On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Jeroen Roovers <j...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 14:44:52 -0500 > Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> Unless I have missed mgorny's point here, this isn't just about >> libraries that have currently subslots. This is about every single >> library in the tree. > > Some (many?) libraries rarely change API/ABI so it wouldn't make sense > to include those in a first run. > >> That's a LOT of bugs. I guess filing bugs is doable if we handle a few >> libraries at a time. However, it would be nice to avoid the repetitive >> "paperwork" and just let people get the job done. > > Better yet, focus on those (few?) libraries that regularly change > APIs/ABIs and for which adding sub-SLOT deps to dependent ebuilds makes > sense *now*. >
Ah, what a silly thing for me to overlook. That does change my outlook.
