On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
<jmbsvice...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>>> There will probably be no active version of Python set.
>>
>> You had two weeks to come up with this.
>>
>> Please find my on IRC to team up on an agreed fix.
>
> As Arfrever noted, this is likely the cause of the broken automated
> weekly stages for this past week. By not having a python symlink /
> wrapper, stages generation failed on stage2 run.
> I'd like to take this chance to recall this is the 2nd time on the last
> few months where stage generation was broken by python changes. Also,
> we've been unable to create hardened stages for over 8 weeks because of
> a sandbox issue.
> The weekly stages generation depends on the quality and stability of the
> "stable" tree. Therefore, the RelEng team kindly asks all maintainers to
> pay attention to the stable ebuilds in the system set and to please fix
> any failures asap as they may / can prevent stage generation. Be sure to
> think carefully about changes that can impact the stage generation, in
> particular when they involve python.

Two issues:

proj/en/releng is old as hell and doesn't even mention stage generation.

How does a developer know when the stage generation is broken?  Is
there a dashboard?  At work we have a guy who is basically a build cop
and checks our build dashboard once a day or so and if it is broken he
goes and finds the guy who broke it and punches him in the face until
he fixes it.  I imagine we do not have staff for this (and no one has
invented punching over the internet.)

I am curious how often stage builds fail (how long can they be broken
until we actually care?)

>
>> Sebastian
>>
>
> - --
> Regards,
>
> Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
> Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJM9cjoAAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPdC0QAK0HLSse/T3XUL9+vjp3VHro
> xXED/VsiXLlJtwlEsfWLf5kkMhejEXTO5gbLWZmqaJynOCFBk55eqQz04YXZQqWv
> XmtEnXzaf+394chTaWV3hPIzuVayZzJRtVJhEj1imbgLIa3Qyx7XJjpC4NwH2MVo
> 1Odef7Eh8vhpE2bD48BxJfp9KGIf+MQf0TPex/4TACirYzJ60J4aGZ627gbzyaym
> 3o9DoLD1DRRrURO66buLyV2eXvnMrNrO3UYKPP1M93uW1hq4RXZRGJ4oGePbBfwQ
> JuoGNc227lixeaivlLA83AOQbfYM3OW8zuM1l2kVMNSvzeVyh/wEx9U9ptvLhhLR
> nd0FJNt8RsIH8Yzi5NUfv4JMJoAQK5km2kNVFH1bE8vVp+RwyTVFPnuCtdNL1uLJ
> rVl+ptrF/Aiey5u/gVXpYSZGjU/lYtp73EebZhO+Bn1mymGMNVr2/UU9HWgCowmN
> so0AIcKa5NkT5L4Y3kI+bSokcrm/5bLbjZQ5MayWsRuEwJkWyt1vxfW2B2DaQbjQ
> +hRezNy/GwnfLM21yEYn46h5RnArdtV3vT6J6vksG+4aepa6WNAFnw47ABJW63z0
> jAL8n/qjrsi2PJlUdrbZ230iqIFV1RmPtP5Z7M9gAM4VAtb8dNPWxB2ooEYOqg6u
> 8yAYnSVjKv/dTK7nPhSk
> =gX34
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

Reply via email to