On 12/25/2016 11:45 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> 8 packages are using either rbd or rados USE flag for Rados
> Block Device support:
>
> use.local.desc:app-backup/bareos:rados - Enable rados storage backend
> use.local.desc:app-emulation/ganeti:rbd - Enable rados block device support
On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:17:03 -0800 Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 12/25/2016 11:45 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > 8 packages are using either rbd or rados USE flag for Rados
> > Block Device support:
> >
> > use.local.desc:app-backup/bareos:rados - Enable rados storage backend
> > u
On 12/26/2016 05:38 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:17:03 -0800 Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> On 12/25/2016 11:45 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> 8 packages are using either rbd or rados USE flag for Rados
>>> Block Device support:
>>>
>>> use.local.desc:app-backu
On 12/26/2016 02:17 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 12/25/2016 11:45 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> 8 packages are using either rbd or rados USE flag for Rados
>> Block Device support:
>>
>> use.local.desc:app-backup/bareos:rados - Enable rados storage backend
>> use.local.desc:app-em
On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 20:49:02 +1300 Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 22:55:27 +0300
> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> >
> > Description how to test this package...
> >
>
> Alternatively, why not have a metatag that just
> permits a valid URL that points to testing instructions?
Sounds g
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 20:49:02 +1300 Kent Fredric wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 22:55:27 +0300
>> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Description how to test this package...
>> >
>>
>> Alternatively, why not have a metatag that just
>>
On 12/23/2016 11:31 PM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Mike Pagano wrote:
>> ChangeLog
>
>
> looks good for me :)
>
Thanks, Alice.
Committed.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 12/26/2016 08:45 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> 8 packages are using either rbd or rados USE flag for Rados
> Block Device support:
Are there other possibly conflicting issues of using "rados" rather than
"rbd" as name (or "radosbd") or someting a bit more verbose than rbd.
--
Kristian Fiskers
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:45:26AM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> 8 packages are using either rbd or rados USE flag for Rados
> Block Device support:
RBD != RADOS.
RBD is the block-device-mapper on top of Ceph/RADOS.
There are other pieces to put on top of Ceph, such as CephFS & RADOSGW
(S3/Swi
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/603776
---
eclass/toolchain.eclass | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/toolchain.eclass b/eclass/toolchain.eclass
index 55249b00249b..97511ee12440 100644
--- a/eclass/toolchain.eclass
+++ b/eclass/toolchain.eclass
@@ -2119
10 matches
Mail list logo