote:
use.force might not be the best name, but it's what we do with it for
most of our users. Being able to -flag in /etc/portage/profile/use.force
is just because /etc/portage/profile gets added to the cascaded profile
chain. Everything we add to portage that allows a profile to
Sven Wegener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 05:08:09PM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Sven Wegener wrote:
use.force might not be the best name, but it's what we do with it for
most of our users. Being able to -flag in /etc/portage/profile/use.force
is just because /etc/portage/profile gets
Sven Wegener wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:16:18PM +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:40:48 +0200
Sven Wegener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We just had a short discussion over in #gentoo-portage and the
idea of an use.force file for profiles came up. It
of great ideas up their sleeves to make
portage better, multiple repos being just one of the many. I'll let
them preach their stuff for now, lest I let slip ideas that never see
the light of day ;) Regardless changes are coming and they definately
make me very excited.
-Alec Warner
Ajec
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
pretty good solutions on how to fix them in a general way. I
think part of the problem is that this doesn't happen often enough and
we end up with a bunch of hacks that need to be integrated together.
- -Alec Warner
Ajec
Dan Meltzer wrote:
>Well it would be nice to have it all abstracted, w
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to get your opinion on Enterprise-oriented desktop
deployment tools for Gentoo Linux (or the lack of).
As a small company CIO, I deployed Gentoo on a small scale here but
quickly ran into scaling problems and the lack of tools to help.
There is no o
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
Any reason why INPUT_DEVICES is needed in USE_EXPAND rather than just as local
USE flags? It's kind of the odd one out among the above.
The reasoning for that is that hardware support doesn't make sens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't really see removing software from the tree because it's made by
a company that uses software patents as a choice that improves the user
experience with Gentoo. It doesn't make Gentoo more useful for anyone.
Just as software thats not open sou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
not being privvy to -core ( where I hear this was started and
subsequently moved to -dev ) I can only assume you didn't find what you
wanted on -core and are trolling for a decent response here.
I am certain there are people who agree with you on a id
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> 1. The Gentoo package's maintainer will identify one *named* contact
>UPSTREAM for security-related matters, and one named general contact
>UPSTREAM (as a fallback for when the security contact is
>unrea
twofourtysix wrote:
On 07/07/05, Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would be in favor of EAPI= or an even shorter variable name.
strlen(EBUILD_FORMAT) * 19546 = 249K
strlen(EAPI) * 19546 = 77K
strlen(EV) * 19546 = 39K
Where 19546 is the number if ebuilds in the tree as.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
R Hill wrote:
> Craig Lawson wrote:
>
>> Comments?
>
>
> This subject has also been brought up on the forum[1] very recently.
> There have been some interesting ideas and alternatives posed that seem
> workable. I was hoping some of the developers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 23/07/2005-15:04:06(+0900): Jason Stubbs types
>
>>On Saturday 23 July 2005 14:34, Alec Warner wrote:
>>
>>>In order to receive this helpful data we basically need 4 or 5 things.
>>&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Recent discussion on this ML and on the portage-ml as well as
#gentoo-portage regarding pkg_warn() and the basic concept behind it.
We talked about adding new functionality, about adding a warning section
to the ebuild or to the metadata. However. a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 July 2005 11:05, Alec Warner wrote:
>
>>Recent discussion on this ML and on the portage-ml as well as
>>#gentoo-portage regarding pkg_warn() and the basic concept behind it.
>>We
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:54:04 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | | Well... What I was mainly thinking (and assuming we don't have the
> | | new virtuals system by whenever this beco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 19:23:37 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | > Hrm. Is this going to be sanely doable by your average dev? How
> | > long a dep string would we be having in typ
amp;w=2&r=4&s=debug&q=b
[4] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-dev&w=2&r=2&s=debug&q=b
[5] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-dev&w=2&r=1&s=debug&q=b
[6] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44796
[7] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cg
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 01 August 2005 09:22 pm, Alec Warner wrote:
Many people do not like the fact that a USE flag changes CFLAGS.
Although there are other USE flags that do this too ( pic comes to mind
in a couple ebuilds, checkpassword fex ) they are a minority compared to
debug
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Martin wrote:
| Hi list,
|
| Bug 97447 wants a logrotate USE flag, which is used by about five
| packages locally. Unless there are any objections, I'll globalify it
| later today.
I think this flag is a bad idea. Why sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is basically a resubmission of Genone's file format merger [1].
The code to handle digests and manifests is currently being designed and
rewritten. As such we need two things from the developer community.
One is a decision of what the new format
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Whoopse, should have gone to gentoo-portage-dev, my bad ;)
Alec Warner wrote:
> This is basically a resubmission of Genone's file format merger [1].
>
> The code to handle digests and manifests is currently being designed and
> re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Parpart wrote:
> On Thursday 11 August 2005 02:04, Carlos Silva wrote:
> [...]
>
>>What do you think of this?
>
>
> I once asked for a better place (namely metadata.xml), but got corrected with
> the following reason:
>
> HOMEPAGE/LICENS
oper cascading profiles
>
> for those of you looking to upgrade older portage versions,
> profiles/obsolete// exists for you
> -mike
If you haven't done so already, might want to fire off a mail to -user
as well.
- -Alec Warner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4
gt; commit statements worth something.
Also forcing a Changelog syntax makes portage's -l feature useful, since
it attempts to parse the Changelog to provide sane entries...but some
Changelogs don't seem to be in the correct syntax that the -l
functionality requires. With a change
e maintainers that don't
deviate from the default much.
In any case both situations scream "hi I need tools cause I'm horribly
complex and difficult to maintain properly".
-Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
sewhere if that is
the case. I just know that for the majority of profiles
default-linux/arch is what most of them inherit from, so thats where the
party started ;)
-Alec Warner (antarus)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
I'm
not trying to bash either team here, just pointing out the facts.
Alec Warner (antarus)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 09 September 2005 05:58 am, Torsten Veller wrote:
>
>>2)
>>What is the next step after the last maintainer is removed from
>>metadata.xml? Well i announced these packages on -dev. Now i can wait some
>>time (how long?
Petteri Räty wrote:
warnera6 wrote:
IMHO it is, but not as a USE flag (it will never be stable enough
without upstream support) but I think many would find the functionality
useful in a script. I know I would. If it works most of the time and
saves space, there is no reason not trim things
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yuan MEI wrote:
> I noticed that cjk-latex-4.6(http://cjk.ffii.org/) has been out for a
> long, but no ebuild is in the portage. So, who'd like to handle this?
Usually you will want to check bugs.gentoo.org before querying on this
list. -> http://bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:14:27 -0400 Peter Hyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Thank you for the opportunity. Apparently though, my submissions have
> | already been rejected Ciaran.
>
> As you know fine well, nothing was rej
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> Chris White wrote:
>
>> Alright, so here's what I think on the whole thing now that I made a
>> nice tidy [Summary] thread.
>>
>> There seems to be some concern about AT testers having more privileges
>> than some other devs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen P. Becker wrote:
>> You're somehow implying that being an AT is not as good as being a dev.
>
>
> Wrong.
>
>> My understanding is that this GLEP is supposed to make AT as good as
>> being a dev, but with a different role, one that doesn't ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:41:37 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | And how is an "Arch Dev" different from say a member of devrel?
>
> Assuming by "arch dev" you
esting
packages in the overlay. Then instruct users to add the overlay to
their portage settings. Testing overlay for testing, p.mask for broken
packages.
/usr/portage/overlay/cat/pkg/bla.ebuild
or
/usr/portage/testing/cat/pkg/bla.ebuild
and so on...
- -Alec Warner
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wernfried Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 01:32:32PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>>Uhm. That's current policy and has been current policy for several
>>years. No GLEP needed.
>
>
> If that's currenty policy, why does the handbook say somet
Official policy states that CVS ebuilds should never be marked
stable[1]. Yet many ebuilds that are based on cvs sources and are
marked stable on arch's. I would like to know why this is so.
./net-misc/netcomics-cvs/netcomics-cvs-0.14.1.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ~amd64"
./games-fps/blackshades-cvs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 20:38 +0300, Alin Dobre wrote:
>
>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>Alec Warner wrote:
>>
>>>Official policy states that CVS ebuilds s
to be able to touch it. It's well known
that pmasked stuff isn't supported. One can't add a use flag to an
ebuild and then turn around and say oh that use flag isn't supported.
If it's not supported it shouldn't be there.
Also might want to submit the ebuild t
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 02:59 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Ok, for those who don't remember...
|
| In the good old days, syslog-ng was the default. Then, for one of the
| releases, the x86 team accidentally included metalog instead of
| syslo
e get along that way on gentoo,
stuff breaks, they reinstall, end of story. If you are upgrading
package foo and you don't know if it's important or not, or if it will
break your system you may want to go and check it out. What does foo
do, what depends on foo ( equery and gentoolkit )?
s your system doesn't boot. I'm not trying to bash reiser here, I
still use ext2 on /boot even if xfs is my main fs of choice for this reason.
Alec Warner (antarus)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozd
; Ideas? thoughts? comments?
>>
>> Lets hear em :)
>
>
> I think quick-basics tutorials like this would be a great addition to
> GWN, but if the IRC Q&A format works then I say go for it.
>
The problem with tutorials is you get a limited view of the one or two
peopl
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Thursday 20 October 2005 21:35, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Too many people using -* (due to auto flags) so that will break for most of
them.
So we have the three things we should deprecate in a single thread:
a) no* flags
b) auto flags
c) -* and - for all arch
or noFOO flags because if a user doesn't have a
portage that handles package.use buildplans will fail.
The tree would need to maintain the AUTOUSE and noFOO flags for old
versions of portage.
-Alec Warner (Antarus)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 20 October 2005 10:03 pm, Alec Warner wrote:
>
>>Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>>>On Thursday 20 October 2005 05:47 pm, Petteri Räty wrote:
>>>
>>>>Every once in a while I see people wanting to use nosomething use fl
ur installed system is so it can
filter relevant news for you? Or do you want to read news on all 10,000
packages? I certainly don't want to swim through all the crappy news
just to find the items relevant for the box that I'm on.
-Alec Warner (Antarus)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
format and
break the tagging, causing -l to display nothing.
If you want to make a seperate program to read the news, go for it. I
don't see why we have to stick silly things in a core utility. emerge
is a package manager, it does not do your laundry too.
-Alec Warner (Antarus)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
www-client/prozilla has been masked since february with quite a few
security vulnerabilities. It's even had a lovely bug with tons of
comments and code additions and audits[1]. Can we ditch it please?
kyoto skyfw # emerge -pv prozilla
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calcul
Dale wrote:
Dave Shanker wrote:
Try emerging x11-libs/gtk+ again and then building bonobo again.
I did that first thing. I was hoping it would fix it too. It compiled
fine but puked on bonobo afterwards. I even did the etc-update and
env-update thing. Would a source /etc/profil
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>>> There will probably be no active version of Python set.
>>
>>
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:25:03 +0100
> "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>
>> "If enewuser or enewgroup is called from outside of pkg_setup, fail"
>
> It is useful sometimes to call it in pkg_postinst(), if the user/group
> is needed at runtime and no
like on the discovery channel?
-A
2011/1/25 Tomáš Chvátal :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dne 25.1.2011 23:08, Robin H. Johnson napsal(a):
>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:02:16AM +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
>>> And now, imagine the state of the user/ dev/ list mess in, s
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 28-01-2011 22:11:30 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>> So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff
>>
>> Please comment and help us improve the "english" of the wh
I'm going to basically reply with my normal QA rant.
1) QA is important to the overall health of Gentoo. People will not
use broken shit.
2) QA should be straightforward. If a developer need to do X to
assure quality it should be fairly obvious why X is required. It
should be clear where to go
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:49:53 +0100
> Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>
>> Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 14.08 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
>> > Hey, here's an idea. Before you go making big masks like this for
>> > packages
>> > several people depen
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was nosing through bugzilla, and noticed:
>
> * Number of open bugs is greater than 14,000
> * Number of open bugs untouched for more than 2 years - well over 2000.
> * Number of open bugs untouched between 1 and 2 years - wel
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Dane Smith wrote:
>> On 03/25/2011 02:46 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Of course now we can add additional requirements:
* The key mus
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>> On 03/27/2011 02:47 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>>> If you prohibit people from doing that, they'll just commit it
>>> normally, and then remove themselves a week later.
>>
>> Why do
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan
>> wrote:
>>> Just start removing old[1] maintainer-needed packages. If people
>>> complain,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Dale wrote:
> Eray Aslan wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 04:41:25PM -0500, Dale wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> +1 Some descriptions may as well not have one at all. May as well
>>> Google the flag and the package and see what, if anything, it returns.
>>>
>>
>> I would s
2011/4/4 Tomáš Chvátal :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dne 4.4.2011 01:13, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napsal(a):
>> 2011-04-03 21:28:02 Tomáš Chvátal napisał(a):
>>> Dne 3.4.2011 19:38, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napsal(a):
I would like to add python-n
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:28:05 +0200
> René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
>
>> Am 27.03.2011 22:44, schrieb Rich Freeman:
>> Well, but you need some way of communicate that certain packages are
>> w/o a proper maintainer. Why else should someone ste
Hello fellow community members,
The election for Gentoo Foundation Trustees has concluded. We had 229
eligible voters with 76 voting for a turnout of ~33%.
Final ranked list:
robbat2
quantumsummers
rich0
blueness
The election officials should have sent you your election confirmation
number whic
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:58 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I know a decision about this type of use flag was made in the past, but
> especially now with the --newuse option in portage, that decision
> bothers me, so I would like to re-open the discussion.
>
> I will use logrotate as my examp
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:56:06PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> You have 24 hours to comment on this news item. Sorry to put it so
>> bluntly but this is required for major security bug (#364973).
>>
>> See attachment.
>
> Should be wr
ask on the gentoo-scm list?
-A
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I and maybe also some other people would be interested in the status of the
> infamous "git migration" of the main portage tree... I am just curious, since
> I have not heard much lat
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Jack Morgan wrote:
>
>
> On 05/10/2011 01:13 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Another issue that was raised in the discussion with the arch teams,
>> even though it predates the arch teams resources thread as we've talked
>> about it on FOSDEM 201
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 08:19:45PM +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
> (klondike) wrote:
>> El 16/05/11 19:54, Kacper Kowalik escribió:
>> > Neither of those points include sending mail to gentoo-dev, which tend
>> > to quickly conver
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Let's start with generalized example so everyone gets the idea...
>
> Reference: man 8 pklocalauthority
>
> /etc/polkit-1/localauthority/10-vendor.d/example-udisks.pkla
>
> [Local users]
> Identity=unix-group:plugdev
> Action=org.freedeskto
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 May 2011, Jonathan Callen wrote:
>
>> Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs[kdeprefix]
>
> I don't think that USE dependencies (or any other EAPI specific
> features) are allowed here.
You should file a bug about that; I'm
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Jonathan Callen wrote:
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
>>> On Wed, 18 May 2011, Jonathan Callen wrote:
>>
>>> Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs[kdeprefix]
>>
>> I don't think that USE dependencies (or any other EAPI specific
>> features) are allowed here.
>
> Th
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:35:11 -0400
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > And yes, it should be automated. I agree. Doesn't change the current
>> > situation.
>>
>> of course it does. it makes the current situation irrelevant.
>
> Does this mean we s
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:46 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
wrote:
> On 6/16/11 7:22 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>> Just a friendly reminder that you should update profiles/ and eclass/
>> before committing anything to the tree, so that you don't end up
>> committing packages with either broken depend
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 07:27:23 +0200
> "Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)" wrote:
>
>> El 03/08/11 06:57, Robin H. Johnson escribió:
>> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:13:19AM +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo
>> > Riera (klondike) wrote:
>>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now that we don't have any old-style virtuals in gx86 anymore,
> I think the 'virtual' category is basically one another plain category
> nowadays.
>
> Considering the number of different virtuals in this category, maybe it
> would
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 18-08-2011 16:57:59 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: LC_PCAT
>> > # @DESCRIPTION:
>> > # Set this to the category of the plugin, if any.
>> > : ${LC_PCAT:=}
>>
>> Please use verbose variable names, and prefix them with
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
>> Sorry, but NO. If you want you can make a big noise message that asks
>> users to install the cron-job but opt-out is not an option here.
>
> Well, that's up to the Council/Trustees ult
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Roy Bamford wrote:
>> It has to be opt-in as opt out would be a dangerous precendent to set.
>>
>> I don't see any harm is a gentle reminder message from emerge, provided
>> that the reminder can be turned off
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Corentin Chary
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some news about euscan (still available at http://euscan.iksaif.net)
>
> - New design (yay !)
> - Atom feeds available for each herd/category/maintainer/package
> (http://euscan.iksaif.net/maintainers/59/feed/)
> - Specific handlers
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 32 Aug 2011 10:57:08 +0200
> Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>
>> Good pointer is that we should probably check if the
>> MERGE_TYPE=binary and not check-reqs ram and disk_build in that case.
>> But there is slight problem how to do it in older
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Tomáš Chvátal schrieb:
>> Start collecting ideas for EAPI5.
>
> 1) USE-flag based support to cross-compile packages (mostly implemented in
> multilib-portage)
> 2) USE-flag based support to install for different slots (e.g. python, ruby
> o
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 10/09/2011 11:15 πμ, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Markos Chandras
>> wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
>>>
>>> On 10/09/2011 11:01
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i keep writing little helpers like this in ebuilds:
> usex() { use $1 && echo ${2:-yes} || echo ${3:-no} ; }
usex...you naughty boy.
>
> this is so i can do:
> export some_var=$(usex some_flag)
> and get it set to "yes" or "no"
If
901 - 1000 of 1224 matches
Mail list logo
