Hi there
Gentoo does not yet have a (proper) way of selecting a BLAS or Lapack
implementation at compile time.
Hence I wrote two eclasses, which can be found in my fork of the science
overlay:
* https://github.com/Doeme/sci/blob/blas_lapack_eclass/eclass/blas.eclass
* https://github.com/Doeme/
Dear Fellows, and thanks Dominik,
Dominik Schmidt writes:
> Gentoo does not yet have a (proper) way of selecting a BLAS or Lapack
> implementation at compile time. Hence I wrote two eclasses, which can
> be found in my fork of the science overlay:
>
> * https://github.com/Doeme/sci/blob/blas_la
On 04/12/17 00:37, Matt Turner wrote:
> A user requested I forward this information to the mailing list:
>
> There's been research, on this, and the study by harvard business
> school was summarized and discussed by NPR in 2015:
>
> [ Turns out toxic coworkers are more
> than just an annoyance. A n
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On the face of it, I like this proposal. On the other hand, wouldn't it
> be
> > better if we just had more active list moderators? That is, moderators
> who
> > move problematic user's posts to moderated by default, and then withhold
> > t
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> 1) there's barely any use for it,
>
> Well, I think that whoever use hardened barely use multilib.
For the value of one anecdote, I'm a long-time hardened user and all
of my hardened systems are no-multilib.
W dniu pon, 04.12.2017 o godzinie 14∶18 +0100, użytkownik Dirkjan
Ochtman napisał:
> On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > > On the face of it, I like this proposal. On the other hand, wouldn't it
> >
> > be
> > > better if we just had more active list moderators? That is, m
W dniu nie, 03.12.2017 o godzinie 14∶06 -0800, użytkownik Matt Turner
napisał:
> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > The problems of more abusive behavior from some of the mailing list
> > members have been reported to ComRel numerous times. After the failure
> > of initial enf
W dniu nie, 03.12.2017 o godzinie 23∶59 -0600, użytkownik R0b0t1
napisał:
> As noted, there is one: analyzing the actions of those who are being
> "attacked" to see why people are bothering to do it in the first
> place. I sincerely doubt the offensive parties are doing what they are
> doing withou
On December 3, 2017 1:35:23 PM PST, "Michał Górny" wrote:
>
>The best way to reach specific Gentoo developers is through Bugzilla.
>This gives the best chance for focused discussion on the specific issue
>without unnecessary distraction for other developers who are not
>interested in the specific
On 12/04/2017 01:11 PM, Christopher Head wrote:
> On December 3, 2017 1:35:23 PM PST, "Michał Górny" wrote:
>> The best way to reach specific Gentoo developers is through Bugzilla.
>> This gives the best chance for focused discussion on the specific issue
>> without unnecessary distraction for oth
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:15:32 +
"M. J. Everitt" wrote:
> On 04/12/17 00:37, Matt Turner wrote:
> > A user requested I forward this information to the mailing list:
> >
> > http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/16-057_d45c0b4f-fa19-49de-8f1b-4b12fe054fea.pdf
> > https://goo.gl/42A8v7 (s
It is interesting to see people discussing behavior on list while flat
out ignoring the following.
This person is NOT me! They showed in #gentoo-java the other day.
Prior to that I have never had any contact. They shared the below log
with me then. Which I found flattering and amusing. Haters will
On 12/04/2017 01:51 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:15:32 +
> "M. J. Everitt" wrote:
>
>> On 04/12/17 00:37, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> A user requested I forward this information to the mailing list:
>>>
>>> http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/16-057_d45c0b4f-
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:51 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:15:32 +
> "M. J. Everitt" wrote:
>
> > On 04/12/17 00:37, Matt Turner wrote:
> > > A user requested I forward this information to the mailing list:
> > >
> > > http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:57:16 -0500
kuzetsa wrote:
> On 12/04/2017 01:51 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:15:32 +
> > "M. J. Everitt" wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/12/17 00:37, Matt Turner wrote:
> >>> A user requested I forward this information to the mailing list:
> >>
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:34:49 -0500
kuzetsa wrote:
> On 12/04/2017 01:11 PM, Christopher Head wrote:
> > On December 3, 2017 1:35:23 PM PST, "Michał Górny"
> > wrote:
> >> The best way to reach specific Gentoo developers is through
> >> Bugzilla. This gives the best chance for focused discussion
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:17:00 -0500
Alec Warner wrote:
>
> Clearly if Gentoo could be successful if millions of people were
> killed; we would not choose to kill millions of people.
> Clearly if Gentoo could be successful if dozens of people were
> harassed; we would not choose to harass dozens of
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:37 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:17:00 -0500
> Alec Warner wrote:
> >
> > Clearly if Gentoo could be successful if millions of people were
> > killed; we would not choose to kill millions of people.
> > Clearly if Gentoo could be successful if
I'm quite unimpressed by how mgorny and jstein behave there.
I wouldn't accept that, were I leading the project.
//Peter
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017, William L Thomson wrote:
[quote omitted]
Can you keep this out of gentoo-dev, please? You personal
reminiscences are very off-topic in this mailing list.
Ulrich
pgp9lk61Z9Iem.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Le 2017-12-03 22:31, Michał Górny a écrit :
Multiple people have tried, and as explained in the long rationale we
haven't had any success. If you have a constructive ideas how to solve
the problem otherwise, we're open to hear them. That's the whole
purpose
of this thread.
Once or twice in 10
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 12:18:04AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> This is something that's been talked about privately a lot lately but it
> seems that nobody went forward to put things into motion. SO here's
> a proposal that aims to improve the condition of our mailing lists
>
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:54:38 -0500
Alec Warner wrote:
>
> I think you make my point sir; not debase it. You did (and continue
> to do) many things, that are in fact
> valuable
What else may I have done since 08 had things been otherwise?
Gentoo's loss.
> However, you also contributed very negati
# Ian Whyman (04 Dec 2017)
# Declared dead upstream. Masked for removal in 30 days
# Please see net-misc/gerbera for a replacement.
net-misc/mediatomb
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 21:29:26 +0100
Vincent-Xavier JUMEL wrote:
>
> Please do rembember that you can't solve all earth problems, not even
> all Gentoo problems :)
Technology is no means to resolve social issues. Our use of technology
is bringing about entirely new unique social issues. Technology
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:52 AM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
> That being said, that people find it acceptable to talk behind another's
> back. Lobbing lots of insults. Then having the ego to assume someone
> would create a fake identity. Any minimal research can show otherwise.
You did already
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 19:54:12 +
Peter Stuge wrote:
> I'm quite unimpressed by how mgorny and jstein behave there.
Doesn't matter its ok because it was about me... I never did anything
of that nature or other stuff. Yet action was sought to be taken
against me years go and it propagates.
Mine
Sorry last one, directed to Alec, but all should read.
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:08:51 -0500
"William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
>
> You could at least realize being here since 2008. If your not the one
> making it better. Maybe do not give others a hard time or creating
> more noise. I do not feel you a
On 12/04/2017 10:36 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> Sorry last one, directed to Alec, but all should read.
I hope you really mean that, we've all heard you complaining about this
too many times already.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:26:26 -0800
Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:52 AM, William L. Thomson Jr.
> wrote:
> > That being said, that people find it acceptable to talk behind
> > another's back. Lobbing lots of insults. Then having the ego to
> > assume someone would create a fake id
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:46 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:26:26 -0800
> Matt Turner wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:52 AM, William L. Thomson Jr.
>> wrote:
>> > That being said, that people find it acceptable to talk behind
>> > another's back. Lobbing lots of i
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:46 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:26:26 -0800
>> Matt Turner wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:52 AM, William L. Thomson Jr.
>>> wrote:
>>> > That being said, that people find it ac
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:43:15 -0800
Matt Turner wrote:
>
> Sorry. I think I was confusing a number of irritating things you've
> done: email spoofing,
That was a complete accident due to a new version of Kmail that had the
from field editable by default. It was NOT intentional. Not the 1st
time. Th
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 18:01:39 -0500
"William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:43:15 -0800
> Matt Turner wrote:
> >
> > Sorry. I think I was confusing a number of irritating things you've
> > done: email spoofing,
>
> That was a complete accident due to a new version of Kmail that
On 12/02/2017 06:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> II. This practically assumes that every new mailing list subscriber will
> be able to recognize the problem. Otherwise, new people will repeatedly
> be lured into discussing with them.
>
> III. In the end, it puts Gentoo in a bad position. Firstly, bec
35 matches
Mail list logo
