Hi,
Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to use slots
and subslots for library dependencies properly [1]. However, today
I see that most of the developers didn't care to properly update their
packages and when I introduced binary compatibility slot in libgcrypt,
I had my hands full of
On 2014.02.28 14:44, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> On 28/02/14 16:18, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:28:30 +0200
> > Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >
> >> It would be very helpful if INSTALL_MASK could be overriden from
> an
> >> ebuild, ...
> > What is the intended goal? Can you give an e
Hello, users and developers.
I've just committed a large patch set that improves the compatibility
and usability of git-r3.eclass. The two major highlights are:
1. the semi-working and problematic shallow clone support has been
replaced by more generic and better designed EGIT_CLONE_TYPE system,
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to use slots
> and subslots for library dependencies properly [1]. However, today
> I see that most of the developers didn't care to properly update their
> packages and when I introduced bina
Dnia 2014-03-02, o godz. 16:45:03
Jeroen Roovers napisał(a):
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to use slots
> > and subslots for library dependencies properly [1]. However, today
> > I see that most of the developers
On 03/02/2014 07:37 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to use slots
> and subslots for library dependencies properly [1]. However, today
> I see that most of the developers didn't care to properly update their
> packages and when I introduced binary
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 16:52:22 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> > How about you file a tracker bug report for each library package,
> > and then file bug reports per package using that dependency
> > blocking the tracker bug?
>
> Excuse me but are you serious?
Sure.
> I'm supposed to report a faftilli
Dnia 2014-03-03, o godz. 03:04:41
Michael Palimaka napisał(a):
> On 03/02/2014 07:37 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to use slots
> > and subslots for library dependencies properly [1]. However, today
> > I see that most of the developers
Am Sonntag, 2. März 2014, 16:45:03 schrieb Jeroen Roovers:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
>
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to use slots
> > and subslots for library dependencies properly [1]. However, today
> > I see that most of the developers did
Everyone on this list really except perhaps Duncan really needs to
learn to trim quotess. Kthx.
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Sure at some point you have to make things evolve but this upstream
> solution simply isn't nice for its users.
That may be, but I don't think it's a distribution's respo
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 17:34:36 +0100
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> > How about you file a tracker bug report for each library package,
> > and then file bug reports per package using that dependency
> > blocking the tracker bug?
>
> I see your point. However please read this beautiful document for
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to use slots
>> and subslots for library dependencies properly [1]. However, today
>> I see that most of the developers didn't car
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 05:49:59PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > Sure at some point you have to make things evolve but this upstream
> > solution simply isn't nice for its users.
>
> That may be, but I don't think it's a distribution's responsibility
> to try to own
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 12:32:05 -0500
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Jeroen Roovers
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> >> Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to use slots
> >> and subslots for library dependencies proper
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
>
> gconf, dconf, polkit, dbus, all do stuff like this. I actually find the
> solution somewhat elegant from my side as a sysadmin.
>
I think the "right approach" depends on the degree to which the file
requires tweaking.
For 99% of users, udev
Dnia 2014-03-02, o godz. 19:09:09
Jeroen Roovers napisał(a):
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 12:32:05 -0500
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Jeroen Roovers
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
> > > Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> > >> Few months ago I have written
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Honestly, setting up a tracker and blocking it with bugs about packages
> which someones-sub-SLOT-checking-script has vetted to be involved could
> be done in less than a day (for the hundred or so packages that depend
> on dev-libs/libgcrypt
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> My script for spotting opportunities to use slot op deps is still out
> there. Of course, I wouldn't just "fix" any ebuild that comes up as
> there are situations where it isn't appropriate. What would probably
> make sense is for QA to defin
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Honestly, setting up a tracker and blocking it with bugs about packages
> which someones-sub-SLOT-checking-script has vetted to be involved could
> be done in less than a day (for the hundred or so packages that depend
> on dev-libs/libgcrypt
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> Honestly, setting up a tracker and blocking it with bugs about packages
>> which someones-sub-SLOT-checking-script has vetted to be involved could
>> be done in less than a day (for the
Hello All,
My name is Michael Tunnell and I am looking for someone from the Gentoo
team to do an interview about the Gentoo project and their personal
involvement with the project on the Linux Action Show.
If you aren't aware of the Linux Action Show, LAS is a weekly podcast and
the #1 Linux Podc
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 14:44:52 -0500
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Unless I have missed mgorny's point here, this isn't just about
> libraries that have currently subslots. This is about every single
> library in the tree.
Some (many?) libraries rarely change API/ABI so it wouldn't make sense
to include th
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2014-03-02 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-libs/libguac2014-02-25 15:50:16 nativemad
net-libs/libguac-client-rdp 2014-02-25 15:51:32 nativemad
net-libs/lib
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 19:58:47 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> > Honestly, setting up a tracker and blocking it with bugs about
> > packages which someones-sub-SLOT-checking-script has vetted to be
> > involved could be done in less than a day (for the hundred or so
> > packages that depend on dev-libs/
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 14:44:52 -0500
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Unless I have missed mgorny's point here, this isn't just about
>> libraries that have currently subslots. This is about every single
>> library in the tree.
>
> Some (many?) libra
25 matches
Mail list logo
