Dear all,
The following packages are up for grabs:
app-editors/bluefish
after retirement of the proxied maintainer.
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-editors/bluefish
The editor is quite famous and it would be nice to keep the ebuild in a
good state.
Todo: please migrate from 'fdo-mime'
Dear all,
The following packages are up for grabs:
dev-libs/libtar
after retirement of the proxied maintainer.
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/dev-libs/libtar
libtar is a C library for manipulating tar archives.
Todo: please migrate from 'autotools-utils' (no replacement)
--
Best,
Jonas
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> In the end we might get to delete some code from portage or an eclass?
> Does this seem worth it?
>
To add to some of the points Kent made, I think so, yes: this means freeing
us from the cognitive overhead of thinking about older EAPIs at all
W dniu pon, 05.03.2018 o godzinie 17∶52 -0800, użytkownik Matt Turner
napisał:
> EAPI 2 removal bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/648050
>
> It seems like tons of churn to update old stable ebuilds to a new
> EAPI, just for its own sake. Take https://bugs.gentoo.org/648154 for
> example. New ebuild add
Hi,
Here's a short batch of patches that explicitly update EAPI checks
for eclass that are going to be banned in EAPI 7, and add some verbose
deprecation notices whenever stuff was deprecated already.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
Michał Górny (6):
eapi7-ver.eclass: Explicitly indicate that EA
---
eclass/eapi7-ver.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/eapi7-ver.eclass b/eclass/eapi7-ver.eclass
index 7eb070c68171..6117124a90a5 100644
--- a/eclass/eapi7-ver.eclass
+++ b/eclass/eapi7-ver.eclass
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ case ${EAPI:-0} in
6)
---
eclass/epatch.eclass | 9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/epatch.eclass b/eclass/epatch.eclass
index 905f68f8ef22..8e03478c26ce 100644
--- a/eclass/epatch.eclass
+++ b/eclass/epatch.eclass
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Copyright 1999-2017 Gentoo Foundation
+#
---
eclass/ltprune.eclass | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/ltprune.eclass b/eclass/ltprune.eclass
index 6b3e93921d96..a8bb4c842bc0 100644
--- a/eclass/ltprune.eclass
+++ b/eclass/ltprune.eclass
@@ -15,6 +15,13 @@
if [[ -z ${_LTPRUNE_ECLASS} ]]; then
+case ${EA
---
eclass/epatch.eclass | 10 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/epatch.eclass b/eclass/epatch.eclass
index 8e03478c26ce..e3178ff40020 100644
--- a/eclass/epatch.eclass
+++ b/eclass/epatch.eclass
@@ -12,7 +12,11 @@
if [[ -z ${_EPATCH_ECLASS} ]]; then
---
eclass/versionator.eclass | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/versionator.eclass b/eclass/versionator.eclass
index 54d77a30b015..bf3f6a2a77b6 100644
--- a/eclass/versionator.eclass
+++ b/eclass/versionator.eclass
@@ -28,6 +28,13 @@
if [[ -z ${_VERSIONATOR_ECLASS}
---
eclass/ltprune.eclass | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/ltprune.eclass b/eclass/ltprune.eclass
index a8bb4c842bc0..f1dd795aea2a 100644
--- a/eclass/ltprune.eclass
+++ b/eclass/ltprune.eclass
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ if [[ -z ${_LTPRUNE_ECLASS} ]]; then
case ${EAPI:-
# Brian Evans (06 Mar 2018)
# MariaDB MaxScale 1.x depends on the deprecated libmysqld
# Newer versions bundle software that require git access
# and modify system libraries for their own purposes making
# it extremely difficult to package.
# Bug 649764 Removal in 30 days.
dev-db/maxscale
signa
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
> + 6)
> + # for eqawarn
> + [[ -z ${_EUTILS_ECLASS} ]] && inherit eutils
> ;;
NACK. With this you defeat the whole purpose of splitting things off
from eutils. In turn, eutils inherits a dozen of other eclass
W dniu wto, 06.03.2018 o godzinie 18∶41 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller
napisał:
> > > > > > On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
> > + 6)
> > + # for eqawarn
> > + [[ -z ${_EUTILS_ECLASS} ]] && inherit eutils
> > ;;
>
> NACK. With this you defeat the whole pu
> On Tue, 06 Mar 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu wto, 06.03.2018 o godzinie 18∶41 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller
> napisał:
>> > > > > > On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > + 6)
>> > + # for eqawarn
>> > + [[ -z ${_EUTILS_ECLASS} ]] && inherit eutils
>> >
On 03/06/2018 12:25 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> ---
> eclass/eapi7-ver.eclass | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/eapi7-ver.eclass b/eclass/eapi7-ver.eclass
> index 7eb070c68171..6117124a90a5 100644
> --- a/eclass/eapi7-ver.eclass
> +++ b/eclass/eapi7-ver
Am Dienstag, 6. März 2018, 02:52:54 CET schrieb Matt Turner:
> EAPI 2 removal bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/648050
>
> It seems like tons of churn to update old stable ebuilds to a new
> EAPI, just for its own sake. Take https://bugs.gentoo.org/648154 for
> example. New ebuild added with EAPI 6 bum
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> Is it worth the effort? Yes, see below.
> Is it a high priority task? No.
>
It sounds like all that has been done is to log a tracker and create
some bugs. That is hardly a major burden on anybody. If it nudges
people to bump the EAP
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:56 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:52:54 -0800
> And with Perl packages at least, incrementing EAPI results in actual
> changes driven by the eclass:
>
> - Changes the names of various control variables
> - Makes perl tests on by default, and parallel by de
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:00 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>
>> In the end we might get to delete some code from portage or an eclass?
>> Does this seem worth it?
>
>
> To add to some of the points Kent made, I think so, yes: this means freeing
>
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 6. März 2018, 02:52:54 CET schrieb Matt Turner:
>> EAPI 2 removal bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/648050
>>
>> It seems like tons of churn to update old stable ebuilds to a new
>> EAPI, just for its own sake. Take https://bugs.g
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
> wrote:
>>
>> Is it worth the effort? Yes, see below.
>> Is it a high priority task? No.
>>
>
> It sounds like all that has been done is to log a tracker and create
> some bugs. That is har
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is it worth the effort? Yes, see below.
> >> Is it a high priority task? No.
> >>
> >
> > It sounds like all that ha
Hi,
I'm not sure that comment of the issue is yet correct with last version.
I think that depends of mariadb libraries and maybe it works also with
mysql but I will investigate on it.
Here (not last version but at least v.2.x):
https://github.com/geaaru/geaaru_overlay/blob/master/dev-db/maxscale
On 03/06/2018 05:55 PM, Geaaru wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure that comment of the issue is yet correct with last version.
> I think that depends of mariadb libraries and maybe it works also with
> mysql but I will investigate on it.
>
> Here (not last version but at least v.2.x):
>
> https://gith
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Is it worth the effort? Yes, see below.
>> >> Is it a hi
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:39 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>>
> >
> > * Mainly, less stuff to memorize. I'll be throwing a party on the day when
> > the last EAPI=0 ebuild is gone. (In the retirement home, probably.)
>
> This is the argument made by others about the cognitive overhead of
> remembering all the EAPI differences. If the packages are untouched
28 matches
Mail list logo
