[gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86/net-misc/aggregate: aggregate-1.6.ebuild

2010-10-28 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote: > ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23 > > Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild > Log: > qa I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of what type of QA you applied, even though for you it may be obvious. I just see lots of unnecessar

[gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86/net-misc/aggregate: aggregate-1.6.ebuild

2010-10-28 Thread Duncan
Fabian Groffen posted on Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:30:55 +0200 as excerpted: > On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23 >> >> Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild Log: >> qa > > I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of what > type of QA

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/blogtk: blogtk-1.0.ebuild

2010-10-28 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 28 octobre 2010 à 12:32 +, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) a écrit : > ssuominen10/10/28 12:32:21 > > Modified: blogtk-1.0.ebuild > Log: > header > > (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha1/cvs/Linux x86_64) > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.7 net-misc/

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/blogtk: blogtk-1.0.ebuild

2010-10-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/28/2010 03:55 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > Le jeudi 28 octobre 2010 à 12:32 +, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) a > écrit : >> ssuominen10/10/28 12:32:21 >> >> Modified: blogtk-1.0.ebuild >> Log: >> header >> >> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha1/cvs/Linux x86_64)

[gentoo-dev] util-linux cramfs use flag

2010-10-28 Thread Kfir Lavi
Hi, It is possible to cancle the cramfs support in util-linux. Why there is no cramfs use flag for it? Regards, Kfir

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/mpfc/files: mpfc-1.3.7-INT_MAX.patch

2010-10-28 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tuesday 26 October 2010 12:11:50 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday, October 25, 2010 18:17:21 Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Monday 25 October 2010 19:06:45 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > > Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto: > > > > Am I missing something obvious

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/blogtk: blogtk-1.0.ebuild

2010-10-28 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Thursday 28 October 2010 10:02:35 Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> --- blogtk-1.0.ebuild 26 Jul 2008 22:48:58 - 1.6 > >> +++ blogtk-1.0.ebuild 28 Oct 2010 12:32:21 - 1.7 > >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > >> -# Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo Foundation > >> +# Copyright 1999-2010 Gentoo F

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86/net-misc/aggregate: aggregate-1.6.ebuild

2010-10-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/28/2010 12:30 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23 >> >> Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild >> Log: >> qa > > I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of > what type of QA you applied, even thoug

Re: [gentoo-dev] util-linux cramfs use flag

2010-10-28 Thread Markos Chandras
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 04:09:43PM +0200, Kfir Lavi wrote: > Hi, > It is possible to cancle the cramfs support in util-linux. > Why there is no cramfs use flag for it? > > Regards, > Kfir > You should really need to open a bug for feature requests -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Devel

Re: [gentoo-dev] util-linux cramfs use flag

2010-10-28 Thread Kfir Lavi
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 04:09:43PM +0200, Kfir Lavi wrote: >> Hi, >> It is possible to cancle the cramfs support in util-linux. >> Why there is no cramfs use flag for it? >> >> Regards, >> Kfir >> > You should really need to open a bug for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/blogtk: blogtk-1.0.ebuild

2010-10-28 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:17:41 -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote: Good luck if you want to fix these "issues", I'm pretty sure there are hundreds of such warnings in the tree. You mean thousands? There is no real reason to fix these repoman "warnings" in the name of "qa" ;) Upon commit of an actual

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86/net-misc/aggregate: aggregate-1.6.ebuild

2010-10-28 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 28-10-2010 17:20:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of > > what type of QA you applied, even though for you it may be obvious. > > I just see lots of unnecessary changes that are apparently considered to > > be justified by "QA". >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/blogtk: blogtk-1.0.ebuild

2010-10-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/28/2010 05:17 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Thursday 28 October 2010 10:02:35 Samuli Suominen wrote: --- blogtk-1.0.ebuild 26 Jul 2008 22:48:58 - 1.6 +++ blogtk-1.0.ebuild 28 Oct 2010 12:32:21 - 1.7 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -# Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eshowkw

2010-10-28 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:33:09 +0200 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > http://dev.gentooexperimental.org/~scarabeus/eshowkw-0.5.0.tar.xz Ebuild attached. You may want to make this slight change: $ eshowkw-ng --help [...] < -P, --prefix Do not display prefix keywords in output. (default: False) >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/mpfc/files: mpfc-1.3.7-INT_MAX.patch

2010-10-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tuesday 26 October 2010 12:11:50 Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Monday, October 25, 2010 18:17:21 Alexis Ballier wrote: >> > On Monday 25 October 2010 19:06:45 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: >> > > Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alex

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/mpfc/files: mpfc-1.3.7-INT_MAX.patch

2010-10-28 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 10/28/10 7:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto: >> Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug in the >> linux >> headers? I see no usage of INT_MAX in the patched .c file... > > the maintainer alr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86/net-misc/aggregate: aggregate-1.6.ebuild

2010-10-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/28/2010 07:22 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 28-10-2010 17:20:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: >>> I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of >>> what type of QA you applied, even though for you it may be obvious. >>> I just see lots of unnecessary changes that are appar

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86/net-misc/aggregate: aggregate-1.6.ebuild

2010-10-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 10/28/2010 12:30 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: >> On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote: >>> ssuominen    10/10/28 09:25:23 >>> >>> Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild >>> Log: >>>   qa >> >> I think it would be good practice if you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86/net-misc/aggregate: aggregate-1.6.ebuild

2010-10-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/28/2010 09:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 10/28/2010 12:30 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: >>> On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote: ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23 Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild Log: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86/net-misc/aggregate: aggregate-1.6.ebuild

2010-10-28 Thread Mark Loeser
Samuli Suominen said: > On 10/28/2010 09:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> On 10/28/2010 12:30 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > >>> On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote: > ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23 > > Modif

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: app-emulation/vmware-dsp

2010-10-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
+# Samuli Suominen (28 Oct 2010) +# Fails to compile on x86_64 multilib, bug 150495 +# Fails to build properly with glibc-2.12, bug 341183 +# Fails to build with make-3.82, bug 343129 +# Only builds esound frontend now that arts have been removed from tree, +# and then fails to load it, bug 153141

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eshowkw

2010-10-28 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So now on the eshowkw is part of gentoolkit (in svn, and in next release). If you want to test it and suggest more features/report bugs you can use it as follows: eshowkw [something] equery keywords something Cheers Tomas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: sys-apps/devicekit-disks

2010-10-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen (29 Oct 2010) # Replaced by sys-fs/udisks # Masked for removal in about 30 days sys-apps/devicekit-disks devicekit-power soon to follow...

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eshowkw

2010-10-28 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:33:09 +0200 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > So now on the eshowkw is part of gentoolkit (in svn, and in next > release). If you want to test it and suggest more features/report > bugs you can use it as follows: > > eshowkw [somet