-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:25:56 +
"Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> Questions:
> 0. What names for the tree/repository.
git://anongit.gentoo.org/portage-tree.git ?
1. afaik everyone is calling it this way already anyway.
2. Since it is hosted directl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:32:41 +0100
Jan Matejka wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:25:56 +
> "Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
>
> > Questions:
> > 0. What names for the tree/repository.
>
> git://a
# Pacho Ramos (19 Mar 2015)
# Dead for years, unmaintained, doesn't respect CFLAGS,
# bug 240842. Removal in a month.
media-video/maven-prog
# Pacho Ramos (19 Mar 2015)
# Dead, doesn't build, doesn't respect CFLAGS (#240902).
# Removal in a month.
net-im/ntame
# Pacho Ramos (19 Mar 2015)
# Dea
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> It is that ebuild tree that is the core to
> what makes it a gentoo system.
>
I think this is really the heart of your argument and others who feel
"gentoo" is the best name for the repository.
I'm not going to argue against that here. I'm
On 03/19/2015 09:38 PM, Lars Wendler (polynomial-c) wrote:
> Index: freeciv-2.5.0.ebuild
> ===
> # Copyright 1999-2015 Gentoo Foundation
> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
> # $Header:
> /var/cvsroot/
We're following the upstream default for that. When the upstream
default changes to gtk+:3 then so will the ebuild. Currently the
gtk+:3 gui is listed as experimental.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:00 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 03/19/2015 09:38 PM, Lars Wendler (polynomial-c) wrote:
>> Index: freeciv
On 03/19/2015 10:17 PM, Michael Sterrett wrote:
> We're following the upstream default for that. When the upstream
> default changes to gtk+:3 then so will the ebuild. Currently the
> gtk+:3 gui is listed as experimental.
>
I don't find any reference that the gtk3 client is experimental.
config
El jue, 19-03-2015 a las 22:56 +0100, hasufell escribió:
> On 03/19/2015 10:17 PM, Michael Sterrett wrote:
> > We're following the upstream default for that. When the upstream
> > default changes to gtk+:3 then so will the ebuild. Currently the
> > gtk+:3 gui is listed as experimental.
> >
>
>
On 03/14/2015 18:25, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> This is a mostly inconsequential issue, but the Git migration provides
> us a chance to make a clean break...
>
> The repository of our ebuilds and the name of the CVS module have been
> called gentoo-x86 since the start of Gentoo, because it original
