On 12/26/2016 05:38 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:17:03 -0800 Daniel Campbell wrote: >> On 12/25/2016 11:45 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> 8 packages are using either rbd or rados USE flag for Rados >>> Block Device support: >>> >>> use.local.desc:app-backup/bareos:rados - Enable rados storage backend >>> use.local.desc:app-emulation/ganeti:rbd - Enable rados block device support >>> via sys-cluster/ceph >>> use.local.desc:app-emulation/libvirt:rbd - Enable rados block device >>> support via sys-cluster/ceph >>> use.local.desc:app-emulation/qemu:rbd - Enable rados block device backend >>> support, see http://ceph.newdream.net/wiki/QEMU-RBD >>> use.local.desc:net-analyzer/rrdtool:rados - Enable support for librados >>> from sys-cluster/ceph >>> use.local.desc:net-libs/xrootd:rbd - Enable rados block device support via >>> sys-cluster/ceph >>> use.local.desc:sys-block/fio:rbd - Enable Rados block device support via >>> sys-cluster/ceph >>> use.local.desc:sys-block/tgt:rbd - Add support for ceph block devices >>> >>> Suggested description: >>> rbd - Enable rados block device support via sys-cluster/ceph >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Andrew Savchenko >>> >> Do we expect the list of packages using RBD to grow? > It is likely, ceph popularity is growing. > >> If so then sure, if >> for no other reason than to give a consistent description. > Anyway IIRC we have a rule: local flags for >=5 packages with > the same meaning => global flag.
Correct. New global flag sounds good to me. > > Best regards, > Andrew Savchenko
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
