On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Alec Warner <anta...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Andreas K. Huettel >> > <dilfri...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> Is it worth the effort? Yes, see below. >> >> Is it a high priority task? No. >> >> >> > >> > It sounds like all that has been done is to log a tracker and create >> > some bugs. That is hardly a major burden on anybody. If it nudges >> > people to bump the EAPI when they're doing other work so much the >> > better, but there doesn't seem to be a drop-dead date yet. >> > >> > If devs don't want to think about EAPI cleanup they don't have to right >> > now. >> >> No, not true. Look at the blocking bugs. We're asking arch teams to >> retest and restabilize ebuilds whose only difference is the EAPI bump. >> > > Ultimate the arch teams are supposed to test the ebuild (that it works), so > when we change the EAPI of the ebuild re-testing is required.
Of course, but that's not the point...
