On 10/28/10 7:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>>>> Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto: >>>>>> Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug in the >>>>>> linux >>>>>> headers? I see no usage of INT_MAX in the patched .c file... >>>>> > the maintainer already has done his due diligence and reviewed the > field. at this point, it is *you* who disagrees with the situation > thus it is *you* who needs to resolve *your* complaint.
Just curious: what are the technical reasons for that? My understanding is that one header depends on another for proper compilation but doesn't #include it. Is that correct?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
